Remember Kerry, OR Dean's primary platforms?
Perot is the perfect comparison. He had a "grass roots" movement, tons of followers, and lots of money. He made a lot of noise in '92. How many young voters even know who he is?
Remember Kerry, OR Dean's primary platforms?
Bernie will be out rain or shine by the end June, and by Mid July he will be remembered just as much as a fart in the wind.
Well if you're comparing something as fundamental as voting to deciding where people have lunch, then of course you're going to have problems understanding my logic, silly guy.
Independents exist in larger numbers than either dems or republicans. If 'just registering as a dem' is such an easy process for people to go through, then open primaries would never be perceived in the first place as an advantage to Sanders.
Registering for anything (be it IDs or party affiliation) decreases turnout. We don't want decreased turnout (I don't anyway). It's not complicated.
He can stand down for the good of the party or maybe we can find an ambitious female District Attorney or State Senator in Vermont who wants the full backing of the DNC in an upcoming election cycle.
He has much chance of being the nominee as I do of waking up with Jessica Alba in the morning. Even if it turned out tomorrow that Hillary Clinton had secretly shot Vince Foster while filming a lesbian porno with Huma Abedin after giving a 13 year old an abortion, the party would just parachute in Joe Biden or Elizabeth Warren or whoever.
Bernie ain't winning shit. He can stand down for the good of the party or maybe we can find an ambitious female District Attorney or State Senator in Vermont who wants the full backing of the DNC in an upcoming election cycle.
But why should people that aren't democrats decide who will be a democratic nominee? You still haven't explained that. It makes no sense. A primary is basically just a courtesy the party does so that members have a say in the process.
Most people are independent because they don't give a shit either way. And it is easy. The fact that people are generally too apathetic to care is irrelevant.
maybe we can find an ambitious female District Attorney or State Senator in Vermont who wants the full backing of the DNC in an upcoming election cycle.
Haha, looks who's never been to Vermont.
Yeah because that worked out so well the last time they tried that.
Why do we have open primaries now if it's this cut and dry to you? It's as simple as: because these people, too, would like to decide who the democratic nominee is.
Voting should not require any form of registration. Are you a person in America? Great. Vote.
But they aren't voting for the President. They're voting for who should represent the Democrat's party. By this logic, why not let Canadians vote in the US general elections?Why do we have open primaries now if it's this cut and dry to you? It's as simple as: because these people, too, would like to decide who the democratic nominee is.
Voting should not require any form of registration. Are you a person in America? Great. Vote.
Why do we have open primaries now if it's this cut and dry to you? It's as simple as: because these people, too, would like to decide who the democratic nominee is.
Voting should not require any form of registration. Are you a person in America? Great. Vote.
Why do we have open primaries now if it's this cut and dry to you? It's as simple as: because these people, too, would like to decide who the democratic nominee is.
Voting should not require any form of registration. Are you a person in America? Great. Vote.
Well if you're comparing something as fundamental as voting to deciding where people have lunch, then of course you're going to have problems understanding my logic, silly guy.
Independents exist in larger numbers than either dems or republicans. If 'just registering as a dem' is such an easy process for people to go through, then open primaries would never be perceived in the first place as an advantage to Sanders.
Registering for anything (be it IDs or party affiliation) decreases turnout. We don't want decreased turnout (I don't anyway). It's not complicated.
As an independent, I never eat democrats. Goes straight to my thighs.
You're out of your mind if you think that is the impact of his campaign.
I think you put too much importance on "the party", as if all of our thoughts on a myriad of topics can be distilled into 2 different buckets of thought. I would argue that he's the only candidate that's in this for the betterment of mankind. You might think Hillary is also in this category, but my judgement tells me she just wants the power and the glory and the check mark in the box labeled "first female US president" in the text books. I may be wrong on that, but that's how she comes across to me.
Haha, looks who's never been to Vermont.
Bernie will be out rain or shine by the end June, and by Mid July he will be remembered just as much as a fart in the wind.
But why should people that aren't democrats decide who will be a democratic nominee? You still haven't explained that. It makes no sense. A primary is basically just a courtesy the party does so that members have a say in the process.
I gotta disagree. He's so overwhelmingly popular among younger voters that Bernie and his views be relevant for a pretty long time.
