• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

It feels like Apple isn't changing the game anymore.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you write for the Verge, per chance?
No, but I think what I said there about build quality echoes what just about every review has said tbh, so it's not like I made some outlandish claim. I was sceptical of that claim myself until I saw it in person. I don't own any watches, and probably won't anytime soon. I've seen/tried them all though.
 
I work for a healthcare software company, and after seeing some of the things that we're doing and planning on doing with the Apple Watch (and seeing one in person), I'm now a believer. I do think that smart watches are a stop-gap solution in the field of wearables that is evolving so quickly, it might be a product that only has a three-year life span, or something crazy. We're on the brink of another major paradigm shift with computing, and who ends up on top in five years is anyone's guess.

Anyways, Apple has hardly ever been the first. They're typically just the ones that do it best.
 
I buy apple whenever I need a new phone just because it's what I know. But I sure have been unimpressed with the big "changes" they make about each new phone.
 
They aren't. They're coasting; more focused on refining than reinventing. It was bound to happen eventually given recent events.
 
But, isn't that what Apple does best? They take an already existing technology and package it in an attractive, well designed and polished manner that makes it intuitive to use compared to the competition.

Google can invent whatever they want but if they can't establish it then it falls short of what it can be. Apple Pay + iWatch is a good example of what can be done if a company puts a ton of resources into it and establishes a standard.

Reviews highly disagree with this statement except the iPhone and even that sometimes is held back because the first gens are always testing the water.

Google Wallet works just as fine as Apple Pay. I think people though the security feature of it made it somewhat better than Google wallet but it literally works the same, there is no different. You tap, slap, whatever you want with the same devices.

Google puts a ton of resources into the software to stand out. Not to be just a companion device and that's what some of Apple products are doing, beside their whole continuity which isn't a new concept as a whole.

The only thing that Google faces is that since they provide the software but it's up to other makers to make due of it and sometimes they don't it does come off looking bad, as if Google themselves did nothing to help the platform when they have.

If you take a look at the 360 which by far is the only Android Smartwatch that everyone knows besides the Galaxy watch and the LG, it is the best one, with the best functionality and design. It was the first watch to actually look like an actual watch.

I don't need to list the things that the Moto watch already does better than the iWatch as both 1st gen models and the improvements that has been made to it in since then.

Apple will probably do the same thing, with it's 2nd gen. And, to me, that's not game changer. It's just playing the game and doing what they can with it. Apple does what it does best, I just fail to see how that translate into what they do, being the absolute standard when are not the one's creating it and taking it to the next level. I think they have done things to other products which has definitely been trusted upon to sometimes set the new standard, but I don't think they have been the one game changing it. These days, it's just apple being last and making it look and feel better, but not necessarily "better".
 
That's why Apple purchased the Beats brand

This pretty much shows that you don't know anything about the subject.
Apple bought Beats because of the people behind it and the influence and connections they have with the music industry to make sure another kind of project (music streaming service) shatters competition.
Beats acquisition is "collateral damage" it was the condition to make so that Jimmy Iovine (and Dre i guess) could work for Apple, they could put the brand in the recycle bin this very second and not care for it for the rest of the eternity if they wanted.
 
What other company is constantly expected to revolutionize the industry like apple? iPod with music, iPhones with phones, iPads with tablets. I think they'll do the same with Apple Watches with watches, once in a couple months apple watches will be available in stores you'll see them flood the streets and the every smart watch maker and traditional watch maker will have to make drastic changes
 
This pretty much shows that you don't know anything about the subject.
Apple bought Beats because of the people behind it and the influence and connections they have with the music industry to make sure another kind of project (music streaming service) shatters competition.
Beats acquisition is "collateral damage" it was the condition to make so that Jimmy Iovine (and Dre i guess) could work for Apple, they could put the brand in the recycle bin this very second and not care for it for the rest of the eternity if they wanted.

Yes, because having all those inside connections is very helpful when it comes to streaming music service, as we've all seen...
 
At the risk of sounding like that U.S. patent office guy from the 1800s who said everything that can be invented has already been invented, is there really anything any of today's tech companies can do with consumer electronics that can be considered a game changer at this point?

