Is it impossible for young white guys to get rich and not also be pieces of shit?
I'll give you guys my PayPal account info and we can find out!
Is it impossible for young white guys to get rich and not also be pieces of shit?
No shoes no service man.If 2016 has taught us anything it's to not trust white dudes who don't wear shoes
I guess it's not too surprising anymore the the Oculus Store is a walled garden, is it?
That's because the founding fathers didn't understand voting systems. First past the post always devolves into a two party system. So, in a sense, we were designed exactly for that, they just didn't know they were designing it for that.
The question is, once you know that America is a two party system, what sort of responsibility do you as a citizen have to engage with one of the two parties, since engaging with a non major party will not achieve any goals you have.
Could this all be fake and not really Luckey?
I read the article, who's the white supremacists? It doesn't mention that in the article or anything about racism.
Maybe you missed this part?
Why would Luckey have used a fake account to conceal all this, and then let The Daily Beast (of all places) know that it's him?
Perhaps you place too much faith in the American peopleOur media has seriously failed translating information to the American people if issues is the number two reason for supporting Trump.
Throw out his various racist suggestions both implicit and explicit, his economic, social, and foreign policy issues are nonsensical at best.
Uh huh. Not what I'm saying
Dear god I can't wait for this cycle to end. This country was never founded with the intention that we would devolve into 2 private clubs battling one another for the strongest superpower in the world.
Basically the American citizenship is being held ransom by 2 massively rich corporations.
Wow, fuck this guy so much. I'm never going anywhere near an Oculus Rift now. Hope they fire his ass. "I'll fly my jet a minute less." Fuck off with that.
I get the hate for Palmer Luckey, but the hate for Oculus seems strange? Like people are forgetting the other thousand + other people involved in its creation, or the fact white supremacy or similar bigots probably work on other products they love and use. Maybe there's something I'm not thinking about, but so long as Palmer Luckey doesn't have the majority of control over oculus,what's the big deal? I get that this could be seen as indirectly contributing to funding white supremacy groups, but couldn't you say that about any large scale product?
Why would Luckey have used a fake account to conceal all this, and then let The Daily Beast (of all places) know that it's him?
Uh huh. Not what I'm saying
Dear god I can't wait for this cycle to end. This country was never founded with the intention that we would devolve into 2 private clubs battling one another for the strongest superpower in the world.
Basically the American citizenship is being held ransom by 2 massively rich corporations.
Could this all be fake and not really Luckey?
I get the hate for Palmer Luckey, but the hate for Oculus seems strange? Like people are forgetting the other thousand + other people involved in its creation, or the fact white supremacy or similar bigots probably work on other products they love and use. Maybe there's something I'm not thinking about, but so long as Palmer Luckey doesn't have the majority of control over oculus,what's the big deal? I get that this could be seen as indirectly contributing to funding white supremacy groups, but couldn't you say that about any large scale product?
Like, I think you're probably right, but that still amounts to declaring it to be everyone else's problem and washing your hands of it.
You recognize that candidate is a legit threat to minorities and that neither candidate will hurt you in the long run but you don't want to vote for the candidate that is actively trying to help out minoriites. The political game isn't perfect but these are our choices and one of them gives a shit.
I get the hate for Palmer Luckey, but the hate for Oculus seems strange? Like people are forgetting the other thousand + other people involved in its creation, or the fact white supremacy or similar bigots probably work on other products they love and use. Maybe there's something I'm not thinking about, but so long as Palmer Luckey doesn't have the majority of control over oculus,what's the big deal? I get that this could be seen as indirectly contributing to funding white supremacy groups, but couldn't you say that about any large scale product?
Considering the kinds of shitty opinions his girlfriend has and his association with people like Milo, I wouldn't be surprised if he was in some kind of "this is totally cool right?" bubble.
Thankfully, the Vive is better anyway.
