It's unfortunate but I think it's pretty common for entire groups to get painted as representative of the loudest and notorious members. I mean, statistically speaking in the US, the whole issue of gay rights is being fought mostly by Christians against Christians, and yet people will often ascribe the close-mindedness towards homosexuals as being more of a Christian attitude than the opposite. Not much to be done about it, sadly. People are people, and we have a tendency towards stereotyping.Spoo said:Haha, I'd buy you a beer regardless!!!
No, you're right. He's on my side. But it's so...frusterating, y'know? That Utahns -- ChAIR Entertainment; that we're all representative of this idea -- this assumption -- that if you're gay you're evil.
Not even. I have gay friends. Most gay people are amazing people; they deserve what they're after. Some people in my state disagree. Some people in other states disagree. Don't categorize ChAIR as a company which disagrees simply because OSC is associated... it's unfair, uncouth, and unrealistic.
I'm sure this statistic is completely real and not pulled out of your ass at all.FieryBalrog said:Yea, being against gay marriage is "crazy". I guess 99.9% of all humans who ever lived including most alive today are "crazy". The cocksure self-righteousness never ceases to amaze.
Being against gay marriage is just stupid. What reason does anyone have to stop people from getting married?FieryBalrog said:Yea, being against gay marriage is "crazy". I guess 99.9% of all humans who ever lived including most alive today are "crazy". The cocksure self-righteousness never ceases to amaze.
Segata Sanshiro said:It's unfortunate but I think it's pretty common for entire groups to get painted as representative of the loudest and notorious members. I mean, statistically speaking in the US, the whole issue of gay rights is being fought mostly by Christians against Christians, and yet people will often ascribe the close-mindedness towards homosexuals as being more of a Christian attitude than the opposite. Not much to be done about it, sadly. People are people, and we have a tendency towards stereotyping.
Nessus said:Ugh, going further off track here, but the arguments most people give against gay marriage are just idiotic.
1. "It's not natural and cannot produce children."
Neither can sterile couples.
2. "It will undermine the sanctity of marriage."
And 50% divorce rate, Hollywood marriages calculated to help their careers, reality TV shows, etc., etc., etc. don't? Hell, even the bastard who spearheaded Prop 8 to protect the sanctity of marriage just got divorced.
3. "It's against my religion."
That's super. But this isn't your church sanctifying the marriage, it's the government.
FieryBalrog said:Yea, being against gay marriage is "crazy". I guess 99.9% of all humans who ever lived including most alive today are "crazy". The cocksure self-righteousness never ceases to amaze.
Yes, that is exactly what you are supposed to do. Your grasp of the argument is uncanny.Jay Sosa said:WTF? Am I now supposed to do researches on every guy on the development staff and the author which provided the script just to be sure that they are good and righteous people?
As long as the game is good I'll play it (as long as it wasn't tested on animals)
Jay Sosa said:Damn thats going to be a lot of work, then I'll rather quit gaming..
Is there maybe something like a blacklist of producers and writers that aren't good people?
x3n05 said:That's the spirit, with that attitude you will get GAF member status in no time![]()
As for the blacklist, as this thread has shown, it's all subjective. While mostly everyone agrees that OSC is a douche, not everyone agrees on the action to take.
Well, to start with, absolutely no Nintendo games. Or games on Nintendo systems, cuz they'll get royalties. That company's owner is so mixed up with the Yakuza you'd have to be completely without conscience to support them.Jay Sosa said:Damn thats going to be a lot of work, then I'll rather quit gaming..
Is there maybe something like a blacklist of producers and writers that aren't good people?
I can't tell if you're serious or not.Mercury Fred said:Wow, I had no idea that POS Card was attached to this. Thanks for the heads up.
Yes, this will prevent me from buying. I was looking forward to this one, but I'll spend my points elsewhere.
rainking187 said:It seems kind of weird so many people are boycotting this game because of a relationship with OSC, but I've never heard anyone bring any of this up when discussing his books. I dunno, maybe I just missed it. I do know this thread was the first time I'd ever heard any of this stuff about him though.
Show me a picture of your copy of Retro Game Challenge or GTFO!B-Genius said:I can't tell if you're serious or not.
A friend was telling me about this yesterday. It's the most ridiculous garbage I've ever heard. There's no way I share Card's views, but there's no way in hell I'd think twice about buying a game just because it was heavily influenced by a book written by someone with a strong controversial opinion.
