• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

SEGA Announce New Aliens vs. Predator Game

vazel said:
Holy motherfucking shit. Did you just say you liked Alien 3? I'm gonna... go watch House now...
the editors cut (the longer one in the quadrilogy set) actually passed Aliens as my second favourite in the series. don't be too horrified. i prefer the body of David Fincher's work to Cameron's. also, while Aliens is definately the one to always go to for inspiration while making a video game (it really pulls off horror action better than anything before or since) i like that Alien 3 is tonally more like the original in terms of being more of a straight horror piece.

i love the religious overtones. i love the bleakness of it. i love the prison stuff. the theatrical cut has some really stupid stuff in it though.

it's the only extended/alternate cut of any of the movies that i prefer. i know Resurrection had an alternate cut, but i don't remember any of the differences making any real difference. Alien and Aliens theatrical versions are definately better (though i would have liked it if Cameron had kept the sentry guns in the theatrical cut... the rest is interesting supplemental stuff but weakens the film).

don't be fooled by Cameron's director's cuts. he had final cut on the theatrical version, same as he did with T2, and same as with T2 his original theatrical cut was better :)

hell i hated 3 when i first saw it. i think like everyone else i wanted Aliens 2 rather than Alien 3... but going back to it after gaining appreciation for Fincher's other movies, and seeing something closer to what his ideas were... i just really found new appreciation for it.

it's Alien 3. he murders everything Cameron created. that was pretty ballsy if nothing else... but those characters were so James Cameron and he had his own designs.
 
Oh Christ now you're saying the theatrical cut of Aliens was better? The Aliens charging the gun sentries and it running out of ammo was one of the most awesome scenes in the movie. Seeing Ripley's long cryosleep consequences in her daughter being dead was also a good scene. You're just so full of wrong in this thread.
 
vazel said:
Holy motherfucking shit. Did you just say you liked Alien 3? I'm gonna... go watch House now...

I woke up. Why don't you?
350full.jpg
 
both director's cuts (fincher's and cameron's) are better than the theatrical releases. in alien3's case it is actually a pretty good flick compared to the meh theatrical release. i don't hate the theatrical release. at least it's better than alien resurrection. i hated that piece of shit.
 
vazel said:
Oh Christ now you're saying the theatrical cut of Aliens was better? The Aliens charging the gun sentries and it running out of ammo was one of the most awesome scenes in the movie. Seeing Ripley's long cryosleep consequences in her daughter being dead was also a good scene.
like i said, i wish he'd kept the sentry gun sequence...

but it just takes SO goddamn long to get to the aliens.

i didn't need Ripley to be all 'oh i am so maternal because i lost my daughter'. i just accepted her mothering of Newt and felt it was more genuine originally than when she has this extra motivation. it's like Newt in the extended cut is a rebound child.

it's interesting to see the colony in it's regular functioning form, and to see the derelict again and to see Newt's family go out and have that being when the infection is brought back... but i much prefer being with the marines in having no idea what we're walking into... not just in terms of knowing how bad the situation is (cause it's pretty obviously bad) but in terms of also having no idea what the colony was like before.

none of the characters we sympathize with had that knowledge.

also it's stupid having Newt be 'the one' that saw it all. just too obvious. again, it's best when this cute little girl just shows up unexpected. the extended cut, it's much more obvious that it's her where as in the the theatrical it's a bigger surprise.

i'd never recommend someone watch the extended cut first personally, but if they enjoy the theatrical i'd totally recommend it for the interesting back story... it just undermines the tension if you get all that first time through, and like i say makes Ripley's mothering of Newt seem more selfish than genuine.

the auto sentry scene is awesome though. no question. cutting it was madness... however all the cuts up to the point we see the first Alien... all good cuts. the pacing is totally off in the extended cut.
 
legbone said:
both director's cuts (fincher's and cameron's) are better than the theatrical releases. in alien3's case it is actually a pretty good flick compared to the meh theatrical release. i don't hate the theatrical release. at least it's better than alien resurrection. i hated that piece of shit.
i'm going to be a pedant.

the theatrical cut of Aliens was cut by James Cameron who had final say. the other cut is an extended cut. i believe the extended isn't his preferred cut of the movie and it isn't mine.

Fincher never has and sadly never will cut a version of Alien 3. he walked off set before they'd finished shooting. he had cut together a lot of scenes after the first shooting block to try to figure out what they needed to go back and shoot to finish the film (they started without a finished script) with an editor. it was that editor that assembled the extended cut on Alien 3 as a best guess of how Fincher may have finished the film.

it's a much better film, but it isn't Fincher's cut. he refuses to even acknowledge Alien 3.
 
yeah you're right. sorry about that. i haven't watched the extras on the quadrilogy since it came out. anyway, i feel the extended version of aliens is better and the editor's cut of alien3 is waaay better.
 
