• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Kony 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyZ83G_geE8&feature=youtu.be


Please support my video! This is a video I made that should put this movement to rest!

I respect what that guy said. But there are other Ugandans who want aid from the west. There is no singular Ugandan voice.

I don't support IC because of their military interventionist ideology, but I'm really worried that people are using the flaws of this organization to wash their hands of the problem altogether.
 
Even though IC and their whole campaign was terrible and showed how ignorant and easily manipulated people can be, seeing the internet come together for this was fascinating to watch. I wonder how big of an impact a slick edited video for something relevant like the fighting over in the Middle East or the shit over here in the U.S. would be...
 
lol I just found out my coworker got caught up in the Kony 2012 hype. he donated $100 and bought the $30 action kit.
He actually said it makes him feel better about himself. Keep in mind he's a 35+ Hispanic male.
/smh

Hey, at least he was fucking honest. You think people spamming facebook and pretending like they're somehow 'involved' in this 'movement' actually give a fuck? For most, it comes down to narcism, attention-whoring yourself, and taking a shortcut to 'feeling good' by doing superficial bullshit that they'll forget about in a week when it stops trending on twitter and they get bored of their edgy Kony 2012 status pics, which they'll revert back to sexy self-taken shots in front of a mirror. It's amazing how someone can become such a passionately loud social media activist for something they did not know existed 6 seconds ago. There is no 'coming together'. Its self-validation.

You know what I do when I hear about something I do not know anything about, especially if it's a complex humanitarian/geopolitical issue? I'll spend the next week doing my own research about it, reading about the different sides, and enlightening myself by finding out as many facts as I can, so I can take a correct and objective view of the matter as a result of an accurate and deep understanding about the issue - all before spamming anyone on social media networks. Don't these kinds of issues deserve that basic level of understanding? Amazing concept, isn't it? But quite quaint and outdated these days.
 
Even though IC and their whole campaign was terrible and showed how ignorant and easily manipulated people can be, seeing the internet come together for this was fascinating to watch. I wonder how big of an impact a slick edited video for something relevant like the fighting over in the Middle East or the shit over here in the U.S. would be...

Would be kind of funny to do a campaign like this for a fake country.
 
Even though IC and their whole campaign was terrible and showed how ignorant and easily manipulated people can be, seeing the internet come together for this was fascinating to watch. I wonder how big of an impact a slick edited video for something relevant like the fighting over in the Middle East or the shit over here in the U.S. would be...

I think raising awareness about Joseph Kony and the LRA is a worthy cause. I don't care for IC's methods or their military advocacy, but millions of Americans are now aware of the injustices that took place in Uganda. That is, at the very least, a positive first step in addressing these kinds of global issues.
 
I'm saying the bandwagon created by the video is worrying, not the video itself. The other day my facebook was filled with people spreading this video and there was tons of people posting comments about it, all suddenly becoming the most passionate activists on Earth after just one video. Not we get these youtube videos saying its bullshit and suddenly the same people are posting them and being dead against it.

All it takes is one video and the people follow like sheep. So while I'm not commenting on this video in particular, the fact that people jump on the bandwagon so easily is worrying because it shows that if the video or creator of the video has a motive, with enough flash production he/she can possibly get away with it.

But that has always been the case even before the internet. Most people are easily buffaloed that was the case in the past and it will be in the future. It's just a part of humanity.
 
I think raising awareness about Joseph Kony and the LRA is a worthy cause. I don't care for IC's methods or their military advocacy, but millions of Americans are now aware of the injustices that took place in Uganda. That is, at the very least, a positive first step in addressing these kinds of global issues.

They are aware of Joseph Kony's atrocities, not those of the government, which is brutal (maybe not LRA level brutality, but criminally violent nonetheless) and has been lead by a crazy narcissist for far too long.

I just read an article that the head nodding disease in Uganda (I remember seeing a report on this from Al Jazeera...here it is:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zpf_KneUNAY) is more dangerous to Ugandan kids than the LRA currently is.
 