I'm sorry, what's your issue with Elon Musk?I'm not surprised. It's like Notch or Elon Musk. A lot of these tech guys get lost in their worlds of numbers and data, so much so that social issues don't even click with them. Because of the binary "works/doesn't work" nature of tech development things outside of it that have gray areas and more nuance seem so foreign that they simply become reactionary and treat the unfamiliar with hostility.
Could this all be fake and not really Luckey?
Then they probably shouldn't have enshrined a two party system into the Constitution. As long as you are required to win over 50% of the Electoral College to win the Presidency, this will be a two party system.
Political parties have more in common with massive Unions than they do with corporations. So again, unless you are going to pass a law saying that like minded people cannot align themselves to increase their leverage, this is the way things are going to be.
That's a fair perspective and I totally understand it. But who is gonna stand up against it? If we are really that unhappy with a 2 party system, which it does seem that many are, who is going to speak up against it? Not every country in the world is a 2 party system. Not by a long shot. Netherlands has a wide selection of parties who hold seats and give their voting demo a broad range of choices to vote for.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_the_Netherlands
That's because the founding fathers didn't understand voting systems. First past the post always devolves into a two party system. So, in a sense, we were designed exactly for that, they just didn't know they were designing it for that.
The question is, once you know that America is a two party system, what sort of responsibility do you as a citizen have to engage with one of the two parties, since engaging with a non major party will not achieve any goals you have.
This story is like a perfect storm of topics interesting to GAF, uniting gaming side and off-topic into one singular purpose
Oculus is gonna flop, Scorpio won't be compatible with Vive because of Valve, PSVR wins undisputed.
Kotaku reporting it now
http://kotaku.com/oculus-rift-founder-funding-trump-shitposters-1786977098
If you want to change the system, the federal level is the wrong place to start, because all of our election laws are controlled at the state level. So if you want a country with the possibility of functional third parties, it requires major changes in election laws, which you should be working for at the state level, by getting sympathetic state legislators elected.
The Netherlands has a different system of voting, which allows for more parties. If you want to match their diversity, you have to work to alter the way we elect people. This includes things like run off voting, proportional vote allocation, etc. It is not sexy or fun.
And while doing that, the country is still moving and one still has a responsibility to grapple with the system as it is, rather than how we'd like it to be. So, I've been supporting, both financially and with personal effort, proportional voting allocation for a long time, but until it passes in more states, I vote with the understanding that it doesn't exist.
We'd all prefer the system to be different, but until we manage that, we can't just sit on our hands and refuse to engage because it isn't perfect.
The article in the current revision doesn't make any sense to me:I'm confused guys, how do we know this is definitely him, all I'm seeing is the Daily Beast saying he personally told them that he uses this alt account?
If I'm not mistaken, this is the only thing and were taking this as concrete proof?
The guy wasn't even wealthy 4 years ago, how would he even be in the rich and powerful circle at that time?
Hopefully it does because if this one very weird claim is wrong, he can sue for an insane amount of damages.Hopefully the news continues to spread.
Completely with you, this just seems fishy.The article in the current revision doesn't make any sense to me:
"The 24-year-old told The Daily Beast that he had used the pseudonym NimbleRichMan on Reddit with a password given him to by the organizations founders."
"Luckey's LinkedIn profile currently lists him as the founder of Oculus VR. He did not respond to requests for comment by press time."
If he told them and that is the basis for the article are we meant to believe that this was a casual chat and then the idea for the article came up a few hours later when Luckey wasn't reachable any more?
Palmer is the face of Oculus. He's linked to them until Facebook distances themselves from him.
Why would the vive not work with scorpio? And aren't the vive specs are open source to allow others to manufacture headsets other than HTC?
Good on you for keeping an open mind. We all could stand to do a bit more of that.This is a very good and strong post Besada and you've given me a lot to chew on and think over here. Thanks for this, and I'm starting to see the other side here. I very well may reconsider my position on the vote before November.
Yeah, I really don't get it.That's disappointing. The whole youth for Trump movement is really bizarre.
I'm confused guys, how do we know this is definitely him, all I'm seeing is the Daily Beast saying he personally told them that he uses this alt account?