• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Reggie on CNN: "3rd-party games like CoD look dramatically better on our system"

Reggie's right, the version of Call of Duty on the Wii U is the best looking version of that game.

Why are you guys comparing it with BLOPS 2 on the PS360? :S
They're not the same games. They're not the same content.
 
There is NOTHING to be in disbelief about.

Your opinion.

He's upselling his company's products.

Heh, again... lying =/= upselling. It's one thing to say "This product is absolutely fantastic! Great buy!". Saying, "...this looks dramatically better on our system" is just lying. Many have pointed out that sometimes it isn't even on par.

It's not a controversy. It's not a big deal.

Never said it was. If anything, you are making a bigger deal about how posters are reacting to this than how people in this thread are actually reacting to what Reggie said.

If Reggie would've said that the Wii U can play Blu Ray movie, that'd be different. But this? No.

That would have been a bigger lie. Lies come in all different sizes.

I felt the same way when Sony was bragging about Toy Story quality graphics on PS2. Did I care? No. That's SCEA hyping up and exaggerating about their products. Who cares? The "Emotion Engine"? LOL, that was rich. But who cares? That's what companies do. Overhype their shit.

Again, there's a difference between "hyping" and straight out saying false information. If you don't care then why are you even in this thread?


You have a reallllly bad habit of projecting on people who don't agree with you. Chill with that, yo. This is about people overreacting to an exec selling his company's products. Stay on point.

So, after the things you have posted in this thread, you are stating this to me? Really? That's pretty hypocritical.
 
If you don't care, and it's not a big deal, then why are you in here ranting about upselling and all the other bs. Apparently it is a big deal to you that a Nintendo CEO has come under criticism in a gaming forum. Not even in the mainstream press, but a gaming forum; let that sink in a bit. Now who needs to chill out, and stay on point?

1.) He's the COO, not the CEO. Shouldn't that be common knowledge at this point?

2.) Ranting? Bro please. Someone having a different opinion and take on the situation from the (sadly) common groupthink in this thread does not equate ranting. The reason I'm stating my piece is because I expect that level of complaining and bickering to exist on gamefaqs and possibly IGN. Not here. Come on now. It's not even remotely a controversy. The "Reggie needs to be fired" posts are so over the top it's ridiculous. I'm stating my piece because I think GAF is much better than that.
 
Exactly. So why the butthurt over Reggie? It's not like it's all over Twitter; it's amongst us here on GAF.

Well the topic is here so he would discuss it here. Or is it more practical if he had gone to some news site and made a topic like "NeoGAF arguing over Reggie, here's why that's dumb"?
 
"3rd-party games like CoD look dramatically better on our system." - Reggie.

laughing.gif
 
1.) He's the COO, not the CEO. Shouldn't that be common knowledge at this point?

2.) Ranting? Bro please. Someone having a different opinion and take on the situation from the (sadly) common groupthink in this thread does not equate ranting. The reason I'm stating my piece is because I expect that level of complaining and bickering to exist on gamefaqs and possibly IGN. Not here. Come on now. It's not even remotely a controversy. The "Reggie needs to be fired" posts are so over the top it's ridiculous. I'm stating my piece because I think GAF is much better than that.

So your here to defend the sacred honor of GAF, and not Reggie?
Sorry...I've made a terrible mistake.
 
People are expecting a representative of a corporation to say anything differently?

Guess he should just say "the third party ported launch titles for Wii U don't run as well as other systems."

That's going to get sales.
 
The fact is tons of gaming companies should be called out on, EA for example is one of them. As well as Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft, etc.
 
I don't recall Reggie calling out say....EA in their interview stating that whatever engine they use in their games is "horrible" or anything to that effect. He's promoting his company's products. Not someone elses's.

I'm not pointing fingers or anything by this but just generally curious. Do you have a Wii U?
 
I don't recall Reggie calling out say....EA in their interview stating that whatever engine they use in their games is "horrible" or anything to that effect. He's promoting his company's products. Not someone elses's.

So because he is the COO it's his job to sell products by disseminating misinformation because in business it is okay to do so because you are selling your products. I mean, he did categorically state that under side by side comparison CoD looks "dramatically" better.

Heck if he had said that the tablet allows for a more unique experience thereby making it a better version then it wouldn't have been a lie or even a truth being stretched. Because that is up-selling the product by outlining relevant features that separate and elevate one version above another.
 
People are expecting a representative of a corporation to say anything differently?

Is the statement (and/or one similar to), "The version of the game on the Wii U has unique features not found on any other current consoles that thus make our version feel more fresh in multiple ways...", that out of the blue or hard to come up with on the fly?

Guess he should just say "the third party ported launch titles for Wii U don't run as well as other systems."

That's going to get sales.

Yep, since there's absolutely nothing else he could have said. :|
 
Guys, when he said Call of Duty on Wii U looked better than other consoles, he was talking about the box art. That blue with yellow stripe is pretty sharp.
 
People are expecting a representative of a corporation to say anything differently?

Guess he should just say "the third party ported launch titles for Wii U don't run as well as other systems."

