As a European, I didn't know her before the tax thing.
Yeah... I'm getting my sources of information from elsewhere now. First impression matters most.
She's the Alex jones of liberals.
The is Alex Jones level of bizarro world bullshit right here. There is literally zero in common between the two. None.She's the Alex jones of liberals.
What she's great at doing is providing some historical context and providing the glue between disparate stories across the media. Some call that meandering or filler, but her style helps slot stories into a wider context where easily missed details can have the space to breathe.If you're getting your news from the TV, you're already losing.
She's not a liar but boy she's a bullshitter. And she's not a journalist, she's an anchor.
Rachel's self-aware enough to poke fun at her own tendency to over-explain and drag out stories as this happened during her appearance on The Simpsons.As someone who follows the news closely at times, I am disparaged alot by her willingness to explain every detail every time. As someone who's worked with intel agencies, brevity is a hell of a trait. I understand why she does what she does but that and her cheesy delivery makes her pretty unappealing to me.
She should be applauded for her dedication though.
I'm more attracted to her wit but I concur. It's nice to actually see good reportingShe's dreamy.
I know that's shallow, but I have a huge crush on her
She's the Alex jones of liberals. They're not equivalents since there's miles between conservatives and liberals. She's not a liar but boy she's a bullshitter. And she's not a journalist, she's an anchor.
She's less I.F. Stone and more this
https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/885000535983751169
#infowars #cnnMemeWar
#CNNISFAKENEWS
>>> http://*************/show <<<
...except shes the number 1 rated Pundit these days.
She's the Alex jones of liberals. They're not equivalents since there's miles between conservatives and liberals. She's not a liar but boy she's a bullshitter. And she's not a journalist, she's an anchor.
She definitely has her pluses. She just isn't for me. This is the great thing about a free press.Rachel's self-aware enough to poke fun at her own tendency to over-explain and drag out stories as this happened during her appearance on The Simpsons.
Brevity and milking commercial time don't jive with one another.
FYI, I consider Rachel to be a revelation. Wouldn't change a thing about her.
Isn't tucker Carlson?
She's the Alex jones of liberals. They're not equivalents since there's miles between conservatives and liberals. She's not a liar but boy she's a bullshitter. And she's not a journalist, she's an anchor.
She's less I.F. Stone and more this
Didn't she just massively screw up a story about a false flag leak type thing involving The Intercept?
First impression matters most.
Yes, this was incredibly fucked up.
She's not quite as bad as Glenn Beck, but she's close.
Didnt she just massively screw up a story about a false flag leak type thing involving The Intercept?
Wow.She's the Alex jones of liberals. They're not equivalents since there's miles between conservatives and liberals.
Didnt she just massively screw up a story about a false flag leak type thing involving The Intercept?
I haven't watched either one in months (don't have cable anymore), but I always felt like her and Chris Hayes were the only worthwhile parts of that network. I preferred Hayes a bit though.
She's the Alex jones of liberals. They're not equivalents since there's miles between conservatives and liberals. She's not a liar but boy she's a bullshitter. And she's not a journalist, she's an anchor.
She's less I.F. Stone and more this
I just recently within the last few months started watching her show.
I don't see where people get the idea that she is sensationalist or some sort of shuckster.
From what I've seen of her show, she's well-sourced, thoughtful, and charismatic, even while getting into the minutiae of political details and historical background.
In fact, I find the comparisons to any high profile right wing pundit named in this thread odd since while her show is certainly liberal in what it covers, I don't find it to be filled with Democratic talking points and editorializing too much on the news. It seems like, from my time watching, she doesn't share much of her personal political opinions on stories nor does she fill her show with lots of punditry of people getting preachy, beyond the content of the show being left leaning. I'm sure people could watch her show and get those elements out of it, but I'd be surprised if people watched her show for that.
Even if she hypes up stuff, I don't find that she's being misleading or deceptive, I find that she has this fascination with piecing together the puzzle of politics and sometimes has an enthusiasm for stuff the average person may not. I think that is also the thing that makes her show interesting because she likes to make other people interested in the details which leads to those elaborate background pieces about a story.
I just recently within the last few months started watching her show.
I don't see where people get the idea that she is sensationalist or some sort of shuckster.
From what I've seen of her show, she's well-sourced, thoughtful, and charismatic, even while getting into the minutiae of political details and historical background.
In fact, I find the comparisons to any high profile right wing pundit named in this thread odd since while her show is certainly liberal in what it covers, I don't find it to be filled with Democratic talking points and editorializing too much on the news. It seems like, from my time watching, she doesn't share much of her personal political opinions on stories nor does she fill her show with lots of punditry of people getting preachy, beyond the content of the show being left leaning. I'm sure people could watch her show and get those elements out of it, but I'd be surprised if people watched her show for that.
Even if she hypes up stuff, I don't find that she's being misleading or deceptive, I find that she has this fascination with piecing together the puzzle of politics and sometimes has an enthusiasm for stuff the average person may not. I think that is also the thing that makes her show interesting because she likes to make other people interested in the details which leads to those elaborate background pieces about a story.
She's the Alex jones of liberals.
As someone who follows the news closely at times, I am disparaged alot by her willingness to explain every detail every time. As someone who's worked with intel agencies, brevity is a hell of a trait. I understand why she does what she does but that and her cheesy delivery makes her pretty unappealing to me.
She should be applauded for her dedication though.
I agree she's phenomenal but dems really need someone who riles up the base to vote too. For some reason someone like Hannity can motivate voters; Maddow doesn't seem to have the same effect. Could simply be a numbers difference though.
She only stands out as decent because the rest of cable news is a flaming fucking cesspool
I agree she's phenomenal but dems really need someone who riles up the base to vote too. For some reason someone like Hannity can motivate voters; Maddow doesn't seem to have the same effect. Could simply be a numbers difference though.
She's the Alex jones of liberals. They're not equivalents since there's miles between conservatives and liberals. She's not a liar but boy she's a bullshitter.
And therein lies the irony. Republicans are way smarter and pragmatic in advancing their stupid agenda. Dems are very stupid in assuring they advance and promote their more informed and sound views.I agree she's phenomenal but dems really need someone who riles up the base to vote too. For some reason someone like Hannity can motivate voters; Maddow doesn't seem to have the same effect. Could simply be a numbers difference though.
She's the Alex jones of liberals. They're not equivalents since there's miles between conservatives and liberals. She's not a liar but boy she's a bullshitter. And she's not a journalist, she's an anchor.
She's less I.F. Stone and more this