• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Gaming trolls keep that same energy

Good thing you are sitting in my mind and read my thoughts. You somehow connected 7 different warnings as if i specifically go to threads to shit in them and on purpose rile up people and actually don't mean anything by post i say.
Good job mate. You should try mind reading more. Could be useful in life.

I even specifically explained to you like 5 that i spent some time creating such ridiculous post to show exactly, brutally how stupid thread title quotes from PR were when applied in real life. I am sorry that you do not have capability to understand sarcasm and few other language constructs which you claim you can like hyperbole.

Next time instead of writing funny ridiculous story that uses logic in PR i will just write "Console hardware does not need to follow stable power delivery because it is a feature only worthwhile in enterprise products" or " YEs Cerny is god UgU" which seems to be what you want threads to feature.

The thread i made about Spengebob was legit but because you saw me in other thread shitting on TLOU2 and i dared to post along it OTHER EXAMPLE of recent game with huge divide between critics and userbase you decided it was some kind of conspiracy that thread wasn't about divide between critics and userbase but secretly about TLOU2 based on nothing other than you not liking that i critiqued TLOU2 before. You seek agenda where there is none.

Yes i am critical of TLOU2 and i don't hide my views on it. Are you so butthurt about my critique that you have to stalk me in other threads to see if my negative post about game reach certain number and you need to prevent me from critiquing it more ? Is that agenda to you that i take part in multiple TLOU2 thread and talk about it ? How many posts i should make critiquing TLOU2 before i will get on agenda list ? Does it work for other games ? Because i plenty critique Final Fantasy 15 even made several threads on it and yet i didn't receive even one warning.

All i can see as answer from you is ignoring arguments and again targeting post warning history as if it makes perfect sense and it is not the reason we talk about it in first place. You painted yourself picture in head that i am XYZ and whatever i do it is proof that this is the truth.

If you are interested in talk then talk instead of hiding behind "you are attention whore but let me tell you..."



I understand now everything. You never were around 2007 on neogaf and you never experienced golden age of Neogaf.
The gifs you like so much that were created and were popularized by that Killzone thread. That thread was so legendary that gifs from that thread got to Sony CES conference next year where Kaz Hirai was standing and behind him was exact same gif i posted in previous post.

They WERE NOT made because Bish Evilore or some other mod created thread to make gifs. Such things do not happen because you say " ok guys time to make good gifs now" they are effect of community interaction, flame wars, heated debates. When i posted one of the most famous gifs from that thread in previous post you say it was not attack gif but hype gif. No it was gif specifically to attack Xbox made by some fanboy as 100s of others that internet lived for good months if not years. Those gifs are still used till this day. Again read the thread and maybe you will understand part of history about Neogaf and what made it so special to so many people.

Spare me those "internet celebrities". I didn't even bother to recover my old account when Evilore made it possible.



And what is that spoiler ? In FF7 remake Aeris doesn't die mate. I specifically went into that thread to ask how should spoilers be handled when you have old game FF7 and Aerith dying is literally gaming history trivia at level of mario wearing red cap. I was banned and didn't even know why because it made logical sense to ask about spoilers in thread where rules about spoliers are being made. I didn't go to any FF7 remake thread and post that there. But it is not something i have problem with. I concur that maybe i should read first 10 pages instead of asking question.

But of course you were insecure about your arguments and you had to look at my post history in order to again change goalposts and create conspiracy theory. If you look long enough you will find anything you want.



... what ? I literally said the opposite that mods are not gods and they have opinions that can change. I start to think you don't understand various language constructs people use in life daily.



I do have finger on gaf. I am here since ~circa2005 and i perfectly know what you are talking about because i took part in discussion about when neogaf was restarted about mod policy, i proposed with few people that there should be politics forum to move people from offtopp who want to talk about politics and leave politics out of offtop.

Yes it is true that it is completely incomparable place to what was in 2015 and this is something great but i fear mod team thinks that only thing about 2015 ish version of forum was wrong kind of people wielding mod power and not that rules were garbage and mods instead of doing their jobs as mods to remove weeds who don't contribute anything and only shit in threads started to tone police what can be talked about and how it should be talked.




Literally my warn was explained that that post "wasn't funny" if that is not tone policing then i don't know what is when you talk about "offhand" mod approach you are proud off. Secondly post has even more reactions than most of post in that threads so it is literally fun for people who read it. So it was fun and people get it. It is mod that didn't get it.