That's going to get sales.

Why are people totally lost? The point is, he specifically compared COD with the other versions, calling it dramatically better graphically when it clearly isn't. If he had generalized the quality of Wii U 3rd party ports, then whatever; that can be spinned, and heck it might even become true down the line, but he drew a line in the sand with COD.
 
Why are people totally lost? The point is, he specifically compared COD with the other versions, calling it dramatically better graphically when it clearly isn't. If he had generalized the quality of Wii U 3rd party ports, then whatever; that can be spinned, and heck it might even become true down the line, but he drew a line in the sand with COD.

Why are you totally lost? COOs and CEOs completely bullshitting is nothing new. At all.

Why is this such a big deal with people?
 
Nintendo fan here.

Reggie has always been annoying and deceptive. He really knows how to shine a turd and should frustrate anyone that has a minimal amount of knowledge about the video game industry.

I'm sure he's effective, though. Just doing his job.

What actually bothered me was a few months ago when he said something to the effect of 'Our fans are never satisfied, even when we give them all this great content!' - what a douche.
 
But it's not R700 and it's likely not 40nm. I guess you're still choosing to ignore everything in the WUSTs.

BTW: I'm not saying it's 600GFlops either.

It was confirmed at 40nm. Wust thread is a complete joke.

Even moving to 28nm doesn't change performance for watts that much anyway.
 
So because he is the COO it's his job to sell products by disseminating misinformation because in business it is okay to do so because you are selling your products. I mean, he did categorically state that under side by side comparison CoD looks "dramatically" better.

Heck if he had said that the tablet allows for a more unique experience thereby making it a better version then it wouldn't have been a lie or even a truth being stretched. Because that is up-selling the product by outlining relevant features that separate and elevate one version above another.

What I'm saying is that companies will exaggerate and hype up their companies products all the time....and it's really not a huge deal. Apple did so with the iPhone 5 when they touted their display as "the most advanced display" despite the Nokia Lumia arguably having a better display. It's standard upselling to hype up your products. Should Tim Cook be "fired" because of that.

NOT saying that's what you stated, just pointing out some of the extremism in this thread in response to an innocuous comment on a very quick CNN interview.
 
LOL. All this spin and defense of Reggie. If this was a Sony rep that said this, NeoGAF would rip him to shreds, and rightly so. Why is it that all of sudden that ripping shitty/deceptive/incompetent PR is such an issue now?
 
Nintendo fan here.

Reggie has always been annoying and deceptive. He really knows how to shine a turd and should frustrate anyone that has a minimal amount of knowledge about the video game industry.

I'm sure he's effective, though. Just doing his job.

What actually bothered me was a few months ago when he said something to the effect of 'Our fans are never satisfied, even when we give them all this great content!' - what a douche.

I actually think I understand where he was coming from with that remark and I actually agree. Unfortunately I think he was frustrated and he really shouldn't have said that to the press. Not a smart move on his part there.
 
Your opinion.



Heh, again... lying =/= upselling. It's one thing to say "This product is absolutely fantastic! Great buy!". Saying, "...this looks dramatically better on our system" is just lying. Many have pointed out that sometimes it isn't even on par.



Never said it was. If anything, you are making a bigger deal about how posters are reacting to this than how people in this thread are actually reacting to what Reggie said.



That would have been a bigger lie. Lies come in all different sizes.



Again, there's a difference between "hyping" and straight out saying false information. If you don't care then why are you even in this thread?




So, after the things you have posted in this thread, you are stating this to me? Really? That's pretty hypocritical.

What's the difference here? Sony saying that the PS2 had Toy Story like graphics was a straight up lie. No hyping there. They also said that the PS3 would run games at 1080p at 120fps. Again, straight up lie.

Not saying what Reggie did was right. Just saying that it's hardly something new in the video games industry. Doesn't make it right. It's just there. :)

Edit: Also, I'm not saying that it's wrong to jump on Reggie's back. No defense or anything. He should get put through the shredder for this, just as Sony has been put through the shredder before.
 
What I'm saying is that companies will exaggerate and hype up their companies products all the time....and it's really not a huge deal. Apple did so with the iPhone 5 when they touted their display as "the most advanced display" despite the Nokia Lumia arguably having a better display. It's standard upselling to hype up your products. Should Tim Cook be "fired" because of that.

NOT saying that's what you stated, just pointing out some of the extremism in this thread in response to an innocuous comment on a very quick CNN interview.
There are plenty of people debating this issue in a rational manner, yet you decide to focus on the extreme posts, and condemn all of GAF for it. I've been around gaming for a long time; longer than a good percentage of GAF I would reckon, and I know how things work. Doesn't mean that these companies can't be called on shit; I praise them when they do the right thing, and let them have it when they do the wrong thing. Nothing wrong with that.
 
I just think saying COD Blops 2 looks "dramatically" better on Wii U is a misrepresentation of the truth. I have a feeling if he had worded it differently like, "Wii U has the definitive version of the game," no one would have batted an eyelash.
 
