Count Dookkake said:6.66
The number of the least.
Except PS3 isn't really selling that well anywhere. And while it's certainly doing better in the West, it's still nowhere near an install base that Final Fantasy has enjoyed for the past 10-15 years.Durante said:I'm of course looking at global sales -- if someone claims that the game will "cripple" them it doesn't make sense to just look at one territory, especially for a series with massive global appeal. I expect FFXIII to sell more than XII in the US and significantly more than XII in Europe for a variety of reasons.
Also I doubt that FFXIII's budget, if you amortize the engine cost over all their next-gen games, is much higher than XII's.
Better than being of the assumption that the Final Fantasy fanbase is so bulletproof that it can withstand a crippled install base.Durante said:Terrel I'm not going to bother replying in detail to your post, you still seem to be stuck in the x% fewer consoles sold = x% smaller game sales mentality.
I had the same thought in my head but was to scared to even allude to it.PantherLotus said:Btw, Square Enix is fully prepared with an answer regarding FFXIII profitability. I think we can all speculate but its not that hard to figure out.
PantherLotus said::lol :lol :lol
============
Btw, Square Enix is fully prepared with an answer regarding FFXIII profitability. I think we can all speculate but its not that hard to figure out.
DeaconKnowledge said:This is totally flying over my head.
blitz64 said:Final fantasy 1-12 series has always been on the winning console. In fact, I thought the n64 lost to the ps1 because they lost the final fantasy series.
It looks like for the first time, the final fantasy series will be released on a 2nd place system. Maybe 13 is a bad luck number in US but in japan, it doesn't have any meaning.
Nothing until Vesperia.itxaka said:does microsoft have a japan-oriented game released shortly?
DeaconKnowledge said:This is totally flying over my head.
PantherLotus said:I really wasn't talking about the Wii at all, as i don't think anybody that loves post-VI FF would even remotely want to see that, although I do think something big from them is coming that will occur in the same universe.
I was really just talking about spreading out the cost of investment by using assets for multiple games over several different sequels (FFXIV) and spinoffs that may or may not appear on other next-gen consoles. Square makes a lot of money off that franchise and its spinoffs here in the states.
titiklabingapat said:Not that I disagree with your general sentiment but they announced Lost Odyssey when it was clear that the Wii had a foothold in the Japanese and WW market. Granted, there are other factors(title could have been planned way before Wii took over, 360 multiplatform development) going on, but the general sentiment is still there.
No, PSOne was already trending to be the winner in Japan when FF7 released. It was just PSOne's "Wii Fit", so to speak, pushing it even higher, and including people chanting that "CGI is killing gaming!" Lots of nice parallels to make between the two.davepoobond said:was PSOne winning when FF7 was released or is that a "since it became the winning console, the axiom still stands" kind of thing?
davepoobond said:umm....isn't this already a given since, y'know...they said that's what they're doing with the White Engine and stuff?
I think he means TLR. At least that would make more sense.LJ11 said:What does Lost Odyssey have to do with SE?
titiklabingapat said:Not that I disagree with your general sentiment but they announced Lost Odyssey when it was clear that the Wii had a foothold in the Japanese and WW market. Granted, there are other factors(title could have been planned way before Wii took over, 360 multiplatform development) going on, but the general sentiment is still there.
davepoobond said:was PSOne winning when FF7 was released or is that a "since it became the winning console, the axiom still stands" kind of thing?
davepoobond said:DONT YOU GET IT?? FFXIII WII-EXCLUSIVE LOLOLOLOL THEY CAN JUST RESAVE ALL THEIR ASSETS FOR 480i AND DUMP ALL THE HD ASSETS LIKE THAT!!!
goat said:I believe that everyone was alluding to a 360 port.
PantherLotus said:I was alluding to multi-console spinoffs, actually.
The number 4 is a big one... but there's not a lot of bad luck ITEMS in Japanese culture as much as there are things you shouldn't do because they're bad luck and bring misfortune, like cutting your nails and/or whistling at night.Osuwari said:Saturn sold better than the N64 and the N64 sold better than the GC. if PS3 is still at GC levels, uh oh...
btw, what things do the japanese consider as bad luck items? or what are their black cats, broken mirrors and friday the 13ths?
Oh yeah, I meant IU or whatever that new SE game where they have characters for both the western and eastern market. I still confuse the two to this day.jgwhiteus said:Do you mean Infinite Undiscovery with tri-Ace? And I think there's a lag between deciding to develop, beginning the process, and getting to a point where you can announce - if they announced when the Wii had a clear foothold, they must have been developing for quite a while before that.