Maybe you should apply mentioned story to yourself ? Maybe it is not me who is not funny but maybe you who is buthurt about invisible conspiracy theory ?



Ok then, why is that in those threads people are allowed to be funny or critical and why i can't ? Why is that you need construct some kind of conspiracy theory about me in order to justify warns ?




The only cyclical argument in this debate is that you say that i am conspiring against something and you using my warn history to create conspiracy theory that support your claim that i am secret MS fanboy despite being warned in both Sony and MS thread for critiquing both.

But you are right. Debate has ended. You don't think anything is wrong with your aproach i have different opinion. C'est la vie

Here is gif that wouldn't exist without community flamewars, heated debates and so on. That is Yoshida aping Neogaf gif meme based on banderas gif which was later made via ND to Joel again based on Neogaf meme. None of which happened because someone made thread to make gifs like you suggest.

2583054-yoshidadoesbanderas.gif


 
What probably happened is OP is frustrated with some of his enemies not getting banned, he reported them a bunch of times and nothing happened. So he's trying to publicly complain in hopes his allies jump in, or mods getting pressured in plain view into taking action into Mista and Arcadia.

Kind of like Floyd riots. One person complaining doesn't do anything. But if he can round up enough support (strength in numbers), it might work to influence mods to change it up.

Good luck with that.

The problem with that is after making such an irredeemable fool of himself in this thread I don't think he's got too many allies and certainly none that would want to back him up. I think most of the people he thought would join him in some mob action to get people he doesn't like banned are avoiding his cringefest like the plague and are embarrassed to even be associated with him. They sure aren't in here defending his garbage.

Seriously if the Mods had any mercy they would have banned him for subjecting us to cringe like this:
Omg u hurt me. Ima tell u again ima a NYC, puertorican g, if I'm mentioning it its valid lol. You can **ck ride all u want but it's facts.
 
Last edited:
Good thing you are sitting in my mind and read my thoughts. You somehow connected 7 different warnings as if i specifically go to threads to shit in them and on purpose rile up people and actually don't mean anything by post i say.
Good job mate. You should try mind reading more. Could be useful in life.

I even specifically explained to you like 5 that i spent some time creating such ridiculous post to show exactly, brutally how stupid thread title quotes from PR were when applied in real life. I am sorry that you do not have capability to understand sarcasm and few other language constructs which you claim you can like hyperbole.

Next time instead of writing funny ridiculous story that uses logic in PR i will just write "Console hardware does not need to follow stable power delivery because it is a feature only worthwhile in enterprise products" or " YEs Cerny is god UgU" which seems to be what you want threads to feature.

The thread i made about Spengebob was legit but because you saw me in other thread shitting on TLOU2 and i dared to post along it OTHER EXAMPLE of recent game with huge divide between critics and userbase you decided it was some kind of conspiracy that thread wasn't about divide between critics and userbase but secretly about TLOU2 based on nothing other than you not liking that i critiqued TLOU2 before. You seek agenda where there is none.

Yes i am critical of TLOU2 and i don't hide my views on it. Are you so butthurt about my critique that you have to stalk me in other threads to see if my negative post about game reach certain number and you need to prevent me from critiquing it more ? Is that agenda to you that i take part in multiple TLOU2 thread and talk about it ? How many posts i should make critiquing TLOU2 before i will get on agenda list ? Does it work for other games ? Because i plenty critique Final Fantasy 15 even made several threads on it and yet i didn't receive even one warning.

All i can see as answer from you is ignoring arguments and again targeting post warning history as if it makes perfect sense and it is not the reason we talk about it in first place. You painted yourself picture in head that i am XYZ and whatever i do it is proof that this is the truth.

If you are interested in talk then talk instead of hiding behind "you are attention whore but let me tell you..."



I understand now everything. You never were around 2007 on neogaf and you never experienced golden age of Neogaf.
The gifs you like so much that were created and were popularized by that Killzone thread. That thread was so legendary that gifs from that thread got to Sony CES conference next year where Kaz Hirai was standing and behind him was exact same gif i posted in previous post.

They WERE NOT made because Bish Evilore or some other mod created thread to make gifs. Such things do not happen because you say " ok guys time to make good gifs now" they are effect of community interaction, flame wars, heated debates. When i posted one of the most famous gifs from that thread in previous post you say it was not attack gif but hype gif. No it was gif specifically to attack Xbox made by some fanboy as 100s of others that internet lived for good months if not years. Those gifs are still used till this day. Again read the thread and maybe you will understand part of history about Neogaf and what made it so special to so many people.