Sure Apple/Samsung/others have plenty of room to make minor upgrades to speed/memory/storage/resolution, but what can be done to phones/tablets/whatever else that can make people say HOLY SHIT I NEED THAT like when smartphones first started getting huge?

Google Glass was probably the best recent attempt, but it was a flop. What else can be done?
 
At the risk of sounding like that U.S. patent office guy from the 1800s who said everything that can be invented has already been invented, is there really anything any of today's tech companies can do with consumer electronics that can be considered a game changer at this point?

Sure Apple/Samsung/others have plenty of room to make minor upgrades to speed/memory/storage/resolution, but what can be done to phones/tablets/whatever else that can make people say HOLY SHIT I NEED THAT like when smartphones first started getting huge?

Google Glass was probably the best recent attempt, but it was a flop. What else can be done?

You're right. Nothing more can be done. We've finally reached the pinnacle of consumer electronics. It took a while but we're here.... we did it boys!!!!!

Back to reality, people have been saying this about Apple for years now. Nothing new. They still make billions and billions so that's okay. Not every company must innovate and create entirely new sectors.
 
Apple pay. Also, after seeing the watch in person, I'd say it's a game changer too. It left by far better impression on me than any of the Android watches.
Apple watch is a fisher price toy compared to some the android watch stuff.

And apple pay isn't anything innovative and new.
 
It doesnt really matter if Apple isnt a game changer anymore. They have so much cash that they could do nothing and still be a market leader.
 
I still use the Mac Pro I got in February 2008. I am pretty sure I can get a full 10 years out of it. That's crazy. It has lasted longer than all of my other machines combined.

+1 vote here. Still using my 2008 Pro and the only problems i have ever had with it ironically were 3rd party ram — the default Apple RAM thats always considered overpriced is still going on strong.

Does that make you more likely to purchase another Apple computer?

Absolutely. When its eventually time to replace it, hardware that ran great for 7+ years is definitely a motivator to reinvest in the same manufacturer.
 
tough to grasp that some believe apple products have no value other than as "status symbols." talk about sticking your head in the sand. these products work well and last.
 
Yes, because having all those inside connections is very helpful when it comes to streaming music service, as we've all seen...

We have yet to see the results likely we'll get the whole picture at WWDC, actually we had a glimpse of that with the few days old news where Apple is pushing record labels to force guys like Spotify to stop their free tier.

How do you think that is happening? Magic? If they manage to do stuff like this is because of Iovine.
 
This pretty much shows that you don't know anything about the subject.
Apple bought Beats because of the people behind it and the influence and connections they have with the music industry to make sure another kind of project (music streaming service) shatters competition.
Beats acquisition is "collateral damage" it was the condition to make so that Jimmy Iovine (and Dre i guess) could work for Apple, they could put the brand in the recycle bin this very second and not care for it for the rest of the eternity if they wanted.

You're absolutely right. The popularity of Beats as a brand had nothing to do with it at all. The acquisition was simply to get all them "inside connections" lol.

And everyone buys Apple products for the innovation they bring to the table.....

If you can't see that the average person buys into a brand because of how it's perceived in society then I don't know what to say.

People that post on internet forums are a minority and don't reflect the majority (or the average consumer), look at gaming for example? Why do you think games like call of duty and Fifa sell by the bucket load every year?
 
Are any of the 'big names' in tech changing the game anymore? It's been a very conservative hardware and software climate for the last 3 or 4 years for the old guard of tech companies. The only ones I can really think of are Microsoft with Hololens and Google with Glass, but neither of these seem like consumer-ready, need-to-own products, more or less tech demos and parlor tricks.
 
Some of these posts... Is it so hard for some of you to believe that some people (who are also very informed in tech) just prefer using certain apple products over their competitiors? But no, it has to just be the marketing right? Sigh. I use android for my phone (galaxy s6) and an ipad as my tablet, I think the iPad is leagues better than any android tablet (especially in battery life and standby time from my experience) and has far better tablet apps, I also prefer tablet ios to tablet android, and the iPhone is a great and solid piece of hardware that is competitive with the best android phones. The macbooks are easily some of the best laptops you can buy with great battery life and fantastic build quality. I thin kthe apple watch misses the mark personally and doesn't really show great vision or focus for a product like the other new product categories did, it feels more like it was made because it was expected for so long.
 
