• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Is the PS3 already the Gamecube of this generation?

Status
Not open for further replies.
chiefoprah.jpg
 
software wise it's much more like the Xbox than the GameCube. almost all the multiplatform games come out on it, and it has a number of worthy exclusives if not nearly as many as on other systems.
 
NeoJobe said:
That "charts site" pic
:lol :lol :lol

Well, nice knowing you. See you later, MUCH later.

Edit: I thought quoting banned sites etc was also a nono, if so, you guys should, you know, not quote that pic!
 
not really, but i'm glad to see that nintendo fans have adopted 'gamecube' as a slur -- it is indeed a nasty thing to call another console. in a few years i suppose you'll be using 'wii' derogatively
 
iam glad someone mentioned this! I studied this topic for quit some time now and after months of research and hard work i can finally say: You are wrong OP!
for evidence check this chart:
ngcequalsonepsp.jpg


I also came up with some absolute mindblowing proof for the NDS in late 2006, but thought it would be better to keep it a secret, well screw that, i guess humanity is ready now!
proofnds.jpg


stay tuned for more evidence and proof that the dreamcast was just like 4 n64s duct-taped together in fall 2009!
 
Sadist said:
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, NOT THE CHARTZ!!!
Well his argument was screwed anyway, he just dealt himself the coup de grace.

Anyway, on topic, It is unfair to compare PS3 - Sales age or otherwise - to any console last gen. In the PS2 era there was only one winner in a single playing field, with this gen, we have 2 seperate markets basically, and in the end the PS3 will end up on a par with 360, if not a little ahead.

So no, PS3 is not the GC if this gen, partly because it is selling better, and partly because this gen is not like the last, at all.
 
drohne said:
not really, but i'm glad to see that nintendo fans have adopted 'gamecube' as a slur -- it is indeed a nasty thing to call another console. in a few years i suppose you'll be using 'wii' derogatively

Your nintendo hate blinds you, this thread was made by a Sony fan...


@the OP: No, because the Gamecube had a decent controller.
 
NeoJobe said:
Third parties, retailers, publishers, developers. Pretty much everyone that controls the future of the games I care about...

I don't particularly think any of them care about WHO is #1 in the way you're thinking of it. In the end they simply want a robust industry that allows them all to profit.
 
Vagabundo said:
Your nintendo hate blinds you, this thread was made by a Sony fan...
I always like to think of drohne as the alcoholic uncle I've never had. You know he's there, buy you just don't give a shit.
 
drohne said:
not really, but i'm glad to see that nintendo fans have adopted 'gamecube' as a slur -- it is indeed a nasty thing to call another console. in a few years i suppose you'll be using 'wii' derogatively
Well, no true Nintendo fan would use the Gamecube name in that way, after all, sales don't matter, only the amount of fun you have with your console, fuck reality! :lol

Anyway, surely it would be more accurate to compare PS3 to the Xbox, after all, it is the most powerful console of the generation, has some of the best games (especially exclusively) and is proving to be a massive money sink for Sony. Yes, that comparison is FAR more accurate, after all, the GC never lost Nintendo a penny.
 
Stop It said:
Well his argument was screwed anyway, he just dealt himself the coup de grace.

Anyway, on topic, It is unfair to compare PS3 - Sales age or otherwise - to any console last gen. In the PS2 era there was only one winner in a single playing field, with this gen, we have 2 seperate markets basically, and in the end the PS3 will end up on a par with 360, if not a little ahead.

So no, PS3 is not the GC if this gen, partly because it is selling better, and partly because this gen is not like the last, at all.

Well I've obviously performed some sort of faux pas...

But as for your point, the PS3 is only slightly outpacing the GC at this point in the GC's life.

And that was my question, would it find a way out of this holiday and catch up or beat the 360?

It just seems like an awfully late point to have only sold 6 million in the states.
 
DarienA said:
I don't particularly think any of them care about WHO is #1 in the way you're thinking of it. In the end they simply want a robust industry that allows them all to profit.

No they don't care about it in the way you are reading into it. They care to know which console has the largest installed base.

My point is if the industry is robust but we the PS3 is in last place, what do you think the next gen will be like?
 
It's really more like a combination of the last two generations.

The Wii is like the PS1 - came from nowhere to dominance with the right tech, right timing, right price and right marketing.

The PS3 is like the N64 - assumed winner that failed to reach expectations due to poor hardware decisions and living in the wake of the far more successful competitor.

And the 360 is like a slightly better Xbox - bought its way into the market, doing better financially then the first one but would still not exist without mass capitalisation from a defensive MS.
 
I owned and loved a GameCube for the quality hardcore titles Nintendo released on a consistent basis on the platform even though a lot of 3rd parties ignored the system. I owned and sold the Wii because technologically it felt about on par with the gamecube but with controls I wanted to love but ultimately hated, and because with the exception of two first party titles, all of the good games were going to the 360 and PS3. No longer are 3rd parties ignoring the Wii, but the games they're putting out there are largely coated in shit and polished with a turd. Sure, they got Cabella going full force into the Wii, but that's no loss.

So the Wii may sell like bananas, but I look at the audience buying them, and they aren't the same people playing the games I love. So no, the Wii is not the PS2 of this generation. The PS2 had an amazing library of games by this point, and had great games coming out its ass left and right. The PS3 certainly isn't the PS2, but I'll take the quality titles coming out on PS3, and my BluRay over dated graphics and wonky controls any day of the week.

I think people pretending that Wii is the PS2 of this gen are smoking high quality crack cocaine. It may have sales like PS2, but high quality games it is in serious lacktitude of.

As I've said before, I camped out at target, with my wife, to buy a Wii, not a PS3. I've never done anything that nerdy in my entire life. I really...REALLY wanted to love the Wii. I simply can't reward Nintendo for what they put out there, and the promises they made with regard to controls and graphics that were simply impossible for them to keep.

