Show them some love they do a good jobResero?
Never heard of them.Show them some love they do a good job
Everyone starts somewhere.Never heard of them.
This might be the worst comparison video I've ever seen. Basically two dudes looking at screenshots and saying stupid stuff.
Well, they are more or less a small "xbox"-fan channel. But well, this comparison is neutral enough. But doesn't got into detail either.Never heard of them.
What vid were you watching??....they clearly called out ps5 was blurrier in spots ...3.00 markEveryone starts somewhere.
PS5 version looks the sharpest.
I wish I was into hitmam games but I just fined them boring
Tbh is was the scene with the red neon light help me make my opinion.What vid were you watching??....they clearly called out ps5 was blurrier in spots ...3.00 mark
Interesting. No RT at launch?
Getting it out of the way so the thread can prosper.
If it's that close that you cant tell, does it matter?I guess I will wait for DF to help me decide. Even if I have to wait a day or two.
I have great doubt about it. The "method" they use to establish the "higher" resolution is really opinable and why use a single scene? NonsenseSo now SX edges it with a high res version?
Not bad to see the progress with the tools.
they didn't pixel count, yes. But it is clearly visible that the SX has a slightly higher res. Not the texture they think about (that would just be texture res), but you can spot differences in the same scene, like AnotherOne pointed out a few posts above (even if the picture has many compression artifacts). Just look at the edge of the desk pad (or whatever this is). I don't think it is a big difference, might just be something BC related after all (I think that because of the slightly different texture resolution).I have great doubt about it. The "method" they use to establish the "higher" resolution is completely wrong.
"Neutral". You don't establish tech stuff taking a single picture and presuming things. You need more samples and tech evidence/argumentation. Wouldn't be surprising if they are completely wrong in most of their assumptions.Well, they are more or less a small "xbox"-fan channel. But well, this comparison is neutral enough. But doesn't got into detail either.
What to get from the video:
- xbox one S/X has no HDR (settings missing)
- current gen consoles run 60fps flawlessly (in their tests)
- Playstation has an optional "open framerate"-mode missing on the xbox consoles
- Series X seems to have a slightly higher resolution (or texture quality) and also higher shadow resolution (they don't mention the shadows, but just look at the scene with the banana, the shadow of the shelf in the background) -> might have something to do with PS4 Pro and x1x versions of the game. Might just be a kind of BC mode active.
Again a single picture prove nothing.they didn't pixel count, yes. But it is clearly visible that the SX has a slightly higher res. Not the texture they think about (that would just be texture res), but you can spot differences in the same scene, like AnotherOne pointed out a few posts above (even if the picture has many compression artifacts). Just look at the edge of the desk pad (or whatever this is). I don't think it is a big difference, might just be something BC related after all (I think that because of the slightly different texture resolution).
I take your quote just to have some clarification. Take as reliable your resume: what is it the open framerate setting. They said it runs flawlessly on current generation at 60 FPS (anyway current gen is the new console? Because no way it runs 60 fps in the oldest) but also open framerate it's absent on Xbox console, so the hell they meant? Because open framerate was basically 60 fps in the previous games. Furthermore if the Xbox even lack of this option why it should push higher some graphic setting if it can't even handle an higher fps options hearing them, seems strange to me.Well, they are more or less a small "xbox"-fan channel. But well, this comparison is neutral enough. But doesn't got into detail either.
What to get from the video:
- xbox one S/X has no HDR (settings missing)
- current gen consoles run 60fps flawlessly (in their tests)
- Playstation has an optional "open framerate"-mode missing on the xbox consoles
- Series X seems to have a slightly higher resolution (or texture quality) and also higher shadow resolution (they don't mention the shadows, but just look at the scene with the banana, the shadow of the shelf in the background) -> might have something to do with PS4 Pro and x1x versions of the game. Might just be a kind of BC mode active.
Never knew a minor resolution boost was pulling away...Series x really starting to pull away now.
"Neutral". You don't establish tech stuff taking a single picture and presuming things. You need more samples and tech evidence/argumentation. Wouldn't be surprising if they are completely wrong in most of their assumptions.
Again a single picture prove nothing.
I take your quote just to have some clarification. Take as reliable your resume: what is it the open framerate setting. They said it runs flawlessly on current generation at 60 FPS (anyway current gen is the new console? Because no way it runs 60 fps in the oldest) but also open framerate it's absent on Xbox console, so the hell they meant? Because open framerate was basically 60 fps in the previous games. Furthermore if the Xbox even lack of this option why it should push higher some graphic setting if it can't even handle an higher fps options hearing them, seems strange to me.
The only better thing of series X is the more CUs and nothing more. Let me put their hardware specs in a different perspective. We can say PS5 has a 22% of faster gpu in the whole specs. And the series X has around of the 30% of more CUs which represent the 40% of the GPU perfomance. Where exactly is clearly ahead in specs the series X hardware? I wouldn't be even so sure their particularly RAM/bandwidth give it a proper advantage over the ps5. Too many people looks the higher number but forget the contest. If I'm not wrong even the higher AMD GPU has the same bandwidth of the ps5. So it means series X is potentially ahead of them?Never knew a minor resolution boost was pulling away...
The real comparisons will come when both parties release their exclusive titles, using the full horsepower of either unit, only then will we be able to definitively say who is the more powerful console.
But on paper the Series X should be winning, it has the engineering nous and the specs to make it a powerhouse, I just wouldn't say what we have seen so far from it's third party showings translates to that expectation.
Yes, this is strange. I guess on xbox one (s) console, you don't need that mode. But on the one x it would be great.I take your quote just to have some clarification. Take as reliable your resume: what is it the open framerate setting. They said it runs flawlessly on current generation at 60 FPS (anyway current gen is the new console? Because no way it runs 60 fps in the oldest) but also open framerate it's absent on Xbox console, so the hell they meant? Because open framerate was basically 60 fps in the previous games. Furthermore if the Xbox even lack of this option why it should push higher some graphic setting if it can't even handle an higher fps options hearing them, seems strange to me.
Hitman 3, MK11, Star Wars Squadrons. 3 for 3 Xbox.
That is correct, but it is hard to get pixel counts these days with all that temporal AA applied to the picture. At least in this the SX has the higher res (better?).Again a single picture prove nothing.