I work for a healthcare software company, and after seeing some of the things that we're doing and planning on doing with the Apple Watch (and seeing one in person), I'm now a believer. I do think that smart watches are a stop-gap solution in the field of wearables that is evolving so quickly, it might be a product that only has a three-year life span, or something crazy. We're on the brink of another major paradigm shift with computing, and who ends up on top in five years is anyone's guess.

Anyways, Apple has hardly ever been the first. They're typically just the ones that do it best.

What are you doing on the Apple Watch that you couldn't do on an Android watch?
 
Some of these posts... Is it so hard for some of you to believe that some people (who are also very informed in tech) just prefer using certain apple products over their competitiors? But no, it has to just be the marketing right? Sigh..

No it's not hard to believe, infact I know there are many people that buy products because the particular product meets their demands and needs.The marketing and popularity are irrelevant to them.

The majority of society are easily manipulated and buy into adverts, marketing, and like to fit in, aspire to have nice things to fit in etc

No one can generalize, of course not every single person on the planet is motivated by the same things. But when it comes to making money businesses don't want to target the minority, they want the majority, you can apply that to everything.

Even music artists, they can either be commercial and be classed as a "sell out", or stay underground and make nowhere near as much money.
 
Hard to explain until you see it in person. It looks and feels like a proper jewelry piece, like a good, expensive 'real' watch. Not like a geeky electronic toy like every single Android (or Pebble) watch does at the moment.

Ever use a moto 360 or the new LG Urbane? That's pretty much Bs and I've tried on most of the current smart watches.

Also the pebble does look like a toy, that we agree on.
 
Welp, whatever dude if you want to be blind continue to do so.

We'll agree to disagree, I'm not into arguing with people online.

The reality is you're quite right I don't know the exact reasons why Apple purchased Beats, and I doubt many of us posting on this thread have the inside knowledge and the reasons behind it.

But from my perspective the popularity of the brand in my mind was definitely a factor.
 
Did Apple announce a new iPhone or something? A thread like this has occurred shortly after every Apple product announcement. All the way back to the original iPod.
 
Some of these posts... Is it so hard for some of you to believe that some people (who are also very informed in tech) just prefer using certain apple products over their competitiors? But no, it has to just be the marketing right? Sigh. I use android for my phone (galaxy s6) and an ipad as my tablet, I think the iPad is leagues better than any android tablet (especially in battery life and standby time from my experience) and has far better tablet apps, I also prefer tablet ios to tablet android, and the iPhone is a great and solid piece of hardware that is competitive with the best android phones. The macbooks are easily some of the best laptops you can buy with great battery life and fantastic build quality. I thin kthe apple watch misses the mark personally and doesn't really show great vision or focus for a product like the other new product categories did, it feels more like it was made because it was expected for so long.

I personally don't own any apple products outside of an old iPod touch, but I do see the appeal. There is a definite perk with owning the hardware and OS so you never have to deal with fragmentation that you'll never get anywhere else. I tinker too much though, so their walled garden isn't for me.
 
What product range is left to innovate?

I mean.. so far, technically.. the innovations Apple did were to product lines that already existed... iPod = portable radio/walkman... iPhone = cell phone... iPad = Laptop

The TV doesn't exactly scream needing tons of innovation.. .and what innovation that's left is the same thing holding back a lot of things PC/Internet.. bandwidth.

We all carry a device that provides us: maps, internet, weather, e-mail, phone, texts, calender, etc. We don't need another object to carry with us.

Objects we carry with us every day are things that will be huge hits... we don't need another item we carry with us.

as far innovation we need clean power and clean cars ie better batteries and ways to charge them for cheap. That's the next game changer... nothing in portable electronics is left to be completely reinvented.
 
