I just don't get this stance. There are billions made off of collegiate athletes every year. And the fact that they are being subjected to, I don't want to call them bribes; but let's be clear that most of these kids don't come from high income families. I mean they are straight up being taken advantage of because of their lot in life by universities willing to break the rules.
I would like to understand the point of people that say let's just pay the athlete, because the NCAA and the universities use it as their back bone. And I do understand the idea of it, but I do not for the life of me understand how it would be implemented. As of right now, the only two sports I have personally heard of that could have payable players as an option/ and that is men's college basketball and football. For most universities, the revenue of those 2 sports provide the funding for the rest of them*(citation needed. talking out of ass, but guessing it's true." You can't just start paying football and basketball players and not start paying women's soccer an lacrosse players. And if you start paying players, how do you determine the the salary? Like I mean I get it, a salary would probably fix a few of the issues, but how on earth would you implement it? I feel like most of these folks on ESPN haven't taken a class in economics. Playing the devils advocate, granted I have absolutely no idea what these schools all make from college athletes, but I personally do not understand how paying college athletes wouldn't create anything but more of a convoluted mess.
Like I've seen some comments on various places saying maybe these athletes should be able to make their own marketing deals after they turn 18 and reap the benefits from that after they turn 18. Makes sense to me. They are 18, an adult, capable of making their own decisions. Say the guy/gal wants to make a commercial for gatorade/powerade or whoever the hell they want to; let them do it. Like maybe do something to where the money isn't guaranteed till one year of college. I don't know. Drunk Thursday ramblings.
Shit is so convoluted that I just gave up on this post. I quit.
Long story short of this though, I do not blame the kids who aren't even fucking 16 or 17 yet for trying to take care of their families. I feel like the blame on this falls solely on these companies and academic institutions that use them to rake in money all to their own benefit. I just don't see a suitable replacement to the system.
Sorry for the belated tangent and the thread bump. Just been following along this whole thing and wanted to say something.
TLDR: Up 5 Lines