Hey, at least he was fucking honest. You think people spamming facebook and pretending like they're somehow 'involved' in this 'movement' actually give a fuck? For most, it comes down to narcism, attention-whoring yourself, and taking a shortcut to 'feeling good' by doing superficial bullshit that they'll forget about in a week when it stops trending on twitter and they get bored of their edgy Kony 2012 status pics, which they'll revert back to sexy self-taken shots in front of a mirror. It's amazing how someone can become such a passionately loud social media activist for something they did not know existed 6 seconds ago. There is no 'coming together'. Its self-validation.

You know what I do when I hear about something I do not know anything about, especially if it's a complex humanitarian/geopolitical issue? I'll spend the next week doing my own research about it, reading about the different sides, and enlightening myself by finding out as many facts as I can, so I can take a correct and objective view of the matter as a result of an accurate and deep understanding about the issue - all before spamming anyone on social media networks. Don't these kinds of issues deserve that basic level of understanding? Amazing concept, isn't it? But quite quaint and outdated these days.
lol that's pretty much what I've been feeling but you put it much better than I did. Well done.


But that has always been the case even before the internet. Most people are easily buffaloed that was the case in the past and it will be in the future. It's just a part of humanity.
Trouble is now with the internet and all these social sites it's so much easier for them to band together than before. As pointed out though most people will just probably forget about it all in a week anyway. It's good to support causes like this, but when people watch one video and hear one persons take on the issue and then jump all over it.....and then hear a rebuttal and flip sides completely again.....it's sad and worrying to see. Especially if it's a complex issue. Even just 5 minutes of a google search would be better than nothing. Once again the banning water petition shows it perfectly. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi3erdgVVTw
 
More I read about this movement the more shady it seems. Seems more like attention whoring than any interest in help people considering this guys real atrocities were committed around a decade ago and we don't actually know he is still alive.... there are numerous rumors that he may have been dead for a couple years. Either way he is not a big part of the problem anymore so why are we wasting time talking about him when we could be helping people. I guess real problems just aren't sexy enough for organizations with as little credibility as this one.

Plus I am not going to give my money to an organization who only manages to get 30% of the money they bring in back to the people.
 
More I read about this movement the more shady it seems. Seems more like attention whoring than any interest in help people considering this guys real atrocities were committed around a decade ago and we don't actually know he is still alive.... there are numerous rumors that he may have been dead for a couple years. Either way he is not a big part of the problem anymore so why are we wasting time talking about him when we could be helping people. I guess real problems just aren't sexy enough for organizations with as little credibility as this one.

Plus I am not going to give my money to an organization who only manages to get 30% of the money they bring in back to the people.


That is the biggest issue most people have, its like they are exploiting the situation of saying suddenly he is the issue. Nodding disease is a bigger threat to the region
 
The media backlash has begun

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/10/opinion/kony-2012-video/index.html

"You are making our work here very difficult".
It is a side remark, uttered politely and quietly. Near the start of the "Kony 2012" video, a man says this. If you have seen the video -- and chances are you have -- you might have missed this small interaction just four minutes into the film. The man who is worried about having his work made more difficult tries to interrupt the filmmaker who is interviewing a child in the northern Ugandan city of Gulu. I don't know who that man was or what he was trying to do. The footage is so old it will be hard to establish. But his words turned out to be prophetic: "You are making our work here very difficult."


Jason Russell, the most prominent face of the group Invisible Children, has made the work of bringing about change very difficult indeed. Invisible Children's campaign is a well-packaged call to leave the state of affairs untouched; their message seems so modern because their tools are. The point made is conformist: Fight violence with violence, dismiss intricate steps of social change and make a narrow ideology mass-compatible by having millions of unquestioning people raise their fists in support. For the U.S., Europe and other generally comfortable corners of the world, this is a worrying picture of a mass culture that easily falls for propaganda.
For the world's less cozy places, to which the areas in which the Lord's Resistance Army has been active belongs, mass support for maintaining the status quo is a tragedy.
So what is the status quo? Well, it is indeed complicated. But suffice to say that for decades, this has been an intricate mix of violence that causes more violence, a violent government that garners international support by vilifying one side of the conflict, and international attention often reduced to uninformed celebrities expressing shock and horror. Crucially, it has been part of Ugandan government propaganda to make this war seem like the tour of personal madness of one man: Joseph Kony. This is the status quo that needs to be challenged.