I did appreciate the attempt to bring aliens back to the horror genre and having a very unique setting and direction, but it didn't work for me at all. For a horror film to work you have to have characters you care about or at least find entertaining. I felt nothing watching these personality-deficient inmates were picked apart.

Ah, well...I'm sure we can all agree that predator 2 was terrible. >_>

EDIT: I totally agree about the extended cuts of alien and aliens. They're the ones I watch regularly, but they do really kill the pacing and suspense.
 
i kinda found myself rooting for the aliens in alien3 because of that. :D anyway, yeah predator 2 is pretty bad but danny glover is the man. and if i'm not mistaken again, isn't it the origin of the idea that the predators had encountered the xenomorphs?

edit: if correct about that last issue, then i will give predator 2 a pass since avp owes quite a bit to it.
 
legbone said:
i kinda found myself rooting for the aliens in alien3 because of that. :D anyway, yeah predator 2 is pretty bad but danny glover is the man. and if i'm not mistaken again, isn't it the origin of the idea that the predators had encountered the xenomorphs?

edit: if correct about that last issue, then i will give predator 2 a pass since avp owes quite a bit to it.

Yes, but it was more of a passing reference/in-joke than a canonical connection at that point. The movie is wretched, but I'm glad it exists. :D
 
luka said:
I did appreciate the attempt to bring aliens back to the horror genre and having a very unique setting and direction, but it didn't work for me at all. For a horror film to work you have to have characters you care about or at least find entertaining. I felt nothing watching these personality-deficient inmates were picked apart.

Ah, well...I'm sure we can all agree that predator 2 was terrible. >_>

EDIT: I totally agree about the extended cuts of alien and aliens. They're the ones I watch regularly, but they do really kill the pacing and suspense.
Good horror films need fodder for the beasties/badass you get behind Ripley the doctor and the Black preacher dude.
 
looked it up. Cameron prefers the extended cut. i was getting confused with Ridley Scott calling the 'directors cut' of Alien a studio marketing ploy and while a version of the movie he's happy with, not the definitive version.
 
luka said:
Yes, but it was more of a passing reference/in-joke than a canonical connection at that point. The movie is wretched, but I'm glad it exists. :D
it also introduces half of the pred's arsenal and establishes he has various vision modes.

it isn't a cinematic wonder, but there was some good source material for the games. that's why i'm not worried to here that the new AvP game takes some stuff from the AvP movies.
 
legbone said:
i kinda found myself rooting for the aliens in alien3 because of that. :D anyway, yeah predator 2 is pretty bad but danny glover is the man. and if i'm not mistaken again, isn't it the origin of the idea that the predators had encountered the xenomorphs?

edit: if correct about that last issue, then i will give predator 2 a pass since avp owes quite a bit to it.

I believe a Dark Horse comic came out a little earlier in the same year as well but for the most part, yeah Predator 2 was the first real big nods towards AvP.
 
Can we please just get back to the thread. I think me, luka, and plagiarize should stop posting in this thread for a while.

Edit: Or I don't know maybe it's good to derail the thread with elements that influenced the game. Let's just hope in the official thread we talk about the actual game.
 
plagiarize said:
looked it up. Cameron prefers the extended cut. i was getting confused with Ridley Scott calling the 'directors cut' of Alien a studio marketing ploy and while a version of the movie he's happy with, not the definitive version.

Yeah, in my dvd booklets Ridley Scott states that he still sees the theatrical version as his preferred cut, while Camerson says the extended Aliens is the one he wanted to make in the first place.

pieatorium said:
Good horror films need fodder for the beasties/badass you get behind Ripley the doctor and the Black preacher dude.

Did you just call Bill Paxton fodder?

2n03mm8.jpg
 
plagiarize said:
looked it up. Cameron prefers the extended cut. i was getting confused with Ridley Scott calling the 'directors cut' of Alien a studio marketing ploy and while a version of the movie he's happy with, not the definitive version.

I find that pretty funny from Scott since two his pretty popular (well maybe not popular in KoH case) films have directors cuts have Directors Cuts that are widely considered to be superior to the theatrical
 
luka said:
Yeah, in my dvd booklets Ridley Scott states that he still sees the theatrical version as his preferred cut, while Camerson says the extended Aliens is the one he wanted to make in the first place.



Did you just call Bill Paxton fodder?