Spare me those "internet celebrities". I didn't even bother to recover my old account when Evilore made it possible.



And what is that spoiler ? In FF7 remake Aeris doesn't die mate. I specifically went into that thread to ask how should spoilers be handled when you have old game FF7 and Aerith dying is literally gaming history trivia at level of mario wearing red cap. I was banned and didn't even know why because it made logical sense to ask about spoilers in thread where rules about spoliers are being made. I didn't go to any FF7 remake thread and post that there. But it is not something i have problem with. I concur that maybe i should read first 10 pages instead of asking question.

But of course you were insecure about your arguments and you had to look at my post history in order to again change goalposts and create conspiracy theory. If you look long enough you will find anything you want.



... what ? I literally said the opposite that mods are not gods and they have opinions that can change. I start to think you don't understand various language constructs people use in life daily.



I do have finger on gaf. I am here since ~circa2005 and i perfectly know what you are talking about because i took part in discussion about when neogaf was restarted about mod policy, i proposed with few people that there should be politics forum to move people from offtopp who want to talk about politics and leave politics out of offtop.

Yes it is true that it is completely incomparable place to what was in 2015 and this is something great but i fear mod team thinks that only thing about 2015 ish version of forum was wrong kind of people wielding mod power and not that rules were garbage and mods instead of doing their jobs as mods to remove weeds who don't contribute anything and only shit in threads started to tone police what can be talked about and how it should be talked.




Literally my warn was explained that that post "wasn't funny" if that is not tone policing then i don't know what is when you talk about "offhand" mod approach you are proud off. Secondly post has even more reactions than most of post in that threads so it is literally fun for people who read it. So it was fun and people get it. It is mod that didn't get it.

Maybe you should apply mentioned story to yourself ? Maybe it is not me who is not funny but maybe you who is buthurt about invisible conspiracy theory ?



Ok then, why is that in those threads people are allowed to be funny or critical and why i can't ? Why is that you need construct some kind of conspiracy theory about me in order to justify warns ?




The only cyclical argument in this debate is that you say that i am conspiring against something and you using my warn history to create conspiracy theory that support your claim that i am secret MS fanboy despite being warned in both Sony and MS thread for critiquing both.

But you are right. Debate has ended. You don't think anything is wrong with your aproach i have different opinion. C'est la vie

Here is gif that wouldn't exist without community flamewars, heated debates and so on. That is Yoshida aping Neogaf gif meme based on banderas gif which was later made via ND to Joel again based on Neogaf meme. None of which happened because someone made thread to make gifs like you suggest.

2583054-yoshidadoesbanderas.gif
668.jpg
 
Good thing you are sitting in my mind and read my thoughts. You somehow connected 7 different warnings as if i specifically go to threads to shit in them and on purpose rile up people and actually don't mean anything by post i say.
Good job mate. You should try mind reading more. Could be useful in life.

I even specifically explained to you like 5 that i spent some time creating such ridiculous post to show exactly, brutally how stupid thread title quotes from PR were when applied in real life. I am sorry that you do not have capability to understand sarcasm and few other language constructs which you claim you can like hyperbole.

Next time instead of writing funny ridiculous story that uses logic in PR i will just write "Console hardware does not need to follow stable power delivery because it is a feature only worthwhile in enterprise products" or " YEs Cerny is god UgU" which seems to be what you want threads to feature.

The thread i made about Spengebob was legit but because you saw me in other thread shitting on TLOU2 and i dared to post along it OTHER EXAMPLE of recent game with huge divide between critics and userbase you decided it was some kind of conspiracy that thread wasn't about divide between critics and userbase but secretly about TLOU2 based on nothing other than you not liking that i critiqued TLOU2 before. You seek agenda where there is none.

Yes i am critical of TLOU2 and i don't hide my views on it. Are you so butthurt about my critique that you have to stalk me in other threads to see if my negative post about game reach certain number and you need to prevent me from critiquing it more ? Is that agenda to you that i take part in multiple TLOU2 thread and talk about it ? How many posts i should make critiquing TLOU2 before i will get on agenda list ? Does it work for other games ? Because i plenty critique Final Fantasy 15 even made several threads on it and yet i didn't receive even one warning.

All i can see as answer from you is ignoring arguments and again targeting post warning history as if it makes perfect sense and it is not the reason we talk about it in first place. You painted yourself picture in head that i am XYZ and whatever i do it is proof that this is the truth.