What is the Invisible Children campaign doing? Advocating fighting violence with more violence? Garnering international support for a violent government? Having uninformed celebrities express shock and horror? Focusing this conflict on one person only? Having millions of people punch the air in cries for war and U.S. troops? And to what end?
The campaign advocates a narrow worldview. It is also a costly one. From 2006 to 2008, the situation regarding the conflict between the LRA and the government of Uganda looked promising. Violence subsided. The LRA left Uganda because they had signed up for peace talks -- slow, unpredictable and often irritating peace talks that did not come with a success guarantee. But the peace talks made the situation almost instantly better. Two years of talking cost less than $15 million.
There was no video with a mass appeal to the world to support the peace process. There was no call to the U.S. government to stop working with the Ugandan army, one of the perpetrators of violence in this war. The Invisible Children -- who visited the peace talks at various points -- decided not to take this slow and long-winded attempt at peace seriously. Invisible Children believe in war. They manage to make millions of people believe war is the best way to bring peace.
Peace talks turned into war in late 2008: Kony was reluctant to sign the agreement as it stood at the time. Invisible Children supported U.S. involvement; the U.S. supported the Ugandan army in upping the military pressure. Social change through peaceful means was given a deadline when the Ugandan army used U.S. planning help to bomb the LRA camp. War, the status quo, was back on. In the first few days of the ill-conceived military operation, a fighter plane worth millions of dollars was lost and thousands of people displaced or killed. War is a lot more expensive than peace.

War as advocated through this campaign has few subtleties. Video propaganda coupled with action kits and precise orders for what to do next leaves little room for thinking. A focus on one man who simply does not hold the reigns in this conflict in the way that Invisible Children portray is myopic.
Social change needs subtleties. It needs room for negotiation, compromises, and shifting the debate. It also needs really boring things: tedious days of discussion and engagement, mind-numbingly unsexy drafting of agreements, and an open mind at all stages. And it needs very invisible people committed to working away on these things through small, but important contributions. These are not people who buy action kits and re-tweet. These are people who have just been told by the Invisible Children campaign that hanging a poster and wearing a bracelet is a better way to bring about social change, that the difficult political context in which they operate everyday, often at great personal risk and expense, can easily be solved if one man is removed.
"You are making our work here very difficult", says the man in the beginning of "Kony 2012." How right he was.



http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/2012/03/08/why-you-should-feel-awkward-about-the-kony2012-video/

Most Americans began this week not knowing who Joseph Kony was. That’s not surprising: most Americans begin every week not knowing a lot of things, especially about a part of the world as obscured from their vision as Uganda, the country where Kony and his Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) commenced a brutal insurgency in the 1980s that lingers to this day.

A viral video that took social media by storm over the past two days has seemingly changed all that. Produced by Invisible Children, a San Diego-based NGO, “Kony2012″ is a half-hour plea for Americans and global netizens to pay attention to Kony’s crimes — which include abducting over 60,000 children over two decades of conflict, brutalizing them and transforming many into child soldiers — and to pressure the Obama Administration to find and capture him. Within hours of the slick production surfacing on social media, it led to #StopKony trending on Twitter, populated Facebook timelines, was publicized by Hollywood celebrities and has been viewed some 10 million times on YouTube. Suddenly, a man on virtually no Westerner’s radar became the international bogeyman of the moment.

