TURBO-Boost is the new cloud!
It's looking to cost around 399 if it's not wrong..
As long as it's decently priced and still has the edge of Sony's first-party teams, I don't see anything to be upset about.
All well and good, except that the Xbox Series X is exempt from this. The GPU and CPU clocks on the Series X run at the rated clocked speeds, constantly.Boostclocks are par for the course for new technology so I'm not sure what's there to complain about lol.
Anyone insisting on who is deluded is deluded.Anyone watching this and not thinking Sony were completely caught with their tech pants down by Microsofts determination not to be bested in hardware specs, is deluded.
...It begs the question just how much weaker the PS5 would have been had Microsoft not given them advance notice over the last 3mths, to revise their GPU clock speeds, which they almost certainly have, to boost it to 10.2Tf.
Neither Sony or Microsoft would choose to start a new generation with significantly weaker hardware.
The thing is, looking at this SSD tech, I could see it being $499. I doubt it and think they'll eat the loss at $399 or $449 but it could be $499 and that would be a catastrophe.Imagine Sony after the speech said it cost 499 dollars, gamer internet will meltdown.
Erm, no.
Not that it would stop from folks spreading fud.
The graphics processing unit (of Xbox Series X) is also a custom unit based on AMD's RDNA 2 graphics architecture with 52 compute units running at 1.465GHz (base) & 1.825GHz (boost) that is capable of 9.75 (base) teraflops & 12.14 (boost) teraflops of computational power.
Inside Xbox Series X: the full specs
This is it. After months of teaser trailers, blog posts and even the occasional leak, we can finally reveal firm, hard …www.eurogamer.net
Microsoft has delivered 12 teraflops of compute performance via 3328 shaders allocated to 52 compute units (from 56 in total on silicon, four disabled to increase production yield) running at a sustained, locked 1825MHz. Once again, Microsoft stresses the point that frequencies are consistent on all machines, in all environments. There are no boost clocks with Xbox Series X.
I see the PS5 coming in just shy of XSX in terms of GPU power.
Complete ass-pull but I think they've likely got lower CU counts but will have tried to push the clocks higher to try and catch up. Probably easier to add more copper to a heatsink than to add a bigger GPU.
Again, total story from my ass.
Never believe. But believe in BOOST!I believed
Didn't even consider that. You might be right.The thing is, looking at this SSD tech, I could see it being $499. I doubt it and think they'll eat the loss at $399 or $449 but it could be $499 and that would be a catastrophe.
GPU is 2.26Ghz, I sincerely hope NOT.Wonder if this will be a traditional flat console, or if they go with something like Series X to help with the cooling.
As long as it's decently priced and still has the edge of Sony's first-party teams, I don't see anything to be upset about.
Yep. Set clocks on the X. It's going to be huge.You guys are making stuff up, this is in the very article you just quoted.
There is no variability on the MS spec sheet.
What makes all of this worse is, the GPU and CPU don't run at the peak clock speeds constantly, unlike the Series X! Microsoft knew what they were doing! Phil is watching this, with a huge, wicked grin on his face.
I guess this concludes who's going stronger into next gen; it's the Xbox. However, Part II is on the way... The PS5 Pro and a Suped up Series X will be coming in two to three years. And so, the console wars continue!
Anyone watching this and not thinking Sony were completely caught with their tech pants down by Microsofts determination not to be bested in hardware specs, is deluded.
...It begs the question just how much weaker the PS5 would have been had Microsoft not given them advance notice over the last 3mths, to revise their GPU clock speeds, which they almost certainly have, to boost it to 10.2Tf.
Neither Sony or Microsoft would choose to start a new generation with significantly weaker hardware.
I don't understand any of this nerdy stuff.
You guys are making stuff up, this is in the very article you just quoted.
There is no variability on the MS spec sheet.
I don't understand any of this nerdy stuff.
Why is that?I doubt it.
Xbox will have that because they have a faster RAM and CPU. They both have NVMe SSDs which are very fast.Mhm, it will have faster loading than Xbox. By a lot actually. Microsoft went for raw TFLOP power. Sony went for performance efficiency. Very android vs Apple imo.
Wonder if this will be a traditional flat console, or if they go with something like Series X to help with the cooling.