Mighty Chin
Banned
Some people seem devoid of joy.
RLM- era.Some people seem devoid of joy.
As has been clarified before, the dialogue says that Raddus has returned to his ship and will be going to fight, not that he has already left.
The droids got on board before he left.
Leland Chee of the Lucasfilm story group says that there are only "Hours, if that" between the ending of R1 and the beginning of ANH.
And if fan math is your jam, someone calculated roughly that it would take about 10 hours to get from Scarif to Tatooine. Since make believe doesn't have to follow rules it's not necessarily true, but for now it's a decent enough guess.
Did they clarify why Leia tried to pretend she was on a "Diplomatic Mission" when Vader just saw her leave a war zone?
Vader scene is great, the terror is real, the horror is there.
as a lead-up to ANH, i don't really buy any of it. slashy Vader is not ANH Vader. totally different demeanor.
Man, sucks so much for Bail. Like, he could have just stayed on Yavin, and he'd have not died.
Also, I thought Vader was completely off in all of his scenes. He just felt like a different character.
Some people seem devoid of joy.
Eh, I think emphasizing just how narrow the path to success was absolutely serves a purpose. Even when I was watching it in the theater, my first thought was the parallel between that and one of my favorite scenes in, honestly, pretty much any movie ever: the docking scene in Interstellar.The Vader scene is not important. That scene could have been completely excised from the film and it would not change a single thing narratively about the characters or the overall story. Just showing the plans getting to Leia is enough to demonstrate that this is just the beginning. I don't think it reinforces how close it was since we could see that happening on Scarif itself. We see the characters taking and spending these chances moment to moment relying on luck and circumstance. It's more effective when it happens with the characters we've spent time with (even if they are boring). Passing their little piece of hope from nameless redshirt to nameless redshirt doesn't add much to their sacrifice. I'm not invested in those redshirts. They don't mean anything, not even on the larger they-represent-the-rebellion sense. Our representation of the rebellion are Jyn, et al. If the plans passed among them or the others sacrificed themselves so that Jyn could deliver it, then I could be more satisfied. That scene would be stronger and not just fanservice. But as it stands, that's all it is. It's great fanservice. It got me excited, but that's all it is.
Some people seem devoid of joy.
Or maybe I just want something better.With films, people believe they are above seeing Vader slaughter Rebels to prove some strange point about being intellectuals who are free thinkers away form the masses I guess? It's strange
Haha, youtuber, internet, very strong points.
Some people seem devoid of joy.
Rogue One sure is.
Eh, I think emphasizing just how narrow the path to success was absolutely serves a purpose. Even when I was watching it in the theater, my first thought was the parallel between that and one of my favorite scenes in, honestly, pretty much any movie ever: the docking scene in Interstellar.
That scene is an incredible scene out of context and on its own immediate merit. The cinematography, the swell of the music, the acting, the effects, everything is pretty much flawlessly executed. But beyond that, its greater contextual meaning really adds a "whoa" factor. It isn't just about those people or that ship or that mission or even the whole planet -- literally the entire future of humanity, forever, is compressed down into whether or not those little docking teeth latch together. So many movies do the whole "save the world" thing, but it's incredibly rare to get an effective and powerful visual metaphor that really drives home what it means to save the world by the skin of your teeth.
That's what the Vader scene in Rogue One was to me. Things were close on Scarif, sure, but in that typical action movie sense, regardless of how beautiful it was shot or how much I doubted they'd go in for the finality of their conclusion. It didn't feel much different from stopping some timer at 00:01 or... I dunno, the conclusion of any Marvel movie, really. But that Vader scene and those four inches of space the plans get through -- that's the whole Star Wars universe there, right in those four inches.
No, it's not functionally useful to the narrative, but it certainly has value. It's a movie, not a technical handbook, after all.
I don't disagree that it's a well-made sequence. It is straight up, without a doubt beautiful. However, having those four inches be the fulcrum upon which the Star Wars universe is hinged without the inclusion of any of the main characters makes it weaker than it could have been. Our main characters had nothing to do with those four inches at all. I don't get invested in goals, I get invested in characters. If any of the main characters were there to see the plans get to the other ship, I could be more invested in the plight, but nameless redshirts getting slaughtered for the cause is boring to me. I'd rather not have Vader be the final boss, but if you want to keep it in, then I think it should definitely serve the narrative. As it is, it's empty tension.
They have everything to do with those 4 inches, because that data tape doesn't exist without them.That is literally their sacrifice being passed forward.
I don't disagree that it's a well-made sequence. It is straight up, without a doubt beautiful. However, having those four inches be the fulcrum upon which the Star Wars universe is hinged without the inclusion of any of the main characters makes it weaker than it could have been. Our main characters had nothing to do with those four inches at all. I don't get invested in goals, I get invested in characters. If any of the main characters were there to see the plans get to the other ship, I could be more invested in the plight, but nameless redshirts getting slaughtered for the cause is boring to me. I'd rather not have Vader be the final boss, but if you want to keep it in, then I think it should definitely serve the narrative. As it is, it's empty tension.
