the editors cut (the longer one in the quadrilogy set) actually passed Aliens as my second favourite in the series. don't be too horrified. i prefer the body of David Fincher's work to Cameron's. also, while Aliens is definately the one to always go to for inspiration while making a video game (it really pulls off horror action better than anything before or since) i like that Alien 3 is tonally more like the original in terms of being more of a straight horror piece.vazel said:Holy motherfucking shit. Did you just say you liked Alien 3? I'm gonna... go watch House now...
vazel said:Holy motherfucking shit. Did you just say you liked Alien 3? I'm gonna... go watch House now...
like i said, i wish he'd kept the sentry gun sequence...vazel said:Oh Christ now you're saying the theatrical cut of Aliens was better? The Aliens charging the gun sentries and it running out of ammo was one of the most awesome scenes in the movie. Seeing Ripley's long cryosleep consequences in her daughter being dead was also a good scene.
i'm going to be a pedant.legbone said:both director's cuts (fincher's and cameron's) are better than the theatrical releases. in alien3's case it is actually a pretty good flick compared to the meh theatrical release. i don't hate the theatrical release. at least it's better than alien resurrection. i hated that piece of shit.
legbone said:i kinda found myself rooting for the aliens in alien3 because of that.anyway, yeah predator 2 is pretty bad but danny glover is the man. and if i'm not mistaken again, isn't it the origin of the idea that the predators had encountered the xenomorphs?
edit: if correct about that last issue, then i will give predator 2 a pass since avp owes quite a bit to it.
Good horror films need fodder for the beasties/badass you get behind Ripley the doctor and the Black preacher dude.luka said:I did appreciate the attempt to bring aliens back to the horror genre and having a very unique setting and direction, but it didn't work for me at all. For a horror film to work you have to have characters you care about or at least find entertaining. I felt nothing watching these personality-deficient inmates were picked apart.
Ah, well...I'm sure we can all agree that predator 2 was terrible. >_>
EDIT: I totally agree about the extended cuts of alien and aliens. They're the ones I watch regularly, but they do really kill the pacing and suspense.
it also introduces half of the pred's arsenal and establishes he has various vision modes.luka said:Yes, but it was more of a passing reference/in-joke than a canonical connection at that point. The movie is wretched, but I'm glad it exists.![]()
legbone said:i kinda found myself rooting for the aliens in alien3 because of that.anyway, yeah predator 2 is pretty bad but danny glover is the man. and if i'm not mistaken again, isn't it the origin of the idea that the predators had encountered the xenomorphs?
edit: if correct about that last issue, then i will give predator 2 a pass since avp owes quite a bit to it.
plagiarize said:looked it up. Cameron prefers the extended cut. i was getting confused with Ridley Scott calling the 'directors cut' of Alien a studio marketing ploy and while a version of the movie he's happy with, not the definitive version.
pieatorium said:Good horror films need fodder for the beasties/badass you get behind Ripley the doctor and the Black preacher dude.
:lol :lolRated-Rsuperstar said:I woke up. Why don't you?
![]()
plagiarize said:looked it up. Cameron prefers the extended cut. i was getting confused with Ridley Scott calling the 'directors cut' of Alien a studio marketing ploy and while a version of the movie he's happy with, not the definitive version.
The Pax wasn't in Alien 3luka said:Yeah, in my dvd booklets Ridley Scott states that he still sees the theatrical version as his preferred cut, while Camerson says the extended Aliens is the one he wanted to make in the first place.
Did you just call Bill Paxton fodder?
LOOK INTO MY EYE.
pieatorium said:The Pax wasn't in Alien 3
I think you have confused yourself, you brought up Paxton in a conversation about Alien 3 not me.luka said:That's the point.
Ah, well...I'm sure we can all agree that predator 2 was terrible. >_>
luka said:Ah, well...I'm sure we can all agree that predator 2 was terrible. >_>
Rated-Rsuperstar said:Predator 2 is a better Predator movie than the original.
pieatorium said:I think you have confused yourself, you brought up Paxton in a conversation about Alien 3 not me.
Rated-Rsuperstar said:Predator 2 is a better Predator movie than the original.
legbone said:i think i can see where you are coming from. do you mean that in a sense that the predator is basically the protagonist in the second film? if so, i can see that.
ANd like I said you had Ripley the doctor guy and the preacher, shit even 85.luka said:Le sigh. I said alien 3 failed as a horror film because of it's lack of interesting and likable characters. Alien had a group of generally nice and sympathetic people and it was frightening seeing them getting picked off. Aliens had a cast of wonderfully amusing and wisecracking marines (including "the Pax"). 3 had...fodder. As you said. Thus, not frightening. Even Ripley wasn't the same. She had nothing left to live for and she certainly didn't care about anyone else at that point.
Fodder makes good gore porn. Alien is creeping horror, it's never been about the violence.
Now you're just doing this to mess with me. :lol
Both of those were hacked to death.Tokubetsu said:I find that pretty funny from Scott since two his pretty popular (well maybe not popular in KoH case) films have directors cuts have Directors Cuts that are widely considered to be superior to the theatrical
shintoki said:Both of those were hacked to death.
