Today I learned. So then his opinion might have an affect in that case.Well this is dumb.
He's one of Disney's largest shareholders (if not the single largest) so technically he does.
Today I learned. So then his opinion might have an affect in that case.Well this is dumb.
He's one of Disney's largest shareholders (if not the single largest) so technically he does.
No, the Ewoks are a horrible way to end a trilogy. Changing the song doesn't make the scene any better. Why the fuck would Lando and the X-Wing pilots land on the moon to party with some stupid backwoods native race?
Meh.
We got the Despecialized and Revisited editions out there in HD, with more care taken to them than Disney or Lucasfilm would take.
I'm good.
Today I learned. So then his opinion might have an affect in that case.
Does George Lucas realise the amount of money he would make on releasing the un-douchey cgi infected star wars orginals on HD?
He would make a billion dollars in 3 months. People would go insane. I dont need to see an extended alien mtv video in jabbas palace.
Smack some sense into his wallet, TatooineGaf!
Toss me to the Sarlacc if old.
They'll wait until there's a lul in new Star Wars movies.
That may be true but it's still an interesting angle to the whole situation and you may see Disney wait until the stock is gone before doing anything, assuming they want to anyways, it's not like we know their feelings they may be happy with the movie situation exactly the way it is.Well, he also sought out permission to sell off his stocks. Can't just dump off $2b in stocks all at once for a few reasons, so he's going to do it bits at a time until it's all gone. I don't think he's really heavily involved.
Hmm. stubborn prick.
We talking about the same George Lucas that is donating the majority of his wealth to charity?
Or is the OP the only actual prick in this nexus.
George has deliberately erased the work of many artists who worked on the original trilogy by adding CGI and prequel actors, he might be a generous man but as a professional he's a prick. George didn't even direct two of the original trilogy, it's artistically dubious to seal away the versions the actual directors released to cinemas. If you want to make a special edition then do what every other director does and preserve the theatrical version alongside it, especially when the special edition is so much worse.
Anyway it wouldn't surprise me if a condition of the sale to Disney was that the most recent edits of the OT are set in stone and legally unchangeable. George is that stubborn.
The bolded would be a dream for me. Updates effects with today's technology but without the little additions/changes that Lucas added.I've come to accept that the original versions may never ever come out, but at the same time Disney's running things now, so who knows. I also have have the Despecialized Editions, so I'm not too fussed right now.
An ideal Star Wars set for me would be the theatrical versions of the OT remastered, plus an "updated" version that has effects updates, but without the Lucas additions (e.g. lightsabers effects fixes).
What might be a huge roadblock to a new set next year for the 40th anniversary is that A New Hope's home video rights are tied to 20th Century Fox.
... I thought this was about Stranger Things...
isn't the issue that the necessary reels of the original untainted don't exist to even convert them to HD?
Meh.
We got the Despecialized and Revisited editions out there in HD, with more care taken to them than Disney or Lucasfilm would take.
I'm good.
"Disney's theatrical lineup could use a boost in some areas. While the studio's animated Wreck-It Ralph, due Friday, has healthy buzz, other recent releases such as Mars Needs Moms and John Carter have disappointed."
Tell that to 2016. Every other studio would kill for Disney's numbers this year. Hell, remove Star Wars and Disney still stays winning.
Disney won't do this until they get the rights to V and VI back
Yub nub fucking sucks, and is a horrible way to end a movie, much less a trilogy. Say what you will, victory celebration was a way better ending.
Pretty much everything else was better in the originals.
It was a horrible way to end the Star Wars saga, but the Star Wars saga doesn't end with Return of the Jedi anymore! Yub Nub is a fitting way to end that particular movie. If anything, Victory Celebration seems out of place now that we know how the story continues. Turns out the Empire didn't just go away.
It's entirely possible (and likely) that Lucas may have signed a contract stipulating that I-VI are set in stone and are not to be tampered with.
Correct.
He did once in 2006, after a petition,
Take out Civil War (408MM) + Rogue One (155MM) and Disney is still number 1.
May 2020 then? They won't get the rights to IV anytime soon though, if ever. So not sure if it's worth it for them regardless.
The original trilogy is not lost just because Lucasfilm claims they no longer have any original elements.
To my knowledge, Lucasfilm isn't even claiming this. Nor would they put out the call for fan-owned 35mm prints if they were claiming it.
They won't get the rights back to IV ever, so they'll just have to take that bullet.
2020 seems perfect to do the 9 disc 4k blu-ray release with the original and special editions of all 9 films.
He didn't capitulate to a fan petition - people internally at Lucasfilm convinced him to do it, and he said yes, so long as they could do it cheaply. Dpp1978 goes over it in a post from the same thread as before.
Pff, they can disrespect Lucas anytime, best thing to happen to Star Wars would be if Disney redcons the prequels and does them right.Ya know, now that this has me thinking, I hope Disney doesn't do it, even if the Star Wars bubble bursts. It would be disrespectful and an insult to Lucas. I'd like to think Disney has more class than that.
there's an untouched (i believe down to the original title crawl) reel at the film archive in America somewhere. i think wired or verge did an article on it.isn't the issue that the necessary reels of the original untainted don't exist to even convert them to HD?
Regardless, Disney should just use that one version of the films from fans online as a close second.
Except there is a secret clause in the contract that says Disney can't release the original movies.Not much considering he doesn't own Star Wars anymore or Lucasfilm
Which is why it's also no longer his fault
Does George Lucas realise the amount of money he would make on releasing the un-douchey cgi infected star wars orginals on HD?
He would make a billion dollars in 3 months. People would go insane. I dont need to see an extended alien mtv video in jabbas palace.
Smack some sense into his wallet, TatooineGaf!
Toss me to the Sarlacc if old.
Pretty sure he makes $0 on Star Wars sales now. Too lazy to check though.
I'd be ok with unedited version, with the exception of keeping in Victory Celebration instead of Yub Nub.
can't comment on the validity of this, it's been banded around a lot but I'm sure if true there would be ways around it, but the best thing about this if true is that Lucas is very much about archiving filmDon't the original versions of the films not exist anymore or something? I remember this being part of why the remasters were necessary, the oldest versions available are the laserdisc ones, not the original workprints.
I don't think the market is as huge as internet supernerds think it is.
I would bet that for the vast majority of people the remasters ARE the original trilogy to them.