Well, I can get behind the sentiment that the inclusion of a main character would've affected the scene positively. The idea that they could've baited us into thinking one of them got out alive, then seeing Vader's saber light their face up red kinda tickles my... emotional rollercoaster-bone. But then you're getting into someone actually figuring out how to get off the surface (or not being there in the first place) and that'd call for a lot of rewriting. I'm okay with the crew staying together and everyone dying on the mission.
They're so far removed from it, though. They don't even know it's happening. For some people, they love that. It makes the characters small cogs in a bigger system. Me? I don't like it. The movie doesn't play anything like that. It doesn't play them as small parts. After all, it's a space opera. I don't think such a "pivotal" moment should be that far removed from the main characters.
That's what the Vader scene in Rogue One was to me. Things were close on Scarif, sure, but in that typical action movie sense, regardless of how beautiful it was shot or how much I doubted they'd go in for the finality of their conclusion. It didn't feel much different from stopping some timer at 00:01 or... I dunno, the conclusion of any Marvel movie, really. But that Vader scene and those four inches of space the plans get through -- that's the whole Star Wars universe there, right in those four inches.
Rogue One > Godzilla > MonstersOut of curiosity, how would people rank the Gareth Edwards films? I'd probably go:
Monsters>>>>>>Rogue One>>Godzilla
Will this movie make any sense for someone who hasn't seen any of the other Star Wars movies?
Most of the characters just weren't that compelling.
Forest Whitaker's character didn't really have a purpose.
Yes, although it would help if you already knew some stuff like what the Force is and what happened to the Jedi. But basically all you need to know is there's a big evil Empire building a superweapon and a Rebellion against it.
I assumed the deathstar takes awhile to re-position and or charge the weapon. Im watching the show and it seems it takes a looong ass time to destroy capital ships with just regular ship weapons.Is there a reason the imperials didn't just blow the Mon Cal ship out of the galaxy? Why did they have to board it?
Not that I'm complaining because we got that sweet, sweet Vader.
I noticed and I barely remember the OT. I think its cause he was too animated. They would show Krennic and then cut to Tarkin who for some reason has like 10x the amount of facial muscles moving. Was that Senate lady CGI though? Edit: lol they just got an actor that looks just like her.Was talking with a pair of college students today and they had NO idea thatwas CG! They thought I was messing with them!Tarkin
Makes me wonder, if I hadn't watched so much of the original or knew the actor was dead, would I have noticed?
Was talking with a pair of college students today and they had NO idea thatwas CG! They thought I was messing with them!Tarkin
Makes me wonder, if I hadn't watched so much of the original or knew the actor was dead, would I have noticed?
A better question is how Leia's ship even escaped in the first place. You'd think they'd have star destroyers looking out for people trying to escape.
I am so tired of Zimmer it's ridiculous. Danny Elfman, Alan Silvestri, Howard Shore and Harry Gregson-Williams are still around and yet Hans Zimmer (or his studio being billed as him) were getting literally every blockbuster film for a few summers, it was ridiculous.
I've seen the original films only once, had no idea who Peter Cushing is or that he died. When Tarkin appeared in Rogue One I noticed instantly that he was CGI. Funny thing is, I did know Leia was put in the film so I was worried her CGI would look super fake as well, but when she appeared I couldn't believe I was looking at computer graphics. Leia looked super real to me.Was talking with a pair of college students today and they had NO idea thatwas CG! They thought I was messing with them!Tarkin
Makes me wonder, if I hadn't watched so much of the original or knew the actor was dead, would I have noticed?
I've seen the original films only once, had no idea who Peter Cushing is or that he died. When Tarkin appeared in Rogue One I noticed instantly that he was CGI. Funny thing is, I did know Leia was put in the film so I was worried her CGI would look super fake as well, but when she appeared I couldn't believe I was looking at computer graphics. Leia looked super real to me.
I really wish we could get stats on how many people (who didn't know the actor is dead) recognized that Tarkin was CGI. I'm willing to be it's a LOT lower than people think, despite being noticeable upon inspection.
It didn't bother me THAT much, but it kind of irks me how hyperspace is being used in these new Star Wars films. More frequently we're seeing pilots make hyperspace jumps to/from the atmosphere. It's become a get out of jail free card, basically.
I thought what they did was just use a lookalike and fix up his face with CGI so he looks even more like Tarkin. Him being fully CGI is actually more impressive than what I thought, and he looked way better than the Leia model at the end, too.I went with my dad and my friend last night, and all of us noticed right away. It's really obvious IMO. Still, it didn't bother me.
I thought it was confirmed that there were actors used for everything but the face for both Leia and Tarkin.I thought what they did was just use a lookalike and fix up his face with CGI so he looks even more like Tarkin. Him being fully CGI is actually more impressive than what I thought, and he looked way better than the Leia model at the end, too.
That said, though, there's no way they could have used the original actor, even if he was still alive. He was already pretty old in A New Hope, and it's been like 40 years since. He'd be geriatric.
I really wish we could get stats on how many people (who didn't know the actor is dead) recognized that Tarkin was CGI. I'm willing to be it's a LOT lower than people think, despite being noticeable upon inspection.