If you are interested in talk then talk instead of hiding behind "you are attention whore but let me tell you..."



I understand now everything. You never were around 2007 on neogaf and you never experienced golden age of Neogaf.
The gifs you like so much that were created and were popularized by that Killzone thread. That thread was so legendary that gifs from that thread got to Sony CES conference next year where Kaz Hirai was standing and behind him was exact same gif i posted in previous post.

They WERE NOT made because Bish Evilore or some other mod created thread to make gifs. Such things do not happen because you say " ok guys time to make good gifs now" they are effect of community interaction, flame wars, heated debates. When i posted one of the most famous gifs from that thread in previous post you say it was not attack gif but hype gif. No it was gif specifically to attack Xbox made by some fanboy as 100s of others that internet lived for good months if not years. Those gifs are still used till this day. Again read the thread and maybe you will understand part of history about Neogaf and what made it so special to so many people.

Spare me those "internet celebrities". I didn't even bother to recover my old account when Evilore made it possible.



And what is that spoiler ? In FF7 remake Aeris doesn't die mate. I specifically went into that thread to ask how should spoilers be handled when you have old game FF7 and Aerith dying is literally gaming history trivia at level of mario wearing red cap. I was banned and didn't even know why because it made logical sense to ask about spoilers in thread where rules about spoliers are being made. I didn't go to any FF7 remake thread and post that there. But it is not something i have problem with. I concur that maybe i should read first 10 pages instead of asking question.

But of course you were insecure about your arguments and you had to look at my post history in order to again change goalposts and create conspiracy theory. If you look long enough you will find anything you want.



... what ? I literally said the opposite that mods are not gods and they have opinions that can change. I start to think you don't understand various language constructs people use in life daily.



I do have finger on gaf. I am here since ~circa2005 and i perfectly know what you are talking about because i took part in discussion about when neogaf was restarted about mod policy, i proposed with few people that there should be politics forum to move people from offtopp who want to talk about politics and leave politics out of offtop.

Yes it is true that it is completely incomparable place to what was in 2015 and this is something great but i fear mod team thinks that only thing about 2015 ish version of forum was wrong kind of people wielding mod power and not that rules were garbage and mods instead of doing their jobs as mods to remove weeds who don't contribute anything and only shit in threads started to tone police what can be talked about and how it should be talked.




Literally my warn was explained that that post "wasn't funny" if that is not tone policing then i don't know what is when you talk about "offhand" mod approach you are proud off. Secondly post has even more reactions than most of post in that threads so it is literally fun for people who read it. So it was fun and people get it. It is mod that didn't get it.

Maybe you should apply mentioned story to yourself ? Maybe it is not me who is not funny but maybe you who is buthurt about invisible conspiracy theory ?



Ok then, why is that in those threads people are allowed to be funny or critical and why i can't ? Why is that you need construct some kind of conspiracy theory about me in order to justify warns ?




The only cyclical argument in this debate is that you say that i am conspiring against something and you using my warn history to create conspiracy theory that support your claim that i am secret MS fanboy despite being warned in both Sony and MS thread for critiquing both.

But you are right. Debate has ended. You don't think anything is wrong with your aproach i have different opinion. C'est la vie

Here is gif that wouldn't exist without community flamewars, heated debates and so on. That is Yoshida aping Neogaf gif meme based on banderas gif which was later made via ND to Joel again based on Neogaf meme. None of which happened because someone made thread to make gifs like you suggest.

2583054-yoshidadoesbanderas.gif

puking_brian.gif
 
Honestly I have mad respect for the admin team here. OP would have been banned 8960426 times in other places and this thread would have been locked 85762624 times. The fact they're allowing you a voice and giving you full transparency of community policy should speak volumes. Respect that you're a guest here and give the other guests their due respect in discourse. I've been an active poster here for 8 years and I've never been warned. I've been checked a few times by others users when I deserved it, which is the best moderation possible imo. Learn when to back off and enjoy the conversation.

I guess you commented without seeing my above post? Hey you getting those points though let's not make this superflous. You not getting an infraction and my post are seperate things but great for you. My post is about being impartial not about staying below the radar and playing a certain position. I own up to my infractions.

But thnks for your feedback.
 
Last edited:
I just want to thank Evilore, the mods, that let this thread ride. I thought it would be shut down but I appreciate you guys letting ppl talk about it.

For everyone tht commented, I appreciate you too because most if not all were respectful and this didn't turn to an overall shit fest.

I'm glad we can have different views but talk cordially and with a respectful decorum.