(VIDEO: The Lord’s Resistance Army Hunts Children in Sudan)

It’s an incredible public relations coup for the NGO, which congratulates itself in the film for spurring U.S. Congress last October to send 100 military “advisers” to aid Ugandan forces in their war against Kony’s Lord’s Resistance Army. The LRA is without a doubt a nasty outfit, responsible for massacres of civilian populations, mass rapes, contemptible acts of mutilation and, most notoriously, the creation of an army of child soldiers, forced to perform gruesome deeds. In 2005, the International Criminal Court in the Hague put Kony at the top of its most wanted list, indicted on 33 counts including war crimes and crimes against humanity. Sure, the U.S. remains in the minority of nations yet to officially recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction, but that, Invisible Children’s members would likely argue, ought not change the need for a moral clarion call: Kony must be brought to justice.

No sane person would disagree with this. Yet for the video’s demonstrable zeal and passion, there are some obvious problems. Others more expert in this arena have already done a bit of fact-checking: the LRA is no longer thought to be actually operating in northern Uganda, which “Kony2012″ seems to portray still as a war-ravaged flashpoint — instead, its presence has been felt mostly in disparate attacks in the Democratic Republic of Congo, a nation with its own terrible history of rogue militias committing monstrous atrocities. Moreover, analysts agree that after concerted campaigns against the LRA, its numbers at this point have diminished, perhaps amounting to 250 to 300 fighters at most. Kony, shadowy and illusive, is a faded warlord on the run, with no allies or foreign friends (save perhaps, in one embarrassing moment of blustering sophistry, for American radio shock jock Rush Limbaugh.) The U.S. military’s African command (AFRICOM) has deployed its assets against Kony since at least 2008 — a fact that goes conveniently unmentioned in Invisible Children’s video.

In a terrific explainer, Foreign Policy cites a scathing critique of the video by leading Ugandan journalist Angelo Izama:

To call [Kony2012's] campaign a misrepresentation is an understatement. While it draws attention to the fact that Kony, indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court in 2005, is still on the loose, it’s portrayal of his alleged crimes in Northern Uganda are from a bygone era. At the height of the war between especially 1999 and 2004, large hordes of children took refuge on the streets of Gulu town to escape the horrors of abduction and brutal conscription to the ranks of the LRA. Today most of these children are semi-adults. Many are still on the streets unemployed. Gulu has the highest numbers of child prostitutes in Uganda. It also has one of the highest rates of HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis.
If six years ago children in Uganda would have feared the hell of being part of the LRA, a well documented reality already, today the real invisible children are those suffering from “Nodding Disease”. Over 4000 children are victims of this incurable debilitating condition. It’s a neurological disease that has baffled world scientists and attacks mainly children from the most war affected districts of Kitgum, Pader and Gulu.
(You can read chilling depictions of ‘nodding disease’ here.)

This is a crisis of public health and governance that can’t be laid at the feet of one vile militia leader, skulking in the jungle. Not once in the half-hour film do we hear the name of Uganda’s President Yoweri Museveni, whose quasi-authoritarian rule has lasted over 25 years. Arab Spring-inspired protests last year were ruthlessly suppressed and the country’s opposition complains bitterly about the entrenched corruption of the Museveni state. The U.S. State Department voiced its concern over Uganda’s rights record last November. Speaking to the Washington Post, Jedediah Jenkins, a member of Invisible Children, shrugs off charges that the NGO is too much in bed with the status quo in Kampala:

There is a huge problem with political corruption in Africa. If we had the purity to say we will not partner with anyone corrupt, we couldn’t partner with anyone.
Sure. It’d be churlish to rebuke Invisible Children for wanting to help those afflicted overseas, while moving tens of thousands of previously apathetic Americans (at least to hit the re-tweet button) at home. But there’s a thin, perilous line between the organization’s brand of righteousness and simple self-aggrandizement. The film makes little mention of ongoing activism by people in northern Uganda. I’m not the only one to feel a bit queasy about the film’s perhaps unintended, yet inescapable white man’s burden complex, with filmmaker-cum-protagonist Jason Russell framing the horrors wrought by Kony and the need to stop him through an overly precious discussion with his blonde, cherub-cheeked toddler son.

