• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Kotaku posts new rumors about Xbox 720/PlayStation 4 (Power, Release Timing)

I wonder if MS will cheap out in other areas (again) like no built in wifi, no build in controller batteries, etc.

Normally free online + region free would be enough for me to say I'm getting a PS4 over 720 without even knowing anything about either, but both of those are looking less and less certain for the PS4.

?
 
Roughly 8 times as powerful is what that old roadmap leak from Microsoft said and that's damn good. If people don't think that's going to be a generational leap then they are crazy.

I really hope that the PS4 is much, much, much easier to program for than the Playstations of the past.
 
And people thought Sony had this generation in the bag. Nothing is for certain.

true, but sony made mistake after mistake

microsoft has the superior tools, will likely have the superior hardware, they have more people attached to their services, as well as a better relationship with the majority of western third parties than sony or nintendo... they just have no disadvantages besides (maybe) weaker exclusives. and that's a big maybe.
 
Sounds good, let's hope it's true and that they do come out soon. They mention the momentum 360 has but neither want to wait until they lose all their momentum before launching a new console.
 
true, but sony made mistake after mistake

microsoft has the superior tools, will likely have the superior hardware, they have more people attached to their services, as well as a better relationship with the majority of western third parties than sony or nintendo... they just have no disadvantages besides (maybe) weaker exclusives. and that's a big maybe.

lolwut?
 
The PSP/PS3/Vita are region free however. Why would Sony go back?

PSVita is region free, but it's sort of a step backwards from PSN stuff on the PS3. And things like P4A / MGR:R demo being region locked are issues.

Not assuming they'll go back, but it's looking like more of a possibility than say a year ago.
 
true, but sony made mistake after mistake

microsoft has the superior tools, will likely have the superior hardware, they have more people attached to their services, as well as a better relationship with the majority of western third parties than sony or nintendo... they just have no disadvantages besides (maybe) weaker exclusives. and that's a big maybe.

Maybe if you look things from US perspective. In other parts of the world Sony still has edge over MS as total shipped numbers are pretty much equal at the moment for X360 and PS3.
 
All this launch stuff makes me curious - will MS go the extra mile to make sure they don't face another RROD situation this time around?

After owning three 360s, I don't know if I want to buy a launch console from them... well, ever.
 
And people thought Sony had this generation in the bag. Nothing is for certain.

Well I think Microsoft is slightly more competent than Sony -brushes RROD, windows vista and 8 under a rug-, ever so slightly. Well at the very least there aren't as many stuff for them to bungle.
 
PSVita is region free, but it's sort of a step backwards from PSN stuff on the PS3. And things like P4A / MGR:R demo being region locked are issues.

Not assuming they'll go back, but it's looking like more of a possibility than say a year ago.

I agree the way it works on the Vita isn't ideal. As for the the demos that's just Atlas/Konami being jackasses. Hell, Atlas is the only company to release a region-locked game on the PS3.
 
true, but sony made mistake after mistake

microsoft has the superior tools, will likely have the superior hardware, they have more people attached to their services, as well as a better relationship with the majority of western third parties than sony or nintendo... they just have no disadvantages besides (maybe) weaker exclusives. and that's a big maybe.

Services like Live have become my sour grapes. As a primarily single player gamer, the online successes (as a service medium) have been translated by third parties as: shoehorn multiplayer/co-op into every game.

There are many times where a game might have turned out better without resources and disk space diverted to tacked on modes. Not only this, why must games (RE) I don't want to play co op in, have multiple characters tagging along with AI?

Damn this Internet gaming era! :P

(great multiplayer or online integration I applaud are Dark Souls/Dragons Dogma interaction)
 
PS4 in December for Japan, limited launch and I'll spend Christmas over there next year and bring one back like with ps3. Assuming it is region free
 
PS4 in December for Japan, limited launch and I'll spend Christmas over there next year and bring one back like with ps3. Assuming it is region free

I say Feb is the earliest they would get it out. It would be interesting to see the chaos if they did a very limited Japanese release for Christmas. Like some VIP style release.
 
After PS3 and Vita, I also think Sony won't go all "hardware-power" next gen. I do think it will be pretty close.

If MS is going for an 8x leap from the 360, Sony will too. They're both going to be right on par with one another so they both get all the third-party games. It will be just like this gen with the PS3 and 360.


Anyone have that quote from Tretton where he said something about Sony being a hardware company and always wanting to push tech... I can't remember, but it was a while ago and was in response to a question about next-gen.
 
Well I think Microsoft is slightly more competent than Sony -brushes RROD, windows vista and 8 under a rug-, ever so slightly. Well at the very least there aren't as many stuff for them to bungle.

