Putonahappyface
Member
You're getting menstrual over the appearance of a fictional character. I was joking I know woman have peach fuzz lol.
You're getting menstrual over the appearance of a fictional character. I was joking I know woman have peach fuzz lol.
Looked like a low effort troll, maybe you should think of better jokes.You're getting menstrual over the appearance of a fictional character. I was joking I know woman have peach fuzz lol.
Dude, plus it's literally running at 1 frame per forever.Please buy another copy because that one is in Performance mode.
Too blurry to my tastes.
Seems like you're white Knighting over a fictional character, that's embarrassing.Looked like a low effort troll, maybe you should think of better jokes.
Yep. HFW on PS5 is head and shoulders above the PC version of HZD at max settings.Honestly the people who said that haven't brought any receipts yet. I think it's pretty obvious that it's an improvement over the 1st game.
I can't believe this month of games ..sifu, dying light 2, cyberpunk next gen, horizon, eldin ring, gt7
Best month of gaming ever
I have just bought HFW, GT7 and have Elden ring pre-ordered for next week also.I honestly can't say when I last time bought four games (new) within the span of two weeks.
I've been toggling between perf and res for a bit. As much as I love the detail and how everything pops in res, performance will be the way to go for me. It looks great as is on my OLED display. No complaints so far.
Hated how on Witcher 3, Horizon 1 …. even Ghost of Tsushima you had to use your past seeing abilities to follow somone, now they can just make it obvious in the environment. Now they just need to make it fun.Rockstar detail level
How sharp does it look then? Can you compare it to anything else e.g. the Insomniac games in performance RT or Demon's Souls at 1440p?
Thanks
I’d happily play in 1080p with better visual effects….They could introduce a mode that lowers the resolution and pushes the visuals forwards. Or just more modes in general. Like a normal and rt mode. However it probably gets confusing then for most people so its understandable. I would just have made different choices.
Whilst I think GoW 3 is one of the most impressive looking games of its day, and it’s set pieces are unrivalled, TLoU literally made me think ‘how the fuck can the PS3 even run this?’ - anyway, both stellar games visually so there’s probably no wrong choiceAscension and Gow3 looked better than TLOU.
Way bigger scale, way more effects on screen, better textures and zero LOD whereas rocks from only a few meters ahead in TLOU often had to load in.
The trick is not to even try 60fps mode because once you try it I find 30fps painful.I've been toggling between perf and res for a bit. As much as I love the detail and how everything pops in res, performance will be the way to go for me. It looks great as is on my OLED display. No complaints so far.
You're getting menstrual over the appearance of a fictional character. I was joking I know woman have peach fuzz lol.
I just wanted to say fuck off to all the people who are already playing the game while the guy with the most hype for the game in the forum has to wait another entire day...
Enjoy it people
(but fuck off anyway)
I still would.
I'll be eagerly waiting for the postman tomorrow.I just wanted to say fuck off to all the people who are already playing the game while the guy with the most hype for the game in the forum has to wait another entire day...
Enjoy it people
(but fuck off anyway)
Future DLC
Yep. HFW on PS5 is head and shoulders above the PC version of HZD at max settings.
I've still got over 6 hours to waithour and 40 minutes left
I'll be thinking of you
You can definitely see the difference between the two modes. It is still quite good in performance, but def not as sharp/detailed as the resolution mode. It's still good though.
If I had to make a guess in comparison, perf mode would look more like how Uncharted 4 PS5 version looks in terms of detail. Demon's Souls and Insomniac look a bit better, but I'd have to do a comparison to see. It comes down to design choices I guess. FW in performance mode is at 1800p with checkerboard rendering.
All in all, I'd gladly take the hit in performance to get 60fps because it does look great. 30fps just feels too jarring after playing so many 60fps games lately.
I'm still in the first area of the game and have yet to see the whole atmosphere in the open world.
Well yeah. Its a new game. Not a port of an old game. They didn't take the time to add extra stuff. Only turned up a few settings. HFW ps5 looks a step above ps4 because they did the extra work, not just raised a few settings.Yep. HFW on PS5 is head and shoulders above the PC version of HZD at max settings.
I still would.
They could upgrade greatly every aspect that is CPU related, better world simulation, physics, AI, animation, denser environments, more NPC's etc... The downgrade from the GPU is quite linear since the game doesn't use RT or any RDNA2 specific tech, but on the CPU side that most compromises had to be made.visuals aside, what would have benefitted if this was purely a ps5 game?
Completely at a loss as to why they didn’t just click the magic “add ray tracing” box, but I’m clueless…Its fine to be clueless, don't drag my comments down to your level tho.
I don't think being a cross gen title is the reason for not implementing RT, plenty of games already did just that, the problem is the cost of it. The game would need to scale down to free up resources for RT to work, mostly in resolution and shader performance, since RT is quite hard on memory bandwidth and compute power.Mostly like RT was out of question due the cross-gen nature… just my guesses.
They didn’t want to make two different render that is like what cross gen games do.
Cross gen limit the scope of you game unless you double the time (and money) to do the same thing in two different ways.
