-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighters MP videos
- Thread starter AltogetherAndrews
- Start date
Lil' Dice said:
rainbow six 3 on xbox...pretty tactical if you ask me. in fact i want them to go one step further and add ironsights. no gun model totaly ruins the immersion for me. so why don't you go think about it for like, 5 minutes. also how exactly would a gun model impede your view... i could say that an over the shoulder view pretty much does the same thing...except, OH IT DOESN'T AND NEITHER DOES A GUN.
Teknopathetic
Member
"On the PC yes. R6 is also a close combat sim while GR takes place in wide open environments. Nothing like having the gun impede your view of a sniper hiding far off in the horizon huh?"
Completely irrelevant to your point that none of those games were "slow paced strategic shooters."
Completely irrelevant to your point that none of those games were "slow paced strategic shooters."
Kabuki Waq
Member
i prefer not having the gun in view while shooting for immersion.
Kabuki Waq
Member
BioFan said:
its what the rectile is there for right?
krypt0nian
Banned
Gek54 said:
No one here really believes that you do. :lol
AltogetherAndrews
Member
Shompola said:
It uses the classic Ghost Recon first person view, which so happens to feature no gun on-screen. This never bothered me in Ghost Recon, so I don't see why it would bother me here.
Cerebral Palsy
Banned
BioFan said:
Why would you want to aim with a gun instead of a crosshair? Would be hard as hell... eh
krypt0nian
Banned
op_ivy said:
To be fair, he was here before post 25 this time.
Kabuki Waq
Member
i guess its the same with ppl who claim they love sim racers because they are so realistic and yadda yadda but when they play the game they choose the behind the car view.
If the game is good enough eventually everyone will get use to not having a gun to look at.
If the game is good enough eventually everyone will get use to not having a gun to look at.
Cerebral Palsy
Banned
Gek54 said:Not really
That is exactly what I want!!! A gun taking up 1/3 of the screen when a crosshair is more functional.
AltogetherAndrews
Member
BigBoss said:
I'm not sure it is. The standard FPS gun display is hardly realistic. You see far too much of the guns, they are often poorly and illogically positioned, and developers rarely if ever even attempt to simulate realistic DOF. Some games do the ironsights better than others, but no developer that I know of has ever taken it all the way, as to include a more realistic normal gun view altogether.
Cerebral Palsy said:
More functional maybe but not more immersive and not more realistic. Unless you are a retard, aiming like that in COD2 was not hard as hell and it takes up less than a 6th of the screen which only happens when you are trying to make pin point shots, naturaly.
AltogetherAndrews
Member
Gek54 said:
Well, Ghost Recon is certainly nothing like COD2, so I'm not sure if that's a valid comparison anyway. Maybe a gun view would work, who knows. It sounds to me though like they decided to cater to two types of GR fans; those of us who prefered the view in GR/IT, and those who prefered the 3rd person view featured in GR2/SS.
As for this whole supposed added realism w/gun in view... anyone catch the Doom 3 movie trailer? Now that's closer to what a first person gun view should look like.
AltogetherAndrews said:
Same with me. Even in Rainbow 6 with the nice gun models, I don't really notice them when playing all that much. Instead I'm spending my time staring and scanning other parts of the screen looking for people to terminate. The sound of gunfire and rumble vibration effects on the controller is where the feel of firing a gun comes from mostly.
Doom_Bringer
Banned
Shogmaster said:
This is what I am talking about
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/tomclancysghostrecon3/media.html
Watch official trailer 2. That vid is fake.
No it wasn't. It was clearly using all in game assets but of course the AI hadn't been implemented and filters were added to give it a movie like feel. The alpha built the dev showed at the PS meeting looked pretty much like the E3 trailer minus the high res textures and filters.
http://x1.putfile.com/7/20206181897.jpg
http://x1.putfile.com/7/20206494244.jpg
Doom_Bringer said:This is what I am talking about
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/tomclancysghostrecon3/media.html
Watch official trailer 2. That vid is fake.
No it wasn't. It was clearly using all in game assets but of course the AI hadn't been implemented and filters were added to give it a movie like feel. The alpha built the dev showed at the PS meeting looked pretty much like the E3 trailer minus the high res textures and filters.
http://x1.putfile.com/7/20206181897.jpg
http://x1.putfile.com/7/20206494244.jpg
MISSION FAILED.
Doom_Bringer
Banned
Jerkface said:
Oh.
I never said that Ubisoft couldn't match the rendered trailer. This is about shog not admitting that the trailer was rendered and spinning for MS. From the latest single player movies I have seen, I can say that single player mode looks great.
I was just surprised that he praised this game even when it didn't look good as the rendered trailer while he kept on trolling in the Gundam PS3 thread even when the pre alpha built came close to the E3 2005 trailer.
http://www.ga-forum.com/showthread.php?t=56146&page=1&pp=50&highlight=gundam
Not as good as I was hoping it would be. One lesson I've learned is that you should never use a 3CCD cam for some off screen footage. It's watchable when in motion, but in stills it's just dreadful. The rest of the footage was done with my cam (using a CMOS chip), so it does not have this issue, but it's underexposed for the most part.<nu>faust said:
Still, it does show how good the game looks.
I'd make some screen captures but I'm not allowed to.
Only problem I have with the game is that the character animation is choppy (could be the vid), and no gun in first person view. Guess if I get a 360 I'll be playing the over shoulder view most of the time. Otherwise, it looks like they might be able to come close to the E3 trailer, and that is all I care about.
Looks pretty fun, but after playing COD2, no gun is a disappointment.
Looks pretty fun, but after playing COD2, no gun is a disappointment.
Shogmaster
Member
Doom_Bringer said:This is what I am talking about
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/tomclancysghostrecon3/media.html
Watch official trailer 2. That vid is fake.
You are one wormy back peddling BS cowboy. NO ONE FUCKING SAID THAT THAT PARTICULAR STUPID TRAILER WAS REALTIME! That was NEVER the trailer in question! And that pic is not from the main pre-rendered video of that trailer!
There was an official realtime trailer/footage shown at E3. It was running on a PC. It was realtime. END O STORY!
It was pre-rendered! It doesn't matter if you use in game models if you use much more advanced lighting and textures and shadows to create a video footage that will look much better than the final game engine (much like that trailer 2 you linked for GR:AW).
You are hopeless. I'm done with you.
Spinning Plates
Member
I cannot wait until we put Killzone under the microscope.
OG_Original Gamer
Member
I was hoping to see rain splashing on the body of your character when the model is in view.