• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Oculus' Palmer Luckey funds white-supremacist/misogynistic/anti-lgbt harassment group

Uh huh. Not what I'm saying

Dear god I can't wait for this cycle to end. This country was never founded with the intention that we would devolve into 2 private clubs battling one another for the strongest superpower in the world.

Basically the American citizenship is being held ransom by 2 massively rich corporations.

Well, reading through this thread it is apparent that the farcical two party system will never end.
People who abstain from voting for either side are labelled 'irresponsible' and 'bad citizens'. The elite can sleep a good nights sleep for the next few decades at least, knowing their brainwashing of the massess is working a treat.
 
I haven't really watched any Trump press conferences

"Crooked Hillary"
"Great Again"
"Those evil immigrants"
"Yuuuuuuge"
"The Best, Simply the best"
"I have a smart brain"
*Smug grin*
"We're winning"
"God bless america!"

Repeat

Cue bad wedding band cover of "You cant always get what you want"
 
Well, reading through this thread it is apparent that the farcical two party system will never end.
People who abstain from voting for either side are labelled 'irresponsible' and 'bad citizens'. The elite can sleep a good nights sleep for the next few decades at least, knowing their brainwashing of the massess is working a treat.
Being actively involved in politics = brainwashed...

May I ask how old you are?
 
In any event, this probably doesn't end well. Facebook probably can't keep him around, Palmer doesn't think he's in the wrong, even if they let him go, now he's unemployed and still super rich headed into the election and he has tons of time to be a shitty person with no reason to hide his beliefs from a larger public anymore. We probably end up seeing more of him at the end of this than less of him.
 
Well, reading through this thread it is apparent that the farcical two party system will never end.
People who abstain from voting for either side are labelled 'irresponsible' and 'bad citizens'. The elite can sleep a good nights sleep for the next few decades at least, knowing their brainwashing of the massess is working a treat.

Or people can do electorial math and understand how it is set up because of the Constitution. But good try at trying to fear monger about the 'elites' that post on GAF of all places.

And you are so much above us poor brainwashed masses. I don't know how your neck can handle looking down at us at that angle from your ivory tower.
 
Well, reading through this thread it is apparent that the farcical two party system will never end.
People who abstain from voting for either side are labelled 'irresponsible' and 'bad citizens'. The elite can sleep a good nights sleep for the next few decades at least, knowing their brainwashing of the massess is working a treat.

And your realistic solution to overturning the elites was abstention?

As someone who has always cancelled my provincial government vote, your masterplan sucks bro.
 
Well, reading through this thread it is apparent that the farcical two party system will never end.
People who abstain from voting for either side are labelled 'irresponsible' and 'bad citizens'. The elite can sleep a good nights sleep for the next few decades at least, knowing their brainwashing of the massess is working a treat.

if you refused to vote for kerry or bush in 2004 i wouldn't call you irresponsible

this time the choice is between a career politician with a ton of baggage, whether you think it's warranted or not, and a blatantly bigoted reality tv host who doesn't understand why we're not using nukes when we have so many of them

do what you like but if you do not contribute to donald trump's defeat in november i will think you're a bad person
 
Well, reading through this thread it is apparent that the farcical two party system will never end.
People who abstain from voting for either side are labelled 'irresponsible' and 'bad citizens'. The elite can sleep a good nights sleep for the next few decades at least, knowing their brainwashing of the massess is working a treat.


I think we would get along very well.

On the flip side, I'll take a few more years of continuing corruption to get Trump out of the political landscape.
 
"Crooked Hillary"
"Great Again"
"Those evil immigrants"
"Yuuuuuuge"
"The Best, Simply the best"
"I have a smart brain"
*Smug grin*
"We're winning"
"God bless america!"

Repeat

Cue bad wedding band cover of "You cant always get what you want"

Ha! I laughed at the "Yuuuuuuge"
 
I can't stand Drumpf, but when has he ever said he wanted to murder muslims or take rights away from minorities? I'm curious if that's the general consensus or if he's on record of saying that.

