http://www.fox4news.com/story/29763807/arlington-officer-fired-for-shooting-death-of-unarmed-teen-suspect
The chief of police announced during a press conference that the rookie officer has been fired and criminal charges are possible.
Wow.
http://www.fox4news.com/story/29763807/arlington-officer-fired-for-shooting-death-of-unarmed-teen-suspect
The chief of police announced during a press conference that the rookie officer has been fired and criminal charges are possible.
Indeed, that and probably eager to get in there, perform and generally prove himself as well.
http://www.fox4news.com/story/29763807/arlington-officer-fired-for-shooting-death-of-unarmed-teen-suspect
The chief of police announced during a press conference that the rookie officer has been fired and criminal charges are possible.
Johnson made the announcement on Tuesday evening at a press conference where he described a detailed timeline of the sequence of events that happened at an Arlington car dealership early Friday morning.
Johnson said the facts of the case will be presented to a Tarrant County Grand Jury, who will determine whether Miller is charged with a crime.
Johnson said Miller was the first officer to enter the dealership showroom, a break in protocol that forced others to follow him inside.
"This placed Officer Miller and the other officers on scene in a position of undue risk," Johnson said.
Taylor tried to initially flee from Miller, but encountered a locked glass door he tried to break down. Miller followed Taylor and Taylor turned toward Miller and began cursing at him.
Taylor then started advancing toward Miller, ignoring verbal commands to get down.
The training officer with Miller, Corporal Dale Wiggins, heard a pop and at first thought Miller had used his Taser. He then realized it was Miller’s gun. Wiggins used his Taser and then Miller fired his gun three more times at Taylor.
Johnson said Miller and Taylor never came into physical contact during the entire incident.
Johnson said other officers on scene had seen what they called a “bulge” in Taylor’s pocket. After Taylor was down, they discovered it was only a wallet and a cellphone.
Can't imagine what dude was thinking..though, I can assume it wasn't that he was getting shot and killed that day. Geezuz..
While still great, I do have one cynical question.
As a trainee, was he part of the union yet? Because his firing seemed to come really, really quickly.
Unfortunate, but you're likely correct..damn shame.Pleasantly surprised they actually fired him. I hope charges are actually pressed.
The message needs to be repeatedly sent to police in this country that taking a life has to be the absolute last resort in any situation.
My guess would be drugs and/or mental illness. Ultimately that doesn't matter, but I'm sure people will bring up his behavior to try to justify a cop unnecessarily taking his life.
Probably. The chief clarified at the beginning that being in training doesn't mean he's not an officer yet. He's able to assess threats, make arrests, etc. while under the supervision of the training officer for six months.
I think once they graduate from the academy in Arlington you're considered a cop.
I think a reporter asked how far away Taylor was when the rookie shot him, and the chief said 6 or 7 feet. My audio cut out, so not too sure about this part, but if that is the case it seems like it's pretty open and shut which is why they dismissed the FBI and handled it so quickly.
I'd be surprised except apparently feds were going to investigate this.http://www.fox4news.com/story/29763807/arlington-officer-fired-for-shooting-death-of-unarmed-teen-suspect
The chief of police announced during a press conference that the rookie officer has been fired and criminal charges are possible.
Cop yes, but was he part of the union? I thought it took a certain amount of time on the job before getting to become a union member. That's something I think is worth knowing given how fiercely the unions stick to their members, regardless of evidence and charges. I'm wondering if his quick dismissal was due to not having union backing yet. I'd love to hear he was in the union and was still kicked off the force so quickly.
Bucket listBecome cop in late 40's dafuq?
I remember paying union dues while on training and while on probation. You are part of the union the day you're hired, pretty much. I would be surprised if they did things differently.Cop yes, but was he part of the union? I thought it took a certain amount of time on the job before getting to become a union member. That's something I think is worth knowing given how fiercely the unions stick to their members, regardless of evidence and charges. I'm wondering if his quick dismissal was due to not having union backing yet. I'd love to hear he was in the union and was still kicked off the force so quickly.
Had to be some sort of bias to shoot an unarmed perp tho. In my view.
It's always a case-by-case basis. The notion of "unarmed" has now been sensationalized an "innocent" persona, as if being unarmed cannot warrant deadly force. The truth of the matter is that there are always facts and circumstances (totality) which may lead down that dark path. It's a difficult notion to digest, but not every action is unreasonable.
Unfortunately, with a bare minimum amount of facts being present in this case, jumping to condemn the officer is not the wisest course of action.
Bucket list
1.Travel outside of the state
2.lose some weight
3.try a new profession
4.Shoot some ni...err protect and serve
3/4 ¯_(ツ_/¯
Cop yes, but was he part of the union? I thought it took a certain amount of time on the job before getting to become a union member. That's something I think is worth knowing given how fiercely the unions stick to their members, regardless of evidence and charges. I'm wondering if his quick dismissal was due to not having union backing yet. I'd love to hear he was in the union and was still kicked off the force so quickly.
