I bet real money next gen is at least as good as 1080ti, with higher bandwidth as well.
Not necessarily.
4x more than base consoles - 5gb usable, so expect 20gb usable for anaconda.
Old ports aren't exactly a good benchmark for ps4.
Yeah, its not like tech will have advanced by then. Thanks nostradamas LOL
Navi=/=Gcn
One should compare apples to apples and not apples to oranges, Kinderfield made that mistake when he used an nVidia card.
We'll see.
Remember the "you'll get 2 or 4gb ram predictions" xD whatever peeps, well see.
then the banker laugh at the size of AMD's check!
The pro is silent to deaf people, airline mechanics, and band groups.
Hahaha
The guy's a complete tool mate. That alone shows you what companies with dev kits think of him. They simply won't tell him for their own reasons. There are a lot of tools like him who like to pretend they have reliable contacts. And even if they do, they somehow think they're in bed with the contacts, and everything they're told is true. So if I'm Ubisoft for example, and wanted the info to stay confidential still, I'd be throwing out lies to him, and would only give him crumbles when I'm ready to. I'm simply using the guy. When I worked in PR we used to do this all the time, using the media guys as simply extended PR tools to reach the masses.
This would apply if next gen consoles targeted 1080p, but they are going to be 4k machines, since the X set the minimum specs to run current gen games at console settings at 4kish which is 9GB usable for games and 6Tittyflops gpu its a useful benchmark
That's cutting it way to conservative on the border of limiting games scopes later on, for a proper next gen leap it needs to double the X at least
Heres hoping to that, it would be a shame if they went overboard with os ram reservation.
2GB chips available i think
Given how clunky the XBox dashboard is (even with 8gb on Nand ram?????) the OS can use the extra ram.
Does the Xbox do game recording? idk 4GB seems like alot to be reserved for a minimalistic console os with simple functions, maybe expand on Sonys implementation of secondary LPDDR chips for OS tasks
What if it's all cloud and this is what one game gets? I mean that is the only way any of these specs make sence. No way can a consumer afford a 4TB SSD
if next gen consoles ship with 12tf+ Navi gpus, should offer similar raw performance to a gtx 1080ti if not better in some areas due to arch advances
What does nvdia marked up prices have to do with amd gpus and semi custom console gpus?
24GB is plausible (dev kit 2x memory)
I actually believe this. Especially as bioware where saying they were getting lambasted for being transparent. What doesn't make sense though is if this is true why those extra effects are not available on PC already.
32GB would be a megaton announcement similar to 8GB GDDR5!
Yeah pricing is the big issue which is why i think 24gb is more likely
Jaguar and Ryzen are not even in the same category even when you take into account their respective timelines. Jaguar was basically a CPU for mobile devices - tablet APUs to be more specific. I bet you didn't even know this. Going to full-blown desktop CPU will increase the price significantly. They will need beefier cooling too. And 7nm process isn't really that mature so don't expect same prices as 14nm chips currently have. That's actually a reason why I think they aren't gonna go with an APU but with MCM design if 7nm is their goal. Multiple smaller chips, higher yields, more cost-efficient.
It's a common problem reading here and there about Pro and prior to that the base model, perhaps Sony skimping on cooling is the cause.