Happy gaming brethrens.

......
 
What probably happened is OP is frustrated with some of his enemies not getting banned, he reported them a bunch of times and nothing happened. So he's trying to publicly complain in hopes his allies jump in, or mods getting pressured in plain view into taking action
There is no Discord for team blue. :messenger_grinning_sweat:
Need to rally people in the open. :messenger_weary::messenger_ok:
 
Gamernyc78 Gamernyc78


tiyl-ralphedwards.jpg

"This, is your life [on GAF]"


Let us take a trip down memory lane and recall those formative years, where you broke out from your shell , stood on your own two legs and made us take notice of you. Reviewing all your reply bans, we can see you have amassed a total of (7). And these have been issued when we have absolutely had our hand forced with your juvenile posts - the below are examples in a string of posts made across the same timeframe in which a singular reply ban was thought enough to make you think and stop.


  • You first reply ban was a quick and direct attempt to derail a thread and trying to antagonise and berate specific users
  • This was followed up within a month for your contributions in this thread, with this being one of many anatagonistic posts
  • Within the month you were back amongst the feuding and like others also received a temporary ban for reducing this thread into fighting
  • You were again removed a couple of months later for yet more console war antagonism, as were other posters for doing the same
  • After a brief hiatus from needing reply bans, you seemed to miss them and earned another temporary one in this thread
  • Again, you ignored many soft mod notices in the thread after your reply ban was served and graced us with posts like this, for which you earned a significantly longer reply ban
  • In the last two months you have still been unable to help yourself and resorted to more console war posts like this


In light of the reply bans, we can now move onto actual site bans (4)


  • Your first ban was a short two day corrective nudge which asked you to tone down the console warring in June 2019
  • Your second ban was for three weeks for ignoring warnings and reply bans (which we will come to shortly) in September 2019
  • Your third ban was for two weeks in in March 2020 for ignoring warning points again and repeatedly console warring
  • Your fourth ban was for two weeks again in June 2020 for ignoring warning points again and repeatedly console warring.


All the instances and logs have attached audit trails of several pages of posts and activity from yourself that the mods review before taking action. These all evidence you atagonising people, trolling, danging low hanging bait or just being disruptive. The above are meant just as a small window to evidence we don't just say "Oh yeah, it's gamernyc78 - smash that ban button".


Lastly, we move onto the actual warnings you have amassed. Eleven in total, some expired now, some not, which we take into account when reply bans and site bans are issued. You are not Jean Valjean and we are not Javert. No one is being afforded any more leniency that you have been. Actions are being taken against you quicker and escalating in harshness because you are not learning, and still insist on being a caricature. Perhaps you will reflect on the fact that how you view posters you have named in the OP, is how you are perceived by a much larger contingent of the forum. Their warnings or nudges are issued at a much lower severity and frequency than yours, because the respect with an honest intent to change is clearly seen. We are not going to punish momentary lapses of frustration that are out of character. True consistency is allowing everyone the same amount of chances you have been given, not upping the harshness of the measures you now face for persisting with the same behaviour.
giphy-downsized-large.gif
 
I'm all for bans on ppl trolling or what some may feel is trolling although ppl are conveying their honest opinion based on owning diff systems and pr rhetoric...

Butttt.....

When you ban a few ppl keep tht same energy with trolls from opposing views. It seems there is some rampant favoritism (and idc if recently some of those ppl recieved warnings). You have huge trolls like Mista (Def a clown must have a mod as a friend) , Arcadia, etc tht spew trolling nonsense and get free passes often. I'm not perfect, I own up to mine and if I get banned for this thts OK but it needed to be said

Stop the favoritism and moderate equally across the board. Let's not be Reset. This place was just as bad before the migration but I was happy it changed but I'm starting to notice things.

Thanks
Dude are you serious? You need to bring receipts and not your own personal interpretation of things.

ninja edit: like this

Gamernyc78 Gamernyc78


tiyl-ralphedwards.jpg

"This, is your life [on GAF]"


Let us take a trip down memory lane and recall those formative years, where you broke out from your shell , stood on your own two legs and made us take notice of you. Reviewing all your reply bans, we can see you have amassed a total of (7). And these have been issued when we have absolutely had our hand forced with your juvenile posts - the below are examples in a string of posts made across the same timeframe in which a singular reply ban was thought enough to make you think and stop.