LOOK INTO MY EYE.
The Pax wasn't in Alien 3
 
I agree that the assembly cut of Alien 3 is fantastic (compared to the movie). I spent the last 20 minutes reading up on the development of the movie and it's quite interesting to say the least. It makes you wonder how the franchise would be different if they kept the "alien virus" (the aliens spread viruses to the human that turn them into mutated aliens) aspect of the original scripts.

luka said:
Ah, well...I'm sure we can all agree that predator 2 was terrible. >_>


Say what you will, but it did help flesh out the Predators backstory and "culture". Also, it did help AvP get more popularity.
 
Rated-Rsuperstar said:
Predator 2 is a better Predator movie than the original.

i think i can see where you are coming from. do you mean that in a sense that the predator is basically the protagonist in the second film? if so, i can see that.
 
pieatorium said:
I think you have confused yourself, you brought up Paxton in a conversation about Alien 3 not me.

Le sigh. I said alien 3 failed as a horror film because of it's lack of interesting and likable characters. Alien had a group of generally nice and sympathetic people and it was frightening seeing them getting picked off. Aliens had a cast of wonderfully amusing and wisecracking marines (including "the Pax"). 3 had...fodder. As you said. Thus, not frightening. Even Ripley wasn't the same. She had nothing left to live for and she certainly didn't care about anyone else at that point.

Fodder makes good gore porn. Alien is creeping horror, it's never been about the violence.

Rated-Rsuperstar said:
Predator 2 is a better Predator movie than the original.

Now you're just doing this to mess with me. :lol
 
legbone said:
i think i can see where you are coming from. do you mean that in a sense that the predator is basically the protagonist in the second film? if so, i can see that.

Yeah. The original is an Arnold movie first then a Predator film second. Predator 2 does a lot more to expand the creature and mythos. Plus, the movie is about as violent as it can get and satisfies my blood lust.
 
luka said:
Le sigh. I said alien 3 failed as a horror film because of it's lack of interesting and likable characters. Alien had a group of generally nice and sympathetic people and it was frightening seeing them getting picked off. Aliens had a cast of wonderfully amusing and wisecracking marines (including "the Pax"). 3 had...fodder. As you said. Thus, not frightening. Even Ripley wasn't the same. She had nothing left to live for and she certainly didn't care about anyone else at that point.

Fodder makes good gore porn. Alien is creeping horror, it's never been about the violence.



Now you're just doing this to mess with me. :lol
ANd like I said you had Ripley the doctor guy and the preacher, shit even 85.
 
Tokubetsu said:
I find that pretty funny from Scott since two his pretty popular (well maybe not popular in KoH case) films have directors cuts have Directors Cuts that are widely considered to be superior to the theatrical
Both of those were hacked to death.
Scott actually likes his Theatrical for Alien.

And Cameron always goes with his bloated Extended cuts. Which basically adds some generic cheese to characters...which really doesn't do much at all.

Also you are not the only one who prefers Alien3 to Aliens. As a kid, I really loved Aliens the best. But as I got older, Once the wow worn off and the film qualities had to stand on their own. You notice how extremely cliche the entire thing is. In which case, I ended up vastly preferring Alien and over time, Alien3 to it. Set design is still amazing, and visually holds up well. I think the most annoying thing is exactly what people bitch about Alien3 doing...It ruined Ripley and everything Cameron done. But really it felt like Cameron ruined everything Scott did. Ripley in Alien was really...human to say. She showed selfish actions, brave, cowardliness, etc. Then in Aliens she goes to perfect. No more actual development other than Cameron slapping in that she was a
mother
. Everything she does is now the correct action and decision...specifically to please the audience. The entire movie takes that route. It becomes this perfect puzzle. Where each piece fits perfecting into the next one, and you keep going in a row. It goes from a very dark and bleak horror film, to a more typical action movie. Complete with the untouchable cast of characters.

I'll also note this. I actually enjoyed this about the franchise. Each one is completely different from the last one. Instead of trying to do what Die Hard 2 did, and attempt to just mimic the first one. Enjoyable, but it feels empty.
 
shintoki said:
Both of those were hacked to death.
Scott actually likes his Theatrical for Alien.

And Cameron always goes with his bloated Extended cuts. Which basically adds some generic cheese to characters...which really doesn't do much at all.

Also you are not the only one who prefers Alien3 to Aliens. As a kid, I really loved Aliens the best. But as I got older, Once the wow worn off and the film qualities had to stand on their own. You notice how extremely cliche the entire thing is. In which case, I ended up vastly preferring Alien and over time, Alien3 to it. Set design is still amazing, and visually holds up well. I think the most annoying thing is exactly what people bitch about Alien3 doing...It ruined Ripley and everything Cameron done. But really it felt like Cameron ruined everything Scott did. Ripley in Alien was really...human to say. She showed selfish actions, brave, cowardliness, etc. Then in Aliens she goes to perfect. No more actual development other than Cameron slapping in that she was a mother. Everything she does is now the correct action and decision...specifically to please the audience. The entire movie takes that route. It becomes this perfect puzzle. Where each piece fits perfecting into the next one, and you keep going in a row. It goes from a very dark and bleak horror film, to a more typical action movie. Complete with the untouchable cast of characters.

I'll also note this. I actually enjoyed this about the franchise. Each one is completely different from the last one. Instead of trying to do what Die Hard 2 did, and attempt to just mimic the first one. Enjoyable, but it feels empty.

I don't think you could call it cliche. Outside of books like Starship Troopers there really wasn't much to compare it to. Aliens took the story in a far more hollywood direction that snagged elements from war movies and the like and it was pretty blatant about it, but brought a lot of it's own elements into the mix. Love it or not it was a great movie and did what it set out to do wonderfully. Some people prefer the isolationist horror of the original and what alien 3 tries to bring back and would thus be a more enjoyable movie for them, but that doesn't make it a better movie. Alien was fantastic, 3 tried a similar approach but failed. I'm looking at it as a movie, not an "Alien" story or anything.
 
damn i just finished reading this page and thought i was in OT :lol

however being a huge fan of the franchise I have enjoyed the banter....aliens 2 extended is by far my all time favorite, what can I say James Cameron knows how to lure me in good
 
You guys need to start playing some avp2 mp. Should help kill time before the big one drops. You don't even need a cd key anymore since they shut down the official servers so go nuts. We need more people playing anyway.

http://www.moddb.com/mods/avp2-project-savior

sl76o7.jpg


(yep, just another excuse to show off how awesome I am :D )
 
vazel said:
I'll give it a shot but those pings look bothersome.

It can be a pain but when there are only a couple active servers you take what you can get. It's admittedly a bit of a crapshoot finding a good game but it's still quite fun, although I really hate how some servers still insist of banning any weapon they feel is "overpowered." Sometimes it's the smartgun, sometimes it's the rocket launcher, sometimes it's the disc, but it's always something. It's pretty retarded.

Truant said:
AvP2 sucked because the pulse rifle looked like shit in first person view.

Yeah, I said it.

I can think of plenty of other reasons why avp2 is inferior, but that's probably at the bottom of the list. Still had a better pulse rifle than Jaguar avp. >_>
 
plagiarize said:
like i said, i wish he'd kept the sentry gun sequence...

but it just takes SO goddamn long to get to the aliens.

i didn't need Ripley to be all 'oh i am so maternal because i lost my daughter'. i just accepted her mothering of Newt and felt it was more genuine originally than when she has this extra motivation. it's like Newt in the extended cut is a rebound child.

it's interesting to see the colony in it's regular functioning form, and to see the derelict again and to see Newt's family go out and have that being when the infection is brought back... but i much prefer being with the marines in having no idea what we're walking into... not just in terms of knowing how bad the situation is (cause it's pretty obviously bad) but in terms of also having no idea what the colony was like before.

none of the characters we sympathize with had that knowledge.

also it's stupid having Newt be 'the one' that saw it all. just too obvious. again, it's best when this cute little girl just shows up unexpected. the extended cut, it's much more obvious that it's her where as in the the theatrical it's a bigger surprise.

i'd never recommend someone watch the extended cut first personally, but if they enjoy the theatrical i'd totally recommend it for the interesting back story... it just undermines the tension if you get all that first time through, and like i say makes Ripley's mothering of Newt seem more selfish than genuine.

the auto sentry scene is awesome though. no question. cutting it was madness... however all the cuts up to the point we see the first Alien... all good cuts. the pacing is totally off in the extended cut.

302szdc.gif
 
The fact Cameron wanted there to be a Ripley/Newt/Hicks combo for third alien, to continue their family adventure, is reason enough to happy he never touched it.

Alien 3 EC is awesome. Really awesome. Glad to see others here enjoyed it.
 
EatChildren said:
The fact Cameron wanted there to be a Ripley/Newt/Hicks combo for third alien, to continue their family adventure, is reason enough to happy he never touched it.

Alien 3 EC is awesome. Really awesome. Glad to see others here enjoyed it.

Hicks defending his makeshift family from a prison planet inhabited with rapists and murderers would have been better than the piece of shit that was the Alien retread aka Alien 3.

Its hard not to get bored with Alien 3 since it attempts to create tension with one Xenomorph again when we already know what it looks like and how it acts. What was so great about the first Alien is that you had no idea how it operated and it never quite showed you the whole thing till the end.

