Samurai G0SU
Member
Very happy
Maybe by going over his concerns and explaining the reasons for 343s decisions? Seeking first to understand, then to be understood is a good way of going at this. One of the main problems people seem to have with 343 (me included) is that they don't seem to explain the reasons for any of their decisions. They didn't explain or give a legitimate reason for the re-design of the Jackals (no, the subgroup argument is not a good excuse. At least make them behave somewhat differently if they are supposed to actually be different), the pelican, Spartan underarmor, forerunner aesthetics, UNSC aesthetics, or Covie aesthetics; and any criticism of these is handwaved instead of explained in a clear and honest way.
The salt is very real in this thread. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, HGAF is on the edge of coming back from a ban.
Oh, BigShow is back?
![]()
Maybe by going over his concerns and explaining the reasons for 343s decisions? Seeking first to understand, then to be understood is a good way of going at this. One of the main problems people seem to have with 343 (me included) is that they don't seem to explain the reasons for any of their decisions. They didn't explain or give a legitimate reason for the re-design of the Jackals (no, the subgroup argument is not a good excuse. At least make them behave somewhat differently if they are supposed to actually be different), the pelican, Spartan underarmor, forerunner aesthetics, UNSC aesthetics, or Covie aesthetics; and any criticism of these is handwaved instead of explained in a clear and honest way.
Maybe by going over his concerns and explaining the reasons for 343s decisions? Seeking first to understand, then to be understood is a good way of going at this. One of the main problems people seem to have with 343 (me included) is that they don't seem to explain the reasons for any of their decisions. They didn't explain or give a legitimate reason for the re-design of the Jackals (no, the subgroup argument is not a good excuse. At least make them behave somewhat differently if they are supposed to actually be different), the pelican, Spartan underarmor, forerunner aesthetics, UNSC aesthetics, or Covie aesthetics; and any criticism of these is handwaved instead of explained in a clear and honest way.
Frankie's not a PR guy for 343, he is the Franchise Development Director. I actually like some of the things 343 is doing in regards to Halo (basically repairing some of the damage they did earlier). I have no issue with most of it.
What I do take issue with is Frankie basically taking a mental dump anytime he posts. Show me one thing of value that he's actually posted here in regards to Halo. One. He's in a position of power at 343 and he treats the Halo community like a mental port-o-potty, and everyone thinks its like a great gift or something. I'm okay with differing opinions, provided those positions are logically defended and explained. If you want to explain and converse, great, I'm your guy. But if your only interaction with "your" community that you supposedly care so much about is to make asinine remarks about valid concerns, I'm no longer interested in engaging in a dialogue because it's very apparent that he isn't.
Nah, I'm out.
lol ur dum
Maybe by going over his concerns and explaining the reasons for 343s decisions? Seeking first to understand, then to be understood is a good way of going at this. One of the main problems people seem to have with 343 (me included) is that they don't seem to explain the reasons for any of their decisions. They didn't explain or give a legitimate reason for the re-design of the Jackals (no, the subgroup argument is not a good excuse. At least make them behave somewhat differently if they are supposed to actually be different), the pelican, Spartan underarmor, forerunner aesthetics, UNSC aesthetics, or Covie aesthetics; and any criticism of these is handwaved instead of explained in a clear and honest way.
Nah, just dropping some knowledge bombs and then I'm out.
Nah, just dropping some knowledge bombs and then I'm out.
Warzone Assault does sound pretty wicked, but with Oddball & CTF being my mainstays since Halo 3, I'm hoping an Objective Playlist will be added. Also, it's odd that an Infection/Flood Playlist is absent.Sounds reasonable for launch. I'm sure we'll see other game types introduced in time, bring on ricochet!
Warzone assualt sounds more promising then vanilla warzone too.
lol ur dum
Do you want them to make you a cup of tea and give you a couple of chocolate hobnobs whilst they go through there development analysis with you?
I bet you Frankie knows how to makes a great cup of tea, its how we Scots have always resolved our differences, that and the odd Glasgow kiss when needed.
lol ur dum
I
343i are implementing these launch playlists based on more than just throwing darts at a dartboard blindfolded. They are basing their launch playlists off of population numbers as well as pro-team and community feedback. .
10/10 post, Frank.
Can we get an idea on what the window will be for other game types to be introduced? Are we talking weeks before Koth, Oddball, etc are rolled out or longer?
Got em.
Now go back to patching the MCC; I'm assuming it's you doing it because, well...
Are you happy that the thread is now about you instead of playlists?
I think they're going to start talking about schedules soon but I've been told "soon" for stuff like Doubles, so definitely weeks rather than months.
I'm not insulting them, and that's not really a good or mature thing to do in my opinion, but the people hurling insults or complaining in angry ways shouldn't just be told to "suck it up" either in most cases. People who complain like that are most likely huge fans and that's why they are reacting that way. The best way to go about it is to understand these peoples problems, explain the reasons things are the way they are, and then speak with them about possible alternatives or compromises, not to dismiss them as "toxic". Also, the reason I think 343 needs to explain these things is because they came into a universe that they didn't create and changed a bunch of things that had been consistent for the most part without giving good reasons why they decided they should be changed. It would be like JJ Abrahms making the Milennium Falcoln smooth and shiny and then when Star Wars fans ask why he just says "we felt like it".How many content creators explain why they do what they do or what they did to their fanbase? I don't like some of the changes either, but they don't need to tell you why they changed the jackals. I hate the new design, but I don't need to hear 'we did it because our artists wanted to go in a new direction', 'we feel this look makes them more menacing'.
I loved the old UNSC logo, I loved the old Mark VI, I love Marty's music, I loved the SPNKr, and I am vocal about it, but I'm not sitting here insulting the devs because they won't explain why they were changed. Criticism is one thing, saying 'FUCK YOU YOU RUINED HALO' is another.
You're right, as a game developer, they should be exempt from the normal standards we hold corporations and companies to. If Coca-Cola releases cans that turn out to be half full, they better be on the mic getting out a press release to the world, apologizing, paying settlements and pulling all their product from the shelves until it's fixed. But if a video game company does it, we should just count our blessings that the exalted Frankie deems us worthy of dropping asinine posts on our forums.
You're the kind of consumer companies have wet dreams about.
We could talk about lightly carbonated canned grapefruit soda instead.Are you happy that the thread is now about you instead of playlists?
I think they're going to start talking about schedules soon but I've been told "soon" for stuff like Doubles, so definitely weeks rather than months.
We could talk about lightly carbonated canned grapefruit soda instead.
This thread was always going to be by far the craziest. Playlists are super divisive and have caused numerous GAF civil wars over the years.
We do a lot of data driven changes and inclusions and weirdly this is one of the things that makes people mad - that they feel that large populations will "bully" the direction of the playlists, and we will make sure the popular ones are always represented, but we do want to make sure cult and niche stuff gets an airing.
We have better tools, and learned (despite BigShow's somewhat understandable refusal to believe it) a lot from the failures of H4 - but I'd also say those were more matrixed flaws than simply matchmaking content.
I think they're going to start talking about schedules soon but I've been told "soon" for stuff like Doubles, so definitely weeks rather than months.
According to a lot of posters on this website I am not a true halo fan because I like Muse in the launch trailer. Rip, I guess.Who are you again?