Don't forget the Zune, Kin and the cancellation of Courier :p

Edit: And Windows ME. Good God damn did ME suck piles of shit.
 
true, but sony made mistake after mistake

microsoft has the superior tools, will likely have the superior hardware, they have more people attached to their services, as well as a better relationship with the majority of western third parties than sony or nintendo... they just have no disadvantages besides (maybe) weaker exclusives. and that's a big maybe.
For many, like myself, Live is not a compelling factor. I have invested in a PSN account and I see XBL as a ridiculous barrier for entry. I doubt I'm alone.
 
If MS is going for an 8x leap from the 360, Sony will too. They're both going to be right on par with one another so they both get all the third-party games. It will be just like this gen with the PS3 and 360.


Anyone have that quote from Tretton where he said something about Sony being a hardware company and always wanting to push tech... I can't remember, but it was a while ago and was in response to a question about next-gen.
I think the quote was something along the lines of "We've never been first and we've never been cheapest."

The one thing I'm curious about is whether Sony will wait for a worldwide release or if not, what territory they'll release first in. Microsoft can get away with releasing in the US for months before EU and Japan get the system. Sony is a bit more reliant on sales in all 3 territories.
 
I think they meant second to high end class PC GPU which would be 660/7800 series level. Which makes a lot more sense. It would still be much better than the current generation when rendering at 1080p. People forget these high end PC GPUs are for people with 1440p or triple monitor set ups.

Technically that would be the 680/7970....those are the second most powerful GPU levels.

You can't just throw out a range...there's even a noticable gap between a 660 and a 660ti.
 
Sony needs to take their time and release hardware that's better than microsofts for cheeper.

How do you propose they do that? To produce better hardware that is also cheaper, they would have to significantly delay the PS4 unless they are planning on taking a bigger hit on hardware.

Also there's little chance either company really knows what the other is doing, so how would they know how much to spend on hardware?


I have repeatedly said I don't expect any big difference in performance, but I recall you being very willing to believe the PS4 will be more powerful than the 720 in the PS4/Jeff Rigby thread. So why is the opposite so lol-worthy to you?

I can care less if there is a noticeable difference in performance between the two platforms, I'll just get the more powerful of the two at launch. However IF the xbox is more powerful than the PS4, I can't wait to see your reaction.

Anyone have that quote from Tretton where he said something about Sony being a hardware company and always wanting to push tech... I can't remember, but it was a while ago and was in response to a question about next-gen.

That was all marketing PR bull with no basis on any facts or knowledge on their competitors. That's no different than the person at Sony saying they don't want to launch last but it's still a possibility.
 
Anyone have that quote from Tretton where he said something about Sony being a hardware company and always wanting to push tech... I can't remember, but it was a while ago and was in response to a question about next-gen.

Different Exec's say different thing's. Tretton has said they don't care about being out first with PS4 just being the best. While another (maybe Andrew House..I don't remember) has said they don't want to launch after the others. (Paraphrasing)

Between them they'll cover all bases.
 
Well, bigger costs will probably kill a lot of developers and the ones with money won't be willing risk it making "not mainstream" games. I do know there are some other platforms for smaller developers, but but I fear for the bigger ones...

If MS is going for an 8x leap from the 360, Sony will too. They're both going to be right on par with one another so they both get all the third-party games. It will be just like this gen with the PS3 and 360.


Anyone have that quote from Tretton where he said something about Sony being a hardware company and always wanting to push tech... I can't remember, but it was a while ago and was in response to a question about next-gen.

Only if they didn't learn anything this gen. I do believe they'll be close to each other, but I don't think microsoft will push it that much too. I could be wrong, of course.
 
Only an idiot would think the Wii U could even dream of running the NeXtBox's games.

It simply is not going to happen. At least nothing near the same quality...if it even gets a down-port.
I do feel bad for all the posters that absolutely believed the wiiu was going to rival current top PCs. I have little doubts that the wiiu will be a great console for Nintendo and fans, but I don't expect to see next gen down ports coming to it. One good thing going for wiiu owners is they can expect ps360 ports as MS & Sony will likely support last gen for a couple years after the new consiles launch.
 
I think both systems will be very similar.
From everything I've read I think they will both have

8core APU with multithreading. MS will stick with IBM, but Sony is going AMD. I also think the GPU portion of the APU will be used for aiding the discrete card I've seen rumors of vsync without a performance hit. Since MS is using IBM they might be able to work some backwards compatabilty.

7800 AMD graphics probably somewhere between the 7870/7850

Split Ram 2GB video 2GB system. Would like 3GB each maybe Epic will convice them to add more.

