I hardly disagree with the article, especially with the part of using dated tech, as it will be (already is) the PC that will have completely fragmented userbase with RT and non-RT GPUs, quard-core vs octa-core CPUs, HDD vs SSD, and so on. I always find it really funny/pathetic when the entire PC market (a.k.a. a couple of billions of people) is positioned from the point of view of less than 1% of its users, who do have a couple of thousands $ worth, cutting-edge gaming rigs, but if you look at the rest 90-99%, well, the reality isn't as pretty as the internet tries to paint it. And I'm not even talking about the prices here, the article mentions 2080Ti which sure can do 4K RT today, but at the same price you can have all 3 consoles, Pro, 1X and NSW, and still have enough money left to get a decent 15" laptop for the ordinary PC tasks like web browsking, movies, Word, Excel etc.
Not to mention all the power the PC can ultimately get sooner or later somewhat vaporizes, because the PC periferals can catch up with it only so much, like the displays for example can be only so big, because people have only so much space on their desks (same applies for <70" HDTVs), and that affects everything else that comes with it - 4K is basically just a gimmick on PC, a unicorn everyone on the internet talks about but no one actually experienced, 1080p is the sweet spot since like forever, while 1440p being seen as the ultimate hardcore gaming resolution also for a very long time. HDR is pretty much non-existent, there are some displays here and there, but it's barely implemented in the games, and if it is then with a very mixed results. OLED PC displays are even more rare than anythign else.. At some point the hardware configuration is becoming seriously overpowered compared to what you can actually experience from it. Hell, the displays that can fully utilize the most powerful rigs out there often cost more than the rigs themselves.
The thing is, the times are a little different now then they were in 2013,where the PS4 and XB1 were sooo damn weak from the get-go, like for real, the games were dropping not just the framerate anymore, but resolution as well, Sony was actually even sued for Killzone:SF running natively in 960x1080, anyone remembers that one? So right as the generation took off we were already fully aware it will be all about sub-FullHD, sub-30FPS, painfully slow download speeds, slow ass HDD, and on top of that Jaguar CPU that slowed everything down even further, so anyone who really wanted to get at least a decent performance/experience really had little to no choice but to get a PC (even with just a mere 2C/4T i3).
And that's exactly what I also did, but as the time progressed, I now have a few thousand $ overclocked, watercooled web browser, no joke, I'm at the age where I don't have time nor I want to spend it on all the software maintenance anymore, like all the patches, driver updates, app updates, store/launcher updates, and so on, which is the essential key for PC being actually a great experience, while the consoles as of this gen take care of themselves while your sleep, while you're outside, at work, etc. Besides that, sitting in front of the desk is a pain in the ass, I have more than enough of that during my daily job, especially given that all the isometric view point&click games I used to love back in the 90's/00's like RTS and RPG games are long time gone, and everything is either in 1st or 3rd person view and can, or should I rather said, is exactly design to be played with a controller. Yes I know, I can always plug the PC to a TV, which I actually do, and as far as the games themselves once launched are not an issue, the problem still remains with with entire Windows, applications etc. that are not designed with a controller in mind, I mean, just browsing YT from the couch is way, way more convenient with TV's build-in YT app than with a wireless M+K combo, especially with those wireless keyboards with trackpads which are specifically designed for the (supposedly) comfy couch experience. I have simply reached the point where I completely understand why ordinary Joes DON'T want to get a PC, and why they prefer the good old convenient console+laptop/tablet combo.
So with all that being said, the upcoming next-gen consoles will undoubtedly be a huuuge step up from the current ones - powerful multi-core CPUs won't bottleneck any kind of activity, not only the games themselves but the likes of game/update installations, downloads, web browsking, anything. VRR will take care of any potential frame drops and screen tearing. SSDs which are one of the best PC's invention/upgrade will also come as a standard, so no bottleneck from the drive side this time around as well. Even wider HDR and Dolby Atmos/DTS-X utilization, and I'm not even mentioning 4K because it's a given, the list just goes on and on.
Now, I'm fully aware that within just a year (maybe even in 2020) the top-end PCs will be at least twice as powerful as next-gen consoles (while also costing more than they already are), but I think no one will ever look at what the PS5/XBX offer (especially for their price), and say "that's not enough, I want/need more!". In a sense, just as with high-end PC, you will have to upgrade all the surrounding hardware to fully utilize the upcoming consoles, like HDMI2.1-capable TV, Atmos/DTSX sound system, Wifi 5/6 router, etc. The PS4/XB1 were surely a very painful step into PC's architecture, but it was a step necessary in order to get to the point from which the PS5/XBX are starting off.