Now a Wii HD with much, much, MUCH tighter controls, and much much MUCH more graphical power is definitely something I may buy into some day. For now though, I'm sticking PS360. I'll buy back into Nintendo when I can walk into a Target and NOT hear some shitty midi violin playing the Super Mario Brothers theme, and instead see a big budget title aimed at me. Wii Music personifies my dislike for the direction Nintendo has gone in. I hope they have fun with their bags of money, because I'm not having fun with their games anymore.

That said, I'm buying a DS for my son for Christmas. :lol
 
NeoJobe said:
No they don't care about it in the way you are reading into it. They care to know which console has the largest installed base.

My point is if the industry is robust but we the PS3 is in last place, what do you think the next gen will be like?

I don't think anyone who is truly enjoying their gaming this generation should give a shit about next generation.

EDIT: And now you're modifying your "point" to deal with the backlash of this thread because no where in the first post does anything like your last sentence above appear that I see.
 
PS3 isn't a GameCube or an Xbox. PS3 is PS3.

It won't follow any of the trends of past systems. It may be similar in one or a few aspects, but in most aspects, it doesn't fit any one console.

PS3 will make its own trends. Whether good or bad.
 
DarienA said:
I don't think anyone who is truly enjoying their gaming this generation should give a shit about next generation.

EDIT: And now you're modifying your "point" because no where in the first post does anything like your last sentence above appear.

It was sort of implied. I didn't want to go off on end talking about possible futures. But if it matters, then that is why it matters. I don't have to write down every single point in the OP in order for it to be a valid point. I was responding to someone's question about why it mattered that is how we got here. I didn't modify anything, I was asked.
 
NeoJobe said:
Well I've obviously performed some sort of faux pas...

You've posted a chart from those who cannot be named and the Eye will surely burn you for it.

delete that damnable chart!!!
 
NeoJobe said:
It was sort of implied. I didn't want to go off on end talking about possible futures. But if it matters, then that is why it matters. I don't have to write down every single point in the OP in order for it to be a valid point. I was responding to someone's question about why it mattered that is how we got here. I didn't modify anything, I was asked.

Sort of implied... You know I could sit here and say I'm sort of implying you're an idiot... and that wouldn't be true either...

The only thing that changes each generation along with the tech, is what type of gamer/genre gets appealed to more than others initially. By the middle of the generation pretty much every gamer/genre is getting support.
 
BadlyCookedTurkey said:
Nintendo fans say this?
We certainly did 4 years ago.

Er...I mean, THEY certainly did 4 years ago....crap.

*runs*
 
Considering it's going to outsell the Gamecube as soon as the end of this holiday or early next year and outclasses the Gamecube in every single area (third-party support and online, specifically).... hell no.

*awaits tag quoting*
 
That OP said way, way too little considering how many words it used.

Work on your substance man. Use one zinger per salient fact you bring up, more then that and you aren't coming off witty or erudite, you're just coming off as a fanboy clown.
 
Dyno said:
That OP said way, way too little considering how many words it used.

Work on your substance man. Use one zinger per salient fact you bring up, more then that and you aren't coming off witty or erudite, you're just coming off as a fanboy clown.

I'll agree with everything except for fanboy. Who am I fanboy for? I don't get it?

I don't really care if you found no enjoyment at all in my writing, that is fair. I get it. But c'mon, why do you have to throw fanboy out there.
 
NeoJobe said:
I'll agree with everything except for fanboy. Who am I fanboy for? I don't get it?

I don't really care if you found no enjoyment at all in my writing, that is fair. I get it. But c'mon, why do you have to throw fanboy out there.

When you go beyond reporting facts, when you start casting a judgement of success or failure based on your own personal metrics, and when you are actively seeking to be an alarmist with regards to a future that you haven't proven the reader you have the ability to prognosticate, you are waist deep in fanboy shtick.

If you're better than that, then let your writing show it.
 
After the surging increase of PS3 sales, Microsoft did the only real sane thing to stay on top of the game - slash that price down. It's just too damn affordable for the average person to even consider a PS3 when so many multiplat titles are available on something that costs so, so much less. The 360's return to dominance is hardly unexpected, nor does it signify the death knell of the PS3 - it signifies sane a sane customer base who just aren't looking to pay more for the same.

When we see a few more well-advertised exclusives on the PS3, a significant drop in price, and maybe a slim model, the 360 is going to have to pull a lot of magic out of its hat to remain anything more than the butt of RRoD jokes.

Is the PS3 the GCN of this generation? Sure, if you're predicting Sony will provide some minimal hardware revision in 2010 and annihilate every other console on the market in sales, drawing casual gamers from every corner of the planet to buy the console in unprecedented hordes.
 
EagleEyes said:
Left 4 Dead. A pretty damn big one if you ask me.

Oh come on, and XBox got Kotor and whole slew of great third party games as well that never went to PS2. That type of stuff always happens. For the most part both systems are getting full support this gen. Certainly more than ever before.
 
plagiarize said:
software wise it's much more like the Xbox than the GameCube. almost all the multiplatform games come out on it, and it has a number of worthy exclusives if not nearly as many as on other systems.

And its losing money hand over fist due to putting unnecessary hardware in

Is there any real doubt?
 
D.Lo said:
And the 360 is like a slightly better Xbox - bought its way into the market, doing better financially then the first one but would still not exist without mass capitalisation from a defensive MS.
You do realise that Sony has had to do exactly the same thing with the PS3 as MS did with the original Xbox right? They're absorbing massive losses to try and keep themselves in the market.
 
PS3 = Game Console
Gamecube = Game Console




Game Console = Game Console


therefore PS3 = Gamecube



simple math dudes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom