demigod
Member
So how fast are loading times on PC with an SSD? Can PCs actually do this zero loading time stuff the new consoles can?
No PCs can’t even with the fastest nvme which is currently around 3,500 mb/s.
So how fast are loading times on PC with an SSD? Can PCs actually do this zero loading time stuff the new consoles can?
How would Spencer know for certain which is more powerful?
Maybe he can also tell us when the PS5 releases?
Of course I already knew the answer. Consoles next gen with have an advantage, if not visually it'll be functionally. Curious to know how the "PC Master race" will get their heads around this till PC tech catches up and becomes something people actually use.No PCs can’t even with the fastest nvme which is currently around 3,500 mb/s.
Sarcasm?Sarcasm? Wasn’t the N64 stronger than the PS1 and GameCube more powerful than the PS2?
Sarcasm?
isn't common sense a machine releasing a year after would be more powerful.
I mean could you imagine turning up a year or two later with a less powerful machine?
Point being, when going head to head and releasing in the same time frame.
Sony has always had the more powerful machine.
Have you not seen Battletoads?Doesn’t matter if the Xbox doesnt improve their exclusive game lineup, that’s the most important “feature” for their chances at next gen.
cell worked with the RSX which gave the PS3 more graphical grunt overall compared to the 360 (it was intentionally designed that way). Not to mention the standard HDD, by 2009/10the PS3 was pumping out games the 360 couldn't do. Heck I was in shock with God Of War 3 MLAA solution which was superior to PCs at the time. Cell was a beast once they got a handle on it.Its CPU was, not its GPU, and it was more memory limited.
No matter what way you look at it.If you’re basing it on same gen, which is what I’m basing it off, not when they were released then it hasn’t always been the most powerful.
Of course I already knew the answer. Consoles next gen with have an advantage, if not visually it'll be functionally. Curious to know how the "PC Master race" will get their heads around this till PC tech catches up and becomes something people actually use.
It's something they're both saying so it seems reasonable to assume as much.You are assuming Sony and Microsoft will be able to deliver what they are promising.
Probably neither has finalised the specs yet. CPU and gpu clocks, small customizations, etc are probably still being fine tuned.Hence Microsoft were vague about specs. Neither want to jump first.
at the end of the cycle games looked better. it had more power overall.
Probably neither has finalised the specs yet. CPU and gpu clocks, small customizations, etc are probably still being fine tuned.
I wish we had color choices right at launch, and I'm not talking of white or black... Give us colors or fully replaceable casings. They can even make more money by selling colored / designed casings.The only thing confirmed is the colour of the console!
I wish we had color choices right at launch, and I'm not talking of white or black... Give us colors or fully replaceable casings. They can even make more money by selling colored / designed casings.
As far as I'm concerned, yes. The only difference to me is the exclusives and that Sony already has a VR solution.Putting aside Nintendo's toys, aren't we at that point where PlayStation and Xbox games look the same?
Putting aside Nintendo's toys, aren't we at that point where PlayStation and Xbox games look the same?
No... Xbox One S games are usually at lower resolution that PS4. Like 900p or 720p vs 1080p. It changes on the mid gen upgrades though.
Rather have them profit of cool looking plastic than trying to get us all under subscriptions for life.Yeah, I'm sure they made a fortune out of that on the Xbox 360
So how fast are loading times on PC with an SSD? Can PCs actually do this zero loading time stuff the new consoles can?
Of course I already knew the answer. Consoles next gen with have an advantage, if not visually it'll be functionally. Curious to know how the "PC Master race" will get their heads around this till PC tech catches up and becomes something people actually use.
can someone summarize the different in power eg 'more times powerful' between PS1/PS2/PS3/PS4 so I can get an idea of where we are.
can someone summarize the different in power eg 'more times powerful' between PS1/PS2/PS3/PS4 so I can get an idea of where we are.
On a scale of 0.00 to 10.00 linns
PS1 = 0.74
PS2 = 2.88
PSP = 1.97
PS3 = 5.50
PSV = 4.10
PS4 (base) = 6.90
PS4 (pro) = 7.20
Probably neither has finalised the specs yet. CPU and gpu clocks, small customizations, etc are probably still being fine tuned.
Thanks wanna have a guess what PS5 will be?
One day this one is stronger, the other day the other side is stronger.
Only take away I get from that is that everything is up in the air and everyone doing their best to 1-up each other.
In other words what might be true today might not be the case tomorrow and I expect it to be the case until the end of the year at least.
Dude why do you sound so bitter? If everyone said that this guy is talking crap and the Scarlet is 2 times as powerful as PS5 would that made you feel better? What impact would it have to you as a gamer/consumer?Pretty sure that the Playstation 3 is already more powerful than Scarlett.
I get a ton of hate for saying this but its been the same EVERY generation. Sony claims more power, they did it with Cell, they did it with Emotion Engine, and they are doing it again. And, in the end, games on MS systems looked the same or better.
I'll get the console that allows anime tiddies, thanks.