• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Naughty Dog: move to next-gen is "terrifying"

Graphics have not really been a factor in most of my most played favourites from this gen.

I'd prefer if more devs stayed in business instead of killing themselves to make shiny shooting games.
 
The increase in capability outmatches the budget increase somewhat I imagine, but its still a big, scary increase. If you spend $20 million on a game (which isn't a crazy budget, though above average for a next-gen title) and it bombas at retail...your studio is done. During the PS1 days, budgets for everything but the biggest titles were minuscule compared to today and a failure could be padded by like a dozen other releases. Someone posted Square's output in the 90's and early 00's compared to today and it was like a crazy long list.

Ah, makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.
 
Think of all the DLC and episodic gaming that'll pay for all this new tech guys! YEAH!

What if the game industry completely stop being innovative due to ballooning development cost, and there is only like 4 studios due to bankruptcy? Then the only place we can get new and unique ideas is on the indie platform or PC.

A good bit of the creativity is headed there lately. Add in DD and that eyebrow-raising playing in Chrome deal from last week, well...
 
If it's terrifying for ND i don't even want to imagine the difficulties Japanese devs will have to face.90% of them will probably move to handheld/mobile development only.
 
I wouldn't mind the best of current generation graphics (ie. UC3, etc) rendered at 1080P, 60 FPS, forever. That's what the next gen should do with ease.

60fps won't be any more common next gen than it was this gen. Most companies are happy with their games running at 30fps. Fighting games, CoD, some racing games and a few action titles (Platinum and Team Ninja games) are the only 60fps games that you'll be able to bank on. It's possible that Respawn games will run at 60fps since Vince and Jason thought that made a big difference with their games.
 
Perhaps it was same sentiment when the ramification of hardware change from PS2 to PS3 had started to set in. This anxiety isn't ND exclusive.

Still next gen would be about iteration/evolution since we are already in the age of HD.

Of course, creating the best looking game on the PS3 (besides Santa monica) puts them on a pedestal which is like a double edged blade when it comes to balancing nigh unrealistic expectations (especially towards the beginning of the new generation) with practical upgrades at the time.
 
naughty dog are just terrified of how much their backs are going to hurt after carrying the ps4 to visual awesomeness.
 
I'm pretty sure that they said the same thing before this gen started too and look how that turned out for them. They'll have put out 4 games and two new IPs which is more than most devs have.

Yes but it was horrifyingly stressful. They were losing people left and right from the sounds of it.
 
So many studios are going to get closed, if games get even 10%-15% more expensive to make.
Those couple of millions are break it or make it
 
When you're doing this on current gen hardware

qdprv.jpg


The expectations for your next-gen game is going to be out of this world.

OMG. Ellie is cross eyed.
 
Reading this from May 2006 is interesting. Compare and contrast that with this new interview.

They know the pressure is massive to deliver another AAA game as well as transitioning to new hardware.

I don't believe the spotlight has been on them anywhere near this much in the PS1/PS2 days.

The dogs seem to be developing stage fright, bless! I think they'll be more than fine.
 
Seriously in awe of all the 'next gen can wait' posts.

Who can afford a $299 console when they got $60 annual CoD's to buy, $50 Elite memberships, $60 XBL Subscriptions, and $5 Avatar outfits? When I bought my $299 Xbox-Tard Pack back in 2005 I expected (nay demanded) it remain relevant beyond the year 2012. Technology has no business advancing, next gen can wait!

*Sent from my iPhone 4S. AT&T Mega Data Plans starting at only $130/mo*
 
Reading this from May 2006 is interesting. Compare and contrast that with this new interview.

They know the pressure is massive to deliver another AAA game as well as transitioning to new hardware.

I don't believe the spotlight has been on them anywhere near this much in the PS1/PS2 days.

The dogs seem to be developing stage fright, bless! I think they'll be more than fine.