I'm not trying to be as extreme as "lol no more RPGs for PS3/360" (not that games on Wii are doing that much better), but I'm doubtful that S-E executives, in making decisions today for the next few years, would be that eager to make big budget console RPGs this gen for any system - it's just a shrinking genre on consoles. Likely they'll reuse assets to get as much value out of Crystal Tools as possible, as others have said, but otherwise, it just seems safer to go with smaller games on the DS, and to a lesser extent the PSP.
Durante said:I expect FFXIII to sell more than XII in the US and significantly more than XII in Europe for a variety of reasons.
Also I doubt that FFXIII's budget, if you amortize the engine cost over all their next-gen games, is much higher than XII's.
Well, as a European in my experience 4 out of 5 people who played FF12 pirated it -- that won't happen to 13. Generally speaking, it also has the "first FF on a new platform" advantage, and I'd hope that Sony/Square co-advertise the hell out of it.charlequin said:This seems outlandishly generous. Even in Europe, the PS3's best territory, it's still not the PS2. What would compel audiences who skipped out on the last FF game to swoop in in droves for this one?
For "a PS2 title"? Sure. Are you familiar with FF12's development?charlequin said:Where are you getting this? The cost of HD assets alone is going to jack up the cost of FFXIII way above the outlay for a PS2 title.
Durante said:Well, as a European in my experience 4 out of 5 people who played FF12 pirated it -- that won't happen to 13. Generally speaking, it also has the "first FF on a new platform" advantage, and I'd hope that Sony/Square co-advertise the hell out of it.
For "a PS2 title"? Sure. Are you familiar with FF12's development?
No, specifically a Square-Enix produced and created game. So he has to mean Last Remnant.jgwhiteus said:Do you mean Infinite Undiscovery with tri-Ace? And I think there's a lag between deciding to develop, beginning the process, and getting to a point where you can announce - if they announced when the Wii had a clear foothold, they must have been developing for quite a while before that.
Durante said:For "a PS2 title"? Sure. Are you familiar with FF12's development?
icecream said:No, specifically a Square-Enix produced and created game. So he has to mean Last Remnant.
davepoobond said:DONT YOU GET IT?? FFXIII WII-EXCLUSIVE LOLOLOLOL THEY CAN JUST RESAVE ALL THEIR ASSETS FOR 480i AND DUMP ALL THE HD ASSETS LIKE THAT!!!
While I'd personally prefer it on the DS or PSP, this will do nicely as a substitute. The meltdowns would be delicious.Gaborn said:They won't give the Wii FFXIII. They'll do the FFVII remake for it.
Durante said:Well, as a European in my experience 4 out of 5 people who played FF12 pirated it -- that won't happen to 13.
For "a PS2 title"? Sure. Are you familiar with FF12's development?
viciouskillersquirrel said:I frankly don't blame them. Too much outlay for too little benefit in the opinion of the common man.
That wouldn't bode well for Valkyrie (that's next week's charts, right?).Spiegel said:PSP is now at +9 million.
PS3= 5k next week?
Outside of the first two sw isn't huge, but at this time of the year it's to be expected anyways.Soule said:Eh I'd like to see a lot of those numbers up a bit. At least software is still really strong I'd like it if HW could match.
So basically only FF (and DQ?) are system sellers?ccbfan said:FFXIII will be the first legitament system seller on the system
I laughed.Count Dookkake said:6.66
The number of the least.
charlequin said:This seems outlandishly generous. Even in Europe, the PS3's best territory, it's still not the PS2. What would compel audiences who skipped out on the last FF game to swoop in in droves for this one?
Actually, no, we wouldn't. Both DVD and CD gave them convenience they never had before. Just like how nowadays people are perfectly content to ditch their CDs to listen to 64kpbs MP3s. Don't think for even a minute it had anything to do with picture or sound quality.shidoshi said:No offense to the common man, but a lot of the time, they have pretty shitty tastes. If it was up to them, we'd probably still be watching VHS and listening to cassette.
Dai Kaiju said:Heh, 'we're gold diggers'.
PantherLotus said:And because its relevant to the current discussion:
Source = US NPD
iidesuyo said:Monster Hunter to surpass WiiFit in 2-3 weeks. Nice to see that gaming is not dead in Japan.
Hairyiguana said:I have never been completely sure what this is supposed to mean. Isn't it likely that a very big portion of those people who own an HD console own the other one as well? That would take a big bite out of that argument I would think.
PantherLotus said:Source = US NPD