Cameron found a solution and Fincher (as much as I like him) regressed the series.
 
Scullibundo said:
Hicks defending his makeshift family from a prison planet inhabited with rapists and murderers would have been better than the piece of shit that was the Alien retread aka Alien 3.

Its hard not to get bored with Alien 3 since it attempts to create tension with one Xenomorph again when we already know what it looks like and how it acts. What was so great about the first Alien is that you had no idea how it operated and it never quite showed you the whole thing till the end.

Cameron found a solution and Fincher (as much as I like him) regressed the series.
you say 'regressed' i say 'went back to the core of the idea'. it's all opinion of course. i think Alien 3 is very much it's own movie and far from an Alien retread. espescially in the extended cut which is so much better it's hard to fathom. Alien 3 as released was basically running away from an alien for the whole film until the ending... the extended cut was so much more.

plus, i love the dog alien. it was totally my class in AvP2 and i still have one sat by my PC as a result. me and a guy named RedRiot used to totally blow through crunchy humans tag teaming as dog aliens. if we were the first two people to get killed in AvP2 survivor (which is basically what infestation in the new one is) the round would be over in very short order.

i am very much looking forwards to resuming the feeding.
 
Scullibundo said:
Hicks defending his makeshift family from a prison planet inhabited with rapists and murderers would have been better than the piece of shit that was the Alien retread aka Alien 3.

It wasn't a retread. It returned to the theme of being one individual alien, but touched on many of its own themes.

It stands alone, in my opinion, much like Alien and Aliens.
 
Sorry — had to chime in here: There is no "director's cut" of Alien 3. Fincher disowned the movie because of the studio's rampant involvement. (Watch the intro on the front of the Quadrilogy disc.) What you're seeing is more of the producer's cut.

And 3 is vastly inferior to the others in the series in every way. And, yes, I realize I'm including Resurrection in that statement, if only to say the CG in that film is at least used properly. Alien 3's CG was horrible when it was released.

Anyway, back to work.
 
spookyfish said:
Sorry — had to chime in here: There is no "director's cut" of Alien 3. Fincher disowned the movie because of the studio's rampant involvement. (Watch the intro on the front of the Quadrilogy disc.) What you're seeing is more of the producer's cut.

And 3 is vastly inferior to the others in the series in every way. And, yes, I realize I'm including Resurrection in that statement, if only to say the CG in that film is at least used properly. Alien 3's CG was horrible when it was released.

Anyway, back to work.
i'd argue that what we got in theatres was the producers cut. the extended cut was done by the editor that had worked closely with Fincher after the first shooting session had ended. they cut what they'd shot together to figure out what he needed to go back and shoot to finish the movie. that editor made his best guess as to what Fincher may have wanted based on those editing sessions.

i don't know how much credit i want to give Hill and Giller for that awesome extended cut. they were involved in the final set of reshoots after Fincher had quit in disgust at how he was being treated. they wrote the movie, but we can see what their writing was like without Fincher and Pickett's influence in things like the reshot scene where they find the crashed spaceship. they were around when that theatrical cut was put together.

i don't know if they were on the studio's side or not in the fights with Fincher, but it did sound like Fincher had basically no one siding with him when he was fighting to keep the section where the alien is captured and set free. if the producers HAD been on his side, we'd probably have had him stay on board until it was finished, and have had a better Alien 3 released at cinemas. probably a better version than the extended cut on the quadrilogy box set.

this is from imdb so it's not necessarily true... if it is true though it makes it clear that the producers weren't on Fincher's side.

imdb trivia page said:
At one point, David Fincher was denied permission by the film's producers to shoot a crucial scene in the prison understructure between Ripley and the alien. Against orders, Fincher grabbed Sigourney Weaver, a camera and shot the scene anyway. This scene appears in the final cut.

Alien 3 has hardly any CG at all in it's theatrical cut. people constantly bitch about the CG Alien in 3, and there isn't one outside of the extended cut. it's a rod puppet or a man in a suit. they used CG to add the cracking effect on it at the end... but the Alien is always a guy in a costume or a rod puppet composited into the shot.

unfortunately the CG budget for the extended cut of Alien 3 wasn't huge, and as such the shots they had to add have some pretty low budget CG... it's still better to have that version though imho.
 
FOX is great at pissing directors, but this takes the cake for the worst planned movie ever. They had to change the damn script while shooting already started.....
 
Aliens 3 is an awful, awful film that ruined the franchise for the movies.

Lets hope the game can live up to the old AvP games, though.
 
Top Bottom