No worries - I found your image:
From
this post on page 70 of the thread, for anyone who wants to see it in context.
I see what you're talking about, but I'm not convinced that's ringing - I'd rather see a test image on which there's a clear and specific presence or absence of superfluous colour on a neutral background, because that's what I've been using as my guide.
Perhaps it's a philosophical issue. I'm going by the metric described in the sharpening test video I linked above: reduce sharpness until what I perceive as ringing disappears. It seems like you're coming at the issue from the opposite side: increasing sharpness until what you perceive as ringing appears. To me, using test patterns, ringing isn't remotely subtle. It's there, or it isn't. And if I keep going lower after what I perceive as ringing is gone, I watch my image blur.
Assuming there's nothing strange going on with our TVs (and I think that's a safe assumption), it seems to boil down to using different methodology to test sharpness, and possibly different perceptions for what constitutes ringing. Perhaps I don't know what ringing looks like, or that sharpness is more subtle than the artifacts I can see. As I said, I'm just going by the test outlined in the calibration video: the white ringing I can see disrupting the uniformity of the grey background of my test images, and the softening of the lines I see below 20. I'm not advocating everyone set their sharpness to 20. I'm suggesting everyone test it for themselves and come to their own conclusions; especially since people have complained that using the Rtings settings gives them a soft image.