Sounds like you're trying to make an example out of him. I don't think you can make a sound argument that this falls in line with the legal definition of murder.He shot to kill and should be charged with murder. Dumb fuck should rot in jail.
It's always a case-by-case basis. The notion of "unarmed" has now been sensationalized an "innocent" persona, as if being unarmed cannot warrant deadly force. The truth of the matter is that there are always facts and circumstances (totality) which may lead down that dark path. It's a difficult notion to digest, but not every action is unreasonable.
Unfortunately, with a bare minimum amount of facts being present in this case, jumping to condemn the officer is not the wisest course of action.
I guess in this case it wasn't sensationalized. It is sad to hear a cop spouting nonsense how you can justify lethal force on an unarmed man.
You do such a great job of improving the image of police its great to have you back. Yes that is sarcasm.
I think it's either 55 or 60 depending on the state/city laws.49 year old rookie officer. Is there not a cutoff?
It appears not, as the department is not standing by him. It's not nonsense. You really can't think of any scenario where lethal force can be used against an unarmed man?
I prefer open discussion on these matters with multiple viewpoints, don't you?
It appears not, as the department is not standing by him. It's not nonsense. You really can't think of any scenario where lethal force can be used against an unarmed man?
I prefer open discussion on these matters with multiple viewpoints, don't you?
Maybe we can't make a sound argument. But considering that what those officers saw was enough to throw him under the bus and fire him as quickly as they did; and that the feds were made to be invlved, I'd say it's not out of the realm of possibility. There wasn't even a physical confrontation.Sounds like you're trying to make an example out of him. I don't think you can make a sound argument that this falls in line with the legal definition of murder.
It appears not, as the department is not standing by him. It's not nonsense. You really can't think of any scenario where lethal force can be used against an unarmed man?
I prefer open discussion on these matters with multiple viewpoints, don't you?
The vast majority of police shootings are not of unarmed people: http://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/police-shootings/ (Good article highlighting the overrepresentation of black men in the "unarmed" category.)How many cops in the UK killed unarmed suspects during the same period versus cops killed by unarmed assailants ? While it is absolutely true and problematic that gun culture here makes these situations more unpredictable it also shines a terrible light on police procedures and training that's hard to ignore. The stats are bonkers.
Hm, well, part of the reason why division continues to occur is the lack of understanding from the other sides and a general refusal to see other viewpoints. Communication is key to establish commonality, and mutual understanding. Civility, too.I'm sadly aware of your view point on all matters related to police violence and to be perfectly honest, I can do with out it.
I am unaware as I do not follow policing in the UK. However, I would be very surprised if their policy completely disallowed deadly force against unarmed individuals.How many cops in the UK killed unarmed suspects during the same period versus cops killed by unarmed assailants ? While it is absolutely true and problematic that gun culture here makes these situations more unpredictable it also shines a terrible light on police procedures and training that's hard to ignore. The stats are bonkers.
What do you mean?Potentially, potentially, potentially. Yes we know, any and anything that can happen, will happen. But what you try to point out doesn't mean much at all.
Sounds like you're trying to make an example out of him. I don't think you can make a sound argument that this falls in line with the legal definition of murder.
An unnarmed suspect was shot multiple times. What happened to using a taser?
What happened to not shooting people who aren't trying to kill you or someone else? This shit is ridiculous. Police in small Nordic countries get college educations and years of training. Our comparatively dangerous society hires people with high school diplomas and trains them for 6-8 months, give them guns, scare the shit out of them, and let them loose on the street to arrest and kill people over fucking weed.
The talent pool for the job is interesting. Anecdotal experiences are just that, but the people I know at a young age that went into law enforcement tended to either be the folks that you figured weren't ever going to do anything legit, or the ones in college that were just there for a sport but got a criminal justice degree b/c it was easy. Again, that's just what I experienced, but it's scary to think about. Layer onto that, it's a thankless job that seems to only be getting worse in that regard. I would think it's a profession that would benefit from a deeper talent pool that isn't interested or motivated to take that path.
Bucket list
1.Travel outside of the state
2.lose some weight
3.try a new profession
4.Shoot some ni...err protect and serve
3/4 ¯_(ツ_/¯
Either he was drunk or trying to rob the place. It's hard to accidentally drive through the front of a building.
Or he had an accident and was disorientated. Jeez.
You probably find most incidents of driving into buildings are because the car failed mechanically.
Just caught up and agreeYou should really review the details or watch some videos before commenting on what happened.
It just register to me that he put 3 more bullets into him after the suspect was on the ground and being tazed. That should definitely be reason to take this as murder. That is straight up executioner behavior.