The spotlight is going to be increasingly on them, since Sony can't rely on 3rd party exclusives. So ND, SSM (, etc.) have to sell the Sony hardware and consoles in general when people are moving onto pc/tablet gaming.
 
I wonder how many more studios will fold in the upcoming generation.

Well who is honestly left ?

We have Square-enix-Eidos +taito, the international Juggernaut super company
EA games and it's dozens of sub-companies
Activision/vivendi-universal/blizzard
Nintendo, Sony and MS obviously
Take 2 games
Ubisoft
THQ

Then, across the pacific -
Konami / hudson
Namco bandai
Sega
Atlus
capcom
Koei/tecmo

I realize you may have meant actual development studios and not publishers but think back 10 years and those 2 things were one in the same and there were over a hundred. Now there's barely 20 publishers left. I predict THQ is next to die , ubisoft is going to end up merging with another company, maybe an asian one ?

It's amazing that Atlus and sega are even still around really. Within 10 years I think you'll see less then 10 publishers. 2-4 of which will also make hardware.
 
I think having uncharted 4 as a PS4 launch title would be huge. But only if theres enough time passed between U3 and U4 that it makes people crave it. a 3 year cycle should be good.

while TLOU team would be in preproduction for either Jak4, TLOU2 or a new IP.
 
They all need to form a cartel and stunt the graphics push for their own benefit. Nintendo games could look like fucking crap and I'd still buy them religiously for their solid play mechanics - i.e. the things that actually matter.
 
I don't think consoles should get a real next gen until developing gets cheaper and more efficient...
The guys here say it pretty clearly, that's why a game like Final Fantasy VII ported 1:1 to current gen graphics would be so expensive... more than anything ever done
 
Everyone wants next-gen but then doesn't remember how much nextgens suck at first. Paying for overpriced upscaled ports. Shoddy early games that are rushed and can't take full advantage of the hardware. Maybe one or two games that are actually worth it in the first 18 months. No thanks.

so we should just never have a new gen?
 
Everyone wants next-gen but then doesn't remember how much nextgens suck at first. Paying for overpriced upscaled ports. Shoddy early games that are rushed and can't take full advantage of the hardware. Maybe one or two games that are actually worth it in the first 18 months. No thanks.

So how about rather than buying that shit, you wait till good games come out, instead of "screw there even being a next gen".

Makes no sense bro.
 
Well who is honestly left ?

We have Square-enix-Eidos +taito, the international Juggernaut super company
EA games and it's dozens of sub-companies
.....

I realize you may have meant actual development studios and not publishers but think back 10 years and those 2 things were one in the same and there were over a hundred. Now there's barely 20 publishers left. I predict THQ is next to die , ubisoft is going to end up merging with another company, maybe an asian one ?

It's amazing that Atlus and sega are even still around really. Within 10 years I think you'll see less then 10 publishers. 2-4 of which will also make hardware.

I really hope, if it ever came to this, that Nintendo would be the one to grab Sega. Only because I think they are the last chance of ever seeing many of Sega's IPs again. They fill voids that Nintendo as a company has, even if they contract them out to other companies and don't do them in house. I think if anyone else grabbed them they'd only be interested in Sonic and maybe not care enough to even sell off the other IPs but just let them rot for good. That and it only seems right that after being rivals (Nintendo and Sega) and now finally working together that in the end Sonic and Mario along with others should share the same home.
 
Yeah next gen is terrifying for the guys who actually go out ahead of the pack and figure out all the new shit and the best practices through trial and error and shit. Especially when they're a AAA studio that is also expected to put out a visually stunning game 'commensurate to the performance of the hardware' that also plays well. It's a massive rush of existing expectations, heightened expectations, and a whole new technological landscape that you have to explore through.
 
Exactly. We still have lower end options to develop for and who says you have to create for one, all or any of them.

If you're scared, step down. We'll still love you on Vita.
Why would jumping to WiiU be any easier? A new system is a new system




Yes then... it's not that heavy, just a problem for the first month...
AHAHAHAHAHAHA


wait ... you're serious?


AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
 
I'm not linking this. The PS2->PS3 transition was hard because PS2 and PS3 are completly diferent pieces of hardware. An entire engine and tools had to be rewritten with a direfent architecture.
Could this mean that PS4 will be completely diferent from the PS3 in such a way that it will force them to rewrite everything again? What could this mean to BC?

This isn't any different from previous gens. Consoles aren't PC's - engines don't go from gen to gen for the most part




[Nintex];33587614 said:
I understand Naughty Dog, they're probably scared that their SCE bosses will champion some sort of alien-CELL-Saturn architecture for PS4 again.
SWWS is helping with the architecture ... so no




AI routines are hardly limited by hardware these days...
Current gen consoles? Yeah they are
 
Should never have gone past the SNES generation. The graphics at the time were fantastic. Imagine how good and polished they would be now that devs have 20 yrs of experience to fully utilize the hardware!
 
If it's terrifying for ND i don't even want to imagine the difficulties Japanese devs will have to face.90% of them will probably move to handheld/mobile development only.

lulz, Japan? You will get less games from them next-gen compared to this gen...
 
re: ballooning development costs: I'd rather developers make a game with a 50 million dollar budget on contemporary hardware than a game with a 50 million dollar budget on shit 2005 hardware.



Isn't that the case with every transition though?

I wouldn't read too much into it.
The thing is that with the current blockbuster business model, you don't have three strikes before you're out. One big miss and everything's going to shit.

The situation is definitely more unforgiving and more daunting than in the past.
 
The thing is that with the current blockbuster business model, you don't have three strikes before you're out.

One big miss and everything's going to shit.

You really think that's the case with ND?

Really?

Next gen is going to be harder than this gen, just as this gen was harder than the one before it. But It's nothing newsworthy IMO. People are going to survive next generation I think.
 
I'd imagine it would be less terrifying if they weren't a first-party studio. Being first-party means they get a lot of support from Sony, sure, but it also means they'll be expected to deliver something solid in the first 12 months after the generation begins, so they need to begin working on it well before that time. A third-party studio has the luxury of sitting back and releasing titles on the old consoles until they're good and ready to make the jump, and by that point there will be middleware and experienced developers available to make it smoother.

They also mentioned that, at the beginning of the current generation, they had very little idea what the PS3 was going to be like and were developing their prototypes on PC. When they got the dev units they were apparently significantly less powerful than what they were expecting, so a lot of that work ended up being wasted somewhat. I'm guessing that experience has made them particularly cautious about any generational changes, though if Sony can get them PS4s as early as possible they might feel a bit more relaxed.
 
Well, the PS3 was/is difficult to work with so I can see why they had problems at first. I hope the PS4 either has a much more simpler design or at least something very similar to the PS3 (cell) so they can carry over alot of their tech. I really can't see Sony going for something completely different and unconventional next gen.
 
I always assumed large development costs were due to devs trying to fit a square block into a triangle hole, so to speak. With next gen, assuming Ram is plentiful, there would be a lot less stagnation during development resulting in more efficiency? How off base is that logic? Of course, I realize the costs toward art assets will go up but in the end it should be somewhat balanced (speaking of AAA games mostly).
 
You really think that's the case with ND?

Really?

Next gen is going to be harder than this gen, just as this gen was harder than the one before it. But It's nothing newsworthy IMO. People are going to survive next generation I think.
Well no, you were talking in general I thought, so I replied in general. Naughty Dog seems pretty safe since they have such a good relationship with Sony. Other developers don't have that luxury.


And it's funny that you say "survive" considering the amount of studios that have died this generation.
 
what they are talking about is true for any new software development, it is just what happens. You start with something new and unfamiliar, you dont really understand it, there are many bugs and issues and then all the pieces fall together at the very end.

there is no easy software development, unless everyone can do it and then it is no fun :-).
 
