I watched this on disney plus tonight, but now I Noticed the girls have been altered just a tad From the original. It came out before Toy Story.
I’d say Kena surpasses it in IQ, but it does take a specific graphic style to match, most others don’t try for it.I still think Toy Story 1 has better image quality than games today. It just looks cleaner. I don't think it's been surpassed yet.
I Don't believe you.I just watched Toy Story 1 on VHS and the gfx look soooo good.
There only a couple of games like Crysis 1 and the UE5 Matrix demo that can compete visually.
Are you out of your mind!? Even a game like Uncharted 2 looks better. Smh.I just watched Toy Story 1 on VHS and the gfx look soooo good.
There only a couple of games like Crysis 1 and the UE5 Matrix demo that can compete visually.
Put the bong down, hippie!
Toy Story required a lot of time, remove that from cinema history and you don't have wall-e, ratatoie etc.
The animations in Toy Story look like dogshit compared to performance capture seen in modern games.Probably animations are better in Toy Story than modern games. That's part of graphics. It also has better music and story than 99% of games, and these things are entangled in the whole issue.
This was from Kingdom Hearts 3 on last gen hardware
It's been a while since I've seen it. Not big into the artistry of modern triple As.The animations in Toy Story look like dogshit compared to performance capture seen in modern games.
It's also understanding concepts. This is why the videogame industry today is in the state that it's in, it's so bad right now. The only developer work I've seen who have consistently reflected the concepts that I see in something like Pixar's Toy Story is Valve software. On the other hand, I saved a lot of money from not buying these terrible ass games today.I think the only thing that still makes you think it looks better is image quality. Everything else is better in modern games compared to Toy Story, but CGI always have this very clean and soft look that makes everything look more cinematic, while games look less clean, with often blur from TAA and then post process sharpening to counter it, as well as various aliasing, shimmering, flickering, all kind of stuff that isn't there in CGI.
I'm not sure if many people still know about it, but "SGSSAA" is the anti aliasing method that gave me the most "CGI" feeling in term of image quality. It only worked in older games however.
To be fair that scene was actually CGI in KH3 too lol So not the best example, but KH3 did look really good in general.This was from Kingdom Hearts 3 on last gen hardware
I mean it was good for the time but tech has advanced for nearly 30 years since. Any kind of AAA title trounces it. The one advantage Toy Story has, as others have mentioned, is it was rendered frame by frame as such high resolutions and polygon budgets that you don’t see any aliasing and the like. But a year after it came out TLOU Part I on PS5 still blows me away.It's been a while since I've seen it. Not big into the artistry of modern triple As.
It looks great because of ray tracing and infinite MSAA
i guess
Was it ?To be fair that scene was actually CGI in KH3 too lol So not the best example, but KH3 did look really good in general.
and aggressiveeeeeeee AA, per the devs/producers.Pathtracing.
cinnamonandgravy, I agree with what you’re saying, but in most of those scenes in the original Toy Story the eyes will not synchronously blink correctly (a lot of people don’t know this).and aggressiveeeeeeee AA, per the devs/producers.
plus there's no jank:
LoD isnt popping in, grabbing your attention.
distant animations arent running at half-rate and dont have abrupt transitions.
bushes arent a bunch of sprites that twitch in the wind as an animation.
clipping is basically non-existent.
eyes behave convincingly.
blah blah blah
that's intentional (only the toys do it).in most of those scenes in the original Toy Story the eyes will not synchronously blink correctly (a lot of people don’t know this).