Stallion Free
Cock Encumbered
GPU money hats?
An ancient practice.
GPU money hats?
4K is a waste of resources IMO.
Where do I preorder?
Are there any visual features that are going to be exclusive to AMD cards in BF4?
I seriously doubt the 4K worthy textures are gonna be locked to Nvidia cards for these Ubisoft games.
And they get 5m$ worth out of their program with EA and Ubisoft, how? To me it looks more of a waste. If half the kickstarters kick off and half of that half is good, it's still 25 new games to play.
P.S. I kind of understand AMD's motive, so ok, I will give that to them.. But Nvidia funding Ubi 5m$ for.. what? Artificial performance tweaks in Watch Dogs that inexplicably only work on Nvidia hardware? Shaders to purposefully handicap AMD?
I know this has been around since forever, but it has to stop.. It hurts everyone involved; IHVs, developers, consumers, everyone.
Right, but tech doesn't just suddenly appear in a mainstream product for a cheap price out of nowhere. It arrives at the enthusiast level first, then becomes mainstream when the price gets low enough. This is aimed squarely at enthusiasts. You won't even get 4k in mainstream gaming next-next gen, let alon this one.
GPU money hats?
The screenshots will be of a eyeball-melting quality and every one of them will be posted with your brand of hardware attached.
This will be worth far more than your deal with Ubisoft and for a far smaller price.
not sure if this is possible anymore, but can't we install two different GPUs (AMD and nVIDIA) and switch between the two depending on game?
ugh 4K gaming?
I'll settle for 1080p, just give me 60FPS, good AA and bigger scope, better modeling, better effects.
4K is a waste of resources IMO.
not sure if this is possible anymore, but can't we install two different GPUs (AMD and nVIDIA) and switch between the two depending on game?
The bad thing about 4k is that it is too good.
Lol, what? It's not really in line with the other one, is it?
Silly Nvidia.
Nvidia, if you give me one of your new Battleboxes including a 4K monitor and a lump sum of US$50,000 I will over the next two years post screenshots all over the internet of the latest PC games running on your hardware.
The screenshots will be of a eyeball-melting quality and every one of them will be posted with your brand of hardware attached.
This will be worth far more than your deal with Ubisoft and for a far smaller price.
came in to post this...
it's a sad, sad world if this is what we've come to
ugh 4K gaming?
I'll settle for 1080p, just give me 60FPS, good AA and bigger scope, better modeling, better effects.
4K is a waste of resources IMO.
This has been going on for decades
I've heard of driver optimizations done by the GPU manufacturer, never heard of straight up moneyhatting
came in to post this...
it's a sad, sad world if this is what we've come to
I've heard of driver optimizations done by the GPU manufacturer, never heard of straight up moneyhatting
Batman Arkham Asylum: Part 2GPU money hats?
Batman Arkham Asylum: Part 2
It had Physx and MSAA options in the options menu for Nvidia.What was the problem with Batman AA?
Did it run bad on AMD cards or something?
So does that mean that each game gimps the other gpu on purpose? 5 million is a good enough reason to do so.
YES 4k gaming make it happen captain.
All we need now is under 1000 4k monitors with 120hz refresh rate.
Guys.. it's Fudzilla......
Shhhhh
According to our industry sources, the creators and publishers of Dirt 2 received quite big chunk of cash to make the game DirectX 11 capable.
Don’t expect any miracles, as developers will only get some minor things enabled and knowing how desperate the gaming industry is these days, they gladly accepted the opportunity to get some free cash for exchange for a few effects in DirectX 11.
ATI desperately need to push the sales of its heavily overpriced DirectX 11 cards that are supposed to launch on September 23rd (two days from press time) and having games such as Dirt 2 and Stalker 2 might help.
The trouble is that Dirt comes only after DirectX 11 official launch which is Windows 7 launch set for October 23rd and our sources have told that Dirt might actually be pushed back at least for December, leaving ATI hanging in there until the launch.
ugh 4K gaming?
I'll settle for 1080p, just give me 60FPS, good AA and bigger scope, better modeling, better effects.
4K is a waste of resources IMO.
erm I don't see why anyone would need to invest 5 million dollars so that they can just render the game in higher resolution. it's literally like a few seconds of tweaking.ugh 4K gaming?
I'll settle for 1080p, just give me 60FPS, good AA and bigger scope, better modeling, better effects.
4K is a waste of resources IMO.
ugh 4K gaming?
I'll settle for 1080p, just give me 60FPS, good AA and bigger scope, better modeling, better effects.
4K is a waste of resources IMO.
People like dennis are gonna start having a nvidia computer and amd computer for different games in order to get the best graphics possible.
If we're talking about computational resources, I think it's only a waste if you drop framerates and use slow LCD tech to get to 4k, because the judder and motion artifacts degrade the image to the point where the benefit is lost. Otherwise, if people feel the cost for 4k gaming is justified then that's their business. I personally don't at the moment but it's good that people have that choice.ugh 4K gaming?
I'll settle for 1080p, just give me 60FPS, good AA and bigger scope, better modeling, better effects.
4K is a waste of resources IMO.