I mean yeah, the competition still hasnt released anything since 2017...
I'm always surprised by how far Nvidia enthusiasts will go to oversell their favorite corporation's products.
Putting "1080p" and "beast" next to eachother just feels weird in 2019.
I agree, I think it's funny when some console players are gaming at higher resolutions than pc folk.Putting "1080p" and "beast" next to eachother just feels weird in 2019.
which is an overclocked 580 which is an overclocked 480.The 590 shipped 4 months ago.
Dumb idea to buy any gpu right now though
What would you suggest to someone with a very old graphic card (GTX 670)?Dumb idea to buy any gpu right now though
What would you suggest to someone with a very old graphic card (GTX 670)?
The 590 shipped 4 months ago.
pretty much anything. get the best card you can afford.What would you suggest to someone with a very old graphic card (GTX 670)?
pretty much anything. get the best card you can afford.
I'm still waiting for a solid 1440p beast. My 1070 isn't cutting it.
Worth noting the rx 580 is $140
Dumb idea to buy any gpu right now though
1080p and am not sure about the budget given how some have said to wait while others to go with 1070ti/1080ti/2060/Vega 56 etc etc.Yeah. Also pretty hard to suggest without knowing his resolution of choice and max budget.
You held on this long, wait for next gen. Or at least Navi/7nm nvidia cards.What would you suggest to someone with a very old graphic card (GTX 670)?
You held on this long, wait for Navi.
See folks, only a corporate drone roots against competition.
See folks, only a corporate drone roots against competition.
It is if you don't time when you sell it right. Also I don't know why pc gamers want "peasant 1080p" still lol.I'm not rooting against anyone. I have Ryzen in my rig, 8 Cores at $150. I guess I'm dumb though because I had to buy a GPU to get it to work since according to you buying GPUs is dumb.
It is if you don't time when you sell it right.
It's a bit different now with next gen right around the corner. This is like buying the gtx 570 expecting it to last into ps4 era.The same could be said of any GPU. Your argument makes no sense.
It's no different than any other GPU generation. 20 or more months away is not right around the corner.It's a bit different now with next gen right around the corner.
You won't know because console resolutions and settings are highly variable, and they will be especially variable next gen as they target high resolutions. 1660 on the other hand will remain a great 1080p card for a very long time.Once next gen launches you know what performance you need to keep up with games roughly
1080p and am not sure about the budget given how some have said to wait while others to go with 1070ti/1080ti/2060/Vega 56 etc etc.
What conditions need to be met for a GPU purchase to not be dumb to you?
I'm really curious as the 16-series offers a generational improvement, the first generational improvement to the sub $300 GPUs we've seen since 2016.
What more needs to be done to make it worth it for you?
Well to be fair high end Turing should be ok or at least the 2080 ti for next gen - Its got good async compute unlike pascal - at least until drivers start being shit.The Pascal/Turing generations of cards are going to age HORRIBLY
They aren't analog like the 700/900 series (retro gamers will always need these) but they also don't support HDMI 2.1 either
They are great for now or if you still have a 400/500 series card but other than that I'd wait
The Pascal/Turing generations of cards are going to age HORRIBLY
Yeah... The ones celebrating this will soon enough feel the hurt in their pockets when AMD is completely out of the picture.
True, although I doubt Intel will be immediately competing at the high end. To get an idea.... AMD's internal GPUs on their CPU parts are vastly superior than Intel's... Are we really to expect that Intel can do on the graphical performance front what AMD can't?Good thing Intel is getting in the GPU market, maybe they can actually compete against Nvidia
Are we really to expect that Intel can do on the graphical performance front what AMD can't?
Note how I said they won't be competing at the high end immediately. Sure. In the long term, they can possibly overtake nVidia. But as of now, the fact that Intel integrated graphics are inferior to AMD's, and the fact that Intel at one point even resorted to Vega for graphics, is quite telling. We can't expect Intel to suddenly shake the whole market with their first graphics card. If Intel releases their first GPU in the next year or two, we should be expecting an upper mid range card at best (GTX 1070/2060/Vega64 range). Not a 2080Ti killer.Are we living in an age where we doubt Intel’s engineering prowess? If they really wanted to and the shareholders didn’t mind the huge R&D spend, Intel could embarass Nvidia.
weird naming scheme Nvidia cards which are confusing customers into thinking they are higher up the hierarchy than they actually are
To get an idea.... AMD's internal GPUs on their CPU parts are vastly superior than Intel's...
Are we really to expect that Intel can do on the graphical performance front what AMD can't?
Next-gen consoles are supposed to be between a Vega 56 and a Vega 64 in power.
Judging by current rumors this is the expectation. Massive jump over current gen, but is already a mid-range GPU today in the PC landscape and by the time next-gen launches who knows where it will be compared to Nvidia, Intel and AMD GPUs.Tell us more about the future.
There's no "us", it's just you. If you think they will offer better performance than the Vega 64 then great.Tell us more about the future.
1080p and considering youre coming from a 670, I'll say go for something used, if you feel comfortable.
Anything will be a big upgrade, considering where youre coming from.
if you want to buy new only, rx580+2 free games or gtx 1660, seem like a good choice for that res and they both are pretty cheap.
Judging by current rumors this is the expectation. Massive jump over current gen, but is already a mid-range GPU today in the PC landscape and by the time next-gen launches who knows where it will be compared to Nvidia, Intel and AMD GPUs.
There's no "us", it's just you. If you think they will offer better performance than the Vega 64 then great.
I believe the 2-tier Xbox $250 4TF "Lockhart" and $500 12TF "Anaconda" rumor. I'm expecting a $400 PS5, so in effect next-gen will be something in between Vega 56 and 64. I'll be surprised if a $400 2020 console can even outperform an overclocked RTX 2060.
Ha Ha, Vega 56-64 performance on next gen systems? That gave me a good ol chuckle....Tell us more about the future.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯You’re underestimating the jump to 7nm and matching against 12nm/15nm tech. You’re also guessing PS4 will be $399.