(PHOTOS: The Front Lines of Hunger in Uganda)

In this telling, to simply “know” about Kony — a figure, as others have already written, of Kurtz-like darkness — would be enough to bring him down. That quest takes place in a world of moral simplicity, of good and evil, of innocence and horror. It is a world where governments would supposedly anchor policy on the emotional tides of their citizens. It is a world, as Elliot Ross at the excellent Africa is a Country blog writes, that does not exist:

To ask people to climb down from the soaring heights of “Kony 2012” (remember how we fall down into Uganda from the heavenly realms of Jason Russell’s Facebook page?) a place where they get to feel both sanctified and superior, and truly descend into the mire of history and confusion is simply too big an ask. It would be boring and difficult and it would not be about Facebook or Angelina Jolie or coloured wristbands or me. When the euphoria evaporates and the Twittersphere has dried its tears (probably by the end of this week), all that remains will be yet another powerful myth of African degradation.
Kony should be found and made to answer for his crimes. But justice is about much more than manhunts and viral video crusades.



Read more: http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/20...kward-about-the-kony2012-video/#ixzz1ojB0cs6F
 
Couldn't you just post the text instead of trying to publicise yourself? I'm not sure why you think people would rather listen to you then read it themselves.

I'm not trying to publicize myself. I post the link to the article in the description too.

Also, that article was posted earlier in the thread btw.


I never said who I was in the video. I'm bringing attention to it. I'm trying to publicize the article if anything.


I figured some people would find the article boring or would be too ignorant to pay attention to it so I made a video.
 
Saw a bit of the Kony 2012 story on CNN last night. Yeah, does it really take over 30% of your revenue to make a "BIG HOLLYWOOD" film? Jesus Christ. Paul Greengrass could've done it for peanuts.

And the other 30% goes towards SUPER AWESOME APPARAL AND ACCESSORIES!

Gimme a break.
 
with no allies or foreign friends (save perhaps, in one embarrassing moment of blustering sophistry, for American radio shock jock Rush Limbaugh.)
55_oh_you.jpg
 
I cant pay to a charity whose owner earns 90,000 a year from my donations when I earn less than him. I work hard on my own to make a living and get paid 65,000 a year. I can't believe he earns 90,000 from donations. That is the definition of elitist.
 
How Invisible Children's Kony 2012 Will Hurt - And How You Can Help - Central Africa

Earlier this week, I wrote an essay outlining what I viewed as some of the problems with the "Kony 2012" campaign spearheaded by the American NGO Invisible Children.

The campaign and accompanying film advocate -- via technological assistance, training and the presence of United States military personnel throughout Central Africa -- for military support of the government of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, ostensibly to facilitate the arrest of Joseph Kony, the leader of the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) rebel group and an accused war criminal indicted by the International Criminal Court.

To anyone who has spent time in Central Africa in general and Uganda in particular, this appears to be a road fraught with peril. In response to several requests that I elaborate further on the problems of this approach and a possibly more constructive approach, I offer the following.

There are several instances of blatant dishonesty in the film that immediately catch one's eye and trouble one's conscience.

The first is the inference that in the Uganda of today thousands of children are continuing their grim sojourns as night commuters to escape the violence of the LRA. With the LRA's presence in Northern Uganda having essentially evaporated by the end of 2006, the use of images of the bodies of thousands of sleeping children -- who may or may not have consented to be filmed -- attempts to convince the viewer that the crisis of overt violence in Northern Uganda is ongoing, and thus necessitating direct military action. As the organization spent $1,859,617 on travel and filmmaking last year (out of total expenses of $8,894,630) one would think Invisible Children could have shown a more current (and accurate) picture of Northern Uganda and the organizations there working to improve it.