Good grief, it's like some of you think your money will fuel his evil homophobic plans or something. Like many have posted, there are far more sensible targets than this awesome game. A gem like this pops up and people manage to find something stupid to moan about. It's disturbing, and you're gonna destroy any creativity that's left out there by not supporting these little corners of the industry that really need us to show we care.
Nessus said:Ugh, going further off track here, but the arguments most people give against gay marriage are just idiotic.
1. "It's not natural and cannot produce children."
Neither can sterile couples.
2. "It will undermine the sanctity of marriage."
And 50% divorce rate, Hollywood marriages calculated to help their careers, reality TV shows, etc., etc., etc. don't? Hell, even the bastard who spearheaded Prop 8 to protect the sanctity of marriage just got divorced.
3. "It's against my religion."
That's super. But this isn't your church sanctifying the marriage, it's the government.
Spoo said:Also, in the name of fucking controversy, I'm buying a copy of Empire tommorow. Yeah, that's money to Card. Does it mean I hate, or don't support gays? No, because I love and support any man who has balls enough to say I am what I am. But after playing, and beating Shadow Complex; I'm sort of dying to get the entire story.
Cheech said:Yeah, I bought a copy of Empire too. Not to be a dick, I just love these kinds of stories. I've often wondered what would happen if the red/blue divide in the US turned into an actual civil war, and the game got me interested in the universe.
This thread is nothing but self-righteous wailing and references to Hitler (22 according to the current thread search). It's interesting on some level, but pretty cringe worthy.
This has also been mentioned and addressed numerous times in the thread. Really guys, there probably isn't much point posting anymore arguments in this thread. It's all been around and around the block several times now.JonStark said:French writer Celine wrote racist, and Lovecraft antisemit, so we shouldn't read ther book ? You're thinking wrong.
Segata Sanshiro said:This has also been mentioned and addressed numerous times in the thread. Really guys, there probably isn't much point posting anymore arguments in this thread. It's all been around and around the block several times now.
JonStark said:French writer Celine was racist, and Lovecraft antisemit, so we shouldn't read ther book ? You're thinking wrong.
He's definitely been deteriorating in his writing quality since Ender's Game. I don't know anyone who thinks otherwise. It seems like his heart isn't in it anymore.Kaijima said:Purely out of scientifical curiosity, I went and read the first five chapters of Empire that are posted online as a free preview.
Ok, aside from the paper-thin liberal cartoon extreme left bashing that oozes off the page, so much so that it verges on Stephen Colbert, one question:
Is Empire just a low point in OSC's writing style, or has he just been getting worse over time? I haven't read much after Ender's Game, eons ago when the world was young.
But, seriously, what I read of Empire seemed written by a 8th grader or something. The prose was far more offensive than the politics.
Kajima said:Purely out of scientifical curiosity, I went and read the first five chapters of Empire that are posted online as a free preview.
Ok, aside from the paper-thin liberal cartoon extreme left bashing that oozes off the page, so much so that it verges on Stephen Colbert, one question:
Is Empire just a low point in OSC's writing style, or has he just been getting worse over time? I haven't read much after Ender's Game, eons ago when the world was young.
But, seriously, what I read of Empire seemed written by a 8th grader or something. The prose was far more offensive than the politics.
Cheech said:Yeah, I bought a copy of Empire too. Not to be a dick, I just love these kinds of stories. I've often wondered what would happen if the red/blue divide in the US turned into an actual civil war, and the game got me interested in the universe.
This thread is nothing but self-righteous wailing and references to Hitler (22 according to the current thread search). It's interesting on some level, but pretty cringe worthy.
Spoo said:Good points. But this thread just isn't about that. It's, really, about one man and his opinion. An opinion apparantly so strong, it convinces the gov't to vote in such a way that is anti-gay. And, if you buy Shadow Complex, you're paying for that.
As opposed to paying for Orson's double stack at wendys.
Kaijima said:Is Empire just a low point in OSC's writing style, or has he just been getting worse over time? I haven't read much after Ender's Game, eons ago when the world was young.
Nessus said:There are a significant number of people who seriously doubt he even wrote Ender's Game, citing the difference in writing styles in the sequels.
Nessus said:(and I notice now that he is banned)
BigKaboom2 said:In his last Gamasutra comment, Peter David said that he got a flat fee for his work on the project; nothing extra based on the sales performance. Certainly a possibility that it's the same thing for OSC.
Aske said:No one significant had a problem with slavery in the past either - it was seen as part of the natural order in every society the world over. Priorities change, cultures evolve, and just because an opinion is widely held, it does not mean it is - or will always be - logical, correct, or considered reasonable throughout the history of the world.
Being against gay marriage is "crazy" in this day and age because it doesn't jive with the most widely accepted tenets of contemporary morality and law. If we lived in a religious society, and believed all our laws came directly from the god of Judaism/Christianity/Islam, then being against gay marriage would make perfect sense. It would also make sense if we lived in a secular society that believed in the morality of a single leader who had declared homosexuality a cancer on our people: 1+1 would equal 2, and we would not be crazy to be opposed to gay marriage. Fortunately, we do not live in such societies.
We live in secular societies that view religions as personal beliefs rather than absolute truths, and we don't tend to believe the individual opinions of powerful people to be a sensible basis for our system of ethics. We generally base our laws around ideals such as the minimisation of harm, protection of legally accepted human rights, and maintenance of fairness. The finer points of these philosophies often conflict, and morality is far from sufficiently universal for us to create laws that everyone agrees upon; but there are usually sound arguments based on one or more of these ideals at the foundation of our legal and ethical systems.
This is not the case for the opposition of gay marriage. There is no logical argument to oppose gay marriage in a secular society which has already accepted that homosexuals ought to be treated as equal to heterosexuals. The remaining opposition stems from religious belief, conservative cultural preferences, and personal disgust; none of which are deemed good arguments upon which to base moral or legal judgments in the modern age.
FoneBone said:meanwhile over at the gamasutra thread, PAD digs the whole deeper and deeper, continuing to play the BOYCOTTS ARE EEEEVIL card while neglecting to address the civil rights or anti-apartheid movements.
This poll was posted earlier in this very thread. It was taken in April of this year.methos75 said:I wish we could just do a mass poll and see just where people in the US truly stand on this issue and let it be done with, personally I think those for same-sex marriage are still part of a pretty insignificant minority in number, but a poll like this would tell the truth.
FrostuTheNinja said:I still find it interesting that no one has answered my question on the idea that you should give money to a cause to "counter act" someone's beliefs because you purchased a product.
Does anyone in here donate money to "Chinese Rights Groups" when they buy a toy that was more than likely made in a sweatshop with shit conditions?
I didn't think so.
Can anyone else think of a situation that would happen in reality where one would doante money to something because they purchased something else?
If you ask me, it sounds like gaygamer and a few people in here are in the pockets of these activist groups.
But hey, that's just me....
Asmodai said:How do you dig a "whole"? :lol
Haha, I have no idea what that has to do with anything, but it looks great :lolSegata Sanshiro said:Show me a picture of your copy of Retro Game Challenge or GTFO!
NinjaFusion said:this thread.
incredible....
Spoo said:An opinion apparantly so strong, it convinces the gov't to vote in such a way that is anti-gay.
B-Genius said:but there's no way in hell I'd think twice about buying a game just because it was heavily influenced by a book written by someone with a strong controversial opinion.
Cheech said:This thread is nothing but self-righteous wailing and references to Hitler (22 according to the current thread search). It's interesting on some level, but pretty cringe worthy.
methos75 said:I wish we could just do a mass poll and see just where people in the US truly stand on this issue and let it be done with, personally I think those for same-sex marriage are still part of a pretty insignificant minority in number, but a poll like this would tell the truth.
We have a republic specifically so the desires of the majority do not trample on the rights of the minority.methos75 said:I wish we could just do a mass poll and see just where people in the US truly stand on this issue and let it be done with, personally I think those for same-sex marriage are still part of a pretty insignificant minority in number, but a poll like this would tell the truth.
BigKaboom2 said:In his last Gamasutra comment, Peter David said that he got a flat fee for his work on the project; nothing extra based on the sales performance. Certainly a possibility that it's the same thing for OSC.
You overestimate the influence of GAF and especially Gamasutra.Flynn said:Regardless of the method of pay the fact that there's a discussion around this issue will result in at least people thinking twice about working with Card in the future.