He wants to kill the entire families of any terrorist

He's against freedom of religion and freedom of speech

His policies are literally unconstitutional

He wants to make the US a state where religion and power are no longer a separate thing, argues for Christianity ruling the US

Co-chair of Trump's presidential campaign wants black attorney lynched

Trump campaign staffer calls police to make black civil rights activist "disappear".

When two of his supporters beat up a homeless Hispanic man, he calls them "passionate"

Kicks out black GOP officials from his events

Kicks out black students that were merely watching his rally too.

He wants to fire all muslim TSA agents



also this
2DUhfrV.png
 
Well, reading through this thread it is apparent that the farcical two party system will never end.
People who abstain from voting for either side are labelled 'irresponsible' and 'bad citizens'. The elite can sleep a good nights sleep for the next few decades at least, knowing their brainwashing of the massess is working a treat.

You can't have more than two parties with the US' first-past-the-post voting system. If you want more parties, your job is a lot harder than just voting Green or staying home whatever. You need to get the actual Constitution amended to get a proportional Congress or an alternative-voting system. Until that's done, yes, voting third party is irresponsible. If you're a left-of-center voter, not voting or voting for any party other than the largest left-of-center one just empowers the largest right-of-center party, or vice versa. It sucks if you don't feel represented by the two big parties, but without changing the Constitution, it's reality.
 
I wonder if Palmer Lucky has a contract to work for Facebook for X number of years after the acquisition, and this is his way of getting out of it.

I'm not saying Palmer is being insincere in his politics, I'm saying that being open about them and creating a PR problem could free him from a contractual obligation if Facebook drops him.
 
Well, reading through this thread it is apparent that the farcical two party system will never end.
People who abstain from voting for either side are labelled 'irresponsible' and 'bad citizens'. The elite can sleep a good nights sleep for the next few decades at least, knowing their brainwashing of the massess is working a treat.

Have fun complaining and doing nothing to stop this 'corruption' you're going on about. And you are irresponsible.
 
Can someone explain to me why Hillary is so bad? I really don't know, don't live in the US.

I know something about leaked emails and stuff, but my knowledge ends there.
 
I'm not buying any more Oculus games until this is sorted.

And I wish Obama could just stay on for another 4 years.
 
100%

His employment should be terminated immediately.
Just curious, do you guys think anyone who donates to Trump or votes for Trump should be fired? (Regardless of the fact that it's illegal in California to fire someone for legal political activity, and no, registering your company in Delaware does not get you out of complying with state law for an employee who works in a CA office)

I'm not voting for Trump and have donated to multiple opponents this cycle but firing 40% of American voters or the millions (edit: more like 10,000s based on opensecrets data?) of people who have donated to Trump or a Trump PAC seems like an excessive response.
 
I can't stand Trump, but when has he ever said he wanted to murder muslims or take rights away from minorities? I'm curious if that's the general consensus or if he's on record of saying that.

There is a ton of stuff, but here is a start.

We have to take out their families

Trump told his crowd that Pershing, who led U.S. troops during World War I, was a “rough guy,” according to Mother Jones. He then said that during the Moro rebellion in the Philippines (1899-1913, and Pershing served as governor of the Moro Province between 1909 and 1913), Pershing “caught 50 terrorists who did tremendous damage … and he took the 50 terrorists and he took 50 men and dipped 50 bullets in pig’s blood. You heard about that? He took 50 bullets and dipped them in pig’s blood. And he has his men load up their rifles and he lined up the 50 people and they shot 49 of those people. And the 50th person, he said, you go back to your people and you tell them what happened.”


“AMERICAN HANDS WILL REBUILD OUR NATION. NOT THE HANDS OF PEOPLE FROM OTHER NATIONS.”

“Think of that. Not only the danger of it all, this isn't only a matter of terrorism, but also a matter of quality of life. We want to make sure we're only admitting those into our country who support our values and love — and I mean love — our people,”

Cs9GhI8WEAE2Pxo.jpg:large


Donald Trump Refuses to Condemn KKK, Disavow David Duke Endorsement

The CEO of Trump's campaign runs a website with a specific "Black Crime" section

I would also recommend reading this VOX Alt-Right primer.
 
The "for the luls" thing that I guess he got from alt-right trolls is somehow the worst part for me.