Also troubling is the film's depiction of Lieutenant Okot Santo Lapolo. A Museveni loyalist who serves as a Resident District Commissioner (RDC) in the Acholi region, Santo Lapolo is perhaps better known for harassing and threatening government critics in the press in the region than opining on human rights. When Invisible Children interview him, however, Santo Lapolo is described simply as a "politician," with no mention of his role as an éminence gris for the regime.

This is alas part and parcel of the film's and the organization's whitewashing of the highly tortured history and legacy of the Museveni government in Central Africa, a government that has done some good things for the country but which also, through reckless military adventurism and a hunger to retain power, has routinely trampled on the values of human rights that Invisible Children claims to champion.

The Museveni government has been undergoing a serious crisis of legitimacy since at least 2001, when the Supreme Court of Uganda, while upholding the vote in presidential elections that year, also found that "the principle of free and fair election was compromised." The situation deteriorated further in 2006 when elections were marked by what observers called "serious irregularities and significant shortcomings." In 2011 elections, the National Resistance Movement -- Museveni's political party -- handed out money and gifts, intimidated political opponents and in general behaved in a way that seriously called into question the validity of the final results.

Over the last year, large scale protests against alleged political corruption and economic mismanagement have occurred in Uganda's capital, Kampala, many aligned with the Forum for Democratic Change led by Kizza Besigye, a doctor and former soldier as well as a former Museveni ally-turned-critic. Government security forces have treated the protests brutally, with at least 10 people dying and several hundred disappearing into jail during the demonstrations last year.

Beyond Congo's borders, in addition to its military actions in Somalia (where Uganda's army is essentially fighting a proxy war for Western powers against Islamist militias in that country,) Uganda's army also still has yet to answer for its actions following its late 1990s invasion of the Democratic Republic of Congo (then Zaire) alongside Rwanda and a hastily-cobbled together Congolese rebel movement.

In the wars that followed, the Museveni government was the key military backer of the Mouvement de libération du Congo (MLC), a Congolese rebel movement led by Jean-Pierre Bemba, who is currently on trial at the International Criminal Court at the Hague -- the same body that indicted Kony -- for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

In addition to the MLC, the Museveni government also actively supported a faction of the Rassemblement Congolais pour la Démocratie (RCD) and the Union des Patriotes Congolais (UPC), both of whom were implicated in the grossest human rights abuses. One former UPC chieftain, Thomas Lubanga, is currently on trial at the Hague, charged with using child soldiers, while another former leader of the group, Bosco Ntaganda, nicknamed The Terminator and also an indicted war criminal, is now a power broker in the eastern Congolese province of North Kivu and a lynchpin of the regional détente between Congolese President Joseph Kabila (himself re-elected in a controversial ballot last year) and Museveni's erstwhile ally-turned-rival, Rwanda President Paul Kagame.

Then there is the history of high-level attempts to crush the LRA itself.

In December 2008, seventeen U.S. military advisers provided logistics, communications, and intelligence support for the Ugandan and Congolese army's Operation Lightning Thunder, an attempt to nab Kony which failed. In the weeks that followed, the LRA descended on several Congolese villages, killing hundreds of people and kidnapping over 100 children from communities left defenseless against the LRA's desire for vengeance.

What is the system of protection that Invisible Children advocates for communities such as these put in the line of fire by the military operations the group advocates? Invisible Children is silent on this score.

This, then, is the context that Invisible Children advocates further militarizing.

Complicating matters still further, the push for an increased military presence in Central Africa comes after the discovery of one billion barrels of potential oil reserves in the country, with an estimated 1 to 1.5 billion barrels yet to be located.

Last month, London-based Tullow Oil signed two $2.9 billion production sharing agreements with the Museveni government, despite the fact that Uganda's parliament had concluded that there should be a complete moratorium on oil-related activity until new laws were put in place (Uganda's Petroleum Exploration and Production Act dates from 1985). Security for the installations is being provided by a military unit closely linked to the president.

Reactions to the Invisible Children campaign from Uganda itself have been telling.

