PAULINK
I microwave steaks.
so what site will have the balls to give it a 8/10?
I hope it's gamesradar
Though I never check their site, are they still active I wonder?
so what site will have the balls to give it a 8/10?
http://www.starpulse.com/news/Alan_...rss&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Another review, no idea of the source, just saw it on Twitter.
8-12 hours depending on what level of difficulty you set it on.
It's a short game but more importantly, its an uninspired single player campaign. Objectives are very basic, I was surprised at the lack of creativity in the level design.
It's a short game but more importantly, its an uninspired single player campaign. Objectives are very basic, I was surprised at the lack of creativity in the level design.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxexYTFkW-A
4.5 stars
out of 5.
6 hour single player campaign or maybe ten if on hardest difficulty
I just googled speed runs for halo 1, 2, 3 and reach
All of the ones I saw combined? About 6.5 hours
I played it in 9 Hours on Heroic while barely finding any terminals on the first playthrough.
Even on Normal, anyone playing this game under 7 hours does not give a fuck about Halo. They're just cruising by every encounter. If you're playing a game just to get to see the next cutscene instead of actually playing the damn game then you shouldn't be in the business of reviewing games.
It's like how when the game first got leaked and apparently the leaker streamed it online on Easy. EASY?! That's the kind of shit where people just wanna brag and see cutscenes instead of actually enjoying the game
Halo 4 is as long as Halo 1, Halo 3 and Halo Reach.
Halo 4 is as long as Halo 1, Halo 3 and Halo Reach.
Ah, I'm dumb. I'm purposely avoiding reviews though in my defense , just came here for the reactions.
Yes I'm sure your review is objective when you have a Halo 4 avatar. Why not put a mountain dew logo there also
I played it in 9 Hours on Heroic while barely finding any terminals on the first playthrough.
Even on Normal, anyone playing this game under 7 hours does not give a fuck about Halo. They're just cruising by every encounter. If you're playing a game just to get to see the next cutscene instead of actually playing the damn game then you shouldn't be in the business of reviewing games.
It's like how when the game first got leaked and apparently the leaker streamed it online on Easy. EASY?! That's the kind of shit where people just wanna brag and see cutscenes instead of actually enjoying the game
Halo 4 is as long as Halo 1, Halo 3 and Halo Reach.
so what site will have the balls to give it a 8/10?
What does this even mean? You're saying that they're running past or bypassing encounters?
That's what it appears. Remember, this game has sprint ALL the time. So if there's objectives with waypoints, you can sprint to them and avoid encounters way better than before.
Berva can you give me a breakdown of your favorite Halo games?
Did you think Reach was confined?
Exactly. Halo has a sandbox that includes vehicles, and gives you lots of opprtunities to just drive on ahead and bypass encounters or run past enemies (now that there's sprint). But if you're just running on ahead to get to the next checkpoint then what's the point?What does this even mean? You're saying that they're running past or bypassing encounters?
I wouldn't worry about the game's length. I still remember GAF freaking out because there were reports of people finishing dishonored in 5 hours when the game would actually last you at least 3 times as long if you played it without rushing through it.
There have always been some encounters you could bypass in previous games, but suggesting that the addition of sprint allowed reviewers to completely ignore significantly more encounters than before seems to be a bit of a leap.
What "review"? I don't give score nor am I in a business to get clicks. I gave impressions about certain elements and laid out a few facts, all in comparison to OTHER Halos. It literally took me 9 hours on heroic for example. This is coming from someone who has played every Halo extensively. Calling this game short, or at least shorter than any other mainline Halo game is being disingenuous. So is your idiotic insinuation that a fan of a Halo game can't give valuable impressions to other Halo fans.Yes I'm sure your review is objective when you have a Halo 4 avatar. Why not put a mountain dew logo there also
No way. They actually said that? Fucking wow.Omission of Iron Sights makes the gameplay feel dated? DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.
The Games Radar review really should be thrown out the window. Not because of the great score, but because of how fucking idiotic it is.
Omission of Iron Sights makes the gameplay feel dated? DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING.
Cheesy one liners with little to no substance throughout, just awful review. The "journalist" couldn't even follow simple embargo protocols.
What "review"? I don't give score nor am I in a business to get clicks. I gave impressions about certain elements and laid out a few facts, all in comparison to OTHER Halos. It literally took me 9 hours on heroic for example. This is coming from someone who has played every Halo extensively. Calling this game short, or at least shorter than any other mainline Halo game is being disingenuous. So is your idiotic insinuation that a fan of a Halo game can't give valuable impressions to other Halo fans.
It's literally one of the worst video reviews I've ever heard. Not even content wise -- just how it's delivered. I've heard YouTube reviews from 12 year olds that sound better.No way. They actually said that? Fucking wow.
I know it's early but where do you think it stands campaign wise against the other Halos?What "review"? I don't give score nor am I in a business to get clicks. I gave impressions about certain elements and laid out a few facts, all in comparison to OTHER Halos. It literally took me 9 hours on heroic for example. This is coming from someone who has played every Halo extensively. Calling this game short, or at least shorter than any other mainline Halo game is being disingenuous. So is your idiotic insinuation that a fan of a Halo game can't give valuable impressions to other Halo fans.
Halo 3 is my favourite.
If I had to put them in order they would look like this.
1. Halo 3
2. Halo 1
3. halo Reach
4. Halo ODST
5. Halo 4
6. Halo 2
Exactly. Halo has a sandbox that includes vehicles, and gives you lots of opprtunities to just drive on ahead and bypass encounters or run past enemies (now that there's sprint). But if you're just running on ahead to get to the next checkpoint then what's the point?
Short campaign
May not pick this up day one. I'm one of like 3 people on the planet who play the series for the campaign. Just too short to justify $60.
I'm pretty sure Bungie has always recommended Heroic for the past few games.
Short campaign
May not pick this up day one. I'm one of like 3 people on the planet who play the series for the campaign. Just too short to justify $60.
Yes, actually. The reviewer should not give two shits about what he or she is reviewing up until the game/movie/book/refrigerator sells itself to the reviewer, not the other way around.
The movie critic should say "Okay, I'm going to see some movie today. So what?" And then, if the movie has merit, the movie and not the reviewer will answer that question. Then, after that process is over, the reviewer will write his review and try to explain to the potential customers the same question: "so what?"
It's not entirely objective (humans are not robots). But it's not at all subjective.
Depends on the Halo. Reach legendary was too much imo. I loved Halo 1 legendary though.Legendary is the only way to play Halo.
What difficulty did you play Halo 4 on? Is it easier, harder or about the same? I've got no experience with Halo 3.
No problemJust wanted to say thanks for your impressions. What you described sounds right in line with what it should be.
Played Halo 4 on Heroic, took around 7 hours to complete.
Halo 3 on Heroic is a harder game purely based on the greatness of the level design.
Short campaign
May not pick this up day one. I'm one of like 3 people on the planet who play the series for the campaign. Just too short to justify $60.