Pimpwerx said:The legal system has done far more to that guy than any insult or ban on this forum will.
Pimpwerx said:Wow! Another thread where the righteous and mighty gather to throw stones at the sinning heathen. Meh. The legal system has done far more to that guy than any insult or ban on this forum will. It's a little funny b/c if you've ever driven home after drinking (either a lot or a little), chances are you've driven while over the legal limit. There are some people who exercise great care with it, but for the most part, people just think that since they're clear-headed, they are safe to drive. The legal limit is deceptively low. PEACE.
Wow, defending him is almost as stupid as what he did. The legal limit is deceptively low? Being drunk, be it because he had only a few drinks or whatever endangers him and others around him; I couldn't care less about what happens to an irresponsible asshole though. And it's pretty obvious he hasn't learned anything; I'm glad this time his ban is permanent. As open as GAF is, putting other people in very real danger and then bragging about it like it's another funny story is completely off-limits.Pimpwerx said:Wow! Another thread where the righteous and mighty gather to throw stones at the sinning heathen. Meh. The legal system has done far more to that guy than any insult or ban on this forum will. It's a little funny b/c if you've ever driven home after drinking (either a lot or a little), chances are you've driven while over the legal limit. There are some people who exercise great care with it, but for the most part, people just think that since they're clear-headed, they are safe to drive. The legal limit is deceptively low. PEACE.
In 2006, there were 13,470 fatalities in crashes involving an alcohol-impaired driver (BAC of .08 or higher) 32 percent of total traffic fatalities for the year.
16,005 people were killed in the United States in alcohol-related motor vehicle traffic crashes (BAC of .01 or higher).
In 2006, 1,794 children age 14 and younger were killed in motor vehicle crashes. Of those 1,794 fatalities, 306 (17%) occurred in alcohol-impaired driving crashes. Children riding in vehicles with drivers who had a BAC level of .08 or higher accounted for half (153) of these deaths.
Pimpwerx said:Wow! Another thread where the righteous and mighty gather to throw stones at the sinning heathen. Meh. The legal system has done far more to that guy than any insult or ban on this forum will. It's a little funny b/c if you've ever driven home after drinking (either a lot or a little), chances are you've driven while over the legal limit. There are some people who exercise great care with it, but for the most part, people just think that since they're clear-headed, they are safe to drive. The legal limit is deceptively low. PEACE.
HorribleAgent Ghost said:
DAMN! Shit is fucked up. I think I would rather die.Agent Ghost said:
holy SHITAgent Ghost said:
EviLore said:Total deja vu...oh, yeah, I banned him for the same thread six months ago. Pretty smart dude, coming in here again six months later to brag about how he's an alpha male.
Agent Ghost said:
Quit rationalizing it. You were driving and you had alcohol in your system. You're just as much a douchebag as the OP.Badabing said:I got arrested for a DWI in March. I had about 3 beers, and went home about 2 hours after I finished the third beer.
blah blah blah
Badabing said:Hindsight is always 20/20 though.
B!TCH said:You couldn't have been that drunk if you got away with it.
I like how you conveniently translate the slang you use effectively negating the purpose of using slang in the first place. If you were assuming we wouldn't understand what you were saying, why did you opt to include slang at all?
Hydro_Alexis said:So what did i learn? You can get banned on gaf for mistakes you make in your real life as well as half the people who wanted to bitch about this whole ordeal are currently on a banned vaction. And i am sure some of you will be happy to hear that i no longer have my licence.
Badabing said:I got arrested for a DWI in March. I had about 3 beers, and went home about 2 hours after I finished the third beer.
I was driving home, with my friend in the passanger and another in the back seat. Then, suddenly, my friend has to puke. With no bag in the car, or any sort of recepticle whatsoever, I reluctantly pulled over.
My friend puked there for about 3 minutes, until suddenly a cop pulled over. This took place on the highway btw. The officer doesn't even check to make sure my friend was OK, and he never even identified him, but my friend said that he was drinking that night -- so the officer quickly suspected me of doing the same. I didn't lie, I told him I drank 2 or 3 beers, but he quickly pulled me out of the vehicle. He issued some tests, like standing on one foot (as cars wiz by at 65mph about 3 feet from me), and I feel I did so successfully, because I was on each foot for about 25 seconds each time, balancing with one leg above the other knee. Then he had me to walk 10 paces, which I also did fine -- I wasn't even looking at my feet.