Writing in the newspaper The Independent, Ugandan writer Musa Okwonga suggested that Invisible Children should have let their viewers know that "when a bad guy like Kony is running riot for years on end, raping and slashing and seizing and shooting, then there is most likely another host of bad guys out there letting him get on with it. "

On the Project Diaspora site, one writer accused Invisible Children of being "a self-aware machine that must continually find a reason to be relevant....selling themselves as the issue, as the subject, as the panacea for everything that ails me as the agency-devoid African. "

How Invisible Children can push for the measures it has and remain eligible for tax-exempt status as an organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code -- which states that such an organization may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates -- would seem to remain something a mystery.

A refrain that is often repeated by Invisible Children's supporters is that the organization's goal is not to "get bogged down by history" but rather to "raise awareness" thus leading to "action." But what kind of action can come in Central Africa if one ignores the region's history?

So then, the line of reasoning goes, what is to be done? If not by supporting Invisible Children's campaign -- intentional or not -- to reinforce the Museveni government's hold on power, then how can those who have been inspired and moved by the plight of those suffering in Central Africa ameliorate the situation of those in greatest need?

Despite living under a rapidly ossifying authoritarianism, Uganda still has a vibrant civil society made up of and working for the empowerment of Ugandans, with a number of organizations that are worthy of any support we can give them.

In Northern Uganda itself, the group Human Rights Focus has labored for years and produced detailed reports on the the conflict there far more nuanced and accurate than anything Invisible Children has ever put out.

Elsewhere, as government officials and foreign investors lick their lips at the promise of an oil boom, groups such as the Africa Institute for Energy Governance and the Water Governance Institute are doing important work to hold both Uganda's politicians and their foreign partners accountable to the Ugandan people.

Further afield, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, groups such as the Goma-based Pole Institute and the late, heroic Floribert Chebeya's Voix des Sans-Voix work to defend the rights of the Congolese under the most difficult of conditions.

These are organizations led by people who risk their lives every day standing up to the Musevenis, the Kagames and the Kabilas of the world.

Likewise, by working with local organizations to strengthen the government of South Sudan, a region that the LRA long used as a redoubt and whose rapid disintegration the group is no doubt praying for to give it another refuge closer to home, would also be an extremely productive use of the time of those outside of the region who wish to help.

If the people who have been moved by the Kony 2012 campaign truly want to help Africa, they must start by learning about and supporting the struggles of the Africans themselves. This is their fight, this is their history, these are their countries. Not ours. The citizens of Africa must write their own future from within their own borders. We cannot do it for them.

There are plenty of informative links in the article itself.
 
I think we should post hilarious Kony memes in here now.

I see no other practical use for the thread other than the barrage of updates attacking IC. Haha.
 
I like the article starts "Usually I would fly off the handle and let passion fly" and then you give an extremely dramatic reading.

Thanks...

I dunno i'm just trying to spread the guy's message. I tried to make it as interesting to listen to as possible. Maybe I should have read it better.
 
I respect what that guy said. But there are other Ugandans who want aid from the west. There is no singular Ugandan voice.

I don't support IC because of their military interventionist ideology, but I'm really worried that people are using the flaws of this organization to wash their hands of the problem altogether.

I've kinda had this inkling as well.
 
Well....this settles it

http://owinomarket.wordpress.com/2012/03/09/an-open-letter-to-invisible-children-their-followers-and-anyone-interested-in-why-kony-2012-is-completely-wrong/

This social activist systematically destroyed Invisible Children's argument and their followers. Point by point. If anyone supports IC after reading that?...needs their head checked

Thanks for that link, lots of interesting points.

The more information that comes out about IC, the more the line blurs between the campaign just being misguided and being deliberate misinformation. Their closeness to a corrupt regime and military was always troubling, considering the extent of their crimes.

At the very least IC are hopelessly out of their depth, which considering the seriousness and complexity of the situation is reason enough to not try and mount a campaign of this scale.
 
the faster you rise, the harder you fall.

that's not what I mean.