I would thing independent votes matter the same way party votes do; they are nominating the person they want to vote for in the general. Wouldn't you want to be sure to get the candidate who has the largest support?
Whether or not independents would have actually given Bernie the edge over Hillary, there is certainly a large group of them who won't be voting for her in the general.
I gotta disagree. He's so overwhelmingly popular among younger voters that Bernie and his views be relevant for a pretty long time.
I gotta disagree. He's so overwhelmingly popular among younger voters that Bernie and his views be relevant for a pretty long time.
You do know the GOP and DNC are semi private organizations right?
Yes, I agree with you for normal elections. NOT PRIMARIES. Like I said, don't want Republicans or independents to decide who gets to represent my PARTY in an election.
But they aren't voting for the President. They're voting for who should represent the Democrat's party. By this logic, why not let Canadians vote in the US general elections?
Until those younger people grow up, get good paying jobs, and don't want to pay a ton of money in taxes.
Just like Ron Paul supporters
I gotta disagree. He's so overwhelmingly popular among younger voters that Bernie and his views be relevant for a pretty long time.
Bernie should bow out cause it's over and dragging this on doesn't help his cause. Another 2 months of this does jack shit for his cause. Bow out gracefully now. Hillary won. Conjure up and excuse whether it leans towards what you might think as facts or just bullshit. Hillary still won. Sorry dems the breaks. Some Bernie supports are just dillusional at this point. The writing on the wall isnt gonna change.
That being said.
I hate this bullshit about down ticket dems. I'm forced to vote for these fucks cause I'm not voting for the other side. Yet for all the votes and even some campaigning from me this century MY down ticket dems have done jack fucking shit to improve things in my local area. I put this sqaurely at the feet of the DNC at my local, state, and national level.
At some point it would be nice to see some results and get thrown a bone once in a while.
This. Additionally the angle that his candidacy's fervent support is a kin to Dean or Kerry' is ridiculous.
Until those younger people grow up, get good paying jobs, and don't want to pay a ton of money in taxes.
I gotta disagree. He's so overwhelmingly popular among younger voters that Bernie and his views be relevant for a pretty long time.
Doesn't mean they're immune to criticism of their voting process, man. I'm not proposing an amendment.
You support more barriers that reduce turnout among likely voters? Awesome. The republicans would love to have you.
Really?
I'm a married home owner with a family and SO and I both make decent money. We both voted for Bernie.
I fucking abhor this line of thinking.
I gotta disagree. He's so overwhelmingly popular among younger voters that Bernie and his views be relevant for a pretty long time.
Your party I'm sure has precient, local, and state meetings. Get involved. Hell, find a dozen or so friends and you can likely run your precient.
You know how I know this works? Because it's what the Right did after Goldwater lost.
You support more barriers that reduce turnout among likely voters? Awesome. The republicans would love to have you.
To be frank, younger voters are a fickle and unreliable constituency.
Voter turnout among people under 35 is reliably terrible.
and he is 75 years and will 79 in four years
To be frank, younger voters are a fickle and unreliable constituency.
Voter turnout among people under 35 is reliably terrible.
New York State has about 2 Democrats for every 1 Republican. If Democrats in that state wanted too, they could vote for the nominee of their choice AND the Republican nominee. Other states are similar (or flipped with 2x Republicans for Democrats). That's a problem. The October deadline for party switching is too far out but NY (and other states) having an open primary is problematic.
Young voters will soon be older voters.
I've ALREADY been involved. I've gone to meetings. The Democratic party in my state and local area is a TOTAL FUCKING SHIT SHOW.
I've ALREADY been involved. I've gone to meetings. The Democratic party in my state and local area is a TOTAL FUCKING SHIT SHOW.
Young voters will soon be older voters.
HAHA. How dare I actually want people with American IDs to decide America's direction.
Sure you didn't mean this? You might as well have meant this.
Putting up barriers of any sort makes less people vote. I'm sorry you disagree with that.
Sorry to say it, but there is no Bernie Sanders movement. This has happened before, many many times, and will happen again.
Wow so the GOP gets a head start to attack Clinton. They would love it if Bernie stays fighting till California
Again. Actual elected office versus membership of a private organization. I don't care if 5 or 5 million people to vote for the Democratic nominee as long as all 5 or 5 million of those people declare themselves to be committed Democrat's.
Then, hopefully, we as a party will choose the best nominee for the general.