Scott actually likes his Theatrical for Alien.
And Cameron always goes with his bloated Extended cuts. Which basically adds some generic cheese to characters...which really doesn't do much at all.
Also you are not the only one who prefers Alien3 to Aliens. As a kid, I really loved Aliens the best. But as I got older, Once the wow worn off and the film qualities had to stand on their own. You notice how extremely cliche the entire thing is. In which case, I ended up vastly preferring Alien and over time, Alien3 to it. Set design is still amazing, and visually holds up well. I think the most annoying thing is exactly what people bitch about Alien3 doing...It ruined Ripley and everything Cameron done. But really it felt like Cameron ruined everything Scott did. Ripley in Alien was really...human to say. She showed selfish actions, brave, cowardliness, etc. Then in Aliens she goes to perfect. No more actual development other than Cameron slapping in that she was a mother. Everything she does is now the correct action and decision...specifically to please the audience. The entire movie takes that route. It becomes this perfect puzzle. Where each piece fits perfecting into the next one, and you keep going in a row. It goes from a very dark and bleak horror film, to a more typical action movie. Complete with the untouchable cast of characters.
I'll also note this. I actually enjoyed this about the franchise. Each one is completely different from the last one. Instead of trying to do what Die Hard 2 did, and attempt to just mimic the first one. Enjoyable, but it feels empty.
vazel said:I'll give it a shot but those pings look bothersome.
Truant said:AvP2 sucked because the pulse rifle looked like shit in first person view.
Yeah, I said it.
plagiarize said:like i said, i wish he'd kept the sentry gun sequence...
but it just takes SO goddamn long to get to the aliens.
i didn't need Ripley to be all 'oh i am so maternal because i lost my daughter'. i just accepted her mothering of Newt and felt it was more genuine originally than when she has this extra motivation. it's like Newt in the extended cut is a rebound child.
it's interesting to see the colony in it's regular functioning form, and to see the derelict again and to see Newt's family go out and have that being when the infection is brought back... but i much prefer being with the marines in having no idea what we're walking into... not just in terms of knowing how bad the situation is (cause it's pretty obviously bad) but in terms of also having no idea what the colony was like before.
none of the characters we sympathize with had that knowledge.
also it's stupid having Newt be 'the one' that saw it all. just too obvious. again, it's best when this cute little girl just shows up unexpected. the extended cut, it's much more obvious that it's her where as in the the theatrical it's a bigger surprise.
i'd never recommend someone watch the extended cut first personally, but if they enjoy the theatrical i'd totally recommend it for the interesting back story... it just undermines the tension if you get all that first time through, and like i say makes Ripley's mothering of Newt seem more selfish than genuine.
the auto sentry scene is awesome though. no question. cutting it was madness... however all the cuts up to the point we see the first Alien... all good cuts. the pacing is totally off in the extended cut.
EatChildren said:The fact Cameron wanted there to be a Ripley/Newt/Hicks combo for third alien, to continue their family adventure, is reason enough to happy he never touched it.
Alien 3 EC is awesome. Really awesome. Glad to see others here enjoyed it.
you say 'regressed' i say 'went back to the core of the idea'. it's all opinion of course. i think Alien 3 is very much it's own movie and far from an Alien retread. espescially in the extended cut which is so much better it's hard to fathom. Alien 3 as released was basically running away from an alien for the whole film until the ending... the extended cut was so much more.Scullibundo said:Hicks defending his makeshift family from a prison planet inhabited with rapists and murderers would have been better than the piece of shit that was the Alien retread aka Alien 3.
Its hard not to get bored with Alien 3 since it attempts to create tension with one Xenomorph again when we already know what it looks like and how it acts. What was so great about the first Alien is that you had no idea how it operated and it never quite showed you the whole thing till the end.
Cameron found a solution and Fincher (as much as I like him) regressed the series.
Scullibundo said:Hicks defending his makeshift family from a prison planet inhabited with rapists and murderers would have been better than the piece of shit that was the Alien retread aka Alien 3.
i'd argue that what we got in theatres was the producers cut. the extended cut was done by the editor that had worked closely with Fincher after the first shooting session had ended. they cut what they'd shot together to figure out what he needed to go back and shoot to finish the movie. that editor made his best guess as to what Fincher may have wanted based on those editing sessions.spookyfish said:Sorry had to chime in here: There is no "director's cut" of Alien 3. Fincher disowned the movie because of the studio's rampant involvement. (Watch the intro on the front of the Quadrilogy disc.) What you're seeing is more of the producer's cut.
And 3 is vastly inferior to the others in the series in every way. And, yes, I realize I'm including Resurrection in that statement, if only to say the CG in that film is at least used properly. Alien 3's CG was horrible when it was released.
Anyway, back to work.
imdb trivia page said:At one point, David Fincher was denied permission by the film's producers to shoot a crucial scene in the prison understructure between Ripley and the alien. Against orders, Fincher grabbed Sigourney Weaver, a camera and shot the scene anyway. This scene appears in the final cut.