Stores will go for it as long as MS paid enough for the floor space. It's all $$$.eek5 said:I think if stores go for it, it will be a huge win just in terms of floor space.
It's been proven again and again that casual gamers go for style over substance when it comes to hardware. And that includes packaging. There's nothing at all stylish about this. If casuals go for it, it'll be because MS has a seriously stylish advertising campaign waiting in the wings.axiomnightmare said:Looks pretty well made. Should be able to appeal to casuals.
Majine said:What ever happened to the words "Compatible" and "Required"?
Why For? said:So Kinect has come to the stage where it's being bashed for the sake of it now?
You would be surprised by how the appearance plays a big role in product purchases.ralexand said:So now people buy products based on their packaging now. The kinect trolls are really reaching now.
Yes I would. Never once have I decided to buy something and then changed my mind based on a box that's going in a closet or on a trash heap.expy said:You would be surprised by how the appearance plays a big role in product purchases.
Yoshi said:
Is she promoting a Kinect-game?
ralexand said:Yes I would. Never once have I decided to buy something and then changed my mind based on a box that's going in a closet or on a trash heap.
They're probably remembering how much the hardcore ragged on the Wii. The reality is that kinect is viewed by casuals as that next cool evolution in controllers while the move is viewed as a Wii knockoff. Maybe Sony can change that impression but for now its the kinect that has the mindshare with the general public.jaydogg691 said:After looking at this thread (with a few laughs), I wonder how someone from MS feels when they see people ragging on their product. That comment on how the hardcore will be the first to adopt doesn't look very promising. I would like to trying out the Kinect to see how it works, but I don't think it's something I'll buy. $150 sounds too high for me.
AzBat said:
Videogame systems arent impulse purchases. We're not talking about a bottle of water here. Never heard anyone say I was going to buy that videogame system, I knew what games I wanted but then I saw the box it came in and said "no way!" Again you guys are reaching.mj1108 said:We're not talking about people on GAF....we're talking about mainstream Joe Q Public.
knitoe said:Ease if use is why Wii became so popular with casual gamers through Sports / Play. Those aren't my idea of "Games." More like simple tech demo showing casual game play. Take Wii Sports Tennis vs Kinect Sport Tennis. Both don't let you control your character movement. All you do is swing to hit ball. Which one will be easier and more natural for someone having never touch them before? Anyone saying "Fuck ease of use" is ignoring the Wii's current #1 selling point to moms & pops, elderly and so on.
This is the Saint Peter Cross.Hanmik said:I´m realy sorry.. But all I see when I look at that is this..
I sure don´t hope I offend anybody.. but that is what I see...
Ghostbusters 2 reference, nice.REMEMBER CITADEL said:Now? No, it's been at that stage ever since the Cirque du Soleil performance.
This and every other Kinect thread =
Xeke said:It'll fit right in with the Canadian bagged milk.
conman said:It's been proven again and again that casual gamers go for style over substance when it comes to hardware.
jaydogg691 said:After looking at this thread (with a few laughs), I wonder how someone from MS feels when they see people ragging on their product. That comment on how the hardcore will be the first to adopt doesn't look very promising. I would like to trying out the Kinect to see how it works, but I don't think it's something I'll buy. $150 sounds too high for me.
ralexand said:Videogame systems arent impulse purchases. We're not talking about a bottle of water here. Never heard anyone say I was going to buy that videogame system, I knew what games I wanted but then I saw the box it came in and said "no way!" Again you guys are reaching.
What the fuck @ that controllerSnowballo said:Same success.
Snowballo said:Same success.
Proof that cool packaging has little to do with the success of a product.Snowballo said:Same success.
Maybe something in the bargain bin but I can't think of a worst reason to buy a game. People will buy a kinect because their friends buy it and invite a group of friends over and have fun playing the games while most likely being drunk. Then it will spread like a virus.RPG_Fanatic said:I sometimes buy games based on boxart. Not as much now as before I used the internet to track game releases, but I still do.
The purpose of the package is to get peoples attention and make them interested in the product. Not everyone will buy this solely on seeing the advertisements. There will be people who walk into the store and base their impressions on what they see there.
Don't diss the Jaguar pad it was simply AHEAD OF ITS TIME.Kunan said:What the fuck @ that controller
glaurung said:
Because it's designed to sit under the TV in the living room. Regardless of the fact that it is aimed at children and families, the sensor has to fit in with most set-ups and black is the most neutral colour for that. Personally I wouldn't want anything but black to sit under my black TV, on top of my cabinet holding a black PS3, black Wii and black 360.panda21 said:i really don't understand why they went with black, if you were choosing a colour to appeal to the kinect market that would be the last one to pick.
InaudibleWhispa said:Because it's designed to sit under the TV in the living room. Regardless of the fact that it is aimed at children and families, the sensor has to fit in with most set-ups and black is the most neutral colour for that. Personally I wouldn't want anything but black to sit under my black TV, on top of my cabinet holding a black PS3, black Wii and black 360.
mj1108 said:We're not talking about people on GAF....we're talking about mainstream Joe Q Public.
panda21 said:but thats not something the audience its aimed at will think about when they are buying it. it ought to appeal to them to look at, not look like a 2000$ AV reciever.
I really don't think it matters. It's certainly not enough to put anyone off. I don't think I recall anyone out of my family or friends particularly commenting on the Wii or Wii remote in terms of how they look. They just care about what it does. I know that they would complain if they had a bright purple Kinect sensor sitting under their black TV though, or any other bright "family-friendly" colour.panda21 said:but thats not something the audience its aimed at will think about when they are buying it. it ought to appeal to them to look at, not look like a 2000$ AV reciever.
FStop7 said:This thing is going to bomb so hard.
flyinpiranha said:But it WILL appeal to them. It matches all the Ikea furniture they bought to hold up their HDTV. You make it sound like casuals can't buy black electronic devices when 99% of all electronic devices come (or are in) black.
You don't need a purple camera with green stripes to be appreciated once it's in your setup.
InaudibleWhispa said:I really don't think it matters. It's certainly not enough to put anyone off. I don't think I recall anyone out of my family or friends particularly commenting on the Wii or Wii remote in terms of how they look. They just care about what it does. I know that they would complain if they had a bright purple Kinect sensor sitting under their black TV though, or any other bright "family-friendly" colour.
panda21 said:i'm thinking about it from the perspective of being a kids toy (kinectimals etc) or for people who don't traditionally play games (wii sports/fit kind of market). you don't want to buy a kids toy that looks like a cable box, it makes it look expensive and not for kids.