TheRagnCajun said:-Hard is a problem to some if they don't have the patience for it.
-Good Players being able to cope with a flawed camera does not change the fact that the camera is flawed. Thats like saying "Good players at Lair can perform the fickle guesture motions consistently"
sandman said:Famitsu give NG2 9, 9, 8, 8 34/40.
Anyone know what did they give NG 1 black and sigma?
Mamesj said:they'll talk about everything on the surface, but they're not going to go into any useful depth. None of these reviewers have established themselves as authorities on this game-- they're writing casual reviews for casual fans
With that in mind, the real review is yet to come. Maybe Team Ninja nerfed NG2 somehow-- perhaps they screwed up guard crushes, gave too many enemies sabaki type properties, maybe the tonfas are useless-- it's these kinds of details a lot of us want.
news to me.DC R1D3R said:It's probably been posted before but here's Giancarlo Varanini's review
Varanini said:youll find that theres a flow to the action thats even more enjoyable than that of the original Ninja Gaiden.
Varanini said:the original Ninja Gaiden feels stiff compared to the action in Ninja Gaiden II
Varanini said:The only thing that misses the mark in terms of new content is the additional weapons. While its great to have access to nine weapons just for the sake of changing things up, you dont really need to use more than two of them to get the job done--the combination of the dragon sword and the falcons talons are more than capable of getting you through the entire game. But the great thing is that you may find a combination of weapons thats better suited to how you play--just as you would have a preference in a fighting game for one type of character over another.
sandman said:Famitsu give NG2 9, 9, 8, 8 34/40.
Anyone know what did they give NG 1 black and sigma?
Kai Ozu said:That's good. They must like it more since it's not as openworldish as the last game. And I recall them giving NG1 9,8,8,7.
Wasn't that a banned meme?Vaxadrin said:So, going by Famitsu, we know it's at least as good as Haze.
Hesemonni said:Wasn't that a banned meme?
Draft said:Just a note: I don't think it's fair to lump the original Ninja Gaiden (NES) in with the rest as having a "bad story." If I remember, that game was one of the first to have an actual story, with cutscenes, characters that spoke at length, etc.
It's really one of the precursors to the cinematic story telling techniques used by most games today.
Please.duckroll said:Just because it has a story doesn't mean the story can't be bad!
Brandon F said:You mean Normal right? I'm playing Sigma now and Hard isn't unlocked until you beat the game on Normal first.
The whole comparing scores and going "so ____ is worse/as good as/better than ____" is bannable, for better or for worse.Vaxadrin said:Geez, I know Haze was bad but mentioning it shouldn't be ban-worthy.
God's Beard said:youll find that theres a flow to the action thats even more enjoyable than that of the original Ninja Gaiden.
all I need to know.
Draft said:Please.
Bad.
I don't know how old you are, but if you were NES age, like 7 or 8 or whatever during the NES heyday, you know, I mean you KNOW, that the NG story was not bad. It was bad ass. Was there any cooler opening sequence than those fucking ninjas having a jump duel in the middle of the night? When they both land and stand there for a second and then the one drops. And then you see Ryu's face and the shadows are highlighting it in an ominous fashion and the text is all like... REVENGE.
That was the epitome of game storytelling at the time. No doubt. Respect.
So.... any update about this from the Gamerscore blog people?CPaladino said:As far as the demo status - yeah, I'll clear up the details tonight or tomorrow morning, I don't have access to the info here on the bus.
Duck said:The whole comparing scores and going "so ____ is worse/as good as/better than ____" is bannable, for better or for worse.
Duck said:The whole comparing scores and going "so ____ is worse/as good as/better than ____" is bannable, for better or for worse.
DC R1D3R said:That line got me too :]
So it seems as though the reviewers are split into two groups. NOVICE and HARDCORE.
When I go to a martial arts class, I don't require a novice of that same martial art to tell me shit.
I feel exactly the same way towards a Ninja Gaiden review.
You make some very good points. I have to say your evaluation of the NG series' critical reception seems reasonable; critics' usual inexperience with deep, skill-based games and their obligation to write for a casual audience are important factors in determining the worth of their impressions on a title such as NG2. For these very reasons I find myself having to read between the lines of most reviews for action and fighting games. Interestingly enough, though, your list of critics' most common complaints about the first NG isn't that far off:Mamesj said:These are the same reviews we read when Ninja Gaiden 1 came out:
--omg so hard
--the camera is broken
--the story is bad
--the action is repetitive
--the environments are bland
--the platforming sucks
this time, the scores are lower, but the reviews are just as uninformative and they bitch harder and more furiously. After a couple days with NG1, it was apparent to people playing it that there was a lot more to the game than simple "action" and that it was a deeper, DMC-style action game that could be played forever. The reviews didn't convey that side of the story. In that sense, these NG2 (and NG1) reviews are like fighting game reviews--they'll talk about everything on the surface, but they're not going to go into any useful depth. None of these reviewers have established themselves as authorities on this game-- they're writing casual reviews for casual fans (because that's the way the wind is blowing in the industry these days.)