Then he just yelled at me and arrested me for DWI. Turns out I had an blood alcohol level of .05, which constitutes a charge for DWI. Bullshit, I say, since I'm already 20 years old and about 6'5", and I didn't even get pulled over for poor driving. But I guess thats the law, a simple game of numbers.
I had to pay out the ass for classes, fines and a lawyer. It's just stupid, I dont even like to drink and I wasn't even drunk. If I was 21, my legal limit would ahve been .08, and I would have gotten let off the hook. But because I'm 20, my legal limit was .02.
Hindsight is always 20/20 though. I should have just turned the car off, pulled the keys out of the ignition, and gotten out of the car. If an officer can't prove who's driving, he can't prove anyone's driving drunk. Bah. I just didn't expect my friend to puke there for 3 minutes straight...
Hindsight is always 20/20 though. I should have just turned the car off, pulled the keys out of the ignition, and gotten out of the car. If an officer can't prove who's driving, he can't prove anyone's driving drunk. Bah. I just didn't expect my friend to puke there for 3 minutes straight...
You drove with alcohol in your system regardless if you like to drink or not. You also drove drunk while being underage, which is an even worse idea
Badabing said:I got arrested for a DWI in March. I had about 3 beers, and went home about 2 hours after I finished the third beer.
I was driving home, with my friend in the passanger and another in the back seat. Then, suddenly, my friend has to puke. With no bag in the car, or any sort of recepticle whatsoever, I reluctantly pulled over.
My friend puked there for about 3 minutes, until suddenly a cop pulled over. This took place on the highway btw. The officer doesn't even check to make sure my friend was OK, and he never even identified him, but my friend said that he was drinking that night -- so the officer quickly suspected me of doing the same. I didn't lie, I told him I drank 2 or 3 beers, but he quickly pulled me out of the vehicle. He issued some tests, like standing on one foot (as cars wiz by at 65mph about 3 feet from me), and I feel I did so successfully, because I was on each foot for about 25 seconds each time, balancing with one leg above the other knee. Then he had me to walk 10 paces, which I also did fine -- I wasn't even looking at my feet.
Then he just yelled at me and arrested me for DWI. Turns out I had an blood alcohol level of .05, which constitutes a charge for DWI. Bullshit, I say, since I'm already 20 years old and about 6'5", and I didn't even get pulled over for poor driving. But I guess thats the law, a simple game of numbers.
I had to pay out the ass for classes, fines and a lawyer. It's just stupid, I dont even like to drink and I wasn't even drunk. If I was 21, my legal limit would ahve been .08, and I would have gotten let off the hook. But because I'm 20, my legal limit was .02.
Hindsight is always 20/20 though. I should have just turned the car off, pulled the keys out of the ignition, and gotten out of the car. If an officer can't prove who's driving, he can't prove anyone's driving drunk. Bah. I just didn't expect my friend to puke there for 3 minutes straight...
Why can't people get it? I never found any trouble understanding the fact that drinking + driving = DON'T. FUCKING. DO. IT. Regardless of the circumstances, whether or not you think you're fine, your system is superior to everyone else's or whatever bullshit you can come up with. You were underage and had been drinking, you posed a danger then and the cops did the right thing.Badabing said:I got arrested for a DWI in March.
RiskyChris said:Hey guys, he had 3 beers in him from 2 hours prior. The law has a reasonable limit of alcohol in your system for a reason, because you aren't immediately a danger after a few beers.
Get off his case about that, and get on him for being a retard and drinking before he was 21. That's the problem.
rs7k said:Oh please. Use some common fucking sense here.
The average cellphone conversation isn't very long anyway, you can turn off your cellphone and drive like nothing happened. You can't "turn off" being drunk, that's where the whole argument falls apart.
DAVIDHUXLEY said:calm down i could care less...
Don't drink & drive.
Sleeker said:I don't quite understand the logic of justifying drink driving.
It seems to require a belief that being drunk repels all pedestrians and drivers one mile from your car while intoxicated, and that you'll always just glide from A to B despite your reflexes being fucked up.
DAVIDHUXLEY said:calm down i could care less...
Don't drink & drive.
White Man said:Does this mean you were the one that screwed up his tag, too,?master
RiskyChris said:Hey guys, he had 3 beers in him from 2 hours prior. The law has a reasonable limit of alcohol in your system for a reason, because you aren't immediately a danger after a few beers.
Get off his case about that, and get on him for being a retard and drinking before he was 21. That's the problem.