I've actually seen a lot acquaintances saying a lot of the stuff you've been posting. Some of its very reasonable but they just seem so smug and condescending about it all. As if they think they're so much smarter than the mindless sheep who liked it on facebook.

And do they care about Central Africa? Nope. They just care about not being seen as a "stupid bandwagoner". All of their rage, links and regurgitated talking points just ring so hollow because I know they don't actually give a fuck.

If Kony 12 is a meme then the backlash is a meme of its very own.
 
that's not what I mean.

I've actually seen a lot acquaintances saying a lot of the stuff you've been posting. Some of its very reasonable but they just seem so smug and condescending about it all. As if they think they're so much smarter than the mindless sheep who liked it on facebook.

And do they care about Central Africa? Nope. They just care about not being seen as a "stupid bandwagoner". All of their rage, links and regurgitated talking points just ring so hollow because I know they don't actually give a fuck.

If Kony 12 is a meme then the backlash is a meme of its very own.


well of course they are smarter than the sheeps who liked it on facebook. Only an objective guy who THINKS before he clicks is smarter than someone who clicks before he thinks. its logical. Yes we care about all central africans, as long as people are not being ripped off and the situation isnt misused because of the unabated misguided enthusiasm. We also care about the Ugandans who themselves say Back off! we do give a fuck! a fuck for some sanity. we also care when the owners of Invisible Child make 90,000 a year off donations you and I make. we also care that Kony is a small fish and solving the situation does not involve violence which is advocated by Invisible Child.
 
that's not what I mean.

I've actually seen a lot acquaintances saying a lot of the stuff you've been posting. Some of its very reasonable but they just seem so smug and condescending about it all. As if they think they're so much smarter than the mindless sheep who liked it on facebook.

And do they care about Central Africa? Nope. They just care about not being seen as a "stupid bandwagoner". All of their rage, links and regurgitated talking points just ring so hollow because I know they don't actually give a fuck.

If Kony 12 is a meme then the backlash is a meme of its very own.

From what I've seen, the backlash has been tiny compared to the initial onslaught. It's mainly just gone quiet, and outside of the memes the links to pieces critical of the campaign actually provoked the only serious discussion of the situation that I'd seen. There was no discussion at all in the beginning, just that video being posted over and over again. It was that assumption that one video told you all you needed to know, the lack of critical thinking, or questions about who the organisation were, which was worrying.

Of course there will be those adopting an anti-bandwagon stance for the sake of it, that their interest rings hollow. But then a lot of the people posting the video in the first place were guilty of the same thing.

What's going on at the moment is the Internet finding balance again, and if in future people are more inclined to not take everything at face value and research a subject themselves that will be a good thing. It's also a lesson to people to not think they can start a viral campaign on this scale blindly and think you won't be held up to scrutiny. Make sure your own house is in order and that your message is sound.
 
I never checked or saw the video, you can smh at me but heh whats in the $30 action kits?


the guy really makes $90,000 from donations? 0_o


i also agree thats its very fascinating watching the internet get together, hmmmm wonder what that means for the future.
 
I must be the only one who didn't watch this thing yet.

edit: hilarious also how quick the media is at attacking the mob-mentality reaction, and then goes on to cite Santorum and other idiots spounting nonsense without attacking that on a daily basis. The media are doing worst than this Kony 2012 video did, 24/7. Bunch of hypocrite assholes. I smell an agenda behind the response from the media.
 
I must be the only one who didn't watch this thing yet.

edit: hilarious also how quick the media is at attacking the mob-mentality reaction, and then goes on to cite Santorum and other idiots spounting nonsense without attacking that on a daily basis. The media are doing worst than this Kony 2012 video did, 24/7. Bunch of hypocrite assholes. I smell an agenda behind the response from the media.

The media gains jackshit from IC.

The media can get an advantage by distorting political news and letting politicians say bullshit.
 
Which is why they have nothing to teach anyone about checking facts and the dangers of ignorance, since they are full of shit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom