Get your shit together, WB.
To late now.
Time for a Nolan reboot
Get your shit together, WB.
To late now.
Time for a Nolan reboot
He could just be negotiating, holding off for the right amount of money, or even right level of freedom.
I guess they could bring Joseph Gordon Levitt back as Batman.
I guess but I can't imagine a world where he wasn't the first person they asked.
He could just be negotiating, holding off for the right amount of money, or even right level of freedom.
I guess they could bring Joseph Gordon Levitt back as Batman.
Chances are that Warner has asked him more times than anybody could count and has said no every time. If he wanted to take charge of the DCEU it would have happened and I don't think Warner Brothers could offer him anything to change his mind.
That's bullshit and you know it. Just stick to defending the Martha scene in BvS with 10,000 word essays.
Bruh you needed a god damn flow chart.
A flow chart.
Yup. WB would move heaven and earth if they thought it would even give them a chance at getting Nolan back to DC. If they didn't get him years ago, they won't ever. His contributions on Man of Steel and a meaningless name stamp on BvS is they most he's willing to give them and I don't see that changing soon. Especially when the man has freaking carte blanche at this point. No reason to accept a big ol' check for something he just isn't interested in returning to when he can get all the money he wants doing whatever the hell he wants.
WB needs a visionary leading DCU.
JL will do better than BvS box office wise, based on the name and spectacle alone.
Where is the flowchart?
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned that Joby Harold has written three films in total, one of which is Guy Ritchie's King Arthur film. His first screenplay was Awake, starring Hayden Christensen.
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned that Joby Harold has written three films in total, one of which is Guy Ritchie's King Arthur film. His first screenplay was Awake, starring Hayden Christensen.
It'll be here soon, together with the inevitable "but Marvel did it too and you don't mind it there".
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned that Joby Harold has written three films in total, one of which is Guy Ritchie's King Arthur film. His first screenplay was Awake, starring Hayden Christensen.
Or there is a bias against bad films. The critics were kind to TDKR, and that was just above average, which the current DCEU stuff can't even come close to.
Haha Hahahahaha
I love how its on the critics, being wrong, and not the longstsnding fans of these comics who mostly basing their criticisms on emotion.
No it doesn't. It proves that professional critics have more discerning tastes than casual movie goers. They'd have to or else they probably couldn't get paid to critique.
Here we go again...
LMFAO or maybe they're just shit films overvoted by blind pathetic fanboys online. Nah, I'm sure Rotten Tomatoes (which is partly owned by WB) has it out for them.
It's OK. Ant-Man had similar issues.
LOL
So, the "critics" are the arbiters of "bad films" instead of the paying audience? Their tastes should override what the general audience wants to see? Sounds like cultural facism.
So, the "critics" are the arbiters of "bad films" instead of the paying audience? Their tastes should override what the general audience wants to see? Sounds like cultural facism.
Thanks. I win the argument by default.
So, the "critics" are the arbiters of "bad films" instead of the paying audience? Their tastes should override what the general audience wants to see? Sounds like cultural facism.
Thanks. I win the argument by default.
I see the marvel bias continues without letting up. Everywhere you turn it's just a steam of negativity and doubt. There is a constant theme to undercut the tremendous support the DCEU has. And I think it's just unbelievably frustrating when youre continually told its not big enough; its not good enough. You cant win. Ive never seen it like this. The default narrative is always negative, and its demoralizing.
Why don't you want James Wan Aquaman? That shit will be the best superhero movie of the year it comes out.
I mean for fucks sake you have arguably the DEFINITIVE Flash writer headed your studio creatively and you still can't make this shit work with a touch up?
Like, Johns is RIGHT THERE.
So there is a grand conspiracy against DC films. WB one of the biggest multimedia company in the world can't fight a bunch of youtube nerds and bloggers?
The disparity between the critic score and user likes proves there's some bias against DC films.
Apologies if this comes off as ignorant, as someone who hasn't read any of the Flash comics what possible challenge does someone who can move faster than we can perceive face from any enemy? Couldn't he just punch anyone repeatedly at super speed? Or build a cage around someone without them being able to react? Why doesn't he just move at super speed all the time? People talk about Superman being hard to write for as there's no real challenges he can face, but the Flash could fuck up your day in a heartbeat.
I think this is Afflecks problem as well. Ben really wants to direct a Batman film. I just think he doesn't want it attached to the larger universe.What they originally had probably worked just fine. What they had rewritten probably worked okay, too.
Flash likely isn't the problem at all.
It's the universe Flash is attached to.
So if this universe brickwalls in November, then the "page one rewrite" becomes an abandoned project. If the universe manages to clear BvS's take, this "page one rewrite" ends up being a revision of what they already had and a director finally gets announced.
I think this is Afflecks problem as well. Ben really wants to direct a Batman film. I just think he doesn't want it attached to the larger universe.
The disparity between the critic score and user likes proves there's some bias against DC films.
I think this is Afflecks problem as well. Ben really wants to direct a Batman film. I just think he doesn't want it attached to the larger universe.
He should have probably thought about that before being in Batman vs Superman.
Yeah, he should've looked into that crystal ball of his and known that the movie would've been poorly received. It's THAT simple!
This is an interesting point. The Flash movie shouldn't be anything like that crappy tv show. I have no idea what it could be tho. To be honest, I don't even want to watch a Flash movie if it isn't some off the wall, batshit crazy thing. That's how I feel right now anyway. It could change after JL comes out.
So two directors already left presumably because of the script, and yet now they've decided to scrap the script anyway? Alright.
DC are held to a higher standard than Marvel. The way people trip over themselves to highlight plot holes for shit that's explained in the movies is truly fascinating. But anyhow, regarding the topic of this thread, it's disappointing they can't get their shit together with the Flash.
So, the "critics" are the arbiters of "bad films" instead of the paying audience? Their tastes should override what the general audience wants to see? Sounds like cultural facism.
The first director wrote his own script. He was fired because WB wanted someone more experienced to direct the movie (not sure why this concern didn't come up when they hired him in the first place, though). The second director left because he an apparently edgier vision of the film that clashed with WB's.
I was kidding because I don't think it's happening; I don't think WB has the balls to greenlight that, and I don't think whoever is at the helm of the DCEU has the ability to pull it off. I'd love for it to happen, but I think it's not so easy: the movie would no longer be "just" a Flash movie, it would be a Justice League movie, meaning it would likely be very expensive to make so it can't just have the "Flash" name attached to it (Justice League: Paradox?). And unless they're willing to get rid of the entire cast (which I don't think makes sense), they would still have the same actors and all they could change is their on-screen characterizations (which I figure is what most people think is wrong).Don't know if you're serious or not but count me in for this. If, and this is a big-ass if they decide that it's time to start from scratch and reboot the whole thing, Flashpoint it's the best way to do it because it wouldn't feel like a reboot (like Spider-Man), it would be like a new piece on the DCEU but this motherfucker will be erasing everything and give a nice and clean slate (well maybe not so clean since their reputation but still).
And I'm pretty sure Flashpoint it's in their plans. A few months ago they said that the "dream" sequence on BvS it's not a dream, that actually happened aka Barry went back in time to warned Bruce. But who the fuck knows? These individuals don't seem sure about anything.
And Diane Lane as Joker.Jeffrey Dean Morgan as Batman with guns sign me up!
So, the "critics" are the arbiters of "bad films" instead of the paying audience? Their tastes should override what the general audience wants to see? Sounds like cultural facism.
Apologies if this comes off as ignorant, as someone who hasn't read any of the Flash comics what possible challenge does someone who can move faster than we can perceive face from any enemy? Couldn't he just punch anyone repeatedly at super speed? Or build a cage around someone without them being able to react? Why doesn't he just move at super speed all the time? People talk about Superman being hard to write for as there's no real challenges he can face, but the Flash could fuck up your day in a heartbeat.