  • You first reply ban was a quick and direct attempt to derail a thread and trying to antagonise and berate specific users
  • This was followed up within a month for your contributions in this thread, with this being one of many anatagonistic posts
  • Within the month you were back amongst the feuding and like others also received a temporary ban for reducing this thread into fighting
  • You were again removed a couple of months later for yet more console war antagonism, as were other posters for doing the same
  • After a brief hiatus from needing reply bans, you seemed to miss them and earned another temporary one in this thread
  • Again, you ignored many soft mod notices in the thread after your reply ban was served and graced us with posts like this, for which you earned a significantly longer reply ban
  • In the last two months you have still been unable to help yourself and resorted to more console war posts like this


In light of the reply bans, we can now move onto actual site bans (4)


  • Your first ban was a short two day corrective nudge which asked you to tone down the console warring in June 2019
  • Your second ban was for three weeks for ignoring warnings and reply bans (which we will come to shortly) in September 2019
  • Your third ban was for two weeks in in March 2020 for ignoring warning points again and repeatedly console warring
  • Your fourth ban was for two weeks again in June 2020 for ignoring warning points again and repeatedly console warring.


All the instances and logs have attached audit trails of several pages of posts and activity from yourself that the mods review before taking action. These all evidence you atagonising people, trolling, danging low hanging bait or just being disruptive. The above are meant just as a small window to evidence we don't just say "Oh yeah, it's gamernyc78 - smash that ban button".


Lastly, we move onto the actual warnings you have amassed. Eleven in total, some expired now, some not, which we take into account when reply bans and site bans are issued. You are not Jean Valjean and we are not Javert. No one is being afforded any more leniency that you have been. Actions are being taken against you quicker and escalating in harshness because you are not learning, and still insist on being a caricature. Perhaps you will reflect on the fact that how you view posters you have named in the OP, is how you are perceived by a much larger contingent of the forum. Their warnings or nudges are issued at a much lower severity and frequency than yours, because the respect with an honest intent to change is clearly seen. We are not going to punish momentary lapses of frustration that are out of character. True consistency is allowing everyone the same amount of chances you have been given, not upping the harshness of the measures you now face for persisting with the same behaviour.

This receipt has a return window of forever.
 
Dude are you serious? You need to bring receipts and not your own personal interpretation of things.

ninja edit: like this



This receipt has a return window of forever.
You could see by Bill O Right's log that OP's bannings and warnings have escalated this year. What's happened is this year has been a trainwreck for Sony and PS5 and LoU2 have been nailed to the cross.

Some of the other hard Sony fans have been similarly banned at times, so the collective group has really toned down their rhetoric this year. So he feels pissed he and the others can't really do anything about it because their list wars, sales wars and bringing up Gamepass as the ultimate game devaluer in MS threads as their staple counter attacks to the Xbox brand is being watched as thin ice material.
 
Last edited:
I never had any problem with @Mista, or -Arcadia- -Arcadia- . Those are genuinely cool and I had some head and thoughtful conversations with them. So I don't get where this is coming from.
Me neither. Maybe I'm just not in the same kinds of threads as those two, but the OP must be seeing some material that's aggravating him so much he's pinpointed them out to everyone.
 
Me neither. Maybe I'm just not in the same kinds of threads as those two, but the OP must be seeing some material that's aggravating him so much he's pinpointed them out to everyone.
Yeah, maybe I'm not visiting the weird parts of Gaf yet. I try to stay away from threads which I know I don't have any interest or I won't contribute with meaningful comments.
 
Last edited:
Me neither. Maybe I'm just not in the same kinds of threads as those two, but the OP must be seeing some material that's aggravating him so much he's pinpointed them out to everyone.

We're 'No BS' posters, pretty much. If someone is actively hurting the forum, or our experience, we tell them to knock it off.

I personally believe that there's a level before moderation needs to get involved, where your peers should correct you. This kind of criticism, and it must be done with a lot of self-examination, lest it go wrong, is essential to a good community.

The OP and his clique got a verbal walloping from both of us, and you can see why, and has remained salty since, making snide, passive-aggressive (ironic for someone who claims to be so gangsta) comments since. Judging by the thread, he's just gotten angrier and angrier about it, us becoming villains more and more in his mind, until his recent string of moderated actions brought... this forth.

Another component is that OP considers being called out on your bullshit as 'trolling'. It's essentially the type of mindset you see from people IRL who prod and prod, with atrocious behavior, until someone has had enough, and tells them to knock it off, with the culprit ensuingly sobbing everywhere about being victimized.