True, and it's the same for every major action or fighting game release. Still, speaking only for myself, balance changes and new subtleties of the combat system aren't nearly as important as the game's technical performance for the time being. As worrying as the reviews are, I'm leaving the last word to players like you. Next week, if the majority of reports suggest NG2 is at least as technically sound as its predecessor, I'll pick it up right away. Otherwise I'll probably wait for a sale or, fingers crossed, Black-style special edition.With that in mind, the real review is yet to come. Maybe Team Ninja nerfed NG2 somehow-- perhaps they screwed up guard crushes, gave too many enemies sabaki type properties, maybe the tonfas are useless-- it's these kinds of details a lot of us want. So, the ballot is still out, but I won't let "bad camera" and "too hard" sway me.
It's probably a lie. I check both the NA and JP Marketplaces and couldn't find it.grap3fruitman said:So the demo's up according to someone on the IGN boards but it's not showing up for me.
Vaxadrin said:"It's a refreshing kind of action game, the likes of which you don't really see these days."
grap3fruitman said:So the demo's up according to someone on the IGN boards but it's not showing up for me.
Ninja99 said:It's probably a lie. I check both the NA and JP Marketplaces and couldn't find it.
pizzaguysrevenge said:Has GAF sunken to the "The only reason you don't like it is because you're not good at it" defense?
For shame.
Oldschoolgamer said:The only thing I saw on new arrivals was nascar.
God damn.
Set the demo free.
Someone post the GAF NG review again :lolpizzaguysrevenge said:Has GAF sunken to the "The only reason you don't like it is because you're not good at it" defense?
For shame.
Oldschoolgamer said:The only thing I saw on new arrivals was nascar.
God damn.
Set the demo free.
PhatSaqs said:Someone post the GAF NG review again :lol
Ninja Gaiden is just not the Ninja Gaiden I expected. It's overwhelmingly mediocre, not enjoyable to play, and the horrendous camera alone destroys any redeeming factors the game may have. Most PlayStation 2 owners should remember Square's similarly over hyped The Bouncer. I'd almost go as far as proclaiming Ninja Gaiden to be the Xbox equivalent.
chespace said:The Forza community says hello to Ninja Gaiden II. :lol
Brandon F said:I really wish there were some speed videos of people building these Forza paintjobs. It would be so awesome to watch it go from scratch to finish in hyperspeed. Amazing stuff.
chespace said:
your avatar is off the limit :/m0dus said:DON'T you tempt me.
Yeah it's awesome storytelling, but doesn't mean the story itself is good, only the way it's presented (like with God of War).Draft said:Please.
Bad.
I don't know how old you are, but if you were NES age, like 7 or 8 or whatever during the NES heyday, you know, I mean you KNOW, that the NG story was not bad. It was bad ass. Was there any cooler opening sequence than those fucking ninjas having a jump duel in the middle of the night? When they both land and stand there for a second and then the one drops. And then you see Ryu's face and the shadows are highlighting it in an ominous fashion and the text is all like... REVENGE.
That was the epitome of game storytelling at the time. No doubt. Respect.
chespace said:The Forza community says hello to Ninja Gaiden II. :lol
http://i32.tinypic.com/2ni8jra.jpgNJ x Falkor said:Can someone rehost with Tinypic, I can't see photobucket at work.
Thank you
No, it WAS good.Mr. Durden said:Yeah it's awesome storytelling, but doesn't mean the story itself is good, only the way it's presented (like with God of War).
Still, people bitching about needing a good story in Ninja Gaiden..... since when are there games in the genre with an actual good story.
Ok ok :lolDraft said:No, it WAS good.
Look.
The modern day gaming slob may scoff at a simple tale of Ninja revenge, but in the late 1980s? This was gaming's equivalent of Shakespeare.
Draft said:No, it WAS good.
Look.
The modern day gaming slob may scoff at a simple tale of Ninja revenge, but in the late 1980s? This was gaming's equivalent of Shakespeare.
Draft said:No, it WAS good.
Look.
The modern day gaming slob may scoff at a simple tale of Ninja revenge, but in the late 1980s? This was gaming's equivalent of Shakespeare.