Both will have Blu-Ray and a Hardrive nothing special.

Sony could easily sell at $350 and not lose much. MS will want to bundle Kinect 2.0 which means a $400 console or they take a loss to compete with Sony.

This is all pulled straight from my ass. But it's what I believe based on all the rumors I've seen. The price is based off past and present BOMs I've seen.
 
im say this every thread but the company that keeps BC with this gens online games, gets my money.

No Retail BC i can live with but no PSN/LIVE BC is a dealbreaker.
 
What I would like to see is:

6-8 core CPU, 12-16 threads don't care about PPC or x86 (I would bet on IBM ahead of AMD though if I had to choose)
160ALUs on the CPU
Dedicated audio/video decoding hardware with compatibility for the latest codecs (HEVC)
GTX670 equivalent dedicated graphics power
80GB SSD
802.11ac
BDXL 100GB triple layer discs
8x read speed with acoustic silencing
4G radio for future proofing

I think that can be done for $399 with a small loss up front, maybe $50.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...... Out of everything that is probably the least likely.
 
How do you propose they do that? To produce better hardware that is also cheaper, they would have to significantly delay the PS4 unless they are planning on taking a bigger hit on hardware.

Also there's little chance either company really knows what the other is doing, so how would they know how much to spend on hardware?



I have repeatedly said I don't expect any big difference in performance, but I recall you being very willing to believe the PS4 will be more powerful than the 720 in the PS4/Jeff Rigby thread. So why is the opposite so lol-worthy to you?

I can care less if there is a noticeable difference in performance between the two platforms, I'll just get the more powerful of the two at launch. However IF the xbox is more powerful than the PS4, I can't wait to see your reaction.



That was all marketing PR bull with no basis on any facts or knowledge on their competitors. That's no different than the person at Sony saying they don't want to launch last but it's still a possibility.

Eh, seems to be we have very little credible information so far, and there have been just as many rumours stating the next xbox will be less powerful as more powerful. So it seems to be there are people who are inclined to believe one or the other. Obviously with nothing like proof to offer on either side.

Like others have said though, I think it is likely to be a flush. I don't think either side can afford to give the other a substantial power advantage. Things might be different if MS to make a full on media centre though.
 
I think both systems will be very similar.
From everything I've read I think they will both have

8core APU with multithreading. MS will stick with IBM, but Sony is going AMD. I also think the GPU portion of the APU will be used for aiding the discrete card I've seen rumors of vsync without a performance hit. Since MS is using IBM they might be able to work some backwards compatabilty.

7800 AMD graphics probably somewhere between the 7870/7850

Split Ram 2GB video 2GB system. Would like 3GB each maybe Epic will convice them to add more.

Both will have Blu-Ray and a Hardrive nothing special.

Sony could easily sell at $350 and not lose much. MS will want to bundle Kinect 2.0 which means a $400 console or they take a loss to compete with Sony.

This is all pulled straight from my ass. But it's what I believe based on all the rumors I've seen. The price is based off past and present BOMs I've seen.
These rumours are quite old especially the RAM
 
So the main takeaway from this "rumor" post is that Durango/Orbis are within the same ballpark of theoretical performance. So much for the FUD being spread around for Sony following Nintendo's path.

THANK THE LORDS!
 
Only an idiot would think the Wii U could even dream of running the NeXtBox's games.

It simply is not going to happen. At least nothing near the same quality...if it even gets a down-port.

I'm just curious as to why people insist on bringing up Wii U in threads that have nothing to do with the system.
 
How do you propose they do that? To produce better hardware that is also cheaper, they would have to significantly delay the PS4 unless they are planning on taking a bigger hit on hardware.

Also there's little chance either company really knows what the other is doing, so how would they know how much to spend on hardware?



I have repeatedly said I don't expect any big difference in performance, but I recall you being very willing to believe the PS4 will be more powerful than the 720 in the PS4/Jeff Rigby thread. So why is the opposite so lol-worthy to you?

I can care less if there is a noticeable difference in performance between the two platforms, I'll just get the more powerful of the two at launch. However IF the xbox is more powerful than the PS4, I can't wait to see your reaction.



That was all marketing PR bull with no basis on any facts or knowledge on their competitors. That's no different than the person at Sony saying they don't want to launch last but it's still a possibility.
There is a 100% chance they know what their competitor is doing, people talk in all industries and dev kits are out in the wild. They may not know the exact configuration,it they will both understand the ballpark the other is aiming for. One of the more obvious comparisons the two can make with the other will be about RAM, and we have seen a bit of competitiveness there already if rumours are to be believed
 
Top Bottom