Why would they put a filter on it? It’s probably just sharp being native 4k. Play in performance for slightly less sharpness perhaps?Playing it just right now in resolution mode. Sharpen filter is too aggresive (and unnecessary) for my tastes. Why a sharpen filter in a 4k image? I have sharpen at 0 in my TV, this is like putting sharpen to 100.
No no, I played a ton of 4k native games in PC. And also Valhalla, Spiderman, Ratchet, etc un 4k 30fps modes in PS5. This game has a sharpener filter. And it's worse because, as usual with aggresive sharpener filters, it adds a white halo around any detail. So, when you move the camera and it adds motion blur (disabling it doesn't solve the problem), those white halos disappear, so luminance of the image vary from brighter to darker each time you move the camera. It's very distracting and something I didn't read in any analysis.Why would they put a filter on it? It’s probably just sharp being native 4k. Play in performance for slightly less sharpness perhaps?
I don't buy this idea, sorry. The only viewpoint difference seems to be "Sony tech/game bad". If he was interested in tech he would have been far more receptive of the UE5 reveal and far more receptive to fast storage and virtualised geometry. The tech displayed there was not only new but pretty amazing wouldn't you agree? He didn't, he downplayed that tech demo reveal. I'm sure I don't need to say why.The issue is that whenever VFX and literally anyone else on this board get into a "graphics generation" discussion it starts from very different viewpoints.
Ok, can’t argue with what you’re seeing with your own eyesNo no, I played a ton of 4k native games in PC. And also Valhalla, Spiderman, Ratchet, etc un 4k 30fps modes in PS5. This game has a sharpener filter. And it's worse because, as usual with aggresive sharpener filters, it adds a white halo around any detail. So, when you move the camera and it adds motion blur (disabling it doesn't solve the problem), those white halos disappear, so luminance of the image vary from brighter to darker each time you move the camera. It's very distracting and something I didn't read in any analysis.
It doesn't. It actually renders at 4k and has an upscaler on top for added fidelity.No no, I played a ton of 4k native games in PC. And also Valhalla, Spiderman, Ratchet, etc un 4k 30fps modes in PS5. This game has a sharpener filter. And it's worse because, as usual with aggresive sharpener filters, it adds a white halo around any detail. So, when you move the camera and it adds motion blur (disabling it doesn't solve the problem), those white halos disappear, so luminance of the image vary from brighter to darker each time you move the camera. It's very distracting and something I didn't read in any analysis.
Anyway my internet is pretty crap and I’m not staying up so I will just download next gen update in the morning and it will be ready to roll tomorrow. Looks glorious but I hate this shady shit by Sony. Don’t try and nickel and dime me you fucks.Are any of you guys buying the $60 version from the online store or are u just gonna pay the $10 ransom to be able to play at 12 am?
I'm torn
You sir are an idiot if you think my post was about whether I can afford $10. Do you really need someone to explain it to you? Because I can. There are too many people like you out there ready to sign off on companies who act shady like Sony is doing here.
It can be an upscaler, I believe you, but the visual result is the same than cranking up the TV sharpen to max.It doesn't. It actually renders at 4k and has an upscaler on top for added fidelity.
Playing it just right now in resolution mode. Sharpen filter is too aggresive (and unnecessary) for my tastes. Why a sharpen filter in a 4k image? I have sharpen at 0 in my TV, this is like putting sharpen to 100.
Are any of you guys buying the $60 version from the online store or are u just gonna pay the $10 ransom to be able to play at 12 am?
I'm torn
It can be an upscaler, I believe you, but the visual result is the same than cranking up the TV sharpen to max.
What a silly and tiny effect, one new that I never had seen before in my life, and it has ruined the game for me. It even gives me eyes strain. Now I understand people that doesn't like motion blur or chromatic aberration, effects that don't bother me. I just discovered the effect that bothers me and I didn't know
It has been rectified- we are back on topic.
hour and 40 minutes left
I'll be thinking of you
To the people playing this does the game have a weird motion blur in fidelity mode? Because that will drive me bonkers.
What tv you got?Playing it just right now in resolution mode. Sharpen filter is too aggresive (and unnecessary) for my tastes. Why a sharpen filter in a 4k image? I have sharpen at 0 in my TV, this is like putting sharpen to 100.
thanks for heads up!WARNING !!! LG C1 owners there might be a HDMI HDR handshake issue with the PS5 which will washout contrast, to fix disable hdmi deep color and re-enable and re-enable HDR in PS5 settings. do not mess with RGB levels on tv or console.
HDR
HGIG
Black Level
Auto/Auto
Wait until you pan the camera in 30 fps mode and then we can talk blur.Please buy another copy because that one is in Performance mode.
Too blurry to my tastes.
I have a LG CX. But. wait, what? I mean, that has no sense and you can see, moving the slider, than 0 adds less sharpen than 10. Also, 0 has no input lag penalty, meanwhile any value adds a bit of added input lag.What tv you got?
If lg oled then sharpen 0 is sharper than sharpen 10