It was so bizarre for them to omit analogue buttons on the Pro controllers.
It'll be great if all, or almost all multiplayer Nintendo games released year 1 could be played multiplayer right out of the box. MK8 basically is confirmed to be able to, but I'd be interested to see if you can play Smash with two Joy Cons. I think it has the right about of buttons; 4 face buttons, 2 shoulders, and an analogue should be everything you need, right?
Every Nintendo console since has been priced at slightly more then it probably should cost. I think that trend will continue and the Switch will be 300 or 350 for the basic model+ a sku for $50 more with some pack in stuff.
Miyamoto said:So unfortunately with our latest system, the Wii U, the price point was one that ended up getting a little higher than we wanted.
I think Nintendo regret pricing the Wii at 250 and missing out on so much potential profit they could have made if it was 300.
They'll be turning a profit at $199 at launch. The BOM of the rumoured specs wouldn't come to much more than US$150 imo.
Thanks OP for this thread! You've exposed many a cheapskate today.
No after 3DS and Wii UI think Nintendo regret pricing the Wii at 250 and missing out on so much potential profit they could have made if it was 300.
Every Nintendo console since has been priced at slightly more then it probably should cost. I think that trend will continue and the Switch will be 300 or 350 for the basic model+ a sku for $50 more with some pack in stuff.
The Switch Pro controllers have gyros in them along with an analog triggers which the Wii U Pro controllers are missing. However, this could vary on a game by game case but giving how easily the general public is confused, I doubt Nintendo would make the Wii U Pro controllers backwards compatible with the Switch.
Where was it confirmed they have gyro?
Wow. Did the op use google translate?
I think it's better if you take out Vitor711's translation from the OP because it's inaccurate and will still confuse people. Instead perhaps quote a piece from the Dualshockers' article for clarification.
They'll be turning a profit at $199 at launch. The BOM of the rumoured specs wouldn't come to much more than US$150 imo.
$249 is my expectation
$199 is best case scenario
$299+ is "everyone to the shelter!" scenario
$249 is my expectation
$199 is best case scenario
$299+ is "everyone to the shelter!" scenario
$249 is my expectation
$199 is best case scenario
$299+ is "everyone to the shelter!" scenario
It's not like the switch is going to have a 10nm SoC. Even if it has a 16nm SoC it's not going to be considered state of the art for mobile. A 150$ BoM is a reasonable estimate.
Other: Thor 2 - Dark World
$249 is my expectation
$199 is best case scenario
$299+ is "everyone to the shelter!" scenario
I think Nintendo regret pricing the Wii at 250 and missing out on so much potential profit they could have made if it was 300.
Every Nintendo console since has been priced at slightly more then it probably should cost. I think that trend will continue and the Switch will be 300 or 350 for the basic model+ a sku for $50 more with some pack in stuff.
$250 was considered a gamble at the time. the thing was essentially a souped up xbox with motion controls, luckily it worked out fine but i couldn't see it flying off shelves had they gone higher
that said it's really not relevant by today's standards. Switch has a much more "conservative" pitch, inflation places $250 as not so much, ect
and it's why I hate GAF, lolThis is why I love GAF
I think it's better if you take out Vitor711's translation from the OP because it's inaccurate and will still confuse people. Instead perhaps quote a piece from the Dualshockers' article for clarification.
The way the OP is written now it's like there are three ways to interpret the article: you saying Nikkei "all but confirmed" it, Vitor117 being somewhere in the middle and Dualshockers refuting it.
Also don't get why the "Speculation maybe" was added to the thread title when it was already confirmed as speculation before that was added, but that may have been a mod's doing.
I think people are setting them up for huge disappointment this Friday because they think 25.000 yen is very likely now. As much as I (and Nikkei) want it to be that price, I think something like 27.900 yen to 29.900 yen max is much more likely because it gives them more wiggle room to do a price cut later and it'll still be cheaper than the PS4.
ThanksYou got it
25,000 JPY MSRP means 27,000 JPY retail, which strongly indicates a $250 US retail price. I'd probably put my money on $249.99 USD, 219.99 GBP, 269.99 EUR.
I don't get the argument that the Switch is under-powered. Even if it ends up being marketed as a home console, the guts of the machine are all in a slim tablet form. The only numbers I could find on the 3DS are 4.8 Gflops for the GPU (take that number with a grain of salt), compared to likely upwards of 400ish Gflops for the Switch.
You're talking about a HUGE graphical leap from Nintendo's last handheld, but people want to compare it to cutting edge Microsoft and Sony home consoles that are 10x the size and have 4-15x the power. I don't understand the argument, and it seems a bit disingenuous. Nintendo can market it as a home console all they want, but if it has mobile components in a mobile device--despite connecting to a TV, it's a mobile!
So yeah, $249 is a good price.
I wonder how GAF is going to respond when it's peoced at $299.99 especially considering all of these it has to be $200 and $250 is too much.
It's going to be hilarious.D;
Those of us with jobs shouldn't find it TOO difficult to raise/save another $100, but I can't speak for everyone. I also can't imagine Nintendo will release it at the same price as the Wii U after, well, the Wii U happened.
Overblown reactions can be pretty funny, though.
Where are people getting the idea it has to be one price point at launch? People are suggesting what they think the best strategy would be, based on what we've seen in the past. $299.99 and $349.99 sans a Wii Sports sort of viral hit did not work. It is also pricing higher than what the handheld market has ever supported, and plenty of people are talking about how they view this primarily as the successor to 3DS.I wonder how GAF is going to respond when it's peoced at $299.99 especially considering all of these it has to be $200 and $250 is too much.
I wonder how GAF is going to respond when it's peoced at $299.99 especially considering all of these it has to be $200 and $250 is too much.
I'm going to buy one because it's my job, but $299 for what it offers from a customer perspective means Nintendo hasn't learned anything. $249 is the max it should be dropping at.
If it's strictly for business purposes, then yes. Which means you are using those expenses for the purpose of making money. If you're not making money from it there's a chance you may get audited.Can you write off consoles and video games generally as business expenses? Just curious.
I'm going to buy one because it's my job, but $299 for what it offers from a customer perspective means Nintendo hasn't learned anything. $249 is the max it should be dropping at.