Reptars Revenge
Member
Just have a game in the fallen hero timeline where Zelda has to pick up the reins. I would love it.
I think with this list, the picture I get is that of all the games, only two -only- star a woman (Fatal Frame and Bayonetta). This is not to downplay games that have gender choices, but at the same time, you have so many games where the character is male, and that's your only choice.
"Mess with the balance of the triforce"...
That's a new one...
So the balance of the triforce requires two males and one female?
I understand that. It could be a game within the Zelda universe though.
Again, I have no issue with Link remaining male as i've stated multiple times. I just don't like the "What would Link be doing?" reasoning.
I think it's fairly straight forward if you try and understand what he's saying from a logical perspective:
- Link is male. Their decision, it's their character. Fair enough.
- Zelda could be the protagonist, but not in a 'The Legend of Zelda' game (ironic I know) because they are quintessentially about playing as Link (who we've established is male). That's the franchise. Of course another franchise could feature Zelda as the main protagonist, but that's a separate matter.
- End of discussion.
It's really quite straightforward, although I get that the phrasing he/his translator used didn't make it sound very good.
Naturally, two men and one woman = balance in the Triforce. Just imagine if there were two women and one man instead. Whoa! Totally unbalanced!
Yes, the excuses they're making are poor and they were fabricated for the people getting upset in threads like this one. The real answer is obvious: they don't want to do it at this time. If they came out and said that perfectly fine excuse, you would all still be upset. It's like a subset of gamers can't simply accept that a decision was made, live with it and move on.
I don't play Halo and a hundred other series because it's not for me. If a FF goes in a direction I don't like, I skip it. If LoZ maintaining that Link is a boy as he has always been as part of the story, lore, history of Hyrule, Nintendo backstory, whatever you wanna call it, maybe it's time to move on. These pointless protests are just that. Pointless. Stop bashing a dev over the head for not giving in (yes, giving in) to impulsive, rabid demands of irrational fans.
Agreed.but yeah he should have just said 'uhh we want male link. That's it'. And that's completely acceptable.
Naturally, two men and one woman = balance in the Triforce. Just imagine if there were two women and one man instead. Whoa! Totally unbalanced!
Sigh
You guys are killing me
It's a game. A made up fantasy game. The middle-aged dude with the reins thinks only dudes should be the hero. That's the end of it.
I'd love bread to have protein btw. Make it happen.
Naturally, two men and one woman = balance in the Triforce. Just imagine if there were two women and one man instead. Whoa! Totally unbalanced!
Sure, vast bulk. But Samus is their lead female character (excluding gender-option characters). It feels all too unlikely that they just coincidentally decided that Samus needed to be defined by her gender in ways that her male counterparts are (usually the most we see in that respect is Mario getting embarrassed when Peach kisses his nose)
People are """"forcing"""" devs to do things because these are products, and also because they actually want this change to happen. People aren't simply screaming "women's lib!!" and demanding female Link or playable Zelda, they're doing so because it's the direction they want the series to go in. It's no different than people who hated TWW and wanted TP, or people who hated TP and wanted SS.
So if there is a game where Zelda is also a fighter... Link wouldn't be able to fit in the story?
Coulda sworn Sheik was a thing.
That's what I'm trying to explain though. It's a 'The Legend of Zelda' game. These games are about a protagonist called Link (who is male, as established by its creator). If Zelda was the main protagonist, it would no longer be a TLoZ game.
I think that's what he's trying to say with the whole "what would Link be doing?" quote.
I think we could still see a game set in the same universe, but based around either Zelda or another female character.
Yes, because that's exactly what has happened in every Zelda game he's directed. She's just kidnapped at the start and never does anything. Totally. Every. Single. Time.
Of course he would. But it wouldn't he a TLoZ game anymore. It would be a totally different game based in the same Universe.
