BY2K said:Too bad it's not made by Nintendo.
When did Nintendo sell Retro Studios?
BY2K said:Too bad it's not made by Nintendo.
That's debatable, for all intents and purposes it was. Nintendo owned Retro by the time the game shipped I believe.BY2K said:Too bad it's not made by Nintendo.
StuBurns said:That's debatable, for all intents and purposes it was. Nintendo owned Retro by the time the game shipped I believe.
Retro is a division of Nintendo. That's like saying SCE didn't make Uncharted.BY2K said:It's still made by Retro. And Published by Nintendo. The makers of the game is Retro Studio.
By this logic, isn't Call of Duty not made by Activision because each studio has an individual name? Or Dead Space not made by EA?BY2K said:It's still made by Retro. And Published by Nintendo. The makers of the game is Retro Studio.
ShockingAlberto said:By this logic, isn't Call of Duty not made by Activision because each studio has an individual name? Or Dead Space not made by EA?
You can't just go "NOPE DOESN'T COUNT STUDIO HAS A NAME" and not expect to sound like a total crazy person.
It's been announced that Journey is coming out sometime this fall.Limanima said:Uncharted 3
I'm not sure if The Journey is coming in 2011, but if it is, then my vote goes to it.
Personally, I'm upset that it's going to be a Bethesda game.ChuckNoLuck said:Are the PC folk upset that Skyrim is going to be a Games for Windows game?
Prime 1's up there with the best of them. I certainly wouldn't discount it so quickly.Vire said:Wat...
I like Prime and all but no.
Just no.
ChuckNoLuck said:Isn't it? I know a lot of PC players that hate GFW in PC games but haven't see anyone in this thread mention it.
No it's not, buy Metroid Prime Trilogy online now, even if you don't have a Wii but plan to get a WiiU they'll work.ChuckNoLuck said:Every time someone mentions Metroid Prime, I get bummed out that I never played any of them. It's probably too late to play them now.
What? does such a thing exist? I use component cables.Nex Superne said:The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword.
Prepared to buy a Wii HDMI adapter solely for this game, as I won't have access to the good ol' CRT TV when it arrives.
Nostalgia~4ever said:wtf, Retro is Nintendo the same way EAD is Nintendo. It is called 1st party.
ChuckNoLuck said:Every time someone mentions Metroid Prime, I get bummed out that I never played any of them. It's probably too late to play them now.
get the third one. it's the best one and it has the most story and voice acting of all of them.ChuckNoLuck said:Every time someone mentions Metroid Prime, I get bummed out that I never played any of them. It's probably too late to play them now.
Rad- said:Battlefield 3. Spent so much hours on Battlefield 2. I just worry the console version will be disappointing as I have no interest in building a new PC just for BF3.
matm666 said:What? does such a thing exist? I use component cables.
MYE said:what the fuck
abasm said:To clarify, Retro Studios is a developer that is owned by Nintendo. Their development practices and style are almost wholly their own, however. Even if the development house is first party, it does the developers a disservice to accredit the game to the publisher. We discuss paintings in terms of their artists, not in terms of their owners. We discuss movies in terms of their directors and cast, not their producers. Shouldn't we discuss games in the same fashion?
Once you start tracing Nintendo titles back to their development teams, you can find some pretty interesting things. One team, headed by Aonuma, seems to hold sole responsibility for the Zelda series. Steel Diver was made by the Wii Fit team. Mario Kart is made by the Nintendogs team. HAL labs doesn't just make Kirby games--they also made Picross 3D and Face Raiders.
By speaking of games in these terms, it's easier to trace stylistic patterns and habits across multiple series.
I don't understand the argument at all, to say their style is 'wholly their own', means nothing, they are wholly owned by Nintendo, they are Nintendo. If the studio is notably different to their others is a different point entirely.abasm said:To clarify, Retro Studios is a developer that is owned by Nintendo. Their development practices and style are almost wholly their own, however. Even if the development house is first party, it does the developers a disservice to accredit the game to the publisher. We discuss paintings in terms of their artists, not in terms of their owners. We discuss movies in terms of their directors and cast, not their producers. Shouldn't we discuss games in the same fashion?
Once you start tracing Nintendo titles back to their development teams, you can find some pretty interesting things. One team, headed by Aonuma, seems to hold sole responsibility for the Zelda series. Steel Diver was made by the Wii Fit team. Mario Kart is made by the Nintendogs team. HAL labs doesn't just make Kirby games--they also made Picross 3D and Face Raiders.
By speaking of games in these terms, it's easier to trace stylistic patterns and habits across multiple series.
StuBurns said:I don't understand the argument at all, to say their style is 'wholly their own', means nothing, they are wholly owned by Nintendo, they are Nintendo. If the studio is notably different to their others is a different point entirely.