Trogdor1123
Member
i believe so.The CU's on the PS5 will be running faster as well right?
I don't pretend to know anything about this stuff but that sounded like a huge over simplification to me.
i believe so.The CU's on the PS5 will be running faster as well right?
(He apologized for that on a dedicated vid on the usual channel for which he, in my eyes, displayed the spine I miss from other internet personalities. Sandal'n'Socks wearing cunt)
Are you denying the fact that the Series X has 30% more active CUs?OK Dealer. Be sure to say hi to Timdog for me
I am wondering how he is still getting samples while regularly shitting on every major company under the sun.Oh, I definitely like that about him, he actually went and apologized, which is way more earnest and mature than 99% of all the shitty internet personalities.
He still went off live to an audience of millions and got on a twitter spat with the actual Tim Sweeney because of really petty PC Master Race reasons, so he really can't expect to be on the good side of either of these companies for a while, even with the apology.
Are you denying the fact that the Series X has 30% more active CUs?
No, I did not deny that XSX has more CUs.Are you denying the fact that the Series X has 30% more active CUs?
something something flippy flopsNo, I did not deny that XSX has more CUs.
So with this 30% CU count advantage. I'd be interested to hear how you think this will play out in real-life game performance. What metrics should we look for as evidence that having more CUs is worth bragging about (in isolation).
I am wondering how he is still getting samples while regularly shitting on every major company under the sun.
Some people here seem to dislike the guy but I think he is factual and sincere and his vids trim a lot of fat other people do.
[...]and the reason was that he simply couldn't believe a console had something as performant as that. He even went on Twitter and got in a "fight" about it. That literally never happens with any of the other companies he's criticized before.
Are you denying the fact that the Series X has 30% more active CUs?
That is how twitter guys start FUD.No, in terms of CU count the gap is closer to 30%. And considering these are APUs on the same nominal architecture, CU comparisons are more telling than teraflop comparisons.
ROFL you do know that the people who already got their hands on an Xbox SX also signed an NDA right? ROFLRofl they had to sign a NDA to get one?
Gotta paid your reviewers i guess rofl.
ROFL you do know that the people who already got their hands on an Xbox SX also signed an NDA right? ROFL
ROFL my aren't you a bright one ROFL
EU outlets started to get the PS5.
DF already said their one is being delivered too.
EU outlets started to get the PS5.
DF already said their one is being delivered too.
No, in terms of CU count the gap is closer to 30%. And considering these are APUs on the same nominal architecture, CU comparisons are more telling than teraflop comparisons.
So the difference comes down to:
Ps5 slightly smaller pizza but more often and faster. With fresh veg and while cooked meats.
XBS slightly bigger pizza but less often and slower. With processed meats and frozen veg.
But there are more on the Xbox SX, so it scales exponentially compared to clock speed.The CU's on the PS5 will be running faster as well right?
ROFL you do know that the people who already got their hands on an Xbox SX also signed an NDA right? ROFL
ROFL my aren't you a bright one ROFL
Imagine thinking that this is acceptable because "xbox also does this". Is that the defense you got really? what a joke.
It's a thread about sony so i adres sony about it. Should be obvious to anybody that isn't blinded by fanboy rage. Guess i triggered a lot of you holy shit.
So the difference comes down to:
Ps5 slightly smaller pizza but more often and faster. With fresh veg and while cooked meats.
XBS slightly bigger pizza but less often and slower. With processed meats and frozen veg.
Imagine thinking that this is acceptable because "xbox also does this". Is that the defense you got really? what a joke.
It's a thread about sony so i adres sony about it. Should be obvious to anybody that isn't blinded by fanboy rage. Guess i triggered a lot of you holy shit.
Gonna be fun times
Well, by starting to ditch that Gears 5 video, as if we haven't seen anything about this game already?
Gonna be fun times
Ye nobody gives a fuck about Gears 5 ffs
Seriously.Well, by starting to ditch that Gears 5 video, as if we haven't seen anything about this game already?
But there are more on the Xbox SX, so it scales exponentially compared to clock speed.
Is gears 5 worth playing? Last I played was gears 2
Seriously.
This game came out over a year ago, and Microsoft are still pushing it as if it dropped a few months ago.
Do people still play this game?
Gonna be fun times
Calm down the unboxings will happen tomorrow. I don't really think it'd a big deal though I prefer hands on with the games and the actual system. Which we will get soon.
midnight tonight or do theyhave to happen at a certain time?
Not gears again, please for the love of God, this shit is really beginning to grind my.... Don't say it NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
GEARS!!!!! lol
Is gears 5 worth playing? Last I played was gears 2
I tell you, do your research, clocks beyond 1.8ghz don't scale on GPU... The extra TFs from more MHz just aren't really there. This is well documented and self evident.Exponentially? Cue Princess Bride meme.
FLOPS is just a matter of num of CUs and clock speed when talking about the same architecture. You can have four lanes of 100 cars per minute or 10 lanes of 40 cars per minute. The oversimplification breaks down a bit when talking about latency and efficiency of the parallelism.
I tell you, do your research, clocks beyond 1.8ghz don't scale on GPU... The extra TFs from more MHz just aren't really there. This is well documented and self evident.
I can't find it now,but there was a GDC talk about this very topic a while ago.
Are you denying the fact that the Series X has 30% more active CUs?
Right ... that’s why the top end AMD cards have 80 CU’s ?? Instead of those 80 they could have used 60 at 2.5 GHz?That's been shown to not matter as much. It's how fast you fill-up the CUs that can dictate performance.
People like the lore, gore and tbh the basics of the gameplay is fairly unique. There really isn't a game like it. Unfortunately it seems over time it has suffered from microsoft pushing to many out and people are getting tired of the formula, it does not help that multiplayer has a very high skill gap so it is not very beginner friendly. Which is a shame as I do love gears, multiplayer is definitely why I personally enjoy it. I have always finished the single player and found it great.I legit don't get why people like Gears so much. Some of the most antiquated, boring shooter gameplay there is. The set piece moments are crap, and I hated them introducing them at all in part 2, they turned it into this dumb variety shooter in that installment and kept with that after. The story is pure dogshit. The "challenge" is basically if the game is on hard that means some enemies one shot kill you cheaply and the rest are just more bullet spongy which doesn't matter because they never flank or push you out of your safety of cover. What a fucking boring franchise, I tried getting into it again with 4 and 5... holy shit what slogs those games are.
People like the lore, gore and tbh the basics of the gameplay is fairly unique. There really isn't a game like it. Unfortunately it seems over time it has suffered from microsoft pushing to many out and people are getting tired of the formula, it does not help that multiplayer has a very high skill gap so it is not very beginner friendly. Which is a shame as I do love gears, multiplayer is definitely why I personally enjoy it. I have always finished the single player and found it great.
Tbh sounds like you just don't like gears of war at all. Considering you played gears 2 didn't like it and then wrote off the rest I wouldn't trust your opinion. Easy to their own I suppose.