Agreed, It should always be link as the male protagonist and Zelda has the female protangoist, I would love to see a Zelda game.I am ok for Zelda being the female lead instead of changing link's gender but please Nintendo make a Zelda game for ....zelda
ditto, that or have a timeline where the big conflict is that Zelda has to locate and protect a newly reincarnated infant Link from evil alongside a crippled Hyrulean empire from the last big conflict generations ago. Bam The Legend of Zelda: Birth of Courage. Just give me a writing credit, that idea is free.Just have a game in the fallen hero timeline where Zelda has to pick up the reins. I would love it.
I don't even know what's going on anymore. You genuinely think Aonuma thinks women aren't capable of having courage because of his Triforce comment? That's really the first place your mind jumps to?Alright, I'll admit that the Triforce comment doesn't make any sense and might be the result of Aonuma feeling that women can't be courageous or something. That one I'll give as a possible sexist comment, assuming that nothing was lost in translation.
I like link as a character and I also enjoy the damsel in distress trope in Zelda, it's always worked well
Yes, the excuses they're making are poor and they were fabricated for the people getting upset in threads like this one. The real answer is obvious: they don't want to do it at this time. If they came out and said that perfectly fine excuse, you would all still be upset. It's like a subset of gamers can't simply accept that a decision was made, live with it and move on.
He's a game designer, not a gender studies major. Also, from what I understand, Japan has a bit different culture regarding gender than the west. Do I think his reasoning is a little faulty? Sure, he could have stated it better (and not use fictional lore to base his claim).
Here's probably what he should have said: Link has always been male and he is a male this game. That might change in the future, whether female Link or playable Zelda, but not this game.
Alright, I'll admit that the Triforce comment doesn't make any sense and might be the result of Aonuma feeling that women can't be courageous or something. That one I'll give as a possible sexist comment, assuming that nothing was lost in translation.
Nintendo could make this easy ny just making a Sheik game though.
This isn't something that we see at all from other developers usually, so how can it be a matter of putting them on the spot? Is Nintendo just managed by children?
I mean with all that said, it isn't exactly easy to take seriously an argument that also suggests that you shouldn't criticize consumer products. Sorry that you don't like people talking about things they don't like about a game. :v
I didn't invent all those things I mentioned. All of those things are true, and they are responsible for it. You can keep on doing the damage control dance but it's not going to work.It's their fault that you invented up something that was never true?
Why? Metal Gear has had multiple games where Snake wasn't the lead, and Snake had several games with him as the sole lead by that point.
At no point was it said that consumer products could not be criticized, so step way back with the strawman.
The point I'm making is that you're going to complain regardless of the reasoning presented before you because you have internally made up your mind that the Legend of Zelda series needs a Female Protagonist for reasons that are not aligned with the wishes of a private game developer who doesn't exist to fulfill your very specific whims.
Sorry I can't take the line of arguing in this thread seriously because the rumors were completely baseless and not at all anything to do with Nintendo's plans. I'm actually on the side of a lot of you who would find it cool to play as a female protag in Zelda (and I have a Samus avatar FFS) but I don't foolishly act like an entitled brat who was promised something. The absurd levels of angry demands and personal entitlement are embarrassing.
The additional explanation just made it a lot worse...
It seems pretty clear to me. As it stands the triforce is in balance, with one girl and two guys. If Link became a girl then there would be two girls and only one guy, which would be out of balance.
Because people want to play as a female character.How come no one has addressed why Ganon is not a female character?
It seems pretty clear to me. As it stands the triforce is in balance, with one girl and two guys. If Link became a girl then there would be two girls and only one guy, which would be out of balance.
Fair enough, I wont argue that as I can't point to a TLoZ game where Link wasn't the protagonist.
But I wasn't the one who brought up Zelda as a protagonist, Nintendo did. And then subsequently dismissed the idea with bad reasoning. They made it seem like the main hindrance behind a Zelda protag game was not anything you mentioned.
That's all I'm saying. They made this more of an issue than it had to be.
The original request/rumor wasn't even about a Zelda protag. Nintendo brought that up themselves (correct me if i'm wrong)