Who can afford a $299 console when they got $60 annual CoD's to buy, $50 Elite memberships, $60 XBL Subscriptions, and $5 Avatar outfits? When I bought my $299 Xbox-Tard Pack back in 2005 I expected (nay demanded) it remain relevant beyond the year 2012. Technology has no business advancing, next gen can wait!

*Sent from my iPhone 4S. AT&T Mega Data Plans starting at only $130/mo*

Damn right. And if I can't afford it, nobody should get it at launch. We all know that consoles sell half of their lifetime in the first year, and so if it doesn't launch and sell 30 million, then it's not happening.

And also, I only need 256 Kb, 10 acres, and a mule and I can farmville fuckers.


Why do we need new things when we have all these old things?

I KNOW, right?! I've got some checkers from pre-WWII era made out of lead. Anyone game?
 
re: ballooning development costs: I'd rather developers make a game with a 50 million dollar budget on contemporary hardware than a game with a 50 million dollar budget on shit 2005 hardware.

Seriously. This is the most ridiculous argument. If Witcher 2 can happen with a small budget, then I'm sure Ass creed, COD, DudeBrah 458052 can too.
 
I'm ready for the next gen, so that I can watch the wacky hype train, not buy the consoles at release, not buy the inevitably shitty release titles, check out some best-of-gen swan songs for current gen this upcoming year and next, and then buy the best of the new consoles a year and a half later when decent shit starts coming out for it. Yep, I'm ready!
 
Well no, you were talking in general I thought, so I replied in general. Naughty Dog seems pretty safe since they have such a good relationship with Sony. Other developers don't have that luxury.


And it's funny that you say "survive" considering the amount of studios that have died this generation.

Wait I was talking in general. I thought you were talking about ND... My head hurts >_>.

Anyway, the economy played a huge role in those studios. I'm not saying next gen is going to be any easier, rather, I'm just saying it's normal for a transition to have some bumps. I don't think next generation will be any different.

(the blockblusters are blockbusters for a reason, they are intended to be heavy weights. They either rise to heaven or plummet to hell. Developers don't have to take this route if they don't want to. God forbid they actually use creativity rather than technology to sell their games.)
 
Sounds like they are saying (we are a first party studio)

Sony does not really want to lose more money so sing the company line.

Things will go back to Snes and Genesis days. Consoles will be far less powerful than PC (from the starting point). People will whine they want graphics back. Would be nice if the focus of next gen was on AI. ND is just conditioning the masses to accept the day when Sony puts out an underpowered system.(In some peoples eyes.)

When people lose they stop playing and say the game sucks. The days of people learning what the game wants and honing skills are gone. The focus will always be on graphics because that is the easiest tool to sell software to the masses.

Just my opinion.
 
Reading this from May 2006 is interesting. Compare and contrast that with this new interview.

They know the pressure is massive to deliver another AAA game as well as transitioning to new hardware.

I don't believe the spotlight has been on them anywhere near this much in the PS1/PS2 days.

The dogs seem to be developing stage fright, bless! I think they'll be more than fine.
I know Naughty Dog has come far this gen but Jesus Christ. They make Uncharted 1 look like a PS2 game sometimes!

6SaC9.png
 
60fps won't be any more common next gen than it was this gen. Most companies are happy with their games running at 30fps. Fighting games, CoD, some racing games and a few action titles (Platinum and Team Ninja games) are the only 60fps games that you'll be able to bank on. It's possible that Respawn games will run at 60fps since Vince and Jason thought that made a big difference with their games.
Sad but true. At least get a locked 30 at 1080p. We don't even get true 720p 30 fps games now.
 
So how about rather than buying that shit, you wait till good games come out, instead of "screw there even being a next gen".

Makes no sense bro.

I think that's kind of the point of my post. I have no interest in being an early adopter again, so for ME, i'd rather Naughty Dog (and all of my other favorite devs) made as many current gen games as possible before moving on. Nowhere did I say I hope Next Gen never happens. Obviously that shit is inevitable.
 
Top Bottom