Tellaerin said:An honest question: Did battle.net provide any additional content, like downloadable quests and the like? That's one of the things people pay for as part of the monthly fee in a traditional MMO, and it's also something that Sega offered with PSO in the past. If battle.net did something similar for free, then maybe you have a point.
For Diablo 2, Blizzard continued to support the game via patches that would add new items, new uniques, additional features, etc over time. While I will agree they're not really comparable to what Sega offered with PSO, it was great at the time because Blizzard was under no obligation to actually continue pumping stuff into a game years after it shipped.
For Starcraft and Warcraft 3 though, the excellent ladder system and player matching was and still is above and beyond anything provided by any other developer up to now. There were also free maps both for multiplayer and singleplayer, as well as excellent player-made custom maps with various different gameplay features and so on.
Another example of a game similar to PSO/PSU would be Guild Wars. It's free to play, but when they offer additional content and so on, you pay for those optionally. As long as you've been a PC gamer for some time, what Sega does with PSO/PSU is totally unacceptable on any level, but I guess the console gamers don't mind.