Getting 4 and 5.
Should I get 6? I've heard mixed feelings about it so I'm not sure.
Why are people giving Capcom shit in this thread? Is the SFV hate that strong?
And then it tells you to put the disc in when you try to load one. And you have to fully install them before you can play. The way the REMAKE / RE0 disc works is not normal.As in there's no special menu to select the game or anything is what he means. You don't get taken to a "Select Game" screen like you do in say The Nathan Drake Collection. It just plops the games on the HDD like you downloaded them. With no indication you even have a physical copy.
RE6 took the "land a critical hit to set up melee" gameplay that started with RE4, expanded in RE5 and just turned the dial to eleven.
The main problem with 6 is that it's wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too long/bloated. A lot of the terrible design decisions could have been mitigated/overlooked if it didn't overstay its welcome by 10+ hours.
See that is my problem, coop and survival horror don't mix
RE6 is pretty much an action adventure game with zombies
Do we have confirmation of that? It doesn't seem that clear.
I'll definitely play RE5 and RE6 again! Sweet coop experiences, I'll try to bring a friend over to the series too.
Is it too much to expect sexy Chris alternate costumes?
And this. RE5 is fantastic in co-op. It's only a stumble if you play it single player and arm Sheva with something other than the stun rod. If you play it single player, you are playang it wrong.Re5 is so good coop. Can't wait to play again.
The lost in shadows dlc in that picture only came to PC when the GFWL transition happened and was available for free to people who already owned the game.
I know there was previous dlc for the pc version, but the dlc in question (since someone was initially suggesting the pc didn't get that dlc) came later for free to people who owned the game.
I'm not mixing anything up.
Look, I like Resident Evil 4 as much as the next guy but seeing people dismiss Resident Evil 5 and throwing it under the bus like this truly disgusts me. To me RE5 is a much better game both gameplay wise and story wise.
Resident Evil 4 might have revolutionized the series but 5 expanded it and made it better.
Wait what. That came out? God damn, I'm so late on that train :lol
But they gave it us for free though!They released it late as hell tho
Can't deal with tank controls at this point. I'd love to play it, but the control scheme makes it too difficult.
RE5 is just better version of RE4 because it has coop.
Will be buying all of these again then. No retail version for EU though? What is this nonsense.
Many people try and play it as a shooter, because there's a cover system and guns, and I guess that's the natural tendency? But if they were better able to convey that the game is a brawler, it would've been better for everyone.
RE6 took the "land a critical hit to set up melee" gameplay that started with RE4, expanded in RE5 and just turned the dial to eleven. Idk how many people get that.
Fine if it's not someone's thing, but it's unique in the industry, and fucking awesome.
When are we getting 2 and 3?
Re5 is so good coop. Can't wait to play again.
Never played re6
The real question here is which version of 4 will we be getting?
I understand but I don't consider RE4 or RE5 to be survival horror almost at all. Both are fantastic action games.
RE4 was barely survival horror anyway.
RE5 canbe played without tank controls. You just can't move and shoot. I mean I think it's balanced for tank controls and should be played that way, but you can totally have aiming on the right stick and strafing on the left.Never know what they may add to 4 with it so far out. I don't think 6 was tank though.
RE5 had a better narrative, gunplay, and some standout encounters (though just as many fell flat), and the coop. RE4 was superior in overall encounter design, A.I. behavior, and replayability. Pacing and Mercs I put about equal. 5 had those terrible set piece events like the Gigante sequence.
If the encounter and level design was just as expertly crafted, it would have been received much better. I honestly only felt that the mechanics shined in Mercs, and likely most people gravitate to the hit-and-miss campaign.
REMAKE 2 is only 6 or so months in development, so I'd expect a 2018 release. Unless they roll REmake 3 in with 2, development on that will depend on their marketing effort and result of such in selling REmake 2.
Best thing about RE6 was its logo!
RE5 canbe played without tank controls. You just can't move and shoot. I mean I think it's balanced for tank controls and should be played that way, but you can totally have aiming on the right stick and strafing on the left.
Here's hoping the lighting in RE4 is at least as good as the Gamecube version.
The insistence on using the PS2 version as the base for ports has really aggravated me in the past.
I have all those games on 360, where is my back compat Capcom
Ps2 was only the base for the first PC version. 360 and PS3 (and steam RE4) all used the game cube version as the base... however 360 and PS3 were missing effects (and substituted some) that were specific to the game cubes hardware.Here's hoping the lighting in RE4 is at least as good as the Gamecube version.
The insistence on using the PS2 version as the base for ports has really aggravated me in the past.