DragoonWalker
Member
No, but I switched from PS to PC about a year ago since that seems to get everyone's exclusives now.
Horizon? Lol. No. Halo and Zelda sure. But it's funny you can only list games that first released decades ago. It shows you how rare it is that a single game will sell a console to a large amount of people
Horizon? Lol. No. Halo and Zelda sure. But it's funny you can only list games that first released decades ago. It shows you how rare it is that a single game will sell a console to a large amount of people
When you consider the frame rate (I hope it's not 30 fps on console), and the modding community and their creativity, PC will be best placed.Not a Sony only gamer but I wouldn't for Starfield.
Bethesda RPG games always thrive on PC. If anybody want to play Bethesda RPGs, the best place is always PC.
If it was exclusive on the console then yes I would, though I already have one for a different reason.
i´ll just play No mans Sky which is pretty much what starfield is anyways
Not suprised at the results...... PS gamers miss out on a ton of games because of their loyalty
We can argue about "high quality" games but it's Gamepass that people will want, not necessarily an Xbox. And MS could care less..................as long as you sign up and play via PC, Xbox or streaming they are more than satisfied.Right. One game alone won't sell a console. Well except for botw. It's ALL the high quality games coming to xbox that will force a lot of people to buy an Xbox.
Horizon? Lol. No. Halo and Zelda sure. But it's funny you can only list games that first released decades ago. It shows you how rare it is that a single game will sell a console to a large amount of people
It amazes me the people who say things like 'it looked trash', 'looked last gen', 'I wouldn't touch it', 'I wasn't impressed' etc. Seriously? I know everything is subjective, but there's no way anyone could genuinely call what was shown as anything other than impressive (obvs we don't know how it'll play at this stage).
I've been gaming for over 40 years, and can say objectively that the Starfield footage looked really good - to say otherwise just doesn't make sense.
Saying it looks like trash might be a bit much but keep in mind everyone has an opinion. I don't think it looked like trash, but I don't think it looked all that great either.It amazes me the people who say things like 'it looked trash', 'looked last gen', 'I wouldn't touch it', 'I wasn't impressed' etc. Seriously? I know everything is subjective, but there's no way anyone could genuinely call what was shown as anything other than impressive (obvs we don't know how it'll play at this stage).
I've been gaming for over 40 years, and can say objectively that the Starfield footage looked really good - to say otherwise just doesn't make sense.
Pretty sure Indiana Jones isn't coming in the next 12 months . It's gonna be multiplatform.Like I said, rarely does a single game sell a console. There are the rare exceptions like Breath of the Wild that actually do sell millions of consoles by itself, but usually its the entire catalog. Maybe Starfield alone won't sell millions of consoles on its own, but in addition to Forza Motorsports, Redfall, Indiana Jones, and all of the other high quality content releasing in the next 12 months, Starfield certainly has the potential to help move consoles.
It amazes me the people who say things like 'it looked trash', 'looked last gen', 'I wouldn't touch it', 'I wasn't impressed' etc. Seriously? I know everything is subjective, but there's no way anyone could genuinely call what was shown as anyth dow GMing other than impressive (obvs we don't know how it'll play at this stage).
I've been gaming for over 40 years, and can say objectively that the Starfield footage looked really good - to say otherwise just doesn't make sense.
No, pc gamers always put the most into bethesda games. I dont see it as janky...the frame rate was off but technically thats the only downside i see. its about the immersive aspects that should build on past bgs games. i listed what makes me excited and if that doesnt then maybe you just dont like bgs games. we havent had a good immersive rpg in a while. last for me was dos 2.I don't understand how anyone can look at the janky ass half baked gameplay footage that we got and come to that conclusion. I guess PC gamer must also be a bunch of playstation fanboys as well right? :
It amazes me the people who say things like 'it looked trash', 'looked last gen', 'I wouldn't touch it', 'I wasn't impressed' etc. Seriously?
how much stupid can be this phrase ?i´ll just play No mans Sky which is pretty much what starfield is anyways
it's free trolling I'm waiting a new game from another famous pub to see if all this is admittedIt amazes me the people who say things like 'it looked trash', 'looked last gen', 'I wouldn't touch it', 'I wasn't impressed' etc. Seriously? I know everything is subjective, but there's no way anyone could genuinely call what was shown as anything other than impressive (obvs we don't know how it'll play at this stage).
I've been gaming for over 40 years, and can say objectively that the Starfield footage looked really good - to say otherwise just doesn't make sense.
You may very well be right, but I would think you'd want to wait till the game was actually released until you made your assessment. Again, just a thought.Nope, but after seeing Starfield I think No Man's Sky is the better choice going forward.
Yeah, no kid. Not gonna happen.Give it two weeks before launch and all these nay sayers will be queued round the block for that fresh Series X
They'll be no resistance.
its not stupid at all , there was so many comparisions between the 2 games when they were showing it , even IGN compared the two side by sidehow much stupid can be this phrase ?
Plot twist: even those who own a Series console voted 'Nah'.How about showing the results of who voted OP? Those who voted yes probably already own a series console.
I have both systems, but honestly, that footage didn't even convince me to install it when it launches on GP.