Like they know inherently that what they support is awful but they want a reason to support it anyways.
 
Just curious, do you guys think anyone who donates to Trump or votes for Trump should be fired? (Regardless of the fact that it's illegal in California to fire someone for legal political activity, and no, registering your company in Delaware does not get you out of complying with state law for an employee who works in a CA office)

I'm not voting for Trump and have donated to multiple opponents this cycle but firing 40% of American voters or the millions of people who have donated to Trump or a Trump PAC seems like an excessive response.

Thing is Luckey funds smear campaigns and he's a public figure. Consumers will associate this with their product. It will cost Facebook. They'll likely ask him to resign if firing is impossible.
 
Just curious, do you guys think anyone who donates to Trump or votes for Trump should be fired? (Regardless of the fact that it's illegal in California to fire someone for legal political activity, and no, registering your company in Delaware does not get you out of complying with state law for an employee who works in a CA office)

I'm not voting for Trump and have donated to multiple opponents this cycle but firing 40% of American voters or the millions of people who have donated to Trump or a Trump PAC seems like an excessive response.

$FB is public and it's conduct detrimental to the company. Any market reaction to this will get him canned for sure on that front.

Also, whether Trump or not doesn't matter, California is an at-will state and they can fire anyone at any time for any reason.
 
Just curious, do you guys think anyone who donates to Trump or votes for Trump should be fired? (Regardless of the fact that it's illegal in California to fire someone for legal political activity, and no, registering your company in Delaware does not get you out of complying with state law for an employee who works in a CA office)

I'm not voting for Trump and have donated to multiple opponents this cycle but firing 40% of American voters or the millions of people who have donated to Trump or a Trump PAC seems like an excessive response.


All of them? No.

Ones like this? You bet.

https://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow/videos/10154541061806800/

How could you trust an employee that shows such a profound lack of reason?

As far as Palmer Luckey goes. He's not the typical employee. When you have an employee that has appeared on magazine covers. That employee needs to carry themselves with a certain amount of accountability and have enough good sense to stay out of the public eye...particularly with something like this.

I guess what I'm saying is...if you HAVE to be an intolerant, racist, elitist cunt...at least have enough good sense to keep it to yourself.
 
$FB is public and it's conduct detrimental to the company. Any market reaction to this will get him canned for sure on that front.

Also, whether Trump or not doesn't matter, California is an at-will state and they can fire anyone at any time for any reason.

Yup. It would be something else if FB wasn't cultivating an image of widespread acceptance, it is pretty intrinsic to their business model. Then there is the fact that an Oculus is an expensive technical product that is liable to be marketed at the more informed and more educated.

These revelations are quite detrimental especially since it is a figurehead, not some hidden away board member.
 
Also, whether Trump or not doesn't matter, California is an at-will state and they can fire anyone at any time for any reason.
Incorrect, you cannot fire someone for protected activity even in an at-will state. Political activity is a protected class in CA, so you can't fire someone for it just like you can't fire someone for their race or sex and claim you were just doing it "at will".

Maybe facebook will ask him to fall on his sword and resign truly voluntarily, he cares a lot about VR and oculus presumably so he might be willing to do it to help oculus' PR. Not like he needs the money or a job at this point.
 
Incorrect, you cannot fire someone for protected activity even in an at-will state. Political activity is a protected class in CA, so you can't fire someone for it just like you can't fire someone for their race or sex and claim you were just doing it "at will".

Maybe facebook will ask him to fall on his sword and resign truly voluntarily, he cares a lot about VR and oculus presumably so he might be willing to do it to help oculus' PR. Not like he needs the money or a job at this point.


I believe in the powers of the facebook legal team. If they really want to make something happen, I'm sure they'll figure out a loophole.
 
Incorrect, you cannot fire someone for protected activity even in an at-will state. Political activity is a protected class in CA, so you can't fire someone for it just like you can't fire someone for their race or sex and claim you were just doing it "at will".

Thanks for the clarification.

I'll go with my other answer which is $FB doesn't want this associated with them and as you said, maybe they tell him to step down.
 
Top Bottom