It's a bit like this, except we didn't sink down to his level and start trolling back -- we only gave him the consequences of his natural actions.

pLRhBpg.jpg
 
Dude are you serious? You need to bring receipts and not your own personal interpretation of things.

ninja edit: like this



This receipt has a return window of forever.
I think some ppl here are slow or better yet are pushing an agenda. I stated many times I own up to my bans and have no problem with my bans this thread isn't about tht. It's about favoritism and certain ppl who troll getting free passes. So since ppl have comprehension issues I'll break it down 😊😊😊

Gamernyc does something tht is considered an infraction and gets warned or banned.

Another forum person does same infractions or worse and gets no warning or Doesnt get banned.

Simple shit isn't rocket science. Hold up ima ask the ppl talking about the sane trolls to give me the receipts /s

No one got time for tht we all know what it is and why certain ppl being called out. You do your investigation pseudo sleuth 😊

Enjoy your day though ❤️❤️
 
Last edited:
I think some ppl here are slow or better yet are pushing an agenda. I stated many times I own up to my bans and have no problem with my bans this thread isn't about tht. It's about favoritism and certain ppl who troll getting free passes. So since ppl have comprehension issues I'll break it down 😊😊😊

Gamernyc does something tht is considered an infraction and gets warned or banned.

Another forum person does same infractions or worse and gets no warning or Doesnt get banned.

Simple shit isn't rocket science. Hold up ima ask the ppl talking about the sane trolls to give me the receipts /s

No one got time for tht we all know what it is and why certain ppl being called out. You do your investigation pseudo sleuth 😊

Enjoy your day though ❤❤
In any kind of an analysis that involves personal biases and feelings, you need to product first party quotes and compare and contrast so that observers can judge your claims on its merits.

We can't just take your word for it because your word is based on your subjective feelings.
 
Gamernyc78 Gamernyc78


tiyl-ralphedwards.jpg

"This, is your life [on GAF]"


Let us take a trip down memory lane and recall those formative years, where you broke out from your shell , stood on your own two legs and made us take notice of you. Reviewing all your reply bans, we can see you have amassed a total of (7). And these have been issued when we have absolutely had our hand forced with your juvenile posts - the below are examples in a string of posts made across the same timeframe in which a singular reply ban was thought enough to make you think and stop.


  • You first reply ban was a quick and direct attempt to derail a thread and trying to antagonise and berate specific users
  • This was followed up within a month for your contributions in this thread, with this being one of many anatagonistic posts
  • Within the month you were back amongst the feuding and like others also received a temporary ban for reducing this thread into fighting
  • You were again removed a couple of months later for yet more console war antagonism, as were other posters for doing the same
  • After a brief hiatus from needing reply bans, you seemed to miss them and earned another temporary one in this thread
  • Again, you ignored many soft mod notices in the thread after your reply ban was served and graced us with posts like this, for which you earned a significantly longer reply ban
  • In the last two months you have still been unable to help yourself and resorted to more console war posts like this


In light of the reply bans, we can now move onto actual site bans (4)


  • Your first ban was a short two day corrective nudge which asked you to tone down the console warring in June 2019
  • Your second ban was for three weeks for ignoring warnings and reply bans (which we will come to shortly) in September 2019
  • Your third ban was for two weeks in in March 2020 for ignoring warning points again and repeatedly console warring
  • Your fourth ban was for two weeks again in June 2020 for ignoring warning points again and repeatedly console warring.


All the instances and logs have attached audit trails of several pages of posts and activity from yourself that the mods review before taking action. These all evidence you atagonising people, trolling, danging low hanging bait or just being disruptive. The above are meant just as a small window to evidence we don't just say "Oh yeah, it's gamernyc78 - smash that ban button".


Lastly, we move onto the actual warnings you have amassed. Eleven in total, some expired now, some not, which we take into account when reply bans and site bans are issued. You are not Jean Valjean and we are not Javert. No one is being afforded any more leniency that you have been. Actions are being taken against you quicker and escalating in harshness because you are not learning, and still insist on being a caricature. Perhaps you will reflect on the fact that how you view posters you have named in the OP, is how you are perceived by a much larger contingent of the forum. Their warnings or nudges are issued at a much lower severity and frequency than yours, because the respect with an honest intent to change is clearly seen. We are not going to punish momentary lapses of frustration that are out of character. True consistency is allowing everyone the same amount of chances you have been given, not upping the harshness of the measures you now face for persisting with the same behaviour.
1vp4ie.gif
 
We're 'No BS' posters, pretty much. If someone is actively hurting the forum, or our experience, we tell them to knock it off.

