People are really getting crazy around these emails. These were discussions on things that could happen or not. Don't you have discussions like these in real life ? At work ? There is always a lot of ways to do things, but you only ever decide to go with one.
Some of these takes on here are just opportunistic, verging on trolling (being kind), the others must be from people who’ve never had any decision making authority in a real business.
It’s incumbent on leadership to approach a problem/issue/opportunity from all angles, and leadership teams are supposed to debate and discuss all possibilities amongst themselves, even crazy ones if they’re smart, then pick the best one in their opinion. If someone says ‘we should shut Xbox down’ in 2019, then in 2023 they
haven’t shut Xbox down it’s safe to assume that wasn’t decided to be the way. How is that hard?
Equally, these people are human and suffer from daily frustrations/boredom/hubris/overexcitement etc and shocker say things that aren’t their die on this hill opinions in the moment. It’s why email discovery in a court case is almost never an actual ‘smoking gun’. I’ve been through it several times, and the first time they pulled up an email where I said something I probably shouldn’t have I was mortified, but it was never even used in the actual findings, even by a very hostile set of opposition lawyers, because they already know it’s not worth the paper it’s written on in legal terms - actions, not words are what they need to make their case. It’s why no one cares if Matt Booty one day overstates his own import and says he’s going to spend someone in to oblivion, or the Sony guy says he’s going to kill Microsoft (was that a threat of violence? Did they need protection? Surely if it’s stated it must be literally the truth?)
I have learned though to make my emails an exercise in banality for any poor lawyer tasked with ever searching through them in the future, and I’m sure the Microsoft guys are going to do the same after this.