That being said, it still is a huge uphill battle to even reach the WiiU's numbers. It's definitely no guaranteed success. Not like they're riding any momentum in the console space.
Oh no doubt, and I've never said otherwise. NX has to be a foundation to build from, something that repairs good will and mindshare, even if it only achieves a moderate bit more success from Wii U. NX is a launching pad to something they hope will be an even greater success, because even Nintendo knows they won't turn their fortunes around Wii-style in one fell swoop.
ps4 came with 8gb of GDDR ram which was pretty beastly when high end graphic cards at the time only had 2-4 gb at most and were more expensive than the ps4.
anyways nintendo have not made a console that appeal to me since the snes. why can't nintendo just make a pure gaming console without a gimmick like back in the day with the gamecube?
I did like the gamecube which i think is better than the n64, wii and wii u combined. this nx doesn't sound like a pure gaming console from nintendo. it will probably have a gimmick again.
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on PSVR and Hololens.
You think it'll be a cut from the DS brand, as well?
In branding, yes. I think 2 screens will still be there, but it will not be the branding focal point.
I think it'll be coincidence that the company carries out one strategy that it had carried out a decade before, yes, because Nintendo isn't just rolling out its set plans from 10 years ago, a new group of people will craft their own plan and if it resembles the one from 10 years ago, that's a coincidence. No one at Nintendo is digging through files to look at what they did with the GameCube.
Are you seriously disagreeing with me or do are you just reflexibly mad about this? I can understand seeing things differently, but the incredulity seems misplaced.
co·in·ci·dence
kōˈinsədəns
noun
1. a remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances
without apparent causal connection.
There is an apparent causal connection. Both outcomes will originate from the same cause: A console selling very poorly with new hardware on the horizon that they see a greater opportunity with.
Coincidence requires that they came to the same conclusion from an entirely different starting point. There's no difference except the people at the helm, but that alone does not facilitate a coincidence.
And looking beyond just Nintendo, it's a standard practice across the video game industry. Sega abruptly killed software support and discontinued the 32X AND the Saturn (except in Japan, where wasn't discontinued hardware-wise until well past its expiry date). Microsoft did it pretty spectacularly and blatantly with the Xbox. In both of those cases, what was the cause? Exactly the same as Nintendo's with the Wii U.
As I said in the rest of the post you didn't bother to include, it's not about playing right out of the GameCube playbook, it's about playing from the business logic handbook. Maintaining manufacturing of the console costs money better spent elsewhere, as is the bulk of software development resources, which CLEARLY aren't being dedicated to the Wii U anymore aside from Zelda, which is suspected to launch on NX alongside the Wii U release.
This is the most blatantly choreographed snuffing out of a console to make room for its successor since the GameCube. Everyone bloody knows that's what is happening, and if you're not seeing the same thing happening, when it clearly makes the most sense from a business standpoint and is something they've clearly done before for the same reasons, I really don't know what to tell you.
Just because different people are at the helm or "the industry has changed" doesn't void the use of the most basic logic to come to the same conclusion from the same starting point. And that is not "coincidence". It's quite possibly the most obvious and banal choice to make that anyone in their position would be making.