whats my 24 inch monitor doing?
I don't know how true that could be. I mean, computer monitors are basically the same as an HDTV these days, right? They're saying you need 50 inches to ever see the difference between 1080 and 720, yet on my 24 inch monitor, I can CLEARLY see a difference in that kind of resolution.
It's difficult to even know where to begin with this one.
Poor PC guys and their small monitors
So why would anyone with any experience in gaming state something like that?
Seriously why?
So Retina on my iPhone is practically useless?
Not if Microsoft somehow ends up ahead in 4k content, then we can use our 5" b&w portable TVs from the eighties, it'll be fine.Welp, I guess we're gonna need 200in TVs to see the difference between 1080p and 4k.
Console wars are hilarious.
Setting my monitor down to 1280x720 since it doesn't matter, brb.
Console wars are hilarious.
Welp, I guess we're gonna need 200in TVs to see the difference between 1080p and 4k.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WVDgPN_Gkk#t=3m
Alternative title: Does 900p vs. 1080p Really Matter?
They all agreed on that, so I went with the title "The naked eye cannot perceive a difference between 1080 and 720 before 50 inches"
(I was prompted to include that this was said on their Xbox Podcast)
If anyone has the names of these guys, I will fill them in.
The first question on anyone's mind when it comes to perception and resolution on such a statement is? "At what distance?"
It's a pretty definite statement being made, but it's incomplete.
The assumption in here is probably average human visual acuity, so I'm not going to be pedantic about that and use perfect visual acuity the way 4K proponents use. (0.6 arcmin, but rather 1 arcmin which US citizens know as 20/20 vision.)
Console wars are hilarious.