I'm totally stunned that people think him going on CNN and lying is ok to do. All the games that are on multiple systems seem to perform better on the other systems than the WiiU for any objective comparison.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-black-ops-2-wii-u-face-off

The Wii U version matches the look of the Xbox 360 game and thus gives it an edge visually over the PlayStation 3 release, but unfortunately it comes up well short in terms of performance - an aspect that is all-important to the playability of a COD title. The frame-rate variance is such that the PS3 game feels generally smoother, while the 360 release feels like an entirely different game in the more demanding levels. Bearing in mind the commonalities in hardware design between Wii U and Xbox 360, we can't help but feel somewhat disappointed that Black Ops 2 under-performs so noticeably.
 
What's the difference here? Sony saying that the PS2 had Toy Story like graphics was a straight up lie. No hyping there. They also said that the PS3 would run games at 1080p at 120fps. Again, straight up lie.

Not saying what Reggie did was right. Just saying that it's hardly something new in the video games industry. Doesn't make it right. It's just there. :)

Sony got called out on their bullshit, and rightly so. Still even though it was stupidly over the top "Toy Story quality graphics" is a lot harder to objectively judge than a direct comparison of the same game on multiple systems. This is easy to jump on because comparisons that fly directly in the face of what he's said were only released a few days ago!

But don't worry... I'm sure we will catch out Microsoft and Sony lying as well soon enough. But that will be tomorrow, and not today. For now, everyone should point and laugh at Reggie for saying something stupid.
 
I just think saying COD Blops 2 looks "dramatically" better on Wii U is a misrepresentation of the truth. I have a feeling if he had worded it differently like, "Wii U has the definitive version of the game," no one would have batted an eyelash.

My point exactly. It's not a big deal, but it's a topic that was put up for debate, so why is it wrong to criticize Reggie for it? There was no outcry of support for Sony when they were "upselling" their product; or is it because Sony is "evil" and Nintendo are the "good guys"?
 
Sony got called out on their bullshit, and rightly so. Still even though it was stupidly over the top "Toy Story quality graphics" is a lot harder to objectively judge than a direct comparison of the same game on multiple systems. This is easy to jump on because comparisons that fly directly in the face of what he's said were only released a few days ago!

But don't worry... I'm sure we will catch out Microsoft and Sony lying as well soon enough. But that will be tomorrow, and not today. For now, everyone should point and laugh at Reggie for saying something stupid.

What? Why is that harder to objectively judge? It objectively wasn't true. There really isn't any gray area there.
 
Sony got called out on their bullshit, and rightly so. Still even though it was stupidly over the top "Toy Story quality graphics" is a lot harder to objectively judge than a direct comparison of the same game on multiple systems. This is easy to jump on because comparisons that fly directly in the face of what he's said were only released a few days ago!

But don't worry... I'm sure we will catch out Microsoft and Sony lying as well soon enough. But that will be tomorrow, and not today. For now, everyone should point and laugh at Reggie for saying something stupid.

I agree with the bolded, but come on man. You can't tell me that Toy Story like graphics is a lot harder to objectively judge. That was some straight up BS right there. lol
 
I just think saying COD Blops 2 looks "dramatically" better on Wii U is a misrepresentation of the truth. I have a feeling if he had worded it differently like, "Wii U has the definitive version of the game," no one would have batted an eyelash.

Well those are two completely different things, and the statement is still iffy but at least not a total lie.
 
What? Why is that harder to objectively judge? It objectively wasn't true. There really isn't any gray area there.

Something weasely like "if we put all the PS2s power into a single model, we could fully render one of the characters from Toy Story". You know, stuff like that.

It's clearly a lie, but like the "Avatar quality graphics" for 720/PS4 it's not as easy to do a quick and direct comparison.

I think I should clarify that Sony lied through their teeth in both the lead up to the PS2 launch and the PS3 launch. It stank of BS then and it still stinks now. It'll be interesting to see how Microsoft and Sony go about it in the lead up to next gen...
 
Quick semi-related question.

Has the GAF axiom of; 'There's a defense force for everything.' been given a number or name yet?

"In terms of specs it's pretty much on par..." :x I believe Reggie's comment was a professional faux pas that was the face of a seething raging hatred he was desperately trying to subdue.
 
What's the difference here? Sony saying that the PS2 had Toy Story like graphics was a straight up lie. No hyping there. They also said that the PS3 would run games at 1080p at 120fps. Again, straight up lie.

Yeah, when I said that, I wasn't comparing what Sony said in the past to what Reggie said in the CNN clip.

I was just replying to him since he said it was "nothing but spin" when (again) there's a difference between spinning something to make it sound better and actually telling a straight up lie.

Those examples you stated from Sony were straight up lies.
 
Sony never said the PS2 would deliver Toy Story graphics, (though they did say movie quality). Thats one impressively long running gaming myth. MS directly said the Xbox would, but its never attributed to them. Sony told many a lie at E3 2005, but I think if you have to compare to another companies lies and PR blunders to try and excuse this, its probably already damning evidence that Reggie goofed.
 
Top Bottom