You are assuming a lot of facts not in evidence here.
1) Did she know it was a lethal amount?
2) Did she know he was dying?
3) Why would she kill a paying customer?
Why presume malice when incompetence can explain things just as well.
You don't need to prove intent for second degree murder. I literally explained it in the post you quoted.
Because there's still a ton of confusion, this is what second-degree murder covers:
- An intentional murder that was not premeditated but doesn't qualify as voluntary manslaughter
OR
- An
unintentional death caused either by an act intended to cause harm (like killing somebody in a barfight)
OR
- An
unintentional death caused by dangerous conduct and an obvious lack of concern for human life.
This case seems to fit neatly into that third category, and it doesn't help that this is the second or third time that this has happened with her, or that she constantly talks about murdering people. Regardless, we have to assume that the police have enough evidence to show that her level of responsibility goes beyond manslaughter.
Wow at the people still excusing her actions.
I wonder if they would be doing so if she wasn't attractive...
GAF defense force for everything. It doesn't help that he's an executive, either.