They have 2 routes:
I couldn't disagree more when it comes to frame rate. After playing every game at 60 on the PC, I don't want any console games if they're going to run at 30. The only game I've suffered through 30fps is Bloodborne. Even then, I don't want to play it anymore because it's just so bad.
I believe they worked with Epic on the engine heavily too. Didn’t they both create the Matrix demo?
Ok I need ALL the details on this lmao.
AI has been not of a concern since Xbox 360.
He probably just made stuff up about his family to get spastic points on reeee.
news.xbox.com
Its was good, but it wasnt that good.
Good. play this game on PC. It will be 60 fps. 120 fps. 240 fps.
yep. so out of touch, virtually every gen for the past 9 gens did this.
Probably should go see a doctor then. 30fps is just fine.
What DLC campaigns can you think of that are better? Hivebusters is about as premium as it gets. It probably could have been extended into a spinoff game.
It's a shooter, controls and visual fidelity matter quite a lot for this, and besides that, there seems to be a massive overestimation of what halving the frame rate target will free up. There's no reason for it to not target 60, targeting 30 will not fundamentally change the experience like you're implying here. It would free up some CPU cycles, though not much, and the GPU cycles saved would just get immediately flipped towards higher resolutions so it wouldn't make a true, tangibly different experience, in my opinion, for the better. You're acting like somehow targeting 30 will make it automatically a better game or targeting 60 is somehow a net negative, and I just thoroughly disagree.
FUN is the keyword. Shit doesn't have to be original to be fun. Ms games will want those sweet sweet ps bucks i'd imagine so it's only a matter of time before they fold like a house made of soggy playing cards.
I agree with this IF you consider 60 fps as the minimum. I want nothing to do with ANY of those bells and whistles if it means we are stuck at 30 fps.
60 is fine for consoles. 120 is nicer.
Then play games on PC where you have options. There should be only one vision from the developer on consoles. I think game visuals are held back by crybabies that think they need 60fps and developers too lazy to optimize right. But I think that laziness comes from have to optimize so many different visual options across different platforms.
I’d be fine with the reduced resolution, if that’s developers overall vision. Again, I think when you have options on consoles, overall everything suffers. I would rather the developer make one choice for each console, then build their game around that.
So Gears 1 and Halo 3 shouldve targeted 60 fps on the 360?
I can easily say: Game is amazing but shit's only 30 fps so I have a hard time playing it now with all the buttery smooth titles I got on my PC.
wasting? have you seen some games recently
Well, then they shouldn't be wasting power on graphical features until it's feasible on consoles, that way they can boost resolution a little and keep a decent frame rate... The power gap needed to make a decent leap these days is just too much imo, then they (for some weird reason) decided it's time to raise resolution an absurd amount
Blood and Wine, Phantom Liberty, Burning Shores....
60fps was always possible, a design choice, not a feature of this gen. This fetishism with it is the feature of this gen. And I guess developers don’t mind it that much because this way they don’t need to sweat and make technical progress they just make a lastgen game, make it run at higher frames and call it a day.
You wouldn't put Hivebusters up with those? I certainly would, especially considering those are RPG expansions.
It's a good and solid 3 hr revisit, which I enjoyed. Nothing more, nothing less.
In my opinion these aren't comparable, respectfully. That was before the sophisticated upscaling algorithms we currently enjoy were even a passing thought, and hitting that 720p resolution target was incredibly important for marketing purposes for the mere purpose of being called "HD." Now, on to specifically how I would feel about them being designed for 60 I'll say this: I never played through Gears and Halo 3 until they were available at 60 fps, as the first time I tried them I just felt they were too sluggish. Granted, I was already used to playing on PC, so perhaps that poisoned me against the experience, but when I tried them years later on a Series X, Master Chief Collection and Gears 1 with the remake and the 60 fps patch), I quite enjoyed them both.