I personally believe that there's a level before moderation needs to get involved, where your peers should correct you. This kind of criticism, and it must be done with a lot of self-examination, lest it go wrong, is essential to a good community.

The OP and his clique got a verbal walloping from both of us, and you can see why, and has remained salty since, making snide, passive-aggressive (ironic for someone who claims to be so gangsta) comments since. Judging by the thread, he's just gotten angrier and angrier about it, us becoming villains more and more in his mind, until his recent string of moderated actions brought... this forth.

Another component is that OP considers being called out on your bullshit as 'trolling'. It's essentially the type of mindset you see from people IRL who prod and prod, with atrocious behavior, until someone has had enough, and tells them to knock it off, with the culprit ensuingly sobbing everywhere about being victimized.

It's a bit like this, except we didn't sink down to his level and start trolling back -- we only gave him the consequences of his natural actions.

pLRhBpg.jpg

So when and where is the thread where you and Mista incensed the OP so intensely that you became Public Enemy #1 of the biggest troll on this forum?

It seems so weird and so random that he calls you two out. I could be mistaken but I have the impression both of you are well liked and I don't recall EVER seeing you accused of being fanboys/girls or trolls. I also find it highly doubtful that the vast majority of posters on GAF whether team Red, Green or Blue would ever consider you guys to be trolls either.
 
So when and where is the thread where you and Mista incensed the OP so intensely that you became Public Enemy #1 of the biggest troll on this forum?

It seems so weird and so random that he calls you two out. I could be mistaken but I have the impression both of you are well liked and I don't recall EVER seeing you accused of being fanboys/girls or trolls. I also find it highly doubtful that the vast majority of posters on GAF whether team Red, Green or Blue would ever consider you guys to be trolls either.

I have no idea. Ask OP, since it appears to have been the most traumatic event of his life.
 
I have no idea. Ask OP, since it appears to have been the most traumatic event of his life.
That he chose to call out you two, of all people, instantly makes me question his perception of reality. It's entirely possible he's right and I'm the one hallucinating, but I need some serious evidence to convince me of that. Evidence that is so far not forthcoming.
 
We're 'No BS' posters, pretty much. If someone is actively hurting the forum, or our experience, we tell them to knock it off.

I personally believe that there's a level before moderation needs to get involved, where your peers should correct you. This kind of criticism, and it must be done with a lot of self-examination, lest it go wrong, is essential to a good community.

The OP and his clique got a verbal walloping from both of us, and you can see why, and has remained salty since, making snide, passive-aggressive (ironic for someone who claims to be so gangsta) comments since. Judging by the thread, he's just gotten angrier and angrier about it, us becoming villains more and more in his mind, until his recent string of moderated actions brought... this forth.

Another component is that OP considers being called out on your bullshit as 'trolling'. It's essentially the type of mindset you see from people IRL who prod and prod, with atrocious behavior, until someone has had enough, and tells them to knock it off, with the culprit ensuingly sobbing everywhere about being victimized.

It's a bit like this, except we didn't sink down to his level and start trolling back -- we only gave him the consequences of his natural actions.

pLRhBpg.jpg

So this isn't about team green vs team blue? Thank god my faith in humanity restored a bit.

Also might be the reason why mod came up with chargesheet on op.
 
Well, glad to have you back, brother. First read the OP and thought "now that's a bad idea!", and people started insulting and heating up. Then it cooled down after Mod of War and EviLore engaged, and now it's like people letting the steam out. :lollipop_tears_of_joy: 🥳
 
Last edited:
So this isn't about team green vs team blue? Thank god my faith in humanity restored a bit.

Also might be the reason why mod came up with chargesheet on op.
It actually is team blue vs green in a way.

The OP complained he's getting warned and banned yet some people who go against his pro-Sony posts (which make them pro-Xbox enemies) aren't getting the same treatment from mods. So he's aggravated.

Bill O Rights did a big list outing him as a console warrior.

The OP feels the forum in tilted in green's favour and made it a note to put a bullseye on two users who he claims is getting special treatment.
 

Well after seeing some posts from OP, I think it's an ingrained character that forum members are trying to change. Not sure am in favor.

Personally I think OP should receive a ban immunity at this point with some caveats. As ban are not working. With a daily limit to his posts, say 20 a day. That way he won't get embroiled in drawn out flame wars while getting enough space to make his point.

Or something like that. Mods must decide.
 
Top Bottom