PS4 and Xbox One browser benchmarks from Anandtech

Nov 20, 2012
1,794
0
0
#1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All results in milliseconds (LOWER IS BETTER).

Sunspider
PS4: 1,027.40
XBO: 2,360.90

Kracken
PS4: 22,768.70
XBO: 111,892.50

Winrar bolded

LOWER = better , as these measure time to completion.

http://anandtech.com/show/7528/the-xbox-one-mini-review-hardware-analysis/5

Interesting, given the similar CPUs the fact that the PS4 halves the XBO sunspider time,and absolutely kills it in Kraken (watch the decimal place, that's throwing everyone off). Also since IE11 is actually a great javascript performer (seriously, test it before the herp derp IE comments).

PS4 also halves the Wii U Sunspider time. Someone want to run Kraken on their Wii U?


Also note, Javascript is very single threaded mostly, the speculation that the PS4 is letting it get at more cores changes nothing.

I wonder what the final PS4 clock was.
 
Sep 14, 2010
7,511
0
0
USA
#13

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
Jan 18, 2007
46,582
1
1,195
The Confederate United States of America
#21
can the xbox browser do neogaf.com better than ps4?
Hell yes OTHER than the nagging issue with too many pics like screen shots threads. That was an issue with PS3 early on but Sony fixed that later.

On the positive side, you can disable pics and all that on mobile GAF which is the version that the browser defaults to on PS4. Easy to read and eliminate bandwidth load on the PS4.
 
Apr 30, 2008
4,253
0
0
#22
#27
Hell yes OTHER than the nagging issue with too many pics like screen shots threads. That was an issue with PS3 early on but Sony fixed that later.

On the positive side, you can disable pics and all that on mobile GAF which is the version that the browser defaults to on PS4. Easy to read and eliminate bandwidth load on the PS4.
now i wish ps4 had snap. the mobile version is such a great version.
 
Jun 15, 2007
23,767
0
990
#29

MThanded

I Was There! Official L Receiver 2/12/2016
Apr 16, 2007
37,219
1
0
There
#30
So xb1 has a much slower browser. That's nuts.

For both lower is better.

Since when does increased worst case execution time metric mean something is better. Everything was in milliseconds.