They haven't been changing the game for awhile now. Too safe. They'll probabaly ride the coattails of their previous marketing, their marketshare, and their design team until they can do something interesting again. They certainly have the engineering and creative talent to shock the world again. Time will tell if their talent is held back by management and stockholder expectation.

The phone landscape has changed as well. Even cheap phones can do everything 95% of users need their phone to do. Smartphones in general don't have as much of the "new hotness" aspect anymore, because they're over 10 years old at this point, and as already mentioned, flagship phones don't have much advantage over mid range phones for most people. "I got the new Iphone/Galaxy!" doesn't impress people for more than 20 seconds.

The entire flagship business model is entirely held up by the cell company model of 2 year contracts. Shit like OnePlus One and the increase of no-contract, cheaper plans threatens that model going into the future. When we reach the point when even 100 dollar models can boast charge time of several days, decent cameras, and 1080p, Apple better have something else up it's sleeve.

My same thoughts, it feels like they are waiting for markets to get established before jumping in, like smartwatches, for example. Only innovation they seem to be making is the way the rest of the market is responding, making everything thinner and faster, with very minor upgrades between product releases.
 
I understand a certain amount of shit Apple gets concerning pricing. It's about design and dependability at the end of the day for me. If I want to buy a Mac, I could build the same computer for far cheaper. Will it run as solidly and for as long? Probably not. In my experience, with the Apple products I have and have had in the past, they just work better, and for longer without issue. I've had Android tablets that crapped out or started functioning poorly, and the iPad 2 I've had for years still runs solidly. The iPad Air has never given me issues and it's my most used electronic product...besides the iPhone 6, which just beats the pants off of any android phone I've used or owned in the past.

I get the status argument to a degree, but I guess I've never felt that way about owning this stuff. I just want solidly built products and I'll pay a little extra for that when I can.
 
They haven't been changing the game for awhile now. Too safe. They'll probabaly ride the coattails of their previous marketing, their marketshare, and their design team until they can do something interesting again. They certainly have the engineering and creative talent to shock the world again. Time will tell if their talent is held back by management and stockholder expectation.

The phone landscape has changed as well. Even cheap phones can do everything 95% of users need their phone to do. Smartphones in general don't have as much of the "new hotness" aspect anymore, because they're over 10 years old at this point, and as already mentioned, flagship phones don't have much advantage over mid range phones for most people. "I got the new Iphone/Galaxy!" doesn't impress people for more than 20 seconds.

The entire flagship business model is entirely held up by the cell company model of 2 year contracts. Shit like OnePlus One and the increase of no-contract, cheaper plans threatens that model going into the future. When we reach the point when even 100 dollar models can boast charge time of several days, decent cameras, and 1080p, Apple better have something else up it's sleeve.

There will always be a huge flagship market though. What you're describing is what happened in the PC market where a $300 laptop can aervace most people's needs, but apple still sits on it's thrown with it's $1200 netbooks that are weaker than the afformentioned $300 laptops. Like it or not, apple is a name brand electronics maker. Like Gucci is for fashion apple is for tech, and until someone challenges that they'll be sitting pretty.
 
No, but I think what I said there echoes what just about every review has said tbh, so it's not like I made some outlandish claim. I was sceptical of that claim myself until I saw it in person. I don't own any watches, and probably won't anytime soon. I've seen/tried them all though.

Behold "geeky electronic toy" versus "a proper jewelry piece, like a good, expensive 'real' watch"

cwhzW8w.jpg


Anecdote - my colleague at work has the watch on the right and everyday someone says to him "is that the new Apple watch?".

I think they are both ugly as sin, for what it's worth.
 
Apple has come out with about 3-4 pivotal/game changing products in their entire history.

Why is it expected that they come out with something that changes the game every year?
 
I'd still rather use an iPhone and Mac over anything on the market right now but their watch is a pretty disappointing product. I remember when everyone said Apple would be the only company to do smartwatches right but what they created was a pretty crap offering. It's ugly as hell with Samsung-esque features like the giant emoticons. Also, taking voice calls and looking at your photos through your watch? These are your use cases? smh.

Also pretty disappointed with the design and ergonomics of the 6/6+. Apple somehow managed to turn premium materials into something that looks so, so cheap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom