Why are you so surprised someone would use a Yahoo account? From everything I've read the insecurity of this situation was due to a weak password. What makes you think some local ISP (which would be the next logical choice for a personal email address) is going to be more secure than Yahoo or G-mail?Kung Fu Jedi said:For the record, I'm not making a big deal out of her free e-mail preference, it was more to do with the fact that she's using Yahoo at all. I'd be just as surprised if she was using G-mail. I'd think there would be better choice for a public official, even if it is there personal account. But, if as you say, there are a lot of elected officials that do this, then color me surprised. Doesn't seem to be very secure. But oh well, what do I know about the e-mail addresses of public officials, aside from the fact that I'd never advise them to do this.
And to be clear, I also understand that they need a separation between their personal accounts and their work ones. That should go without saying.
Amir0x said:If there's nothing juicy, all it's going to do is allow this incompetent candidate to garner sympathy votes.
Release the hounds!!!!!!SetUhatU said:These people are just feeding the fire for the repubs. McCain Palin is now instoppable. And fyi - to say palin is incompetant while supporting obama is spectacularly hilarious.
Squirrel Killer said:Why are you so surprised someone would use a Yahoo account? From everything I've read the insecurity of this situation was due to a weak password. What makes you think some local ISP (which would be the next logical choice for a personal email address) is going to be more secure than Yahoo or G-mail?
If you're so boggled by the idea that an individual would use a free provider for email, who, besides spammers, do you think is using all those accounts the providers claim?
SetUhatU said:These people are just feeding the fire for the repubs. McCain Palin is now instoppable. And fyi - to say palin is incompetant while supporting obama is spectacularly hilarious.
SetUhatU said:These people are just feeding the fire for the repubs. McCain Palin is now instoppable. And fyi - to say palin is incompetant while supporting obama is spectacularly hilarious.
SetUhatU said:These people are just feeding the fire for the repubs. McCain Palin is now instoppable. And fyi - to say palin is incompetant while supporting obama is spectacularly hilarious.
SetUhatU said:These people are just feeding the fire for the repubs. McCain Palin is now instoppable. And fyi - to say palin is incompetant while supporting obama is spectacularly hilarious.
SetUhatU said:Damn - instoppable - idiot. I sound as young as most of you are...
whatever Junior. Please post what this great mayor who left her town of 9,000 in debt has done that makes her so much more competent than someone who has been running a historic presidential campaign for the last 19 months. We'll wait.SetUhatU said:Damn - instoppable - idiot. I sound as young as most of you are...
Relix said:Wait a sec, I just read Anonymous did this. The anonymous from 4Chan? That's so fucked up -_-
That requires him to use electronics, first.whitehawk said:Holy.. Shirt......
Fucking 4chan, next they'll hack McCain.
She's an absolute maniac.BakedPigeon said:WTF is up with the attacks on this lady? Is she the devil or something?
M3wThr33 said:That requires him to use electronics, first.
SetUhatU said:These people are just feeding the fire for the repubs. McCain Palin is now instoppable. And fyi - to say palin is incompetant while supporting obama is spectacularly hilarious.
Kung Fu Jedi said:He invented the Blackberry. What's your point?
They will intercept his carrier pigeons.M3wThr33 said:That requires him to use electronics, first.
ezekial45 said:That was actually a joke made by a Mccain adviser.
SetUhatU said:And fyi - to say palin is incompetant while supporting obama is spectacularly hilarious.
FightyF said:Whoa! Once your babysitter finds out you've been chatting on the internet, she's gonna ground you for good!
Depends what experience each candidate has really, not how much.Blader5489 said:It's a somewhat valid point as Obama is also fairly inexperienced, comparatively.
SetUhatU said:These people are just feeding the fire for the repubs. McCain Palin is now instoppable. And fyi - to say palin is incompetant while supporting obama is spectacularly hilarious.
FightyF said:Whoa! Once your babysitter finds out you've been chatting on the internet, she's gonna ground you for good!
Eteric Rice said:And not even the FBI can kill Anonymous.
It's a somewhat valid point as Obama is also fairly inexperienced, comparatively.
Public figures are people too, they have to get their personal email somewhere. The nice thing about free providers is that their disposable. The account starts getting too much spam or unwanted attention and you can just give the new address to the people you want to hear from.Kung Fu Jedi said:*sigh* Again, I'm not surprised that people use these e-mail systems. I have a G-Mail account. What I am surprised about is that PUBLIC FIGURES would use one for their personal mail. It's far too easy to search around these kinds of systems to find personal addresses, and while a local ISP may not be necessarily more secure, they aren't well known either, and offer a bit of security through obscurity.
Oh they will, unless the hacker used a public computer in a different state.Eteric Rice said:4chan.
Somewhat original again.
And not even the FBI can kill Anonymous. They're everywhere... Probably have a few in the goverment. :lol
whitehawk said:Oh they will, unless the hacker used a public computer in a different state.
Squirrel Killer said:Public figures are people too, they have to get their personal email somewhere. The nice thing about free providers is that their disposable. The account starts getting too much spam or unwanted attention and you can just give the new address to the people you want to hear from.
Oh and, security through obscurity never works.
Blader5489 said:It's a somewhat valid point as Obama is also fairly inexperienced, comparatively.
The problem isn't experience per se--arguably, Palin has greater experience, having held executive office both as Mayor and Gov'nor, and this is to her credit. It's obvious however that while the knowledge gained via Palin's terms in the executive has been closely tied to the peculiarities of Alaska governance, Obama holds a far greater breadth of knowledge when it comes to issues of national and international scope, arguably the bulk of what a President deals with. Frankly there are holes in both candidates' resumes, and since his opponent is actually John McCain and not Sarah Palin, overall the experience issue does not play out in his favor.Blader5489 said:It's a somewhat valid point as Obama is also fairly inexperienced, comparatively.
whitehawk said:Oh they will, unless the hacker used a public computer in a different state.
I agree, Yahoo! isn't really bad. If you want to complain about horrible e-mail Windows Live is shit, it is barely compatible with Firefox.APF said:Edit: oh, and Yahoo! has a good email client, stop being Google Whores.
Amir0x said:Well I've said much on the matter, but there's no hypocrisy in the statement.
Because one is an actual incompetent who is one of the most SPECTACULARLY (lol word of the day) unqualified candidates in history, not because of her lack of experience but because of her lack of intelligence, lack of knowledge, lack of honesty, lack of honor who is on the ticket of a POW POW POW candidate who believes in the literally satanic approach of implying your rival panders sex to little children. This from a candidate who believes you shouldn't be able to have an abortion even in the case of rape.
This is in contrast to Obama, of course, who has run one of the most brilliant political campaigns in US history toppling one of the most powerful Democratic brands while demonstrating his competence in something like 592 debates.
Are these the same people that are ok with socializing our businesses?SetUhatU said:However, as the polls reflect, there is a large traditional chuck of America that does not want to socialize our nation.
SetUhatU said:I appreciate your argument and the hysteria with which you present it. Let's look closer at your links:
Link 1: "i do not have permission to view page" nice gaf.
Link 2: The Bush Doctrine - something that is ambiguously defined at best. You can see a smug Gibson nearly jump out of his seat with glee in this "gotcha" moment. This is not a good illustration of incompetence unless you are pointing that finger at Gibson for his inability to ask a question as a responsible journalist.
Link 3: What does the VP do? Good question? To take this as Palin having no comprehension of what the vice president does because she lacks brain power is ridiculous. Desperation much?
Link 4: I don't understand your point.
Link 5: Transferring Colleges? Are you serious? What does this have to do with anything? Desperaaaaaaation.
Link 6: Nuanced political speak re: Iraq.
Link 7: I agree with this - her continual discussion of the bridge to nowhere and her flip-flop on this issue bothers me. Leave it alone palin this is not a winning topic.
Link 8: Community Organizer: Hilarious little jab @ the convention. This would hurt any prima donna.
Link 9: Super POW Bros: infantile.
Link 10: Ads - I hate these on both sides. You overstate this though.
Link 11: Many of us share his stance on the right to life.
Re: Obamas brilliant campaign. You are right, it is incredible that he was able to defeat the Clinton machine. Obama is a great speaker, very motivating and inspirational. However, as the polls reflect, there is a large traditional chuck of America that does not want to socialize our nation.
ronito said:Are these the same people that are ok with socializing our businesses?
While comparatively, you're right, the idea that either is "experienced" is laughable. For any non-entry level job, you need five to seven years experience.Death_Born said:Obama is not comparatively inexperienced, despite the Republican propaganda.
and they tell you to make up something that no one will figure out. Its probably more like Sarah Palin :lolbirdman said:12345
You know, something only an idiot would use for his/her luggage.
ronito said:Are these the same people that are ok with socializing our businesses?
Deregulation caused this. You cant have it both ways.SetUhatU said:This worries me as well. GM will soon be crawling to Washington looking for the same type of bailout. This will only get worse and it doesn't seem like the bailouts are the answer.
MThanded said:Are you king slanders apprentice?
You have to be kidding about the Bush doctrine link. She should know what the bush doctrine was. He just asked the question. If she answered it right there would have been no problem. I forgot about the media being on big librul spin machine though.
.