TheWorthyEdge
Member
Are you serious? They're ranking and rating conferences based diversity?
didn't I see you in the Horizon thread talking about how much you want to fuck the main character
I think grading Nintendo on diversity is kind of tough because they have no choice but to have Asian people on the stage, because Nintendo is an Asian company, and it's creators are Asian. It would look diverse by default. I do like the fact that they feature female presenters and it never feels forced when they're there. If you ever saw a Nintendo World Store bag, you'd get the feeling the diversity displayed on the bag feels forced. I don't know how to describe it. Sometimes it just feels so fake.
Well, here is the problem. Shoe-horning in diversity, as you put it, implies that a lack of diversity is the default. If you make a black game protagonist, you made a black game protagonist, while if you made a white game protagonist, you just made a game protagonist.
Maybe developers will start shoe horning in diversity, and maybe that will be super awkward and cringe-worthy for a while. But the attitude that diversity should be added, instead of simply assumed, needs to change, and I'm willing to take a few years of awkward and cringe-worthy in my entertainment software to get there.
People aren't advocating for tokenism, they just try to measure how diverse the industry is, or how much diversity it projects.So there's something wrong with being white apparently? Are people advocating for tokenism?
Wow, looks like a lot of people are still very much offended from just talking about diversity at E3. The reactions in this thread worries me a lot in that I thought the general discourse would be more open and receptive towards simply talking about diversity in games and conferences.
They're not just talking about games, but the stage presentationsSo the people who are bothered by shoe-horned diversity, have you offered another way of increasing diversity in games?
So the people who are bothered by shoe-horned diversity, have you offered another way of increasing diversity in games?
They're not just talking about games, but the stage presentations
Yeah, not sure what the metric for the rating here really is. Article could probably have done without that.What would be the metric for 5/5? No straight white males in any games or presenters? Sony's biggest game featured a female lead and yet it scores 3/5?
Of course it's important, but as long as a medium isn't actively pushing away other demographics, sometimes the demographics just fall where they may. Most entertainment sectors have a strong demographic leaning, yet it seems to only be pointed out as an issue when it pertains to white males. There are plenty of entertainment and hobby mediums that are largely comprised of black males, or white women, or Latinos, etc. Is that an issue?
Maybe next time you will simply answer his actual question instead extrapolating.
"The only identifiable woman in Bethesdas press conference was Emily Kaldwin, and while she made a strong showing its unfortunate she has to share the limelight with her ageing father."
Is this sarcasm? I hope it is
So the people who are bothered by shoe-horned diversity, have you offered another way of increasing diversity in games?
I think that they should only have developers up ther instead of paying actors to be presenters, regardless of sex/race. I don't want to watch someone just read cue cards about games.And that differs how?
The ratings are super arbitrary and I imagine they are there to make a point, which I don't think worked super well.
That said, I feel like the last group of people that should be upset about arbitrary numbers that are mostly just imaginary are video game industry enthusiasts.
Intersectionality.
Only covering one spectrum (rich, white, presumably straight, guys) is not the way forward. Just trying to simply do more is better than one-dimensionality. Anything is better than that, even if it does not cover all identity categories (religion, age). The games industry needs to think more broadly and do the proper actions right now. Not tomorrow, not next week, not next year, right fucking now.
Yeah, not sure what the metric for the rating here really is. Article could probably have done without that-
Women are continually pushed away, there's a lot of sexism that happens in the industry, from publishers to actual players. I'm not saying every woman experiences this, but women making games or talking about games have to continually "prove" that they're gamers to a lot of their audience, otherwise they receive misogynistic and sexist comments.
As to if it's an issue when the entertainment/medium is comprised of one minority, I'm not sure. That's an interesting discussion to be had.
I edited my post. You are right!
I will say this though, I feel like these companies are just going to shoe horn in "diversity" into their games because of fear of backlash now, when you have sites now grading you based solely on that. I don't think that is the end result we all want. Personally, I want and feel it all needs to come from a genuine desire to do so, not feeling forced to because of fear. IMO.
I give this post conference a B+ because it appealed to my demographic.The ratings are super arbitrary and I imagine they are there to make a point, which I don't think worked super well.
That said, I feel like the last group of people that should be upset about arbitrary numbers that are mostly just imaginary are video game industry enthusiasts.
Only covering one spectrum (rich, white, presumably straight, guys) is not the way forward. Just trying to simply do more is better than one-dimensionality.
As opposed to Sony, known American company.
The Bechdel test is a weird thing to apply to a video game conference. It's suppose to be about people presenting new stuff to the crowd, not having conversations with the other people on stage. Whenever conversations happen during conferences, they always sound so fake.
They did.... for 2 seconds in the ending montage along with the other good gamesI told you all Sony should have shown Gravity Rush 2!
I feel like this is boarding racism in itself by discussing the race distribution and getting upset about one thing or another...who cares?!